Monday, June 30, 2008
In Memoriam: Cathy T. Succumbs To Cancer, One Mile North of the WTC
You may recall that Cathy T. lived about one mile North of the WTC. My article here related her eyewitness testimony to what she saw, and felt, at the time of the first “plane hit” at the North Tower. Her report further supports my theory that a (relatively) large basement nuke was set off at the same time that the perps exploded the North Tower on top-- the bogus plane hit. It also indicates that the official seismic recordings are doctored. Cathy T. described to me how her building shook (she was on the 15th floor) at that time, and books fell out of their case, and on to the floor. She said that that was the only time that happened-- not when the other tower had its “plane hit”, nor when the whole WTC was destroyed. She also described how there was thick ash all over the streets at her location-- one or more inches thick-- a mile north.
For the last two years, Cathy battled cancer of the breasts, spine and brain. She suffered immensely, and this very active, vibrant person went from an advanced yoga practitioner and spinning (biking) master to a cripple. Her diet, lifestyle, and genetics made it likely that she got cancer from the WTC fallout. She was a vegetarian and ate mostly organic wheat grass juice, and had no history of cancer in her family, and had been very healthy and active before this. While we cannot know what caused an individual’s cancer with certainty, we must demand that the statistics of NY metro area residents be ascertained to see if there is a post-9/11 related cancer increase. The regime is likely trying to hide this. Cathy believed that the nuking of the WTC on 9/11 was the cause of her cancer, and read my articles, and much else on the Conspiracy.
She wanted her eyewitness account of the seismic event at the time of the first bogus “plane impact” known to all, as an act of revenge/justice against those who perpetrated 9/11. She is survived by a daughter, and a son. She was a very good person. After I became ill, from the poisoning of my home with mercury for speaking out about how SS agent Greer shot President Kennedy, Cathy T made sure to help me. Cathy died last week in her Manhattan apartment. She will be greatly missed.
Rest in Peace, Cathy T.
Will the Real Lynn Spencer Stand Up?
This comparison is really wild.
This smacks of an intel job.
Sunday, June 29, 2008
Ghostplane "Auteur" Michael Hezarkhani an Affiliate of Rudy Giuliani
Update 7/2: Supposedly, Hezarkhani is NOT on the board of the partners. Why he was listed there in the Whitepages is a mystery.
If You Set Off a Bomb In the Upper Levels of a Large Tower, Is It Possible It WOULDN'T Oscillate?
3. How do you account for NIST's detailed analysis of the oscillatory motion including damping of the So. Tower following hit? How does one get the Tower to oscillate like that in the absence of a plane-hit? Note that Momentum must be conserved in ANY collision. A Boeing 767-200 traveling at high speed has enormous momentum, which can be calculated using P = MV. Similarly, explosives blowing OUT the side of the building would have some momentum -- but have you calculated how much? In other words, how much explosives (by weight) does one need to use, and at what velocity of the "exhaust" gases, to equal the enormous momentum of a high-speed B-767?
Massive Delays and Cost Overruns at Ground Zero
New Yorkers will be told the "grim truth" Monday about new delays and cost overruns at the World Trade Center redevelopment site by Port Authority executive director Christopher Ward, state officials and real-estate industry sources said yesterday.
Ward, in what one source called "the coming grim truth," is expected to outline for Gov. Paterson and the PA more than 20 major problem areas facing the $16 billion redevelopment efforts, including massive cost overruns and unrealistic construction timetables.
At least one project, the much-heralded but costly Santiago Calatrava-designed transit center, may not get built.
I guess this is what you get when you try to rebuild over a radiation-soaked hellhole.
Saturday, June 28, 2008
Micro-Nukes in the WTC--Creating The China Syndrome: Important Matters of Completeness & Plausibility
My “Many Nukes” Hypothesis for the destruction of the WTC on 9/11, perpetrated by the American regime, is detailed here wtcdemolition.blogspot.com. How this led to the China Syndrome is detailed here wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com.
To summarize these matters now, I have written how the towers’ destruction entailed numerous micro-nukes detonating in each tower, and furthermore much redundancy was employed to insure that sufficient numbers of these low-yield devices successfully went off as planned. Some of the redundant micro-nukes were impacted by the exploding micro-nukes, which allowed for the redundant ones’ fissile material to give rise to the China Syndrome. I also explained how some micro-nukes fizzled for various reasons--part of the reason for having so many redundant micro-nukes present. I listed several factors that could have caused this fizzling, even hypothesizing that the early explosions in the WTC7 were fizzled nukes, that were meant to destroy WTC7 but they did not properly go critical.
The reader can read how standard some of these concepts are in the nuclear world. The military and “policy” makers use the term “fratricide” for the occurrence of one nuclear warhead impacting/adversely affecting another one and preventing the latter from going nuclear. Read here, for example. Under the heading of “Nuclear targeting and fratricide,” you will find this: “Historically, analysts have assumed that only 2 nuclear warheads could be used in a short time frame against any target because of a problem called “fratricide.” Assigning multiple warheads to a target requires precise timing to prevent one incoming warhead from destroying others. Furthermore, a nuclear detonation near ground level (which is ideal for destroying hardened silos) would create a debris cloud that could destroy other warheads heading to the same target.”
Furthermore, long term storage of nuclear bombs or warheads involves another form of fratricide. This article on the many problems of long-term nuclear warhead storage, describes how nuclear warheads have “vulnerability to fratricide neutrons,” as well as being susceptible to many other problems that could make them fizzle. So you can see that I was correct in writing that impacted and/or fizzled nukes, are problems that could be expected to occur when you have a complicated scenario involving many small nukes going off in a relatively small place-- especially in an enclosed space. And these matters thus could easily explain where the available fissile material to cause the China Syndrome at the WTC came from.
Now knowing of these potentially, fratricidal effects on the nukes to be used in the WTC on 9/11, the American perps-- foul physicists, and monstrous military men, much like those involved in nuking their own at Port Chicago, and other innocent humans at Hiroshima and Nagasaki-- did the following. 1. Emplaced many redundant nukes, in each WTC building, and at each level to be nuked. The levels where the nukes were emplaced took fratricidal effects into account, as much as possible. 2. Used (somewhat hardened) sensors that would trigger (sequentially, as needed) redundant nukes at each level that they were to be set off at. 3. Used sensors that themselves would be vaporized, if the first, planned nuke went off properly, so that the redundant ones would not go nuclear. Of course, their fissile material would then be available for the China Syndrome Aftermath. Did all this go off exactly as planned? No. As I have written, the hidden, denied, early WTC7 explosions indicate that the perps failed to properly set off the nukes in WTC7, and took five or more hours to re-do it, later in the afternoon. One possible scenario for the failed, early nuking of WTC7 could be the following. The early nukes in the lobby and basement fizzled (due to fratricidal or other effects). That is, they exploded but either did not attain any criticality (only conventional explosions worked), or else the fissile material had been “weakened” and the resultant nuclear explosion was too small for demolition of WTC7 to occur. The sensor(s) were themselves damaged (from partial explosions), and did not then trigger redundant nukes to go off, or else all redundant nukes fizzled, as Jennings (in the last article) describes several WTC7 explosions.
However even a properly functioning nuclear device going off inside a building can lead to its own China Syndrome, as follows. Let us look at the efficiency of nuclear devices historically, as I do not have access to data on the efficiency of the most current nukes. But it would likely be in the same range. The efficiency of a nuclear bomb is the percentage of its total available fissile material (such as Uranium-235 or Plutonium-239) that actually undergoes fission during the criticality stage of implosion/explosion-- roughly one microsecond. The remainder is still highly radioactive and could give rise to a China Syndrome under certain conditions. Peter Vogel’s book, “The Last Wave From Port Chicago" describes on page 13-13 how the Hiroshima “A-Bomb” used only 1.14% of its contained fissile material. The Port Chicago type A-Bomb had even less efficiency-- about 0.5%. More recently, 6% efficiency for updated nuclear bombs is cited here. Such a low efficiency is due to the immense difficulty of having an implosion, and then an explosion, whereby the fissile material has only one microsecond before the imploding, fissioning U-235 critical mass with its tremendous number of released neutrons and subsequent energy release (and great heat and pressure), forces the critical mass to explode outward thus terminating its criticality geometry.
What this means is that even a properly functioning, fission bomb will have 94-99% of its highly radioactive, fissile material released into the environment where it will more slowly continue to fission and decay-- and release great heat. Now if a nuclear bomb goes off several thousand feet in the air, a la Hiroshima, the unfissioned U-235 will be widely dispersed and will come down over a huge area. (The heat of the Bomb would even have vaporized the unfissioned U-235, but this will later condense and come down somewhere.) But the micro-nukes--even the properly fissioning ones used inside the WTC-- were, at least partially, contained during the destruction. But as the buildings were being destroyed, even vaporized, the remaining fissile material would be able to reach all around the WTC area, and some would likely reach significantly beyond as well. Some fissile material from the sub-basement nukes, would likely be trapped in the largest concentrations, to be found in the aftermath, in these basement areas. These radioactive fragments would also be inaccessible to the usual radiation-lowering mechanisms that were extensively employed beginning the very next day-- water hosing, and “coating” with sand/earth.
To sum up, my “Many Nukes” and resultant China Syndrome Hypothesis, is well supported by the known concepts of nuclear warhead fratricide, and the low (0.5-6.0%) efficiency of fission bombs. Indeed all the facts involving exploding numerous micro-nukes in an enclosed (or partially enclosed) space appears to make the China Syndrome aftermath not only plausible, but inevitable!
The Grand Dilemma
The problem is clearly not that Obama is a great candidate for president-- he has many flaws from my point of view-- but the problem is that McCain is SO very much worse.
I'm just curious-- can anyone who anyone who understands that 9/11 was an inside job make a serious case that John McCain as president would be a good thing for the country?
Friday, June 27, 2008
So What Happened to Congress Taking on the Oil Speculators, Anyway?
Another 160 billion down the tubes.
Though I guess it isn't money wasted if you like seeing lots more people die...
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Why the Democrats Won't Impeach Bush and Cheney?
WTF??? We're all hostage to the criminals in the White House?
How much more insanity can this country take?
Was the First Atomic Bomb [in modern times] Exploded on an American Town by the American Govt?
by The Anonymous Physicist
Vogel’s book is freely downloadable here. http://www.portchicago.org/
Port Chicago was a WWII munitions port about 35 miles northwest of San Francisco, traversed through various waterways. The massive explosion that occurred there, at 10:19 P.M. on July 17, 1944 has been the subject of debate ever since. Wikipedia has this summary of the superficial info: “The Port Chicago disaster was a deadly explosion that took place on July 17, 1944 at the Port Chicago Naval Magazine in Port Chicago, California ... killing 320 sailors and civilians, and injuring more than 400 others. Most of the dead and injured were African American recruits, and the continuing unsafe conditions even after the disaster resulted in a number of servicemen refusing to work, known as the Port Chicago Mutiny, a month later ... Two hundred and eight sailors were convicted in summary courts-martial, and received bad conduct discharges. The remaining 50 men, known today as The Port Chicago 50, were found guilty of mutiny in a subsequent court martial, and were sentenced to dishonorable discharges and prison sentences of 8 and 15 years of hard labor... Thurgood Marshall sued the Navy on behalf of the 50 sailors. Although he was unable to get the convictions overturned, Marshall succeeded in winning clemency for the 50 sailors, but not until after the war in 1946.”
In The Last Wave From Port Chicago, author Peter Vogel, details his over 20-year quest to prove that the Port Chicago explosion was a nuclear one. The book attempts to show that Port Chicago was the one and only “proof firing/test” of the Mark II [Uranium Hydride Autocatalytic Lateral Implosion] atomic bomb. Vogel starts off his tale with his own history of being a rebel and being anti-establishment, and even being arrested at a protest rally for assaulting a policeman. He then became a reporter at the “San Francisco Chronicle”, and subsequently an editor for “Electronics” magazine. At the latter, he wrote, or edited, at least one piece on electronic component reliability in ICBMs shot into the Van Allen Radiation belts! Vogel ends up in 1980 in New Mexico, appointed by Governor King to be Secretary of the Board of Directors of NMERDI--the New Mexico Energy Research and Development Institute. He writes that Gov. King liked him so much, that he appointed him to be an honorary Colonel in the NM National Guard.
This is how Vogel ended up in New Mexico where, for 25 cents, in 1980, at a Santa Fe Church rummage sale, he purchased a box of donated tools that had in its bottom, a photocopy of a remarkable document. The document was titled “History of 10,000 ton gadget.” [Gadget was code for the fission bomb.] It included information on “fireball,” “detonation,’ and “radiation.” Vogel traced the document to Paul Masters, who worked at Los Alamos, during the Manhattan Project. Masters was involved with photography and copying. Masters had apparently copied this secret document, and taken it home with him, in his “shirt pocket.” The penalty for doing this was quite severe, and gives pause. Curious also, is the fact that Masters’ wife, Charlie, was in “counterespionage,” and “connected” to the Secret Service! Vogel reads the document and begins researching the Port Chicago explosion, and related Los Alamos matters.
One of the first people he interviewed, at Los Alamos, was Dr. Edward Teller. Vogel had actually taken a course from Teller in California years earlier. Teller, of course, is notorious as the right-wing “father of the H-Bomb.” Except that that claim is false. (See the book, “Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb” by Richard Rhodes, read here.) Teller was also involved in the so-called SDI or “Star Wars” development of shooting down missiles, high above the Earth. Vogel arranges to meet Teller at Los Alamos--and lies and says the interview will be about the energy crisis--and photographs him, after he surprised Teller with the “History of 10,000 ton gadget” document. This photo shows Teller looking at the document. Teller stops and tells Vogel, “I believe you have a classified document. You should take it immediately to the Classification Office. I will deny I have ever seen this document. I will deny I have ever discussed Port Chicago with you.” The two go off to that office with the document, but Vogel keeps a copy, of the classified document.
Shortly after this, as Vogel begins his in-depth research into the possible, deliberate nuking of Port Chicago, by the American gov’t, an important Los Alamos report on Port Chicago gets re-classified, after it had been de-classified. Nonetheless, there is a massive store of documents on Port Chicago at Los Alamos. Officially Port Chicago could not be a nuclear explosion, in part, because there was not enough Uranium-235 [U-235] available for this in July, 1944. Vogel attempts to show that this is incorrect, and that every book saying this is wrong. He takes particular aim at Richard Rhodes’ Pulitzer Prize winning book, “The Making of the Atomic Bomb.” (Read here.) Vogel shows numerous errors of commission and omission, and says the book must have won its awards for its mass, not its veracity. Vogel writes that he is told, by physicists, to help prove his case, he should ascertain the amount of U-235 that was available at the time of the Port Chicago blast. This too remains classified, even though this is now six decades later. The book thus has numerous chapters and appendices related to the amount of U-235 the Govt’s labs had produced at different times. Curiously again, Vogel gets two Los Alamos Manhattan Project scientists to tell him the answers to this question. They tell him that there was enough U-235 in July, 1944 for the Port Chicago blast--even though this information is classified, and has serious penalties for Manhattan project scientists to reveal to anyone. (Assuming those scientists’ responses were truthful.)
Let me now summarize the findings of this book, and articles by Vogel and others that try to prove that the Port Chicago explosion was a nuclear one, as opposed to an explosion of the munitions at the pier, or on board the two ships (the SS E.A. Bryan and the SS Quinault Victory,) in the water near the pier at Port Chicago. The explosion was massive--the pier was leveled and much of the nearby town was also--and had a large white fireball visible for several hundred miles. People for over 20 miles reported seeing a bright white light as bright as several Suns. Reports state that the column of flame rose to approx. 10,000 feet before the night sky prevented observation of any further rising. The flame from the Trinity test, a year later, also rose to that altitude, with its subsequent mushroom cloud rising to nearly twice that height. The resultant cloud at Port Chicago was described as being a “mushroom cloud”--the first time that term was used in public discourse in the English language. The document Vogel found which was written after Port Chicago, but before Trinity, correctly predicted the 18,000-foot altitude of the Trinity mushroom cloud “in typical Port Chicago fashion.” Vogel shows these things did not occur in other huge munition ship explosions, that he details in the book. All seismograms were immediately seized, and not allowed to be published for several years. Were they re-done, as I have asserted the WTC seismic recordings were? Eyewitnesses said some of the many missiles that flew to great distances were of various colors indicating they were in a molten state due to what we lately call “extraordinarily high temperatures.” The official report itself says many missiles were molten. The Navy was even there across the pier making a film of the explosion. This was revealed some years later when they began showing a nuclear explosion that some recognized as being of Port Chicago. The military then said this was not an actual film, but was “special effects” [sound familiar?] created much later. Others examined the film itself, and proved that this was false, as the film was made of nitrate that was used in 1944, but was no longer used because of its own flammable nature.
Of particular importance is the following: 1. Reports from Los Alamos, and other places, about subsequent fission bomb detonations contain the phrase, “in Port Chicago fashion,” when referring to the rising mushroom cloud or fireball. Even when the British regime exploded its first atomic bomb, in 1952, off the coast of Australia, their report stated, the bomb was placed in a forward hold of the HMS Plym and detonated "Port Chicago style." 2. Crucially, before the Port Chicago explosion, there are Los Alamos reports (at the highest levels--Dr. Conant and General Grove) on the need for a test/proof firing of the Mark II nuclear device--before further development or use of this type of A-bomb. But just after the Port Chicago explosion, Los Alamos reports (between the same top people) state that this is no longer necessary, and that they can go on to other things. 3. Los Alamos scientists were immediately sent to Port Chicago, and the Navy’s three man Court of Inquiry on the matter, which began a few days later, included the brother-in-law (Capt. J.S. Crenshaw) of one of the top Los Alamos people, Captain Parsons. Parsons would fly in the Enola Gay to arm the Bomb before its dropping on Hiroshima. 4. At the time of the Port Chicago blast, Los Alamos physicists thought the bomb to be used on Japan would be too heavy for airborne use, and therefore had to be taken in by ship. 5. There was a massive 800-foot diameter crater created under the S.S. Bryan.
Out of 320 dead, only 81 bodies were recovered. Out of these 81, only 30 bodies could be identified. However, we cannot assume any vaporization of people, as these figures could possibly result from conventional explosions in ships. The long lasting effects of the Port Chicago blast are also telling. In 1968, the federal govt bought up all the buildings in Port Chicago, and demolished them, and later erected a monument. There has been a high cancer incidence in Contra Costa County, CA for the last several decades.
Curiously, Vogel did not suffer a strange car accident, nor surprise heart attack, nor rapid cancer, nor was he brutally assaulted nor had his home contaminated with a very toxic form of mercury, as was done to me, for just once speaking out on how SS agent Greer shot both Connally and Kennedy. Vogel meets with many Los Alamos scientists and tells each one that he is researching Port Chicago, and that he is trying to prove that the U.S. Govt deliberately nuked this American pier and town, and suffers no harmful consequences for this. There is much else in the book that gives me pause. Much else seems to be establishment dogma. There is the omission of what the Ottawa agreement really was about (British control of American nukes), standard nonsense about Osama bin Laden is thrown in, immense praise for one of the members of NMERDI, Dean McGee, Chairman of Kerr McGee. I have written of the jury verdict against Kerr McGee in the Plutonium poisoning and car ramming murder of Karen Silkwood. There is an establishment view on many things in the book, even saying there was a need to nuke an American town, and American sailors, to “save 100,000 American lives” in the invasion of Japan. When the truth is that Japan had tried to surrender for months prior to Hiroshima. Some of the reports on Port Chicago at Los Alamos, and other Los Alamos reports, show one parameter the Manhattan Project was always concerned with, was destruction of “dwelling houses.” So the mass murder of innocent civilians was always the goal.
Recently I have seen what is likely an intel Hangout regarding Port Chicago. Now it is claimed, by some, that Port Chicago was indeed a nuclear explosion, but it was an accident! All sorts of specious arguments are used. But the history of American nuclear bombs is that, from the outset, various fail-safe mechanisms were employed that made it virtually impossible for an accidental explosion to occur. If the SS E.A. Bryan held an atomic bomb in its hull, it would not have been armed until it was ready to be “proof/test fired” and also studied and filmed at its “anointed place.”
A related matter is that I have read another book on some of these matters that has a very different take on them. This book is "Critical Mass: How Nazi Germany Surrendered Enriched Uranium for The United States' Atomic Bomb" by Carter Plymton Hydrick. It may not be readily available, but is highly recommended here. It demonstrates that both the fissile material, and even the advanced detonator mechanism used on Hiroshima were of German origin, and taken from the submarine that officially was intercepted on its way to Japan, which had set sail near the end of Hitler’s reign. I thought the book did a good job of demonstrating its hypotheses. Now the regime’s intel assets have gone crazy both in regards to Hydrick’s book and Vogel’s. (See the use of foul ridicule that would be recognized, even here, as coming from intel entities.) But here you can read how some of the strongest critics of “Critical Mass” changed their minds when presented with the evidence. I have a different take than Hydrick on this, going to my Ultimate Truths here: http://anonymous-physicist.blogspot.com.
If the Atomic Bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had German fissile material and advanced detonators, this wasn’t by accident that this came into the hands of the Manhattan Project people. Rather the PTB intended this destination for these materials, and not Japan. Similarly, the Uranium for the Port Chicago blast may have been delivered from Germany, or elsewhere in 1944, as well. This could be the reason that the American Govt won’t release its 1943-45 Uranium production amounts still, over 60 years later! And the PTB do not want the People to know how they controlled WWII for that purpose--creating nuclear bombs for use on Humanity; and the different “sides” of that war, and all wars, have been a ruse. “Critical Mass” also reveals some strangeness regarding the physicist given credit for the advanced detonators that also had been a great stumbling block to implosion fission devices. This was Luis Alvarez, PhD. Decades later, this Alvarez (who would also receive a Nobel Prize) would write some impossible Physics that President Kennedy’s body could be slammed backward against the incoming momentum of a bullet fired from behind him. Alvarez wrote this claptrap, and got it published in a Physics Journal--shades of Bazant and Seffen--after the Zapruder film was first publicly shown in 1975. It’s a violation of the fundamental Law of Conservation of Momentum. Before this, the regime/media just lied and said Kennedy’s body went forward in the limo. So Hydrick’s book and Vogel’s book are similar, but different. Unlike Hydrick’s book, Vogel’s ignores the issue of the detonation difficulties that also held up testing and use of fission bombs, and asserts that there was enough fissile material (U-235) by July 1944, let alone August 1945. I recommend people read both, and make up their own minds.
Vogel shows that the Hiroshima nuke used only 1.14% of its contained fissile material--the rest of the U235 did not undergo fission--due to the geometry and Physics of the implosion/explosion. Thus its efficiency is about 1%. The Port Chicago type A-Bomb had even less efficiency--about 0.5%. More recently, 6% efficiency for updated nuclear bombs is cited. This will be important in another (upcoming) article.
My conclusion is that there is much circumstantial evidence that the Port Chicago explosion was a nuclear fission explosion that was deliberately perpetrated by the U.S. regime. One could argue that circumstantial evidence is not proof, but trials have resulted in murder convictions based solely on circumstantial evidence. But one could say that there is no absolute proof, unless that film is of the Port Chicago nuking. Or unless some Los Alamos scientists who know the truth, would come forward. Of course, if they did, they could face charges of releasing secret information on the one hand. And on the other hand, they could (if the People ever got control of the regime again) face charges of Mass Murder, Treason, Conspiracy, maybe even genocide of a race, as the use of Afro-Americans, and removing the white Coast Guard detail that night is also telling. So we are not likely to get a confession from the perps.
Peter Vogel’s "The Last Wave From Port Chicago" presents much evidence that the July 17, 1944 Port Chicago explosion was a deliberate nuking of our own citizens, and sailors, and an American town and pier, by our own government. It should be read by all. It also fits in with the evidence that the WTC destruction on 9/11/01, was the deliberate nuking of America’s largest city by its own regime, and that the China Syndrome resulted, as detailed here http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and here wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com.
But going beyond this level, I consider it a strong possibility that the PTB wanted the deliberate nuking of Port Chicago to get out! While they deny it officially for the masses, they want others to know. There is too much “coincidence” here. Vogel’s early anti-establishment, and so much later recitation of establishment dogma, the finding of the document, the strangeness of its owner and his “secret service, counterespionage” wife. The lack of prevention/retribution rained down on Vogel. The two scientists who told him there was sufficient Uranium--IF that is true. We have both too many coincidences, and also many people who could have, and maybe still could, face severe penalties for their parts in this. Would anyone but a spy--or someone starting this “revelation” want to photocopy a top-secret document, and then take it home, and face severe penalties? The document would be available from then on, at such time as the PTB would want to promulgate it. Likewise for the scientists who faced severe penalties for revealing Uranium-235 production amounts. They were not arrested or harmed. But all these “coincidences” in Vogel’s tale may be genuine.
Finally, in light of the distinctions of the two above books in regards to available amounts of fissile material and advanced detonators, I can not know for sure which is right. But this is not the main issue. Regardless of whether the Uranium-235, or the detonators, in a nuclear bomb at Port Chicago came from an American lab, or a German lab, or elsewhere, the evidence itself reveals that it is very probable that the American and British regimes ordered the nuking of Port Chicago, in furtherance of its plans for more massive nukings on other civilians in Japan, and so on.
Did the perps, still at Los Alamos, and Lawrence Livermore observe the nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and say that the rising smoke, photographed going up into space, was in ... “Port Chicago fashion”?
The Pt Chicago date is July 17, 1944.
Adding up the digits: 7, 1, 7, 1, 9, 4, 4 adds up to 33!
All things nuclear! Especially the first one in modern times!
"9/11 Was an Inside Job" Apathy
Something I don't typically think about is people who think "so what?" about 9/11 being an inside job.
Yet this "so what?" attitude is pretty much the sentiment I encountered when I told some college age kids that I was convinced that 9/11 was an inside job. These were kids I know, not just strangers I ran into. It's not like I just said this out of the blue. Yet they were totally blase about the idea. Didn't even ask me any other questions.
But closer to home, my wife is just as apathetic about this. She doesn't seem to have a major problem with 9/11 being an inside job-- she just DOESN'T CARE. She doesn't think it affects her life and doesn't think there is anything she can do about it. And here she lives with me, a guy who was basically obsessed with 9/11 for a few years. But she just has other things that she is concerned about.
Not sure there's much anyone can do about this sort of apathy...
To add-- that anyone who HAS tried to do something about 9/11 now probably has a certain amount of apathy that anything CAN be done. I know I do. It's just one of those things that you feel strongly about but can't DO anything about-- unless maybe you devote your whole life to seeking change-- and of course this is impossible for most people.
Jet of Flame Shot from WTC7 Before It Fell, According to New NIST Report
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Robert F Kennedy on the Vietnam War
... Kennedy made a speech where he raised the issue of morality and the Vietnam War: “Although the world’s imperfection may call forth the act of war, righteousness cannot obscure the agony and pain those acts bring to a single child. It is we who live in abundance and send our young men out to die. It is our chemicals that scorch the children and our bombs that level the villages. We are all participants.”
In an television interview later that year Kennedy again returned to the morality of the war: “We’re going in there and we’re killing South Vietnamese, we’re killing children, we’re killing women, we’re killing innocent people because we don’t want a war fought on American soil, or because (the Viet Cong are) 12,000 miles away and they might get 11,000 miles away. Do we have the right, here in the United States, to say we’re going to kill tens of thousands, make millions of people, as we have, millions of people refugees, killing women and children, as we have.”
Nuke EMP at Time of 2nd Hit?
The nuke could have been in the basement, timed to go off with the "plane hit". Perhaps there was even a nuclear event with the "plane" explosion.
This is also a good video to hear how unbelieving Fairbanks was about what happened. I have to think he is giving off signals here about fakery.
(Thanks to a reader for the tip about the EMP)
Gas could Fall to $2 If Congress Curbs Oil Speculators
But oh, what are the odds that Congress will do anything about this? It's clear, seeing the officials quoted in the article downplay the role of speculators, that the PTB WANT high oil prices-- for many reasons.
And certainly many on the left like high gas prices, as it forces people to conserve and use more "green" methods of transportation-- an argument to which I am somewhat sympathetic.
But mostly I feel as if the high price of gas is some sort of sick experiment being forced on us by the PTB, to see how society reacts.
Monday, June 23, 2008
George Carlin Was Shrill
This clip shows he knew what was going on with 9/11 and other conspiracies-- very wise words about a new 9/11 investigation:
Lawrence Velvel Is Shrill
On September 13-14, 2008, Lawrence Velvel, the dean of the Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, plans to convene a 'convention' at the school's facilities; the attendees of which will plan strategies to prosecute members of the Bush administration for war crimes.
"This is not intended to be a mere discussion of violations of law that have occurred," stated Velvel in a press release. "It is, rather, intended to be a planning conference at which plans will be laid and necessary organizational structures set up, to pursue the guilty as long as necessary and, if need be, to the ends of the Earth.
"We must try to hold Bush administration leaders accountable in courts of justice. And we must insist on appropriate punishments, including, if guilt is found, the hangings visited upon top German and Japanese war-criminals in the 1940's."
Velvel's sharpest words were saved for President Bush, according to a passage from ABA Journal. "The man ultimately responsible for the torture had a unique preparation and persona for the presidency," wrote Velvel. "He is a former drunk, was a serial failure in business who had to repeatedly be bailed out by daddy's friends and wanna-be-friends, was unable to speak articulately despite the finest education(s) that money and influence can buy, has a dislike of reading, so that 100-page memos have to be boiled down to one page for him, is heedless of facts and evidence, and appears not even to know the meaning of truth."
Sunday, June 22, 2008
Jonathan Turley Is Shrill
Saturday, June 21, 2008
Paul Craig Roberts Is Shrill
Think about this question: In the 21st century what regime is more lawless than the Bush Regime?
Everyone is entitled to his own answer. The only answer I can come up with is the Zimbabwe regime of Robert Mugabe. Voted out of power in the last election, the great man hasn’t left. Zimbabweans are going to have to vote again, and the great man has said that any vote that is not for him will be cancelled by a bullet.
Is Tim Rutten CIA?
Apart from understanding how and why the Bush/Cheney administration tricked the American people into going to war in Iraq, no question is more urgent than how the White House forced the adoption of torture as state policy of the United States.
Then concludes with these astounding passages:
Part of the hysteria over all this that you see in places like the Wall Street Journal editorial pages stems from an anxiety that congressional inquiries, like that of Levin's committee, will lead to indictments and possibly even war crimes trials for officials who participated in the administration's deliberations over torture and the treatment of prisoners.
It's true that there are a handful of European rights activists and people on the lacy left fringe of American politics who would dearly like to see such trials, but actually pursuing them would be a profound -- even tragic -- mistake. Our political system works as smoothly as it does, in part, because we've never criminalized differences over policy. Since Andrew Jackson's time, our electoral victors celebrate by throwing the losers out of work -- not into jail cells.
The Bush administration has been wretchedly mistaken in its conception of executive power, deceitful in its push for war with Iraq and appalling in its scheming to make torture an instrument of state power. But a healthy democracy punishes policy mistakes, however egregious, and seeks redress for its societal wounds, however deep, at the ballot box and not in the prisoner's dock.
IT'S A "PROFOUND-- EVEN TRAGIC-- MISTAKE" TO PUNISH WAR CRIMINALS?
This sort of incoherent, blase mentality is so incredibly pervasive among "journalists", and benefits the PTB so much, you truly have to wonder if ALL these people are CIA, carefully crafting public opinion into a "manageable" form.
Yes, Bush is bad, but all you have to do is vote for "change", and EVERYTHING WILL BE SO DIFFERENT!!!! YEAH, THAT'S THE TICKET!!!!
Chris Floyd has more on Rutten and torture.
London-based "ICE" Group Controls the Price of Oil
"People can actually corner the market and drive up the price," said Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash. "When there is no policeman on the beat, you know that crime can go up."
More and more fingers are pointing at one of the least-known but most powerful foreign exchanges - the InterContinental Exchange, or ICE.
By the end of 2007, the all-electronic exchange accounted for nearly a 50 percent market share of all global oil futures contracts, a total of 138.5 million contracts - up 49 percent from 2006.
Today it boasts more than 2,100 individual traders representing virtually all of the major players in oil - banks, hedge funds, energy companies, investment giants.
And according to a securities filing, two of those giants, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, were founding partners of ICE.
"The fact that they started this shows the intent of where they wanted to go," Greenberger said. "Which was to trade crude oil and energy products without any police in the United States supervising it."
That's because it's considered a foreign exchange. Taking advantage of a loophole created by the CFTC, the company says its "energy futures business" is conducted in London, it is not subject to U.S. laws. Over strong criticism, the CFTC agreed.
All this despite the fact ICE headquarters are on the fifth floor of a building in Atlanta, it's primary data center in Chicago, and nearly all its trades settled in U.S. dollars.
"It is a charade, and ... it defies explanation," Greenberger said.
Now Congress and others are asking just how much of the crude oil futures market is being manipulated by either excessive buying designed to drive up the price, or phony transactions that imply a supply problem that does not exist.
Friday, June 20, 2008
Nuclear Meltdown Near LA Released More Than 400 Times More Radiation Than Three Mile Island
Quite interesting for those who say the WTC couldn't have been nuked because there weren't enough cases of cancer. Were talking about a reactor meltdown that has been estimated to cause a few hundred cases of cancer over 40 years. Whereas we already know there have been many cases of cancer in ground zero responders-- including thyroid cancer, which is typically associated with radiation poisoning.
Also note there were 400 total cancers in Ground Zero responders, including 75 blood cancers.
The official excuse for the cancers is toxins released from the shattered tower contents-- heavy metals and polyphenols, etc.
While some cancers may be due to the toxins released, cancers usually take many years to develop and as far as I know, there is not much if any precedent for acute exposure to toxins causing cancers at this kind of rate. One can always argue that the WTC pile was a uniquely cancerous situation, however, one can also argue just as well that the cancers were caused by radiation from the nuking of the WTC. After all, would a true building collapse cause such an extreme degree of pulverization and toxin release? One could thus argue that extreme demolition was required to turn the towers into compact mounds of debris smoldering with toxins.
Big Big Day for the Fake Opposition Dems
Jun 19, 2008 19:48 EST
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. House Thursday approved enough new money to wage wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for another year, while abandoning attempts to set deadlines opposed by President Bush for withdrawing American combat troops.
By a vote of 268-155, the House approved the funding for the two wars. Most of the $161.8 billion the Pentagon will get, which is slightly less than Bush requested, will be used to fight in Iraq.
Published: June 20, 2008
WASHINGTON — After months of wrangling, Democratic and Republican leaders in Congress struck a deal on Thursday to overhaul the rules on the government’s wiretapping powers and provide what amounts to legal immunity to the phone companies that took part in President Bush’s program of eavesdropping without warrants after the Sept. 11 attacks.
The deal, expanding the government’s powers to spy on terrorism suspects in some major respects, would strengthen the ability of intelligence officials to eavesdrop on foreign targets. It would also allow them to conduct emergency wiretaps without court orders on American targets for a week if it is determined that important national security information would otherwise be lost. If approved, as appears likely, the agreement would be the most significant revision of surveillance law in 30 years.
Glenzilla has more here and here on the disgusting wiretapping and telecom immunity deal and the outrageous capitulation to Bush and the Republicans.
UPDATE: Telecom immunity went through.
Here are the 293 pieces of shit.
Even more from Glenzilla here, and on the sickening response from Obama.
Exxon Mobil, Shell, BP and Chevron to Get No-Bid Contracts to Drill for Iraq Oil
My guess is the odds of getting more Iraq oil on the market to significantly lower oil prices is very low. But for sure, these oil companies will make a bundle.
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
More Dirt on McCain
Had he not been the son and grandson of admirals, there is scant chance he would have been admitted to the U.S. Naval Academy. Given his behavior patterns and academics, had he not been the son and grandson of admirals, there is little doubt he would have been thrown out. Instead, in 1958 he managed to graduate 894 out of 899. Had he not been the son and grandson of admirals, he is no chance he would have been accepted into the prestigious naval flight training program over far better qualified officers. On his way to becoming a North Vietnamese ace, the aviator lost 3 expensive aircraft on routine, non-combat flights. Little was made of all that, because he was, you know, the son and grandson of admirals.The article goes on quite a bit more in this vein, eventually concluding that McCain is the most flawed presidential candidate in history.
McCain’s most horrendous loss occurred in 1967 on the USS Forrestal. Well, not horrendous for him. The starter motor switch on the A4E Skyhawk allowed fuel to pool in the engine. When the aircraft was “wet-started,” an impressive flame would shoot from the tail. It was one of the ways young hot-shots got their jollies. Investigators and survivors took the position that McCain deliberately wet-started to harass the F4 pilot directly behind him. The cook off launched an M34 Zuni rocket that tore through the Skyhawk’s fuel tank, released a thousand pound bomb, and ignited a fire that killed the pilot plus 167 men. Before the tally of dead and dying was complete, the son and grandson of admirals had been transferred to the USS Oriskany.
Bush Wants to Drill for Oil Offshore
KBR-- Ripping Off the American Public as Best They Can
Blackwater Tries to Use Shariah Law in Court
So LIttle Time, So Many War Crimes to Report
WASHINGTON — The framework under which detainees were imprisoned for years without charges at Guantanamo and in many cases abused in Afghanistan wasn't the product of American military policy or the fault of a few rogue soldiers. It was largely the work of five White House, Pentagon and Justice Department lawyers who, following the orders of President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, reinterpreted or tossed out the U.S. and international laws that govern the treatment of prisoners in wartime, according to former U.S. defense and Bush administration officials.
In August 2004, a Defense Dept. panel convened to investigate detainee abuse after the Abu Ghraib scandal issued its much-anticipated report. Interrogation techniques designed for use at Guantanamo Bay, which President George W. Bush had decreed outside the scope of the Geneva Conventions, had "migrated" to Iraq, which Bush recognized was under Geneva, concluded panel chairman James Schlesinger, a former defense secretary. Schlesinger's panel, however, did not explain which officials ordered the abusive techniques to transfer across continents -- or how and why they became Pentagon policy in the first place.
Tuesday the Senate Armed Services Committee answered those questions. In a marathon hearing spanning eight hours and three separate panels, the committee revealed, in painstaking detail, how senior Pentagon officials transformed a program for Special Forces troops to resist torture -- known as Survival Evasion Resistance Escape, or SERE -- into a blueprint for torturing terrorism detainees.
WASHINGTON — The U.S. military hid the locations of suspected terrorist detainees and concealed harsh treatment to avoid the scrutiny of the International Committee of the Red Cross, according to documents that a Senate committee released Tuesday.
"We may need to curb the harsher operations while ICRC is around. It is better not to expose them to any controversial techniques," Lt. Col. Diane Beaver, a military lawyer who's since retired, said during an October 2002 meeting at the Guantanamo Bay prison to discuss employing interrogation techniques that some have equated with torture.
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
War Crimes Watch
A Senate investigation has concluded that top Pentagon officials began assembling lists of harsh interrogation techniques in the summer of 2002 for use on detainees at Guantanamo Bay and that those officials later cited memos from field commanders to suggest that the proposals originated far down the chain of command, according to congressional sources briefed on the findings.
The sources said that memos and other evidence obtained during the inquiry show that officials in the office of then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld started to research the use of waterboarding, stress positions, sensory deprivation and other practices in July 2002, months before memos from commanders at the detention facility in Cuba requested permission to use those measures on suspected terrorists.
The reported evidence -- some of which is expected to be made public at a Senate hearing today -- also shows that military lawyers raised strong concerns about the legality of the practices as early as November 2002, a month before Rumsfeld approved them. The findings contradict previous accounts by top Bush administration appointees, setting the stage for new clashes between the White House and Congress over the origins of interrogation methods that many lawmakers regard as torture and possibly illegal.
"Some have suggested that detainee abuses committed by U.S. personnel at Abu Ghraib in Iraq and at Guantanamo were the result of a 'few bad apples' acting on their own. It would be a lot easier to accept if that were true," Sen. Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.), chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, wrote in a statement for delivery at a committee hearing this morning. "Senior officials in the United States government sought out information on aggressive techniques, twisted the law to create the appearance of their legality, and authorized their use against detainees."
The Daily Challenge in Reading the News
Iraq Thoughts of the Day
1) we are essentially paying off most of our enemies (the Sunni militias who used to be insurgents)
2) much of the ethnic cleansing has already been done, and there are less conflicts and killings as a result
Even if Iraq were to become a blossoming peaceful democratic republic in the next few months, the previous five years were no less of a tragedy.
Tim Russert Helped Spread War Propaganda
Monday, June 16, 2008
The Real McCain
Sunday, June 15, 2008
Iraq Might Ask U.S. to Leave
Where's the LOVE?
Hmm, I wonder if the one million Iraqi dead have anything to do with this?
Or maybe they just don't want to be treated as a US colony or vassal state?
"Bush renews attempts to capture Osama bin Laden"
Yeah! This will totally rehabilitate his legacy.(/sarcasm)
There's no doubt they can come up with a dead (or alive) Osama doppleganger if they want. The only question is that they have a bit of a PR problem as most people will want to think the war on terror is over-- and I doubt the PTB want THAT... yet.
Saturday, June 14, 2008
Right-Wing Radio Show Hosts Say the Cutest Things
Radio talk show host Michael Reagan is calling for the murder of political activist, Mark Dice, after hearing that Dice is mailing letters and DVDs to troops in Iraq. Reagan wants to pay for the bullets. (snip) Reagan adds, “How about you take Mark Dice out and put him in the middle of a firing range. Tie him to a post, don’t blindfold him, let it rip and have some fun with Mark Dice.”
I'm sure Reagan will emit some mealy-mouthed apology and all will be forgiven.
Really, this is no big deal-- there are few things lower in this country than those sad, sick people who are against war, and killing them is just like squashing a bug. (/sarcasm)
UPDATE: Oddly, the PrisonPlanet site fails to mention that Mark Dice was distributing material saying that 9/11 was an inside job!
UPDATE 2: Apology in the works?
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Democracy Stays Alive by a Thin, Aging Thread: Supreme Court Restores Habeas Corpus by 5-4 Margin
Frighteningly, the vote to save some semblance of constitutional rights was only 5-4, with Bush/McCain-favored judges voting against-- and these are the YOUNG guys on the court. At face value, one would have to say this is a good reason by itself, to vote for Obama.
Ultimate Truths, Part VII-- Poisoning Those Who Reveal Ultimate Truths: Mozart, Beethoven, Karen Silkwood, US Presidents, Rock Stars, and Myself
Copyright, June 9, 2008 by the Anonymous Physicist. Permission granted for all to re-transmit, post, etc as long as it is non-profit and “Copyright, Anonymous Physicist” remains on it.
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart was purportedly a Freemason. But when he supposedly rose to a high enough level, and found out what the Freemasons were about, he rebelled. He had apparently found out how this secret society is involved in enslaving Mankind, and started to inform humanity via his operas. As Beethoven would also attempt through his music, Mozart’s operas exhorted people to throw off the yoke of the enslaving elites. He was poisoned, and this great genius died penniless at the age of 36, and was buried in an unmarked grave. Years later, and apparently wracked with remorse, the official Viennese/Austrian Court Composer Antonio Salieri confessed to his involvement in poisoning Mozart. The PTB then immediately committed Salieri to an insane asylum, and declared his confession was the product of a madman-- a cover that continues to this day. University historians continue to proclaim this as fiction. The only ones proffering less truth than University historians are the “historians” carted out on TV.
This paper on Mozart’s death looks at both sides of the Mozart poisoning issue. It notes Mozart’s end-stage symptomatology, and possible poisoning--in particular, mercury poisoning. The joint swelling, vomiting and high fever that Mozart suffered near his end, are also hallmarks of Porphyria, which is readily induced by mercury poisoning. Mercury (or other heavy metal) poisoning also causes a nasty (metallic-like) taste in the mouth, and severe kidney problems (I can tell you this from my own experience, as well), which also plagued Mozart at the end. Induced Porphyria also causes Kidney problems. That paper does indeed answer its own question, when it notes that end-stage kidney disease causes unconsciousness and inability to work in the last days or weeks (while Mozart was still working until his last two hours). But a poisoning would not. Note that the official cause of death was “miliary fever.” Read this on miliary fever. See that 1. this usually affects “sedentary women”, and 2. It sounds like total nonsense.
It appears, to this researcher, that Mozart was continually being poisoned at the end. Other reports state that Mozart said he was being poisoned, and would soon be dead. Much like how Princess Diana, Martin Luther King, and Jack Ruby knew that they would soon be dead, and even knew how (Diana and Ruby, at least)! And the burial, in an unmarked grave, clearly prevents any testing, or future testing, for toxins. I find it incredulous, that it is claimed that, not just Mozart, but no one, would pay something for a more usual burial. What about Mozart’s father, all his students--some of whom were rich--etc.? Furthermore, numerous authors have stated that Mozart was not impoverished, and had paid for his physicians even at the very end. No, I think the PTB wanted Mozart buried this way for the reason I suggest. And it remains to this day a Modus Operandi for the PTB, when they kill someone, to get hold of the body, and do something to the body (cremation, use of formaldehyde, or make enough time go by, without access to the body, etc.)--often against the deceased or his will--that prevents a true analysis of the body. With most assassinations, a corrupt or threatened Medical Examiner is the final step employed. With Mozart, apparently a quick burial in an unmarked grave solved the perps’ problems. Apparently no one was allowed to take a locket of Mozart’s hair, which could have been kept and preserved. The latter was the case with the hair of Beethoven and King George III.
In contradistinction to “official” University historians, is the “amateur”, Gail Altman. Her self-published book (read here) on the death of Ludwig van Beethoven, “Fatal Links. The curious deaths of Beethoven and the two Napoleons” is remarkable! The poisoning/murder of Beethoven is the epitome of how the PTB remove those who try to inform the People of Ultimate Truths. Altman’s excellent book hypothesized that Beethoven died after being poisoned several times, and over time. This book was published while few even said that his death was from poisoning, and that his maladies were either natural, or his deafness came from his father’s beatings. Altman’s research and thinking indicated that his deafness and illness, and near madness all came from lead or arsenic poisoning. She even revealed the likely murderer. One of Beethoven’s doctors was none other than a physician who treated Napoleon Bonaparte and his son. Napoleon’s hair analysis showed massive arsenic poisoning and also high levels of lead and mercury.
Altman thinks that this same doctor poisoned/murdered both Napoleons, and Beethoven. She shows the dates of this doctor’s visits, tied in with Beethoven’s illnesses. Within a couple of years of this book coming out, Beethoven’s hair was analyzed. It was proven that he had lead poisoning. Lead can, of itself, make one very ill, and deaf, and kill the victim, and, IMO, it can also induce Porphyria (see below), which can also lead to all of this, and also one of its main symptoms is abdominal pain that plagued Beethoven.
When physicians are involved in poisoning their victims, the PTB can always say it was accidental, as heavy metals were/are in some medicinal remedies. But Altman even includes why Beethoven was poisoned. She revealed that Beethoven had tried to inform the masses of how the elites controlled them, and that the people should get rid of these elites. Altman states that Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony is very telling. She states that there are several versions of the Friedrich Schiller poem, “Ode To Joy”, one of which is sung in Beethoven’s Ninth. And that Beethoven included a version not seen anymore, that was even more revealing of Beethoven’s desire to warn the people about their kings, governments, and religions. This site claims to have the “original version” of Schiller. Like the Zapruder film which “loses” more frames as the years go on, the Ode To Joy may have versions we are not allowed to see. Friedrich Schiller (1759-1805), I should note, is said to have been a Freemason and supposedly died of Tuberculosis in 1805. But there are strange facts that have recently come to light. Just last month, DNA tests on the skulls in Schiller’s grave, found that his skull is NOT in his grave. The Anonymous Physicist will shortly use the above cited version of Schiller’s Ode To Joy to reveal-- likely for the first time in history-- just what Schiller and Beethoven wanted to tell Humanity about!
The “Ode To Joy” was written in 1785 by Friedrich Schiller (1759-1805), and put to music by Beethoven in 1824. Wiki also reveals that Schiller’s first play, “The Robbers” is about revolutionary anarchy, the nature of evil, religion, class, and economic inequities in German society.
On one level, it is clear that Beethoven/Schiller wanted to inform about the secret societies enslaving Mankind. Line 87 is “Eternally may last all sworn Oaths, secret societies.” However I assert there is an Ultimate Truth that they apparently knew, and wanted to reveal, and warn Mankind about. It is The Ultimate Truth, as I myself have written about here. Namely that there is a grid or quarantine around the Earth, whereby even more powerful, and good, ones watch over Humans, and the quarantined monsters, that enslave Mankind. Please read carefully the following lines I have excerpted from the supposed original “Ode To Joy” poem. Again, Altman says that the real original poem that Beethoven included, and first published along with his Ninth Symphony is different, even more revealing, and no longer published as either Schiller’s or Beethoven’s works. I have included the translation only, along with the line numbers. (The translation seemed to be accurate from the German I can recall, although some words have several meanings.
21 Those who dwell in the great circle,
22 Pay homage to sympathy!
23 It leads to the stars,
24 Where the Unknown reigns.
33 You bow down, millions?
34 Can you sense the Creator, world?
35 Seek him above the starry canopy.
36 Above the stars He must dwell.
57 Endure courageously, millions!
58 Endure for the better world!
59 Above the starry canopy
60 A great God will reward you.
61 Gods one cannot ever repay,
62 It is beautiful, though, to be like them.
81 He whom star clusters adore,
84 Above the starry canopy!
87 Eternally may last all sworn Oaths, secret societies
90 Brothers, even it if meant our Life and blood,
91 Give the crowns to those who earn them,
92 Defeat to the pack of liars!
93 Close the holy circle tighter,
94 Swear by this golden wine:
95 To remain true to the Oath,
96 Swear it by the Judge above the stars!
97 Delivery from tyrants' chains,
104 And hell shall be no more.
The “great circle” and being “above the starry canopy” can refer to the Grid/Quarantine around the earth, and “leading to the stars” can refer to the “Stargate.” Likewise the “creator” or “judge” is “above the stars”, or beyond the quarantine. There is even an allusion to star clusters that adore “Him.” Perhaps they even knew of the origins of the Quarantiners. Other lines appear to be speaking against royalty: 91: “Give the crowns to those who earn them, 92 Defeat to the pack of liars!” Now we should not forget that Beethoven was a definite atheist. (See here.) So we can be sure that he is not making any trivial reference to the usual trivial “god” of common religions. He would not have his last work be about something he detested. Knowing and trying to reveal these Ultimate Truths got Beethoven poisoned. Of course, both Beethoven and Schiller were trying to tell Mankind to cast out the handful of elites, so that Man could live in Peace and Joy. But they apparently were also trying to tell Mankind of the origins of all the evil, and the enslavement of Mankind, and that there are others even more powerful, and good, who were/are watching over us.
Regarding Heaven and Hell. Is it possible that the Ode To Joy gives hints as to the source of these seeming myths? Heaven is beyond the Hell of the Grid/Quarantine. And maybe even the so-called seven levels of Heaven (“Seventh Heaven”) have something to do with levels of the Grid. Note that the Van Allen radiation belts can be thought of as having several layers.
Even the “royals” themselves are apparently not immune from being poisoned! King George III (b. 1738, d. 1820) --who “lost” the 13 colonies [the future United States]--was likely poisoned, and was quite mentally ill for the latter part of his 60 year reign. Many have seen the Hollywood movie, “The Madness Of King George.” However, unlike the film with its psychobabble and happy ending, King George ended up blind, deaf and insane. And his problems were not “mental” in origin. Rather he suffered from the incurable, untreatable disease called Porphyria. While Porphyria has a genetic basis, it is greatly worsened by heavy metal poisoning (lead, arsenic, mercury, other). Recent analysis of George’s hair revealed very high levels of Arsenic.
This, in and of itself can make someone very ill, but likely induced a terrible level of Porphyria. As likely was the case with Beethoven, George’s medical doctors may have been the ones to poison him. Whether this was done unintentionally with medicinal compounds, or deliberately for some political actions he took can be debated. IMO, it was highly likely the latter, but just what he did that upset the real PTB, I have not investigated.
Indeed I might speculate that the Royals of Europe may have been genetically altered to make it easier to poison them. You have heard of the term, “Royal Blue Bloods.” It refers to the fact that most of the royals’ blood or urine will fluoresce under UV light, or bright sunlight. This is one sign of Porphyria. Porphyria affects the blood, liver, kidneys, brain and nervous system, GI tract, muscles, and skin. It is a little-known, but frequent cause of so-called mental illness. Even to this day, both orthodox and alternative physicians are too ignorant to diagnose the many who suffer from Porphyria. While proclaimed as a one in a hundred thousand disease, a few enlightened physicians have claimed that as much as 20% of humanity have this tendency, which is brought out after heavy metal, or other toxic, exposure. Even pesticides damage the Cytochrome P450 enzyme system in plants. But that same system, when damaged in people is Porphyria. So pesticides should never have been allowed. Likewise for mercury in dental amalgam fillings, and in baby’s forced vaccinations (which contain Thimerosal— a very toxic mercury compound)! Autism IS caused by mercury in baby’s vaccines.
I am sure that the mercury poisoning of Mankind is not an accident! So if one survives a poisoning with the PTB’s beloved arsenic, lead or mercury, the prognosis is poor indeed. The heavy metals and subsequent Porphyria are employed to make someone physically and mentally incapacitated, when the PTB have decided not to totally murder someone. CIA manuals have been found that teach their vermin employees how to use mercury compounds to poison people. Note also that the PTB continue to put out “experts” that will say that the Hair Mineral Analysis is not a valid test. It is extremely valid for finding heavy metals in hair. The PTB don’t want people to know of their use in poisoning famous people, nor do they want the masses to use this inexpensive test on themselves-- or their children-- while they are alive, to find out if people are being poisoned.
As horrible as mercury, and the induced Porphyria are, there is a worse poison that the PTB have employed in recent times. This brings us to the intrepid heroine, Karen Silkwood. She worked at the Kerr-McGee nuclear (Plutonium) processing plant in Oklahoma, in the 1970’s. While she is known for reporting extensive safety violations at that plant, the real reason she was killed is often hidden. She had uncovered that the Kerr McGee plant was missing hundreds of kilograms of Plutonium, and was about to show proof of this to the NY Times, when her car was run off the road, and she was murdered. But before this, Silkwood had been massively poisoned with Plutonium. It had been apparently placed in a sandwich in her refrigerator. Her place had been (unbeknownst to her) broken into. Kerr McGee tried to frame her and claim that her carelessness as a handler of Plutonium (Pu) gave rise to her massive Pu poisoning. She had been poisoned earlier as well. Her levels of Plutonium indicated that she would likely live only a few months more.
But when she contacted the NY Times, and was about to meet with its reporters, she was murdered immediately. A lengthy civil lawsuit, and numerous appeals, were undertaken by her family, and estate, against Kerr McGee. The result is that a jury found that Silkwood was murdered (the car’s rear was damaged by another vehicle), and poisoned, and awarded about half a million dollars in damages and ten million in punitive damages. Appeals went all the way to the Supreme Court, and an out of court settlement for $1.38 million was reached. Ultimately, IMO, her death is likely about the American regime’s hidden proliferation of nuclear material to other nations. Most likely Pakistan or India, at that time-- early 1970’s. But some other insidious use for the missing Pu could be the case. Silkwood is a true heroine who continues to be falsely defamed by the regime/media as a careless worker and drug abuser. Her Plutonium poisoning shows that the Gestapo regime of the USA will use any monstrous poison to kill its citizens when they try to do some good, and blow the whistle on the regime. (Ref.: “The Killing of Karen Silkwood” by Richard Rashke, read here.)
The excellent book, “The Covert War Against Rock” by Alex Constantine (read here) also reveals that any popular rock star who tried to inform the masses that they were capable of throwing off the few evil ones that enslave them, ended up dead or falsely charged with various crimes. It contains hidden details of the deaths of Jim Morrison, Jimi Hendrix, Bob Marley, John Lennon, Tupac Shakur, Micheal Hutchence, Brian Jones, Phil Ochs, Peter Tosh, and the Notorious B.I.G. Some were poisoned with drugs such as heroin and cocaine and made to look like they O.D.’ed themselves. Recently, witnesses to the death of Jim Morrison have finally come forward and cast suspicion on the “official” death report of Morrison. This shows that from Mozart to the present day, when popular musicians try to inform the People of the nature of their enslavers and recommend casting them off, the PTB poison or shoot them.
The deaths of several American Presidents are likely due to poisonings. (And I would never trust “official” exhumations.) Conspiracy experts have shown that those Presidents that have tried to either terminate the Central Bank or show the role of the Jesuits, and the British regime, in controlling the American govt, end up shot, or poisoned. Recently deceased conspiracy expert, Sherman Skolnick wrote that three American Presidents were killed, via poison. This began in 1841 with the poisoning/assassination of President William Henry Harrison, 35 days after his telling, Inaugural Address. See here. President Zachary Taylor is acknowledged to have died from poison, only “food poisoning” (milk and cherries) is cited, and subsequent Cholera is falsely claimed. Another purportedly poisoned President is Warren Harding. The end of his two years in office is variously attributed to pneumonia (like Harrison), or heart attack. Some also say that President James Garfield, though shot, had completely recovered, and that he was poisoned two months after his shooting, as the shooting had not worked. Officially he died of “blood poisoning” from the shooting. Interesting that two of these Presidents deaths are attributed to poisoning, just the wrong kind of poisonings (food and blood). I would suggest that independent (if they exist), foreign sources first determine if these poisoned Presidents are the people in their tombs, then test their remains for heavy metals and other toxins. When the PTB decide not to blow a President’s brains out, they go the poison route.
Finally I wish to relate some more details of my massive, mercury poisoning. I should first say that I feel a close kinship with Karen Silkwood, as my home was also broken into, and a deadly mercury compound was emplaced into all the floors and countertops. This then out-gassed, and has basically damaged my lungs, kidneys, liver, heart and other organs. Other medical sequelae are also horrendous. The foul, intel agencies also sent agents to “greet” me with four chasing vehicles, who tried to run me off the road, on the first day that I moved to a new state. There have also been assaults, as Bill Cooper also suffered. All this is for my revealing, and proving that SS agent, William Greer fired two shots, first hitting Connally, then killing President Kennedy. This is something known to many in the gov’t, and to many of the eyewitnesses-- until they were killed. But even 40 years later, the truth of the assassination of the last President, the Peace President, is not allowed or tolerated.
It was a Hair Mineral Analysis that helped save my life, after collapsing numerous times. Blood tests confirmed the massive mercury poisoning. My own body became perhaps the largest source of out-gassing mercury in the state! Survival became problematic, and wellness impossible, after the federal regime did this to me. Agents of such agencies as the EPA were called off after promising me, on the phone, to help find which mercury compound was used against me in my home. These episodes prove extensive real-time wiretapping of me by the federal Gestapo agencies.
But all this is why-- even knowing that they are likely to complete their job, and kill me outright for what I do-- I decided to inform the People of the use of nuclear bombs on the WTC, and the China Syndrome aftermath. I also could not tolerate seeing how so many of the bogus 911 "truthers" were clearly intel assets pushing nonsense that was meant to hide the nuking of the WTC, and the vaporizing of so many Americans, and the radiation-induced cancers that have begun in the responders. That no other physicist was doing this also sickened me. I will struggle on here, until they kill me.
Always remember that being alive without Justice is no life. And that there are so many more of us than of them. I am proud to be in the company of Mozart, Beethoven, and Karen Silkwood-- poisoned for trying to tell the world Ultimate Truths, and to revolt against the handful of evil monsters that are enslaving YOU! What are YOU going to actually DO about it? Life isn’t worth living for what they have planned for YOU.
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Bush Impeachment Update
CNN reports this as a move that is designed to kill impeachment-- certainly Dem leadership (Pelosi et al) do not want impeachment. Words fail me in describing how fucked up Pelosi is in this regard. Talk about a fake opposition Democrat!
Optimistically, this could be a good move, as it will allow the judiciary committee to collect evidence, and the threat of bringing impeachment to the floor can be used for some leverage against Bush. Certainly, impeachment probably would have died if sent to the floor for a straight up vote, so this isn't so bad-- in a relative sense.
Meanwhile, 89% of people in this MSNBC poll think Bush should be impeached (almost 700,000 responses).
al-CIA-duh Odds and Ends
Wow, al-CIA-duh in Iraq was like REAL, or something. Seriously, this is one of the more bogus things I've read on al-CIA-duh so far. The Anbar prince? Gimme a break.
Hungry for Truth
Regardless of the details of what Blair Gadsby thinks about 9/11, I really have to admire this guy's courage. He's up to day 16 now on his hunger strike for the truth.
If a lot more people did what he's doing, perhaps even some real truth could be disseminated and maybe even some real change effected.
UPDATE: It's over, at day 17.
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Never-Ending Insanity: $42 Billion Spent Annually on Private Espionage
Jeremy Scahill, author of Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army reports for The Nation on the shadowy Blackwater's growing foray into the world of private espionage.
The privatization of intelligence has grown dramatically under President Bush, with Washington paying $42 billion annually in private intelligence contracts, compared to just $17.5 billion in 2000. As Scahill points out, it means that 70% of the U.S. intelligence budget is going to private companies, which creates an interesting market for government operatives.
Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater, started Total Intelligence Solutions in April 2006 in order to capitalize on this growing demand for privatized intelligence services:"Total Intel brings the...skills traditionally honed by CIA operatives directly to the board room," [Blackwater's vice chair Cofer] Black said when the company launched. "With a service like this, CEOs and their security personnel will be able to respond to threats quickly and confidently -- whether it's determining which city is safest to open a new plant in or working to keep employees out of harm's way after a terrorist attack."
"Total Intel"-- lovely people I'm sure, with ONLY the best interests of ALL American citizens at heart. Right?
Now, where is our Blackwater troll? One time I posted stuff on Blackwater killing civilians in Iraq, amazingly I had someone defending them here. Honestly, for such an "obscure" site, I get the most amazing shills here.
Kucinich Enters Articles of Impeachment Against Bush!!!
Here is an almost complete list of the articles-- even some stuff on 9/11:
(more complete list here)
#33: Repeatedly ignored and failed to respond to high level intelligence warnings of planned terrorist attacks in U.S. prior to 9/11.
Clark warned the president in daily briefings of the threat. Clark was unable to convene a cabinet level position. Tenet met with the president 40 times to warn of threat. Still no meetings of top officials.
#34: Obstruction into the investigation of 9/11
#35: endangering the health of 9/11 first responders
UPDATE: Raw Story documents the shameful response of the mainstream media.
Increased Oil Prices Almost Entirely Due to Unregulated Speculation
This was on the Diana Rehm (NPR) show today, with some economists on talking about the Soros testimony on oil prices in Congress yesterday.
The panel also noted food price increases are due almost entirely to speculation.
This all adds up to an artificial crisis to me.
The End of the Internet?
Bell Canada and TELUS (formerly owned by Verizon) employees officially confirm that by 2012 ISP's all over the globe will reduce Internet access to a TV-like subscription model, only offering access to a small standard amount of commercial sites and require extra fees for every other site you visit. These 'other' sites would then lose all their exposure and eventually shut down, resulting in what could be seen as the end of the Internet.
Monday, June 09, 2008
Song and Dance-- and Censorship-- at KSM Gitmo Trial
At 9:33 a.m., Mohammed spoke to the court for the first time, uttering a single "Yes" into a microphone in answer to the question of whether he speaks English. He then asked for a translator, but a good one, because he said he had been "mistranslated" at his Combatant Status Review Tribunal at Guantanamo more than a year ago, when someone "put many words in my mouth."
Just 24 minutes later, after the other detainees answered a series of mundane questions, Mohammed stood up to address the court. He opened by chanting Koranic verses in Arabic, complete with an English translation for the court, offering a few unexpected lyrical moments. But his words then veered sharply. Although polite and almost deferential, Mohammed quickly made clear his dislike of America.
"I consider all American laws under the Constitution to be evil and not of God," Mohammed said. He particularly took issue with a society that allows "same-sexual marriage" and other things that "are very bad." He said he could not accept a U.S. lawyer because the nation is "still in Iraq and Afghanistan and waging their crusade."
When Marine Col. Ralph Kohlmann, the presiding judge, tried to interrupt Mohammed, Mohammed would hesitate and say, "Go ahead," essentially granting permission to Kohlmann to speak. While Kohlmann was extremely patient with Mohammed, he blew up several times at defense attorneys, sternly telling them to "sit down, sit down" in the middle of their arguments.
Kohlmann also had a surreal conversation with the five defendants toward the end of the hearing, discussing with them the parameters for them to review and handle classified evidence if they do represent themselves. Military prosecutors said with no apparent irony that they are prepared to hand over classified materials to the nation's arch enemies, although it is unclear whether the detainees would have access to witnesses or how a detainee would handle top-secret CIA materials.
"There will not be evidence they will not see," said Army Col. Lawrence J. Morris, the chief prosecutor for military commissions. Human rights advocates were skeptical, however.
Mohammed appeared to have equal disdain for the process, but he only briefly mentioned his "torturing" at the hands of U.S. officials, something he acknowledged he was warned not to mention in open court, lest a security official hit a button muting the audio to observers in the courtroom and at a media center nearby. That button was pushed at least a few times on Thursday when detainees appeared to discuss elements of their early captivity in secret facilities or the way they were treated.*
"All of this has been taken under torturing," Mohammed said. "Then after torturing, they transfer us to Inquisition Land here at Guantanamo, and you tell everyone to sit down, sit down."
The case will continue to go forward, and while Mohammed has asked for the death penalty so he could become a martyr, he seemed content to stir things up on his first day in court. He sat smugly at the defense table after the others declared that they wanted to represent themselves, taking a legal approach to which they are entitled but one that could turn Guantanamo's highest-profile military commission into a circus.
*You also gotta think they had the mute button in case anyone went "off the reservation" about the official 9/11 story.
56th Annual Bilderberg Meeting
But no worries, I'm sure they only have everyone's best interests at heart-- everyone from the richest to the poorest....riiighht.
Actually, more likely they all sit around, getting off on watching videos of the 2nd hit and the nuking of the WTC-- the biggest snuff film in history.