Sunday, November 30, 2008
FUBAR'd in South Asia
In a thinly veiled message to the US, Pakistan officials have threatened to withdraw troops fighting Islamists along Afghanistan if India builds up forces along the border it shares with Pakistan. Furious Indian officials have linked the deadly Mumbai terror operation to Pakistan. "If something happens on that front, the war on terror won't be our priority," a Pakistani senior security said ominously. "We'll take out everything from the western border."
His threat was clearly aimed at pressuring the US to temper India's response to the attacks, reports the Times of London. The US is faced with a dilemma of appeasing both nations, while India's vulnerable coalition government is under pressure to respond swiftly to the terror attacks in the run-up to the national elections in spring.
The bigger picture is that the recent Mumbai attacks were certainly orchestrated by the PTB, with hopes of destabilizing this fragile nuclear-armed region.
I wonder if this is the beginning of the "manufactured" international crisis that Joe Biden mentioned a couple months back as a test for Obama.
These are perilous times, and it looks grim. But as someone with extensive personal ties to India-- my wife is from India, and I work with Indian nationals-- I can only hope for the best here.
Friday, November 28, 2008
CNN Touts "Mumbai Massacre", "Mumbai Under Seige", "Terror in India"
This one looks like real trouble, politically speaking, in a way that wasn't true for the many other major terror attacks that India has suffered in recent years. Look for a roll-out of the War on Terror, version 2.0-- possibly culminating in some really nasty earth-shattering events.
The attack on the Jewish center, and foreign national victims, plays into this, of course-- particularly the former. (And now 5 Jews being reported dead, including a rabbi.)
None of this overlooks that the attacks were horrible, brutal and barbaric events, and deserve condemnation from all. The question still is who was behind it all. The fact that two top counter-terrorism officers were killed early on is a sign that there may have been some official involvement.
Not surprisingly, earlier this summer, from Sec. Def. Gates: "even winning the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan will not end the "Long War" against violent extremism and that the fight against al-Qaeda and other terrorists should be the nation's top military priority over coming decades, according to a new National Defense Strategy he approved last month."
UPDATE: If true, very grim news of Pakistani and Bangladeshi (formerly East Pakistan) involvement:
India's NDTV is now reporting new details, based on Indian intelligence sources, of the Mumbai attack, including the total number of attackers, their origins, etc. We'll have video shortly. Key details seemed to be that there were 40 attackers, half were there in place and in advance and half were brought in on speed boats from the sea. 29 were Pakistani, 11 were Bangladeshi.Important caveat there at the end, though really, any reports from intelligence agencies should be treated with caution.
I should emphasize here that while reports sourced to off-the-record statements from intelligence agencies should always be treated with caution, that is particularly the case here. The Indians come at these terrorist incidents with strong (and not at all unfounded) assumptions about Pakistani involvement. That may very well be the case. But we should wait for firmer evidence before taking these reports as the final word.
Is there any precedent for this type of small armed invasion by an outside terrorist group on a suicide mission? There may be some precedent , but I can't think of anything like this off the top of my head. It's quite bizarre.
An interesting editorial in the WaPo on the Indian internal "war on terror" and ways it is reminiscent of recent US and Israeli history.
The Answer Is "Yes"
"South Side of the Sky":
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Hey, Who Stole My Truth Movement?
But still, one thing that has always puzzled me is how so many blogs-- hundreds of them-- can pay so much attention to politics but at the same time ignore deep politics and conspiracies. This is particularly odd when considering how extensively deep politics influences conventional politics. How can so many apparently intelligent people be so deeply involved in such superficial matters?
Lizard People for President!
One of the more interesting challenged ballots in the Franken-Coleman Senate race.
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
What Real Terrorism Looks Like
NEW DELHI — Coordinated terror attacks struck the heart of Mumbai, India’s commercial capital, Wednesday night, killing dozens in machine-gun and grenade assaults on at least two five-star hotels, the city’s largest train station, a movie theater and a hospital.I have always been amazed this kind of thing hasn't happened in this US, given how prevalent guns are. If we had had a real terrorist threat, it might have happened. The closest was that sniper that terrorized Washington DC in late 2002-- right about when Congress was debating about invading Iraq. I think there's little doubt that the sniper attacks were "an inside job", though I've seen very little analysis of that story from that angle.
Mumbai police said the attacks killed at least 75 people and wounded 240, according to preliminary reports. There were also reports that hostages had been taken at at least one of the hotels, with Americans and British nationals being singled out.
UPDATE: To clarify a couple of things: First, about "real terrorism"-- I meant that India clearly has a real terror threat being leveled against it, as there have been a whole series of attacks there in the past few years, and that these are more real down-to-earth type attacks. This is in sharp contrast to the clearly bogus threat that al Qaeda posed to the US, and to the clearly hoax that was 9/11. Obviously people were terrorized on 9/11-- but it was a very different kind of fake terrorism than what is happening in India. That being said, I think it very likely that this India attack was orchestrated by the powers that be. Anonymous Physicist has noted to me that the Guardian is reporting that the attacks started at 10:33 PM. If that isn't a tip-off, I don't know what is! Second, about the idea that terrorists would use guns in the US-- I meant that I would expect that if there were "real" terrorists threatening the US, they would do more gun attacks. In other words, that the lack of gun attacks indicates the lack of a bona fide terror threat.
Finally, about India-- clearly the powers that be are pushing their buttons, trying to get them to do something drastic. So far India has shown a lot of restraint, I think. We'll see how long that lasts.
Military Looks More Towards Domestic Defense
(AP) Defense Secretary Robert Gates on Monday ordered his top department leaders to conduct a broad review to determine whether the military, National Guard and Reserve can adequately deal with domestic disasters and whether they have the training and equipment to defend the homeland.Sound like this is more about preparing for martial law.
Michelangeli Plays Bach-Busoni Chaconne in D minor
(part 1 of 2)
I say this is heroic, because I just got the sheet music to this piece, and it is a horrifically difficult piece to play on the piano. It is also one of the most powerful Bach pieces I've ever heard. Admittedly, it's not really pure Bach, as Busoni has added many extra notes to create the piano version of this piece that was originally written by Bach for violin.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Thoughts of the Day
2) Howard Zinn and his ilk make me sick.
3) It is depressing but not shocking to see the perpetrators of the financial crisis being either bailed out or promoted into the Obama administration (Geithner, Rubin, Summers, etc). This is quite analogous to the 9/11 perps (FBI, CIA, military, media) all getting promoted or getting big budgetary boosts after 9/11-- all of course, to try to prevent another terror attack. Now, we have these "financial wizards" all getting bailed out and embraced to try to "prevent" another financial meltdown-- after most of the damage has been done.
Howard Zinn, Noam Chomsky, Daniel Ellsberg, Gore Vidal, and Seymour Hersh: The Worst Kind of Intel Perps for the Gestapo Regime!
by The Anonymous Physicist
Recently the outrageous comments from best-selling historian (“A People's History of the United States”) Howard Zinn, PhD have woken more people up as to the insidious nature of Zinn, and other alleged “anti-war” gatekeepers. Zinn (a former Rhodes Scholar) said that 9/11 “didn’t matter,” and that 9/11 truthers are “fanatics,” and other outrageous things. It is necessary to expose the little-known, deeper relationships, and reasons, involved in the gatekeeping of bogus, “leftist,” supposed “anti-war” personalities including Zinn, Noam Chomsky, Daniel Ellsberg, Gore Vidal, and Seymour Hersh. I will list the likely Op-Plan of each of these five individuals at the end of this article.Zinn joins another celebrated, alleged “liberal,” “anti-war” public figure in disparaging the efforts, and people, involved in uncovering the facts of 9/11/01-- linguist Noam Chomsky, PhD. Both of these supposed critics of American Gov’t policies have also said similar things regarding the Assassination of President Kennedy. Either “Oswald alone did it” (Chomsky) or it doesn’t matter (Chomsky, Zinn). Of course, even the House Assassination Committee of the late 1970’s said there was a conspiracy, but Chomsky ignores that. I will now add another “celebrated anti-war activist” into this mix--Daniel Ellsberg, PhD--and reveal one link amongst them. Ellsberg is famous for releasing the so-called Pentagon Papers, which purported to reveal the early history of the Vietnam “Conflict.” Ellsberg allegedly purloined/copied this “hidden history” from the Rand Corporation where he worked, and got it printed in the New York Times. Ellsberg was tried and acquitted for his actions. Many revere him for his “anti-war” efforts, as they do Zinn and Chomsky. Ellsberg claimed to have evaded the intelligence agencies’ desperate attempts to find him, by hiding out with, or being assisted by, his friend Zinn.
Now The Pentagon Papers are a clever mix of truth and lies. While it revealed that the Gulf of Tonkin incident was faked, it had ulterior motives. One was to pin the blame for the War on Vietnam on President Kennedy who, of course, was assassinated and could not defend himself. It became, in effect, a second assassination of Kennedy. He was killed in part for starting to withdraw the first 1,000 troops/advisors, and for revealing that by 1965, all U.S. troops would be out of Vietnam. And the Pentagon Papers are cleverly crafted to give the opposite impression. Again former Army Major John Newman’s book, “JFK and Vietnam” is definitive here. But, IMO, Wiki blows the long-term Op-Plan of these three, bogus “anti-war” activists, Zinn, Chomsky and Ellsberg, as here: “Daniel Ellsberg, a former RAND consultant who had secretly copied The Pentagon Papers, which described internal planning and policy decisions of the United States in the Vietnam War, gave a copy of them to Howard and Roslyn Zinn. Along with Noam Chomsky, Zinn edited and annotated the copy of The Pentagon Papers that Ellsberg entrusted to him. Zinn's longtime publisher, Beacon Press, published what has come to be known as the Senator Mike Gravel edition of The Pentagon Papers, four volumes plus a fifth volume with analysis by Chomsky and Zinn….” (See here) These three, I assert, have had a life-long Op of cleverly denigrating President Kennedy, and subsequently downplaying the regime’s assassination of him. The Pentagon Papers’ lies about Kennedy’s actions, and plans for Vietnam were an early part of Zinn’s, Chomsky’s and Ellsberg’s anti-JFK Op. So it is NOT a coincidence that these individuals continue to proclaim the Regime ’s 1963 stance on the Kennedy Assassination. And that the truth of JFK and 9/11 “doesn’t matter. Move on.”
But reading Ellsberg’s book, “Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers” only proved to me how blatant are the intel lies of Ellberg. It’s funny how he claims to have given the slip to all the intel agencies while communicating with (phoning) Zinn, or hiding out with him. Knowing some of the technologies that the NSA, CIA, and FBI had only proves 1. He’s lying about this, and 2. That they knew everything, and that therefore he must be intel, along with Zinn. Ellsberg also brags about his far above, top-secret classification, greater than the President, while he was at the Pentagon and Rand. In the 1950’s, Ellsberg was a Marine Commander in Vietnam. Those who know the real history of the War on Vietnam know that almost all the first 15,000 “advisors” in Nam until after the JFK Assassination were CIA. Ellsberg, in 1962, received a Harvard PhD in Economics. Ellsberg began work at the Pentagon, in 1964, under Robert McNamara, the Defense Secretary. Then he returned to Vietnam, allegedly with the State Dept., but working under who he describes as his great friend-- Edward Lansdale. That despicable creature is well known as a CIA perp, exposed by Col. Fletcher Prouty for being in charge of the three tramps in Dallas, and who likely played a supervisory, Military Intel/CIA role in the Assassination.
Does any non-intel shill believe that it was a coincidence that Ellsberg’s very first day at the Pentagon was the day of the planned, bogus, intel Op that became known as the Gulf of Tonkin “attack.” Also note that the Gov’t’s highest civil service grade is GS-18, which is said to be the equivalent of a Major General in the Military. Ellsberg attained this level at the young age of 33 (naturally.) We have seen, even here at this blog, that when nefarious intel agents are involved in a treasonous crime, they are ordered to maintain their involvement for the rest of their lives. Their cover is often of a “liberal” or a “researcher,” or a “re-investigator.”
That Ellsberg book also has a quote from Richard Nixon, who was incredulous at his impending impeachment. Paraphrasing here, Nixon asked why they were going after him-- “I didn’t do anything as bad as Franklin Roosevelt, who knew the whole Pearl Harbor thing ahead of time.” But these three “musketeers'” role in creating the Pentagon Papers’ fiction of blaming the War on Vietnam on JFK, was an Op also shared with notorious CIA Assassin Eduardo Howard Hunt. One of his Plumbers’ jobs was to lie and and defame Kennedy as ordering the Assassination of South Vietnamese President Diem, and of planning to widen the Vietnam War.
Another celebrated, alleged anti-war author is Gore Vidal. He was an in-law of Jackie Kennedy. He takes every opportunity to denigrate JFK with the most corrupt, superficial lies on Cold War events. Again a book like, Newman’s “JFK and Vietnam” makes terribly clear how behind the scenes, Kennedy was desperately acting in secret for peace; while lying to his advisors, and sometimes to the public, about his plans. Gore forever ignores JFK’s firing the top three CIA perps after the Bay of Pigs fiasco, and Kennedy’s NSAM’s [National Security Action Memoranda] that emasculated the CIA and started the Vietnam withdrawal.
Similarly is celebrated anti-war journalist, Seymour Hersh. His first claim to fame was his being first to publicly report on the My Lai Massacre. http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2008/07/defeating-britishamerican-gestapo.html He was not “in-country”, contrary to misconception. One wonders if Hersh’s massacre numbers are downsized, as Hugh Thompson himself believed. Hersh is now known for also revealing details on the torture and rape of prisoners in the Abu Ghraib jail in Iraq. Again one wonders what, if anything, is still being held back by Hersh and the Gov’t? Perhaps a similar mass-murdering Phoenix-like Program? But Hersh’s Long-term Op is revealed with his JFK hit piece/book, “The Dark Side of Camelot,”[not read by me]. Some reviews of this book included, “In a Los Angeles Times review, Edward Jay Epstein cast doubt on these and other assertions, writing, "this book turns out to be, alas, more about the deficiencies of investigative journalism than about the deficiencies of John F. Kennedy." Responding to the book, historian and former Kennedy aide Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. called Hersh "the most gullible investigative reporter I've ever encountered." Hersh, of course, says Oswald alone did it, and JFK was responsible for the Bay of Pigs, and the Vietnam War. On the Bay of Pigs matter, a 2000 Washington Post article revealed that the CIA knew that the USSR knew the date and plans for the Bay of Pigs invasion; and did not call it off, or tell President Kennedy.
But such facts and findings rarely, if ever, cause the five “gentlemen” in this article to change their public denigration of Kennedy, or that “Oswald alone did it,” or that “it doesn’t matter.” So it is no surprise to honest conspiracy experts to see any or all of these five undercover gentlemen proclaim that 9/11 happened the way the Regime says it did -- even if physically impossible, and refuted by the evidence of nukes and China Syndrome Aftermath. See wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com
And this Ultimate Truth of 9/11 is, of course, also hidden/forbidden by nearly all the conspiracy, and 911-truther, websites, because they too are intel-controlled specifically for that reason.
Let me now summarize the Op-plan for each of these five insidious people--
Howard Zinn: The U.S. Gov’t did bad things IN THE PAST. Anything recent, JFK Assassination, 9/11 -- well those don’t matter, the Govt’ is mostly telling the truth about those. Forget about them, move on.
Noam Chomsky: The U.S. Gov’t does still do some bad things, but ONLY OVER THERE. Anything recent and IN THE USA, like the JFK Assassination, and 9/11 -- well they don’t matter, the Govt’ is mostly telling the truth about those. Forget about them, move on.
Daniel Ellsberg: JFK is responsible for the War on Vietnam. But Ellsberg’s Op is far more clever and covert than the two above. Ellsberg has come out for a new 9/11 investigation, and even that “the CIA may have been involved in the JFK Assn.” (Of course, it’s the entire top level of the Gov’t that was involved.) But his summary is always that “THE NEXT EVENT” will lead to this or that -- but it’s things that WE ALREADY HAVE -- like fascism. I could see Ellsberg being told to promote one of the intel agencies’ 9/11 Hangouts, like Thermite.
Gore Vidal: Oh, I knew JFK well. He was a terrible President, but a charming man. Oswald alone did it, and it doesn’t matter, because JFK was a terrible, sickly, drugged, corrupt President. Remember I knew him, I was an in-law. Vidal is in the new “Zero” 9/11 movie. I have not seen that, but was told it pushes the Thermite Intel Hangout.
Seymour Hersh: JFK was a terrible, sickly, drugged, corrupt President. Oswald alone did it, and it doesn’t matter. And 9/11: 19 Arabs did it, but our foreign policy response has been atrocious. The Gov’t has terribly over-reacted; we should stop doing those bad things overseas.
So this article has revealed the insidious, hidden nature of celebrated, alleged, anti-war activists. It even revealed how several of them have known each other well for decades, and the great likelihood that they were protected by the Gov’t in an Intel Op -- the Pentagon Papers legend -- as this legend is over the top for those in the know. The Regime does reveal its great fears when its deep undercover assets screw up and reveal themselves, as Zinn recently did. The two things that clearly worry the Gestapo Regime remain the truth of the Kennedy Assassination -- Secret Service Agent Greer’s shooting Kennedy in the head, and the truth of 9/11 -- the WTC was nuked and the China Syndrome Aftermath resulted. Therefore, these are the facts that we must promote far and wide!
I even recently revealed here http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2008/11/ultimate-truths-part-xiii-nuclear.html that the major reason that President Kennedy was killed may have been because he wanted to wrest control of nukes and ICBMs from the military.
Don’t you see one event that would never have occurred if JFK had lived, and had successfully wrested control of nukes from the Military/Intel? The nuclear bombing of the World Trade Center on 9/11/01! The two events are indeed linked at the deepest level. John Fitzgerald Kennedy knowingly died trying to prevent events like 9/11, and the ensuing bogus wars.
Monday, November 24, 2008
The Gates of Delirium
"The U.S. government is prepared to lend more than $7.4 trillion on behalf of American taxpayers, or half the value of everything produced in the nation last year, to rescue the financial system since the credit markets seized up 15 months ago," according to an estimate by Bloomberg News.
"We must destroy the future in order to save the future..."
No Wonder They Drove Padilla Insane0 comments
Sunday, November 23, 2008
An Unexpected Consequence of Youtube
Gyula Kiss - Brahms intermezzo, op.117 No.3:
Maria Yudina plays Bach Chromatic Fantasia & Fugue:
Hüsker Dü - "Something I Learned Today"
GANG OF FOUR - ANTHRAX:
Saturday, November 22, 2008
Almost Makes Me Sad
UPDATE: Perhaps it is not as it seems.
I suppose this clip says more about Rick Sanchez and CNN and what they are willing to say about Bush, than anything. Of course, this plays into the psychology of many such as me who would love to see Bush actually be treated as a pariah for what he has done. But alas, I guess that would be giving world leaders too much credit for being decent people.
The Ultimate Truth of the Kennedy Assassination
Today is the 45th anniversary. Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could bring the PTB to justice -- true justice -- by the time the 50th anniversary rolls around?
Please also read this-- "John Fitzgerald Kennedy, The Last True President Of The United States".
Friday, November 21, 2008
Scary Economic Similarities wth 1932 and 2008
The interregnum of 1932-1933, the long stretch between the election and the actual transfer of power, was disastrous for the U.S. economy, at least in part because the outgoing administration had no credibility, the incoming administration had no authority and the ideological chasm between the two sides was too great to allow concerted action. And the same thing is happening now.
How much can go wrong in the two months before Mr. Obama takes the oath of office? The answer, unfortunately, is: a lot. Consider how much darker the economic picture has grown since the failure of Lehman Brothers, which took place just over two months ago. And the pace of deterioration seems to be accelerating.Most obviously, we’re in the midst of the worst stock market crash since the Great Depression: the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index has now fallen more than 50 percent from its peak. Other indicators are arguably even more disturbing: unemployment claims are surging, manufacturing production is plunging, interest rates on corporate bonds — which reflect investor fears of default — are soaring, which will almost surely lead to a sharp fall in business spending. The prospects for the economy look much grimmer now than they did as little as a week or two ago.
That Crazy Liberal Mainstream Media
Meanwhile, they still won't allow talk of Bush administration war-crimes.
For some reason, I keep forgetting that these people are complicit in war-crimes themselves. Perhaps because they are so good at distractions.
Question of the Day
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories
by The Anonymous Physicist
Several, differing WTC nuclear destruction scenarios have been put forth by their respective authors. While they all have nuclear explosions in common; they have key differences. These differences must be openly examined, and used to strive towards a final nuclear 911 WTC destruction scenario that fits all the evidence, and is not contraindicated by the Laws of Physics. Nuclear WTC scenarios that do not fit all the evidence, or contain false statements, or are contradicted by physical law need to be abandoned.
1. Within a year or two of 9/11/01 people began to post at physics forums that WTC destruction seemed to involve nuclear bombs.
2. By 2005, the first website appeared which contained a nuclear WTC destruction scenario by an Anonymous Finnish Military Expert. He hypothesized that one upwardly-focused, sub-basement shape-charge-like nuke was used to destroy each tower. Tower destruction, he stated, was likely done with the aid of conventional explosives as needed. The Finn also hypothesized that the single nuke was a fourth generation, fission-free thermonuclear (pure fusion) device. He cited the alleged Tritium finding by U.S. Gov’t scientists. Therefore (fusion only), there could be no China Syndrome Aftermath with this theory.
3. In 2006, William Tahil wrote a book and offered it for sale online. (It is now downloadable for free.) Tahil also claimed that one deep underground nuclear explosion per tower occurred, but that they weren’t bombs per se. Rather, he claims, there were two huge, underground, fission nuclear reactors already present, which were made to go supercritical, and explode in a nuclear fashion. Tahil wrote that a China Syndrome Aftermath resulted.
4. In 2007, this Anonymous [American] Physicist offered a detailed, nuclear WTC destruction scenario. Many small nukes were said to have been employed during tower destruction, but some conventional explosives may also have been used to allow the nukes to be small, and not vaporize the outer tower structure. After first incorporating all the “official” evidence, that included findings that supported both fission and fusion; he [I] first wrote that either fission-initiated fusion bombs or tritium-boosted fission bombs were used.
But after finding massive, irrefutable evidence of the China Syndrome Aftermath at the WTC for up to six months-- until the fissioning, radioactive fragments were carted away-- and noting that the China Syndrome can supposedly only occur from fissioning remnants, not fusion components, the Anonymous Physicist has stated the following. The alleged Tritium data release to the public may be a clever regime ploy (red herring) to get people to look for the mythical fourth generation nuke precisely because it is fission-free, and therefore you couldn’t have WHAT WE DID HAVE-- THE CHINA SYNDROME AFTERMATH at the WTC. Since the evidence of the China Syndrome of a massive heat-generating source existed at the WTC for months afterwards, and only fission fragments could cause this heat GENERATION for so long, the bombs likely were fission bombs. The Govt then deliberately released bogus information (Tritium), as covering up the China Syndrome Aftermath was their most crucial Op-Plan after 9/11. The China Syndrome arose, and HAD TO ARISE perforce, because a fission nuke uses only 1-6% of its fissile material. The remainder is left over and will remain fissioning for a long time, as the half-life of Uranium 235 is 700 million years. Also the concepts of redundant nukes, "fratricided" nukes, and fizzled nukes were detailed in my papers, and all lead to a China Syndrome Aftermath.
Furthermore, the massive disinfo efforts by the American regime, and its agents, make clear how important it was/is to cover up the nuking, and the China Syndrome Aftermath in NEW YORK CITY. As usual, disinfo agents try too hard. Their M.O. is often clear to see. The hangouts known as the Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT), and “DEW” blatantly lie that there was no heat during or after WTC destruction. And another hangout (thermite) has its proponent admit to the great heat for months, but must lie and claim that “thermite burns forever,” when it actually cools off in minutes or hours. The final step, in the intel agencies’ disinformation scheme--as more and more people see the truth of the nuclear destruction of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath-- is to plant individuals (mostly online personalities) who will pretend to be pro-nuclear 9/11. All the while everything they write is meant to confuse, confound, and actually belittle the nuclear 9/11 hypothesis with ludicrous or irrelevant claims. They will be easy to spot; they will likely never cite my research and articles on the nuclear destruction of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath. They will cite the other theories above-- but not mine-- precisely because of the unchanging flaws in the others, as detailed above. So please be aware of new, allegedly nuclear 9/11 proponents who may actually try to confound the issue; and present mis-, or dis-information, or irrelevancies, or pretend it is unknowable, or doesn’t matter.
Let us now examine the first two detailed nuclear WTC destruction scenarios listed above. First, let us look at the Finnish military expert’s claims of one sub-basement, pure fusion, shape-charged-like, upwardly focused nuke per tower. This appears to be erroneous in several ways. First the observed, top-down, destruction mechanism, and the earlier, highly likely nuclear sub-basement explosion (see more below) both belie the one nuke per tower hypothesis. The Finn has stated that he is an expert on shape charges, and that the top/down scenario could have been done via nuclear shape charges in the sub-basement. But the website that has his articles says that his translator refused to translate his details of how this could have occurred. But even if theoretically possible, the details of the early likely nuclear, sub-basement explosion (see below) demonstrate that his one nuke per tower scenario is untenable. Likewise, this Anonymous Physicist, has proposed that the hunt for the pure fusion, 4th generation nuke is likely a deliberate, planted red herring precisely because this would obviate what did take place-- the China Syndrome Aftermath. So I contend that the Finnish Military Expert’s hypotheses of 1. Pure fusion nuke, 2. One nuke per tower in the basement are incorrect. The Finn also says that “red mercury” could be one way to attain fusion without prerequisite fission. This is the “red mercury” scam, that I have shown here is physically impossible to cause fusion; and is a British American Regime Psyops. The Finn was given my critique of his hypotheses, by the owner of the site that has his nuclear scenario. There has been no word back from him to my knowledge, but I would still welcome this now.
Next I have written what may be the only full review of Tahil’s book here. And this should be read by all, after reading his book. Tahil deserves credit for analyzing the USGS dust/elements study, and concluding that fission likely occurred during the WTC destruction, and even afterwards with secondary fission on some of the samples. But then Tahil’s scenario entails one nuke per tower in the sub-basement again-- but here each one was a fission explosion that arose from making a large, hidden fission reactor explode like a nuclear bomb with upward focusing (as with the Finn). My review makes clear that several aspects are untenable or improbable. First, a nuclear reactor “going super-critical,” and exploding like a nuclear bomb is said to be physically impossible. Then the videoed, top-bottom tower destruction itself makes the one nuke per basement unlikely. Furthermore, my articles have also cited much eyewitness testimony such as from survivor sub-basement nuke survivor, Felipe David, and WTC Engineer Mike Pecoraro. Pecoraro was in a sub-basement level, and went UP a level to see that an earlier blast vaporized a 50 ton steel press and shriveled up a heavy concrete/steel door into foil-like matter. This implies a nuke went off above him, not below him, and so even if a fission reactor could be made to go off like a nuclear bomb (which is stated to be impossible), could the one reactor do this a second time after it would have had its first, chaotic nuclear explosion? So the actual destruction videos and eyewitness testimony further erode some of Tahil’s (and the Finn’s) hypotheses.
Finally, numerous crucial statements Tahil wrote are incorrect. His rationale for the massive hidden reactor hypothesis was two-fold. 1. He claims that a fission bomb uses up 100% of its fissile material, when the correct figure is only 1-6%! and 2. Massive amounts of Strontium and other elements found in the dust, he claims, could only mean that two massive fission reactors were already present. My review showed that Strontium occurs in concrete, sometimes not as a tiny component, but as a relatively large percentage, as is known for the concrete used in making the Empire State Building and the Pentagon. All this taken together make his two hidden, massive, reactors hypothesis either physically impossible (to go off as a bomb and/or to subsequently be re-used), unnecessary, or untenable. But again his work is most valuable for demonstrating the likelihood that fission occurred during WTC destruction, and that the China Syndrome resulted. I have had no communications from Tahil after my review and critique of his hypotheses. But I continue to welcome honest criticism of both my critiques of the other nuclear scenarios, and of my own hypotheses.
It is hoped that people will examine all the evidence (including survivors’ testimonies, EMP, massive heat, sound, radiation lowering methods used, photos, etc.), and the Physics I have outlined, and that are archived at these two blogs, http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and http://wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com, and stop promoting misinformation or disinformation. I assert this includes the “red mercury” scam, the tritium red herring, and the latter’s implied fission-free pure fusion hangout as well as seeing how massive hidden underground reactors going off as nuclear bombs are improbable if not impossible-- and don’t fit the destruction evidence, and eyewitness testimony. They are not needed when you learn the aspects of my “many small nukes” hypothesis. If you are truly interested in what was perpetrated on 9/11, please read the ENTIRETY of the two blogs that contain my archived nuclear 9/11 articles, and make up your own mind. And if you want to see just how the Official Regime “explanation” for what occurred at the WTC on 9/11/01, (and some of the “alternative” non-nuclear theories) used bogus science and committed outright fraud, there are more articles on this at this site.
To sum up, all the evidence of the actual WTC destruction, and the great heat generated there for up to six months indicates that WTC destruction was most likely caused by numerous small nuclear fission bombs (micro-nukes), not by a single basement nuke, nor by massive hidden reactors that exploded like nuclear bombs. The China Syndrome Aftermath arose, and had to arise, because the fission fragments were contained in the buildings as they were nuked, and ended up all over the rubble pile, and beneath the towers and WTC7.
It’s time to promote, or at least publicly discuss, the continual efforts made by this Anonymous [American] Physicist to examine all the evidence of the nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath in New York City. Please promote these works both on the net and to friends, family, and neighbors. It is ABSOLUTELY THE MOST CRUCIAL ASPECT OF 911 TRUTH, TO INFORM PEOPLE THAT THE AMERICAN REGIME NUKED ITS OWN MOST POPULOUS CITY, NYC, ON 9/11. If your favorite blog or website ignores-- or blocks-- this most crucial aspect, either post it yourself or tell all your friends, family, etc. And carefully examine the differences in the nuclear 911 hypotheses, and eliminate the impossible, the improbable, the untenable, or what the evidence indicated is incorrect; and promote what fits all the evidence, and is physically tenable-- many small fission nukes were used to destroy the WTC on 9/11/01, and the China Syndrome Aftermath resulted. And the radiation issue is also discussed here.
Please promote this, as there isn’t much time left before they pull away the wool from everyone’s eyes. It won’t be pleasant, and must be prevented. Life will not be worth living then. Remember Hiroshima. The survivors there were said to be envious of the dead. This may be what they have planned for all of us, with the American Regime being, as Rev. Martin Luther King said, “the greatest purveyor of evil in the world today.” Indeed, there is much evidence that the American regime nuked its own people at least once before 9/11/01, in the Port Chicago, California incident, as I detailed here. Thus the American regime remains the only regime that has nuked its own people, as well as others, and that fact would likely enrage the American people to act, as nothing else might.
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Gulf War Syndrome Caused by Nasty Toxins
I think the bigger question is-- what form of government would result in less abuse of power? What form of government would keep the military from exerting undue influence, and from organizing something like 9/11? Is it clear that a libertarian government would not eventually morph into some version of the monster we have now?
Moreover, absent some major revolution-- which just ain't gonna happen-- is there really any chance of replacing our current government with a libertarian one?
The question of course is moot for all practical purposes, as the major problem we have to deal with is the evil "powers that be"-- not choices in governing philosophy.
The Money Hole
In The Know: Should The Government Stop Dumping Money Into A Giant Hole?
Cindy McCain Claims She's "Just Like Any Other Female Human"
Dems Turn the Other Cheek on Lieberman
The CIA and the Film Industry
Monday, November 17, 2008
Absolutely Maddening: Why Is It So Hard to Think Some Guantanamo Detainees Are Innocent?
Now, as Mr. Obama moves closer to assuming responsibility for Guantánamo, his pledge to close the detention center is bringing to the fore thorny questions under consideration by his advisers. They include where Guantánamo’s detainees could be held in this country, how many might be sent home and a matter that people with ties to the Obama transition team say is worrying them most: What if some detainees are acquitted or cannot be prosecuted at all?
Further Analogies Between the WTC and Chernobyl China Syndromes of Molten Metal and Radiation Release
Here is a satellite photo of abandoned fire trucks, cars, helicopters-- all apparently still (2008) too radioactive from Chernobyl radiation released after its 1986 explosion. Looks a bit like some of the photos of abandoned cars and fire trucks after 9/11, in lower Manhattan.
Molten metal in a French reactor. Can someone ask the 9/11 firemen/responders if this is like what they saw?
Can you see the hot spot still in this Chernobyl slag, years or decades later? The black line points to it.
Did China not want this stuff? Maybe USSR/Ukraine could not pay their price?
Chernobyl’s “flowing lava” forever caught in the act. The same words the WTC firemen used.
Chernobyl’s once flowing, molten, "Elephant's Foot". The caption reads, “Once molten fuel/debris mixture that dripped down through the floors of the exploded RBMK-1000 reactor at Chernobyl. It was so radioactive and solid, they had to use a rifle to chip a piece of it off.”
Here is video of a tragic chopper crash: “helicopter with crew of military pilots spreading ANTI-RADIATION SOLUTION across the blown-up reactor of Chernobyl nuclear plant.”
Finally, note the photo and text here.
This excellent Chernobyl site says here, “THEY TRIED IN VAIN TO PUT OUT THE FIRE with 2400 tonnes of lead and 1800 tonnes of sand.” Does this sound familiar? I have written on the trucking in and out of dirt that the DEW proponent was kind enough to reveal to help prove the case for the nuclear destruction at the WTC. Mayor Giuliani ordered the trucking in and out of sand the very next morning.
But note the admission that many tons of sand and lead could not put out the radioactive Chernobyl fires! Sound familiar? As I have written the radioactive mini-nuke fragments strewn about in the rubble pile, and more concentrated under WTC1, 2, 7 also released great heat that went on for up to six months-- until all areas were reached, and they were carted away.
Now THESE are real “unextinguishable fires” to use the term the disinfo nuclear physicist, Steven Jones, desperately tries to claim for (“nano-composite”) thermite--which actually stops burning in minutes. I have revealed Jones’ anti-science claims in this regard here.
You might want to read more of the Chernobyl.info site for future reference. Note that it states that out of 800,000 Chernobyl responders (called “liquidators” here), one reference claims 25,000 have already died. How does this translate to the WTC? At the WTC, the number of responders is said to have been 40,000. No exact extrapolation can be done because of so many unknown variables in radiation exposure at the two different event aftermaths. If everything were equivalent, the ratio of numbers indicates 1250 WTC responders would die from their radiation exposure. Curiously as of 2006, there were some 400 rare cancers that are not uncommon results from radiation exposure.
More on the China Syndrome at the WTC here.
Again I state that WTC responder- survivors should reach out to their brother and sister survivors from Hiroshima and Chernobyl. They have much in common.
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Freaky Car Damage
The metal is heavily crumpled, warped and bent, but the paint is unscratched. The driver felt a small "bump" but no major impact. This sure doesn't look like the result of an ordinary collision-- so some people are wondering about a UFO encounter.
New 2nd Hit Videos: They're Making Them Faster and Faster, For Some Reason
I like the "high quality" mode.
Here's another new one-- but they "miss" the plane:
This also has freaking-out/overacting women, like some other videos.
Ah, this video is from Caroline Dries, from an NYU dorm. Dries is now a writer for the TV show "Smallville". More on Dries experience here. She claims to have seen the plane. Their view was fairly constricted of the scene, but it's possible they saw something briefly.
Note, if you go look at the history channel version, there is a good view of the white "elephant" plane, flying to the north, off to the east. Also note the Youtube version of the video is very distorted, with the towers looking much skinnier than they really were.
There's something kind of fakish about this-- they way she pans inside and around the room randomly and then videotapes herself getting socks out of her drawer (we don't see her put them on before she goes in the elevator?). The camera work is very shaky at times but other times more "professional". A few seconds after the tower was hit, one of the girls says there was a plane. They do have a radio or TV on, so not clear if the idea of the plane came from there.
One odd thing about the Badger Heral article-- what on earth was so unique about Dries' experience on 9/11 in the dorm that they wrote an article about her? Wouldn't there be dozens of other students with the same view who also could have videotaped the same thing?
In any case, this History channel interactive map of video views of the WTC is kind of cool.
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Something Big Is Coming?
The article incongruously closes with this bit on the nuclear weapons arms race:
1945 US drops atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
1953 Russia tests its first atomic bomb
1962 US discovers Soviet Union building a nuclear missile base in Cuba. After seven days of intense talks a naval quarantine is placed around Cuba and is only removed once President Khrushchev agrees to dismantle the base
1983 President Reagan launches the Strategic Defensive Initiative – Star Wars. This would allow the US to detect a nuclear weapon being launched and, by using laser technology, give it time to launch its own weapon to destroy the enemy missile
1986 President Gorbachev proposes a 50 per cent reduction in the nuclear arsenals of both sides. The discussions finally dissolve with no agreement reached
2008 US strikes deal with Poland and Czech Republic on Missile Defence Shield. Russia retaliates on day that Barack Obama is elected US President by threatening to station missiles in Kaliningrad, near its border with Poland
Missing from this timeline, of course, is the 2001 nuclear demolition of the WTC complex.
Black Box in Pentagon Punch Out Debris?
Yes, that is absurd. But that doesn't stop these genius scientists from inventing some cockamamie explanation for the official story. Nor do they bother questioning the "coincidence" that "airplane" hit the one part of the Pentagon that had been retrofitted to withstand an airplane crash from terrorists.
Thought of the Day
1) government shills/intel agents
2) the media
3) Bush supporters
5) "Blue Dog" Democrats
6) "War on Terror" cheerleaders
7) 9/11 conspiracy poo-poo-ers
8) conservative bloggers
9) spoiled, complacent, willfully ignorant Americans
Note-- obviously many of these overlap, and this is a non-comprehensive list.
Friday, November 14, 2008
Memories... Misty Water-Colored Memories...1 comments
"The problem with the economy is that it was full of phony money"
Giving some money to irresponsible financial institutions is not going to solve anything-- there is just way too much phony money that needs to be flushed out of the system. A few hundred billion is just a drop in the bucket compared to several trillion dollars in artificial money from the housing bubble and other capitalistic scams that needs to be shed. So of course the "bail-out" is floundering. The great Ponzi scheme is unraveling-- but sadly no one in power wants to call it what it is.
The bigger question, assuming our civilization doesn't completely collapse, is whether we can ever come up with an economic system that is actually reasonably SUSTAINABLE-- and not dependent upon endless puffing up from phony money.
Thursday, November 13, 2008
How Many Articles Have Claimed That Bush Was Going to Attack Iran Before He Left Office?
While these articles often made compelling cases for Bush attacking Iran (or Israel attacking and the US joining in), I have long thought Bush wouldn't do it. And at this point, while Bush has some 60 odd days left in office, an Iran attack doesn't seem likely at all-- given our economically weak state and Bush's historic unpopularity.
So what's the deal with all the people screaming that Bush was going to attack Iran? Was it just a giant distraction? A distraction from, say... the fact that the 9/11 was an inside job and that the WTC was nuked by the US regime?
We Kill, Anywhere, Anytime
(Hmmm, that would make a good "Rage Against the Machine" song)
Navy and Supreme Court Say Fuck You to the Whales0 comments
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Unprosecuted War Criminal Dies at 75
William Doyle, a tough-talking Vietnam War veteran who helped lead a decorated platoon that killed hundreds of unarmed civilians in a case concealed by the Pentagon for decades, died Nov. 6 in Springfield, Mo. He was 75.
Doyle was a team leader on the Army's famous Tiger Force in 1967 when some members began executing women and children in a bloody rampage that lasted seven months.
Creepy Video of the Day
"An animation with Jules, a biologically designed robot. This animation was created to test the limitations of his servos and experiment what he can and cannot do."
(Lots of related creepiness if you go to the Youtube link)
Here's some other technological creepiness: "Neuroimaging Of Brain Shows Who Spoke To A Person And What Was Said". 'Nuff said.
More Expensive to Withdraw Troops Than Keep Them in Iraq?
But this is even more disturbing-- it is pure insanity that the Defense Dept is asking for this much EXTRA money:
Pentagon Wants $450 Billion Increase Over Next Five Years
By Josh Rogin
Pentagon officials have prepared a new estimate for defense spending that is $450 billion more over the next five years than previously announced figures.
The new estimate, which the Pentagon plans to release shortly before President Bush leaves office, would serve as a marker for the new president and is meant to place pressure on him to either drastically increase the size of the defense budget or defend any reluctance to do so, according to several former senior budget officials who are close to the discussions.
Experts note that releasing such documents in the twilight of an administration is a well-worn tactic, and that incoming presidents often disregard such guidance in order to pursue their own priorities.
And with the nation's economy caught up in a global financial meltdown, it remains unclear whether either Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., or a Democratic Congress would support such large increases for defense next year.
"This is a political document," said one former senior budget official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. "It sets up the new administration immediately to have to make a decision of how to deal with the perception that they are either cutting defense or adding to it."
Dov Zakheim, the Pentagon's top budget official from 2001 to 2004, who is not involved in the current discussions, agreed.
"The thinking behind it is pretty straightforward," Zakheim said. "They are setting a baseline for a new administration that then will have to defend cutting it."
The fiscal 2010 portion of the estimate includes a $57 billion increase, out of which $30 billion would go for a vaguely defined contingency fund and $14 billion would go for replacing or fixing existing equipment, called reset, and modernization, the former officials said.
The new estimate, which has not been publicly released, would raise the fiscal 2010 budget number announced by the administration this year from $527 billion to $584 billion, not counting operations costs for the ongoing wars.
Money to prosecute the ongoing wars is not included in the new estimate, meaning the military would still need significant supplemental appropriations in addition to the increased budget request.
Exactly how the Pentagon's new spending estimate will be communicated to Congress or the incoming administration remains unclear.
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
The Trig Palin Conspiracy
Monday, November 10, 2008
Obama Plans to Close Gitmo
Treat DC As a Crime Scene
... if I were president-elect, I would be planning quite an operation on inauguration day. As soon as I was sworn in, I would demand that Robert Mueller submit his resignation. Then I would instruct the FBI to lock down FBI Headquarters, the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency offices, the executive suites at the CIA, the National Security Agency's offices, the National Intelligence Agency's offices, and management's offices at the Department of Justice. I would tell them to put yellow police tape around all of these buildings and offices, and I would treat each as a crime scene. I'd have them preserve evidence from every safe, every email cache, every hard-drive. And then I would prosecute every violation to the fullest extent of the law.Yeah!
My number one priority would be exposing the truth about the anthrax attacks,Yeah!
the White House Iraq Group, and the mass firings of U.S. attorneys in the lead-up to the 2006 midterm elections.Errm, what?
But, I'm a hardass that has no interest in pretending continuity in government is preferable to justice and the rule of law. Obama has a more difficult road. Mueller is appointed to a term that doesn't end until 2010. I think Mueller should be in the docket. The last thing I think is acceptable is to have him continue on as head of the FBI, when I consider it the job of the FBI to investigate and imprison most of Washington's elite Establishment.Well yeah, but there's something rather conspicuous by its absence here.
How can anyone at this point in time have doubts about the anthrax attacks but not doubt the 9/11 story?
CovertOps: Denver Police Had "agents provocateurs" at the Democratic National Convention
...it was discovered that undercover DPD detectives trapped within the crowd on 15th Street staged struggles with uniformed officers in order to be "arrested" and removed. Pendergrass cited the Operations and Procedure Manual, §108.08 (2)(c), which states that "unprofessional police behavior can inflame a tense situation and make control efforts more difficult and dangerous."
Solution to Our Energy Needs: Nukes Planted in Every Neighborhood!
Nuclear power plants smaller than a garden shed and able to power 20,000 homes will be on sale within five years, say scientists at Los Alamos, the US government laboratory which developed the first atomic bomb.Seriously, this is some creepy shit.
Universal Healthcare Now!
Sunday, November 09, 2008
New 2nd Hit Video in Black and White
Angle is similar but not identical to the Jennifer Spell video:
In the B&W video, what is that blinking white light in the smoke? Hard to believe it is simply PAPER, as some might say (Killtown once claimed that a large white floating object in the Spell video was just paper). This object is too bright!
"The Black Stalin"
Friday, November 07, 2008
Now That the Election Is Over, RESET
So-- we need to renew our quest for justice, and a good start would be to continue to spread the word about the nuking of the WTC towers on 9/11.
Thursday, November 06, 2008
Rahm Emanuel as Obama's Chief of Staff: an Inauspicious Start
In terms of deep politics, Emanuel is quite troubling:
RAHM EMANUEL as former senior Clinton White House advisor was reportedly implicated in various illicit dealings with the Red Chinese penetrating U.S. industrial, financial, and military secrets. A dual citizen, Israel/US. he left the U.S. about 1990 to serve in the Israel Defense Forces, the IDF After leaving the Clinton White House, where he served off and on for some six years, Rahm made a sizeable fortune apparently from the secret Red Chinese dealings to get at U.S. secrets, while Rahm Emanuel was a top official of the investment house, Wasserstein, Perella & Co. Rahm is ostensibly an accomplished participant in "political opposition research", a code name for compiling and using blackmail data.
Rahm Emanuel has used a portion of his apparently ill-gotten fortune to buy massive advertising and such, paving the way for him to win, as he did, the Illinois Congressional District previously occupied by defrocked Congressman Rostenkowski, convicted of embezzling sums from the House of Representives private bank. With his dual political loyalty as well, Rahm both supported Clinton publicly while he apparently manipulated him privately using reputed The Mossad controlled sexmate, Monica Lewinsky.
Rahm Emanuel has ostensibly functioned as The Mossad's Deputy Chief for North America. In the past, some of Israeli intelligence's top officials for U.S./Canada, were headquartered in Chicago, operating in part through Bank Leumi.
NOW Can We Stop Worrying About Election Fraud and Vote Count Manipulation?
While the Obama win appears to be pretty "clean", I think the vote really wasn't close enough to manipulate without being too obvious. Further, it seems likely that in this election, the PTB actually wanted Obama to win -- and thus there was no need for manipulation (or to do much obvious manipulation).
Overall, I don't think we can really feel satisfied with our election systems until we get justice for 9/11 and related crimes, and take back the country from the PTB. There's no reason to be complacent while we have these criminals still running around.
Update: there may well have been some funny vote business in Alaska. And other places too-- covered here by Bradblog.
Barack Fucking Hussein Obama!
Certainly as predicted, the right begins their total freak-out.
The great irony is that, apart from Obama's race and Muslim name, he's a freaking centrist Democrat who will have some mild liberal streaks on social issues and economics, but will otherwise continue essentially the same undue expansion of power with a very similar overall foreign policy:
Although I expect the coming régime to provide less fodder for high-kick comedy than the current, I expect it to be a much more interesting study in the operation of the modern executive-imperial American state. The ham-handed execution of executive expansion and foreign imperialism under George Dubya will now yield to subtler application of the same policies and prerogatives.I imagine the death and destruction during an Obama presidency will be less (although I could well be wrong), but I am fairly sure the death and destruction will be more subtle and under more of an international umbrella. But to be sure, the PTB haven't gone anywhere, and they are still as evil as always.
Wednesday, November 05, 2008
44th President-- Barack Hussein Obama
Fucking A. The next four years are going to be crazy.
But certainly Republicans got the spanking they sorely deserved. My long-held feeling has been that Bush would eventually be a disaster for the Republican party. It will be interesting to see if they change in any significant way.
Worth noting that Obama had an extremely powerful ground game, with an awesome get-out-the-vote organization, that I can speak of from direct experience. Many Obama supporters were extremely excited about his campaign, much more so than Kerry in 2004 and Gore in 2000.
No matter what else you might think of Obama, this is huge from a civil rights, human equality perspective. I find it very gratifying that Americans were able to elect an African-American president.
It's particularly worth noting that all the McCain smears completely failed in this election. I'm sure we haven't heard the end of the supposedly evil associations of Obama-- the right will keep pounding on it and hounding Obama with it, the way they did it to Clinton. And my guess is Obama will remain a popular president and will actually be a GOOD president-- a welcome change.
An Obama presidency won't, of course, be the end of deep politics, grand hoaxes, big lies, false-flag attacks and the "powers that be". How he deals with all this, however, will be interesting to watch. It's quite likely that he will pull the same crap as his predecessors did, possibly even he'll be worse. I hope not, but I won't be surprised if some totally suspicious, horrific thing happens in the next four years.
Lastly, an Obama presidency DOESN'T change the facts about 9/11 and the other Bush war-crimes. People should still seek justice for those crimes, in every way they can.
*Funny how that works.
(For some fun with the Obama win, see here.)
Tuesday, November 04, 2008
Obama Does It
It's Hard to Deny That If Obama Wins
Conversely, if by some chance he loses, it will be hard to deny that something terribly fucked happened.
The Initial, Failed Demolition of WTC7
It's crucial to note that a few people specifically reported explosions in WTC7, very early in the day, well before it finally went down:
(From here and here.)
Of course, the media was predicting the collapse of WTC7 for several hours before it finally it went down. CNN's Rose Arce was reporting the imminent collapse of WTC7 as early as 12:22 PM:
Anonymous Physicist has hypothesized that the initial demolition of WTC7 failed due to "fizzled" nukes, and I think that is the best explanation we have for now of what happened to WTC7.
Ground Zero Porn of the Day
Monday, November 03, 2008
Poor Poor Pitiful W
Even for a declared optimist, Bush has appeared remarkably sanguine in this season of discontent. The economy is melting down, his own party has shunned him, and Tuesday's election is shaping up as a searing rebuke to his eight years in office. . . .
"Everybody kind of wanted to spend the last 100-plus days doing some legacy things, and the financial crisis has thrown a wrench into that," said one prominent Republican who regularly talks with senior White House officials.
"You have a combination of no legacy stuff, a horrible economic mess and the likelihood that Obama is going to win," this person added. "There is a real sadness there."
None of this would matter, of course, if not for Bush's deep and abiding unpopularity. Bush has not commanded approval from a majority of the nation since early 2005, making him arguably the most disliked president since polling on the question began in the 1930s. A Washington Post-ABC News tracking poll last week put Bush's approval rating at 24 percent and found that McCain had made little headway in separating himself from Bush or his policies.
It's not for lack of trying. For the first time in recent memory, a sitting president has effectively sat out the presidential race, avoiding public appearances on behalf of McCain and other Republicans and raising far less money than usual in private fundraisers. Bush voted for McCain by absentee ballot rather than voting in person in Texas, as he has for the past three elections, and officials say he plans to spend election night at the White House rather than at a rally or other campaign-related event. . . .
"This is unprecedented for a president to be this invisible during a campaign," said Charlie Cook, editor of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report. "This is what happens when you have a 25 percent approval rating."
Something that should never be forgotten:
George Bush is the person in whom the Right placed its blind faith, the one they glorified and held up as the ultimate standard-bearer of what they believe in. And now he -- and they -- lay in shambles and disgrace. No matter what metric one uses, it's difficult to overstate what a profound failure the Bush presidency is, and everyone -- including Bush -- knows that. The most important aspect of this Tuesday's election is to finalize their humiliating repudiation and to bury them for what they've done.
If these guys won't be prosecuted for war-crimes, humiliation is the LEAST we can do.
Hopefully, as they sit humiliated, they can contemplate the monstrosity of what they did to Iraq and its people.
Coming Soon? Possible Re-run of the Very Best TV Fakery of All Time!
Here we learn that private companies are vying for a $20 million prize to send a rover to the Moon by 2010. A leading candidate to take the prize is said to be a team from the Carnegie Mellon University's Robotics Institute in Pittsburgh. David Gump, President of Reston, Va. (near Langley) based Transformational Space Corp. is an “advisor” to the Carnegie Mellon team. The prize is called the CIA… er… I mean Google Lunar X Prize.
But let’s see who Gump’s company, Transformational Space Corp., appointed as CEO two years ago. It is Charles Duelfer. He was until 2005, “Director of Central Intelligence [CIA] for Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction.” I guess he flunked attempts to plant nukes in Iraq, after trying from 2001-2005. Now is he going to fake Moon landings and "rovers?" Will they “dust off” the same old TV studio where the Apollo “Landings” were shot? Or will it be all CGI this time? Other articles say that their rover will take extra care not to trample on Apollo 11 astroNOTS Armstrong’s and Aldrin’s “lunar foorprints.” As a physicist, I wouldn’t anticipate any problems with avoiding those “footprints.” But who knows, that old TV studio could get crowded. Wouldn’t it be a pity if the new private rover fell onto Armstrong’s “lunar footprints”? Why I guess that would silence those who claim Apollo was a Hoax. Not.
So we may soon see a return to those glorious days of TV Fakery. They just don’t do it well today-- 9/11-- like they did in the old days. Oh, the nostalgia! Will we, in a mere two years, hear a paraphrasing of those famous words, “That’s one small rover for man, one giant rover for mankind.” Or lies to that effect. Stay tuned to a TV near you!
Sunday, November 02, 2008
If the WTC Nuclear Destruction Had the China Syndrome Aftermath, Why Didn’t Hiroshima?
The extensive evidence that the World Trade Center area “suffered” from great heat in the rubble pile and beneath the towers, from heat generated by the China Syndrome is here. But if my nuclear fission hypothesis for the destruction of the WTC is correct, why didn’t the fission bomb that destroyed Hiroshima have a known China Syndrome there?
The reason is that there are numerous differences between the two events. My “many nukes” hypothesis for WTC destruction contains the concepts of redundant nukes, fratricided and fizzled nukes. Please read the above archived articles to understand just what attempting to explode many small nukes in the enclosed buildings entails, and even my hypothesis that the early explosions in WTC7 likely were fizzled micro-nukes. Now for some specific, relevant differences. Hiroshima was just one fission nuclear bomb, not many as with the WTC. Redundant, fratricided and fizzled nukes are not relevant to the events of Hiroshima, unlike the WTC. Finally, Hiroshima did not have a China Syndrome Aftermath because the A-bomb went off at an altitude of about 1800 feet, and IN OPEN AIR-- NOT IN THE CENTERS OF BUILDINGS NOR THEIR BASEMENTS.
The Hiroshima nuke was, of course, much larger than the sum of the numerous micro-nukes employed to destroy the WTC. As I have detailed, a fission nuke uses up only some 1-6% of its fissile material in its chain reactions before the remainder is blown apart from the heat and pressure resulting from the chain reactions. The 80 generations of fission chain reaction take but a total of one microsecond before the bomb’s contents themselves are blown apart. In the open air, much of the micro-fragments of the remainder 94-99% of the fissile material (Uranium-235) were in the fireball, and much of this rose further with the fireball. But these heavy Uranium atoms fell back down. Some dispersed into the upper atmosphere, and would come down around the world. (Note that no Gov’t has released atmospheric radiation data in the days after 9/11/01--this is perhaps both telling [of the worldwide collusion of regimes] and sad.) At Hiroshima, they came down in notorious fashion. Much of the remaining Uranium fissioning atoms came down 30 minutes later in the so-called “Black Rain.” Many more people may have died because they suffered desperate thirst from their dehydrated condition in part from damaged, melted, hanging skin; and they drank the black rain, as there no longer was running water. They thus ingested radioactive particles. (The worst thing they could have done.)
There was no known China Syndrome Aftermath at Hiroshima because the Uranium atoms came down over a widely dispersed area; and thus were not concentrated enough to have heat generating effect in any known areas. Note that I have detailed that at Hiroshima, radiation levels on the ground were low enough so that American troops were there performing various tasks within a few days. At the WTC, the micro-nukes (emplaced in the centers) were chosen small enough so as to not vaporize the outer structure (and give the Op-Plan away). So as the micro-nukes were going off at each level and in the sub-basement area, the outer structure was still extant for the most part. Also there was no fireball under these conditions that rose to 15,000 feet or so. Just as there were no fireballs seen in all the underground nuclear tests. And there was no rain for several days. The heavy Uranium atoms and fragments, if in the dust, would have come down first, with all the many lighter elements coming down on top of them soon thereafter. This effect may even have provided some radiation shielding. Much of the rubble pile was indeed hot, and led to such phenomena as melted firemen’s and dog’s boots; and the need to hose down the rubble pile for many weeks and months, with countless photos showing the steam emanation that resulted. Fratricided or fizzled nukes and the more totally enclosed sub-basement effect would have left more concentrated fission fragments in some areas and in the former basements. These would later give rise to massive temperatures and molten metal weeks and months later, as detailed in the above-cited archived articles.
Indeed, I would assert that the floors that were chosen for the initial explosions, (the “official,” but CGI “plane hit” floors), were chosen precisely because they still provided enough height and building material so that the first nukes going off at their top-most level would not vaporize through to the top! That could have allowed a visible rising fireball that had to be avoided. In other words, if the first nuke, in the top-down demolition, occurred at or near the top floor, it could have vaporized through to the outside air and a visible fireball could have then ensued. So the floors for the “plane hit” explosions were carefully chosen to coincide with the placement of the initial nukes to go off. This logic also dictates that if there were no planes, it is also highly unlikely that missiles hit the towers either. Anything hitting the towers could have jeopardized both the smaller shape charges to go off-- and create the so-called plane-shaped holes; and also if the wrong floor were hit, it could have interfered with the planned start of the top-down nuclear demolition, although some redundancy was probably built in.
But we should also never forget at least one similarity between Hiroshima and the WTC. Just as many people close to the Hiroshima hypocenter were vaporized, over 1100 human beings in the WTC towers were so vaporized that no intact strands of DNA could be used for identification. But fortunately there was one major difference in the aftermath, there was no widely dispersed, radioactive “black rain” to ingest or have fall upon people. The people of Japan have never forgotten their “black rain,” nor their Hiroshima that was perpetrated by the same regime, primarily against innocent women, children and old men (despite the American propaganda efforts to imply otherwise). Likewise it must be the task for Americans to learn what this same regime did to the innocent human beings in the World Trade Center and the 40,000 responders, and the many nearby Metro New York residents and workers.
The terms Hiroshima and World Trade Center need to become synonymous. And the world needs to come together to counter this same monstrous regime before it kills all or most of humanity!