Humint Events Online: July 2009

Thursday, July 30, 2009

FBI Claims 95% of Shredded and Buried UA93 Recovered Less Than Two Weeks After 9/11

September 24, 2001 Posted: 3:14 PM EDT (1914 GMT)

SHANKSVILLE, Pennsylvania (CNN) -- The FBI announced Monday that its investigation of the site where a hijacked jet slammed into a field here is complete and that 95 percent of the plane was recovered.

The federal investigation into the September 11 terrorist attacks continues.

Evidence-gathering was halted Saturday afternoon and the pieces of United Airlines Flight 93 that had been recovered were turned over Sunday to the airline, with the exception of the flight data recorder and the voice recorder, which are being held and analyzed by the FBI, according to FBI agent Bill Crowley.

Crowley said the biggest piece of the plane that was recovered was a 6-by-7-foot piece of the fuselage skin, including about four windows. The heaviest piece, Crowley said, was part of an engine fan, weighing about 1,000 pounds.
This is really, really hard to believe, given the official story that much of the plane was buried deep underground and small pieces of the plane were found for acres around the official crash site. In fact, it sounds like total baloney. Keep in mind, that they are not only saying that they recovered 95% of the debris in less than two weeks, but that they managed to reconstruct the plane with these thousands of tiny pieces of debris enough to know that they got 95%!!!

I call bullshit.

Via KT.
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Six Centrist Senators Destroying Real Health Care Reform

Evil fucks.

Note-- 3 Dems, 3 Repugs


PTB screwing the people again.
Bookmark and Share

The Fed: A Never-Ending Rip-Off Conducted in Secrecy

Eliot Spitzer: Federal Reserve is ‘a Ponzi scheme, an inside job’:
The Federal Reserve — the quasi-autonomous body that controls the US’s money supply — is a “Ponzi scheme” that created “bubble after bubble” in the US economy and needs to be held accountable for its actions, says Eliot Spitzer, the former governor and attorney-general of New York.
The war being waged on the TARP watchdog's independence:
Neil Barofsky, the chief watchdog over the $700 billion TARP bank bailout program, is one of those rare creatures in Washington: he takes very seriously his responsibilities of independent oversight and accountability. (snip) But ever since he was appointed to head the oversight office created by Congress when it enacted TARP -- an office designed to ensure transparency and accountability at the Treasury Department and in the banking industry -- he has repeatedly clashed with Obama's Treasury officials over their lack of transparency in how the trillions of dollars in TARP-related funds are being sent to and used by the banking industry. (snip) Last week, he issued a report documenting that the actual amount of taxpayer money theoretically put at risk in the bank bailout -- once Federal Reserve, FDIC and other programs are counted -- is $23.7 trillion, not the widely cited figure of $700 billion, a report that prompted attacks from the White House and Treasury on his credibility. Separately, Barofsky has continuously disputed White House claims that it's impossible to account for what has been done by banks with the TARP funds. (snip)

Most significant of all, and obviously due to Barofsky's truly independent oversight efforts, the Obama administration is now attempting to induce the Justice Department to issue a ruling that Barofsky's office is not independent at all -- but rather, is subject to, and under the supervision of, the authority of Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner. By design, such a ruling would completely gut Barofsky's ability to compel transparency and exercise real oversight over how Treasury is administering TARP, since it would make him subordinate to one of the very officials whose actions Congress wanted him to oversee: the Treasury Secretary's.
Bookmark and Share

Update on the Michael Jackson Assassination: The Curious Case of Conrad Murray, M.D.

by The Anonymous Physicist

Previously, I highlighted how a Canadian reporter, well published in the newspapers of London (MI5 control), had predicted to within a day, that MJ would be dead six months later. And I predicted that his claim that MJ was a total invalid with several disabling lung diseases was bogus. I was soon proven right about the bogus lung diseases by video of MJ’s dancing, 2 weeks before his death.

Now if MJ died of a drug overdose, it would be easy to place the whole blame on him as a druggie. Or to claim that it was due to an accident. But I assert that that reporter, Ian Halperin, has given the MI5/6 Op away with his claim, that attained the A.P. key of absurdity or impossibility. His knowing that MJ would be dead exactly 6 months later (with the one day off, thrown in so as not to be clear that he was told the date), and his ludicrous, bogus claim of MJ having several, severe lung diseases, highlight the absurdity and the foreknowledge, only the murderers would have known.

It appears that MJ’s private, live-in physician, (at a claimed $150,000 per month, paid by the London group that was allegedly to bring the 50 year-old MJ to London for the 50 gigs), Conrad Murray, M.D., has played a prominent role in MJ’s death as noted here. This contains strong indications of possible, deliberate murder. Although great negligence may be substituted/claimed at any upcoming trial. Let us examine the TMZ piece. It has classic indications of malice aforethought. During the “event”, Dr. Murray allegedly left MJ alone after allegedly administering the precarious IV of Propofol. Apparently he didn’t want to see what would be happening to MJ. Then he may have made sure MJ was irretrievably gone, and didn't come back to him, until such time as it would be certain he was hopelessly dead. Then he puts on an act, and attains absurdity [the A.P. key] by working on him in the ER, long after MJ was irretrievably dead. Indeed, from earlier reports, EMTs reportedly wanted to declare MJ already dead upon their arrival at MJ’s residence. Earlier reports were that Dr. Murray did not call for an ambulance until after working on MJ for half an hour. Of course, I highlighted that the PTBs beloved “33” was the 9/11 dispatcher’s number.

Now there is this claim that MJ was already dead for 2 hours, unattended by Murray, while dying from an apparent OD of, or other fatal reaction to, Propofol. Of course, if this was murder, the actual agent used, could have well been something else that we may never know about, if the intel agencies are involved here, as I assert they are.

Let us look more closely into Murray now. Curiously Wikipedia/(CIA) still does not have a bio on Murray, even though millions would likely want to view it! Murray's attorney has a bio on him, which should be taken with a grain of salt. It proclaims: "Dr. Conrad Murray was born in St. Andrews, Grenada... At age seven he moved to Trinidad & Tobago to join his mother and stepfather. He later became a citizen and completed his primary schooling under the British education system...When he was 19 years old he bought his first home. The proceeds of its sale later funded his education in the United States... In 1992, he completed his internship and residency at Loma Linda University Medical Center [LLUMC], in Loma Linda, CA." This bio details his extensive training in cardiology, but does not address that he was not board certified in cardiology, according to all the other sources. Strikingly, Murray’s lawyer’s site proudly proclaims Murray as a Freemason “for three years” with this photo!

Now the LLUMC is part of Loma Linda University in Loma Linda, California, and is under the auspices of the Seventh-day Adventist religious organization. The Seventh-day Adventist Church proclaims that it has 5666 primary schools around the world. The LLUMC is undergoing a "seismic upgrade project" headed by Turner Construction Company of New York, NY. The latter--a "construction management company"--was deeply involved in the World Trade Center clean-up/([nuclear] cover-up.)

Now hypothetically, what if Dr. Murray is an asset of British intel, or of some secret society ultimately out of Rome? Can we guess what may be the ultimate outcome of this? Usually the PTB let their assassins go scot-free. But not necessarily if there is great public light on an event, as is the case here. What then? They have several options. Murray may have an “accident” any time now. There may be a show trial on negligent homicide or such; and a jail term along with a dearth of interviews, à la Noriega, Sirhan Sirhan, etc.

Several California medical examiner’s offices, I have already pointed out, have a notorious history of being subverted by the American Federal, Gestapo, intel agencies. This occurred in the assassinations of Robert Kennedy and Marilyn Monroe (and I am sure numerous others.) And this I have said may be why the Jackson family did their own autopsy. But that family, I have pointed out, from the book of a sex slave, may have been totally controlled by intel during the entire lifetime of MJ; with the father likely giving over his son(s) for torture and rape in exchange for fame and fortune. It is important to understand that the fame and fortune aspect does not negate the victim from still being--FOREVER MORE--nothing but a slave/sex slave, till the moment of death.

All of Jackson’s alleged drug seeking may have been an intel legend for his upcoming demise at the hands of the intel agencies. This would be like Lee Harvey Oswald’s created legend as a “Comma-nist” [I prefer LBJ’s pronunciation] sympathizer, defector, un-defector, patsy, etc. I have detailed what may have been the first claim that LHO was also a likely early sex slave/courier, and may have been tortured and raped at an early age. So just as LHO had orders to parade around as a “Marxist-Leninist” for his later denouncement as a “lone nut Communist” assassin to jump start the Cold War--that Kennedy was ending--and to have the massive build-up of nukes and ICBMs, for ulterior purposes that I have elsewhere revealed, MJ’s legend was his allegedly begging for many drugs. This legend includes his allegedly seeking the drug that would officially kill him.

So we may soon see Dr. Murray proclaiming (assuming he does not suffer an “accident”) that he was “star struck,” and “just” did what MJ requested. Curiously this happens just as American TV commences a weekly show on “concierge doctors.” Also curious is the show’s title, “Royal Pains” on the USA network. But the TMZ piece above, if true, indicates possible, deliberate action to ensure MJ would die, and could not be resuscitated. And all Murray’s efforts to do so seem to have been initiated AFTER this was no longer possible--attaining the level of absurdity. And again remember, if intel is involved, others may even have been in the MJ residence assisting; and that the Medical Examiner’s office will be totally subverted by the Gestapo agencies. So the MSM and the Court proceedings will likely conclude MJ died of a drug overdose based on his own addictions, and only negligence on the part of Murray is involved. But some of us will know better.

Note that malfeasance on the part of the police or medical examiner’s office may already have occurred! Recall the fact that investigators had to go back one or more times, for things they missed the first time! This is a serious admission, and a serious “error” in investigative technique. While they are claiming that they found drugs and paraphanalia, etc., on subsequent visits, my above logic indicates that the case may already have been subverted by intel agencies, early on--and all sorts of things may have been allowed to be removed!

The only real question from my POV, is just what was MJ trying to reveal to the world that made the PTB decide to poison, and do away with him? Was it any crucial Ultimate Truths as Mozart, Beethoven, and even myself, were trying to reveal to the world? As depicted here. Or was MJ trying to inform the world of his own sex slavery, given over, by his father, to American Intel filth for rape and torture as a child?
Bookmark and Share

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Rex84: End-Times Goodies

The U.S. government, under a program called REX 84, runs approximately 3,708 detention camps nationwide. They are all fully operational and ready to receive prisoners should the US government institute martial law.

The Rex 84 Program was initially established as a way to deal with a mass exodus of illegal aliens crossing the Mexican/US border. They would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons.

Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program is initiated for its proper purpose. Garden Plot is the program to control the population. Cable Splicer is the program for an orderly takeover of the state and local governments by the federal government. FEMA is the executive arm of the coming police state and thus will head up all operations. The Presidential Executive Orders already listed on the Federal Register also are part of the legal framework for this operation.

The camps all have railroad facilities as well as roads leading to and from the detention facilities. Many also have an airport nearby. The majority of the camps can house a population of 20,000 prisoners. Currently, the largest of these facilities is just outside of Fairbanks, Alaska. The Alaskan facility is a massive mental health facility and can hold approximately 2 million people.

FEMA USA Concentration Camp Locations:

Rex84 = Readiness Exercise 84

More on the FEMA trains here.

(thanks to J for the links)
Bookmark and Share

Richard B. Cheney: Rockingest VP EVER!

Vice-President Cheney advocated in 2002 for the Bush administration to send military troops to Buffalo to arrest the so-called Lackawanna Six as enemy combatants.

This would have violated both Fourth Amendment guarantees against search and seizure without probable cause and the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which makes it illegal to use the military for law enforcement.

Despite those prohibitions, Cheney argued that the president did have the power to use the military on US soil, citing an October 23, 2001 Justice Department memorandum co-authored by John Yoo which claimed that presidential power extended to the domestic use of the military as long as it served a national security purpose.

What a man, what a MAN!!! Swinging his big dick all over the US like a massive protective saber, saving us all from harm from those dark, scary mooslims!!
Bookmark and Share

Saturday, July 25, 2009

Deep Thought of the Day

Sadly, anything that can be used to help people-- be it a type of food, a drug or treatment, an invention, a technology, a policy, a form of entertainment (even music) -- can also be used for harmful and/or destructive purposes.

The PTB seem to have mastered taking good things, and turning them into destructive things.
Bookmark and Share

Friday, July 24, 2009

Time to Claim Independence from Our Evil Overlords

Good piece here-- meshes with APs ultimate truths pretty well.
Bookmark and Share

Question of the Day

Has the mainstream media choked on their own vomit yet?
Bookmark and Share

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Were Delta 89 and Delta 1989 Part of the 9/11 Hijacking Drill?

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

More on the LROC Lunar Landing "Proof"

AP discussed the recently released LROC photos here.

But this photo deserves further examination--

There are potential anomalies with the LM size and shadow, but I want to focus on the "footprints". There are a couple of problems here noted by AP. First has to do with the size, and the second has to do no obvious return track-- assuming the parallel track is not the return.

Using the scale bar, we can measure the footprint track. One of the footprint lines corresponds to 2 meters wide-- or over 6 feet-- on average.

CLEARLY, a 6 foot wide track cannot correspond to one person's footprints. One the other hand, this 6 foot wide track is unlikely to be made by two astronauts walking side-by-side, as they would have had to stay very close, next to each other, for the whole walk of over 100 meters-- and they would have had to shuffle their feet the whole way (in contradiction to the low gravity on the moon), and do so in a way to disturb the dust to make a larger 6 foot wide track! Clearly this is an absurdity!

So these footprints are clearly, blatantly bogus.

But beyond the size, there is the matter of the two tracks. The second track HAS to be a return track, but this makes little sense. WHY would the astronaut/s walk-- in a completely new and exciting environment walk almost perfectly parallel to their outgoing tracks, no more than 20 feet away? Wouldn't they want to check out NEW areas on the moon and take a much different return track? Were they afraid of getting lost just a few hundred feet from their LM? It's completely nonsensical and more evidence of poorly thought-out fakery.
Bookmark and Share

Outrage Fatigue Watch

Clearly the financial system is rigged and the US taxpayers are getting ripped off massively by Goldman Sachs and their ilk.

But for some reason I don't understand, I am really having trouble getting suitably outraged over this.

And I really can't muster any feelings about Obama's birth, in contrast to others, when there are so many far worse scams and conspiracies.
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Corruption Watch

This email posted at TPM pretty much summarizes my thoughts:
Just to mention something that is obvious, but hopefully not overlooked, i.e., if this country cannot pass a bill which insures that every citizen has access to medical care, which every developed country has managed to do (and got done many many years ago), there is something very fundamentally and structurally wrong with this country.

Such an event, in my mind, would confirm that we live with a completely corrupt and dysfunctional form of government. Forty nine states, each with bicameral legislative bodies, some of which have distinguished themselves recently with unabashed levels of incompetency and cluelessness. Then, graft a federal government over that, which is also bicameral, the non-representative portion of it being filled with officials who are certifiable morons and/or who are bought and sold like whores by wealthy contributors.

Talk about a Waterloo.

This is a defining moment in our history. Do we fulfill our supposed status as a "shining city on a hill" or continue our long slow decline into a second rate oligarchy?
I think it is obvious we live with a "completely corrupt and dysfunctional form of government, but I guess you always have to hope things will get better.
Bookmark and Share

Monday, July 20, 2009

If Piece of Shit Spook Gerald Posner Is Involved, We Can Be Sure Michael Jackson Was Murdered

Bookmark and Share

The Latest NASA/Apollo Hoax--LROC is a CROC

by The Anonymous Physicist

The following fakery was totally expected. Indeed, the only thing surprising is that it took NASA so long to trot this out. To “celebrate” the 40th anniversary of Man not walking on the Moon for the first time, NASA has released photos purporting to show Lunar Module descent stages, scientific apparatus and (wink) even footprints from 5 of the 6 Apollo “Lunar landings.”

These are allegedly from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) launched last month. I will now point out the latest fakery. This purports to show Apollo14’s descent engine, its scientific package, and a long trail of footprints.

Note the Lunar Module is an obvious insertion of a square object, whose sharp borders you can see give away this insertion. Then note how its shadow does not come from the entirety of the inserted object. That is, the top part is NOT casting a shadow to the right of it. Then the scientific package either has no shadow, or the dark stuff seen does not emanate from it. Then we come to those lovely footprints. First see how they appear continuous when they shouldn’t be-- what with that 1/6th g on the Moon, the astroNOTs would have been making those leaps and bounds. Then realize the width of their feet is only 3-4 inches or so--well beyond the resolution limit of this camera as we can tell from what is in these photos. No such trail would be visible due to these limitations. (Remember I have described how covert operators often slip up by trying too hard, and end up showing impossibilities or absurdities.) Note I also cannot see this alleged trail going back to the LM. How’d they skip ahead?

The Apollo 11 photo has the descent engine having too long a shadow based on other shadows in craters. And some craters do not show any shadow.

Likewise the Apollo 15 photo has numerous craters without any shadow, especially in the bright regions to the right of the alleged LM. (Being bright does not negate needing to show a shadow-- indeed against the brighter stuff, the shadows should have been even MORE noticeable. Not showing shadows only indicates that these bright regions were doctored. One can only wonder what may have really been in these regions?)

The Apollo 16 photo also has far too long a shadow going past the far end of the large, nearby crater. Some craters again do not show any shadow, and the large crater near the left top seems to show a shadow and no crater.

The Apollo 17 photo
also has some craters with no shadow.

There are many other indications of fakery and doctoring that I can see, but this will suffice for now. So after having 40 years of planning to remastermind such photos, the regime comes up with this “one small step” for photo alteration, “one giant leap” for poppycock. I was the first to spell out the reason for the whole Apollo Hoax, in that the Quarantine does not allow Man to leave low Earth orbit. Others, including Tsarion, incorrectly stated that the Moon is where the Quarantine is at. It is not; low Earth orbit, is the limitation for Man that is imposed upon us due to our DNA having some from the monsters who created us. Indeed in one of my recent books, “Quarantine: Mankind Held Hostage: The Ultimate Truth of Hiroshima, 9/11 & Man’s History” I detailed that one of the reasons Man was created was to act as a Guinea Pig in Quarantine-escape, or Quarantine-testing events.

In remembering the Apollo Hoax, on the upcoming 40th “non-iversary”, we should never lose sight of the fact that the American Gestapo regime enforced the Apollo Hoax on the remaining AstroNOTs (and the rest of Humanity) by burning alive the three men they trapped in Apollo 1-- Grissom, White and Chaffee. Grissom, in particular, apparently could never be bought or controlled, and would never have stood for faking the whole thing. The others got the message. So on July 20, let us celebrate the lives of these brave men who apparently would not go along with the Apollo Hoax. Their own gutless colleagues, in going along with the Apollo Hoax-- mock their existence-- but we should not.

(Note, the wiki page "Apollo Moon landing hoax conspiracy theories" has these LROC photos prominently displayed-- Spooked)
Bookmark and Share

Saturday, July 18, 2009


This is too funny:

Maybe for 9/11, they just took out the little caption saying "animation".

AP adds:
This CBS broadcast again shows the magnitude of the audio fakery. Due to the speed of light limitation on the 2-way communications with the Earth, some 3 seconds are missing between an AstroNOT speaking and his hearing the beginning of the Houston chap's reply. We can hear bogus, instantaneous, "live" communications instead. Indicating it was all created in a stage here on Earth. An interesting aside, is that even if the two people--Cronkite and Schirra--did not know that the whole Apollo Program was a hoax till then, they would likely have known about the lack of a delay to the speed of light limitation that they were not hearing. Thus these two are pretty good actors! This is well known about Cronkite. His notorious 1988 PBS NOVA TV show on the Kennedy Assassination is an example. Several of the interviewed doctors later stated that the show's depicting them saying JFK's body showed only evidence of shots fired from the rear were manipulated, and part of what they said was excised. The show pretended that out of 19 medical examiners, only Cyril Wecht said the fatal head shot was obviously fired from the front. As Cronkite did the interviews, he must have known of the lies and distortions NOVA released to the public. He was the most DIShonest man in America.

Then I have commented on the flimsy joke of a landing craft. It's balance was so poor, that if an AstroNOT moved or coughed the whole thing would have irretreviably been thrown off kilter. One proof of this is Armstrong's ejecting from NASA's similar, simulating craft, the Lunar Landing Research Vehicle (LLRV), just seconds after trying to fly it. To this day, NASA has been unable to successfully create a stable form of such craft. But, if in 1969, NASA's AstroNOTs could not fly such a simlar craft for more than a few seconds without crashing it, how could they have successfully created a similar craft that flew far longer (in time and space) and with two people on board to cause instabilities?
Bookmark and Share

9/11 Researcher Recidivism: 2nd Hit Videos Are Real?

Strangely, several 9/11 no-plane proponents seem to be recanting on part or much of the no-plane thesis. In particular, high-profile no-planers Genghis (genghis6169), DJ Shure (Pumpitout/Jeff Hill) and Rasga Saias have apparently changed their mind about the 2nd hit videos, and now these people seem to think the videos are real, and some kind of plane hit the tower. There also seems to be some support for the hologram theory, as well.

This is best I can tell from their recent statements, anyway. Genghis, in particular, freaked out on me for suggesting the ghostplane (Hezarkhani) video was fake. Shure has been pushing the idea that Carmen Taylor and Jennifer Spell are honest and that they really took shots of a plane. Rasga Saias has curiously retracted some good work of his showing video fakery (the puffball contradiction) and is now pushing the idea that a plane hit the tower (in email exchanges). Why they have made this switch, I can't say for sure. Nor can I figure exactly what they are thinking regarding 9/11.

The best I can figure is this latest trend is a pre-planned op to destroy the no-plane theory. Nico Haupt's behavior in the past two years or so and Webfairy's general silliness have not helped either. Of course, there has been the endless, nonsensical infighting among the "no-planers" about how much of the videos were CGI. I tend to think, similar to Ace Baker, that the plane was CGI and the rest was real. But I am open to more extensive animation-- though I haven't seen really convincing proof of this.

What bugs me no end is people who don't communicate clearly what they are promoting-- or they promote clearly weak shit-- and then they get outraged at you for not understanding or believing their theory. Again, this is probably part of the psy-op.

I try to make my views on 9/11 pretty clear. If I change my mind, or if I have made a mistake, I try to post it here on this blog. I still think the evidence for video fakery is overwhelming. Having Carmen Taylor go on the Pumpitout forum and answering questions and appearing to be a folksy real person from Arkansas, hasn't changed my mind.
Bookmark and Share

Zero Interaction Physics or Zero Crash Physics

by The Anonymous Physicist

In looking over some of the CGI videos of the second tower hit, I realized that perhaps no one before has summarized some matters of what is and isn’t on these CGI videos. And that this summary is also a good, accurate catch phrase for the 9/11 truth community.

Now many have stated that the videos of the “second hit” show impossible crash physics. In a sense this is very true. But that summary may beg the issue. After all what do we have on these CGI videos? I suggest we focus now on the tower. I assert that we have NO INTERACTION PHYSICS or NO CRASH PHYSICS!

In the first few “plane entering tower” frames of the videos, what some have called “melding” occurs. That is the front part of the plane appears to DISAPPEAR into the tower--without ANY interaction of the tower. Very importantly, I could state this better WITHOUT THE WORD “INTO,” as I assert this CGI video just has the plane image sequentially disappear, and not “into” anything! Now one video, the Spiegel [German TV] video has a close-up view from the side. It purports to show a flash at the surface of the tower just before the plane “enters.” This led to the hangout/distraction of pods and missiles fired. Then the Hezarkhani video of the frontal view shows--in the first frames--the “melding” or disappearing of the front of the plane, along with first a white puff or two, and later frames have gray puffs.

But the curious thing is two-fold.

1. First all these puffs appear to be at the surface of the tower.

2. Nothing is shown to happen to the tower, at least while the front half of the plane is “entering.”

Thus all these puffs appear to be painted onto the tower’s surface. This includes the alleged “missile fired from pod” bright orange puffball (seen from the side), and the white and then gray puffballs seen from the front. All the puffballs do not have any accompanying tower damage at all. No tower damage can be seen until much later in these GCI videos. They contain zero interaction physics or zero crash physics. Both the above side and front videos merely have puffballs painted on to the surface of the tower--until after about half the plane or more has “entered.” The side view has only the initial orange puffball. It’s either pretending to be a pre-entry puffball, or the initial contact moment. Then there are no other puffballs until much of the plane has “entered.” And no interaction physics as well.

Now the tower CANNOT have waited to display interaction physics-- pieces breaking off, or bending, some going inward some possibly even breaking off and falling out and such-- or crash physics. In the real world, it would be there from the instant the tip of the nosecone hit the tower. And puffballs painted onto the surface of the tower do not constitute interaction physics. I have also written that from the moment of a real plane hitting the 4 inch steel of the tower, a shockwave would have traveled down the plane at 5000 mph and would have deformed the back of the plane almost instantaneously or caused it to break off. So the plane also shows zero interaction physics or zero crash physics.

So no attempt to show the interaction of the plane and tower was employed in the CGI software used to create the second hit “videos.” Simplistic puffballs were painted on to the SURFACE of the tower. And at least for the first half of the ”second plane” disappearing into the tower, there is zero interaction physics or zero crash physics, not merely impossible crash physics.

Now a method used in the analysis of the Zapruder film of the Kennedy Assassination might be useful here. Except of course, it may not be needed, or work here. Why? Because the Zapruder film versions that we are allowed to see, at least had their origin in a real film, whereas the WTC/9/11 “second hit videos” appear to be entirely CGI. Now all real JFK researchers know that the Zapruder film versions that we are allowed to see have been massively doctored. There are many missing frames, and altered frames, and a moving background is added in, when the limousine was brought to a halt, and much else. I have seen some 15 versions or more--none of which is accurate based on eyewitness testimony. But some Z-frames are relevant here.

Frame 313 is the fatal head shot frame; and you can even see the end of the gun of the shooter/driver, SS [Secret Service] agent, William Greer, as the it goes past the curvature of the head of S.S. agent Kellerman. The side flap, the back of the head, and the spray coming off the head of Kennedy have been analyzed, and are predominantly bogus. Here are frames 321 , and 335 to make this clear. Now the side flap is known to be painted in because of both analysis and the eyewitness accounts from the Parkland Hospital doctors and Bethesda autopsy viewers. But my main point here is that some of these frames show an intact back of Kennedy’s head when numerous witnesses, again at Parkland and Bethesda, have stated that a good portion of the back of his skull was missing. And dot density analysis was used to verify this. That is, Kennedy’s brown hair was found, in these painted in frames, to be far more black than anything else in the frames that really was black. The black dot density [black dots per square millimeter] of JFK’s back of head far superseded anything in the frames that really was black.

Some type of similar analysis of the various puffballs could be attempted by the experts in this regard. Of course, this discussion indicates it isn’t even necessary as there is zero interaction physics or zero crash physics of the tower and the plane for at least the first half of the plane “entering” the tower. And we are apparently dealing with total CGI here. Adding on puffballs of differing colors to the SURFACE of the tower does not afford interaction physics or crash physics at all! That is the tower remains PRISTINE for far too long a time.

While some could analyze all these painted on surface puffballs, the terms zero interaction physics or zero crash physics should be employed by actual 9/11 truthers, as it may be stronger, more relevant and more understandable than saying impossible crash physics. And it should also be proclaimed that the tower on these fake CGI videos remains PRISTINE for far too long a time to remind people we are dealing with the same monsters that should have been eradicated when they killed President Kennedy, and invented the pristine bullet. It too claimed to be pristine and show no interaction despite the claim that it hit some five bones in two people.

And BTW, for those who still doubt that no planes hit the towers on 9/11, consider the following. You can be sure that the perpetrators-- the Regime’s military and intel agencies-- took many videos of what they were doing (for various reasons). Likely they took videos from their helicopters and planes flying nearby or overhead, from satellites, and from intel assets in nearby buildings, and on the ground. If ANY of them showed real planes, and real interaction physics, they would have released these by now. This, together with how numerous people have done fine work for over five years now documenting that all the released videos are bogus CGI, cements the case.

I should include that I have no doubt that the regime could have put better CGI on TV. See for example, the 1997 movie “Contact.” When the first huge worm-hole device is destroyed, one piece of it is exploded, and falls onto the rest of it. There is much INSTANTANEOUS interaction physics simulated, and it looks pretty real-- even though the structure is quite elaborate, and entirely CGI. Now the regime, some four years later, and with likely vastly superior CGI capability at its intel agencies, could have put plane hit videos, on TV, that contained some, or much, interaction physics, but chose not to.

This has traditionally been the case with their most dastardly deeds. With the Kennedy Assassination, the Pearl Harbor set-up, Gulf of Tonkin non-incident, the Apollo Hoax, and other events, either at the time they happened, or some time thereafter, everything the Gov’t says is a lie, and often a physical impossibility-- and this is clear to the intelligentsia. Those who can think and change can see this. But most people cannot easily think and change; and that difficulty is created and enforced by the Govt, the media, education, religion, etc. I saw Spooked recently put up an acronym for this-- MITOP: Made It Transparent On Purpose.

It agrees with what I have written. From the beginning, I have cited everything from the jet’s wings blinking in and out of existence, to the words of videographer, Evan Fairbanks, when he got his video from the FBI and saw that the jet/tower interaction looked like “bad special effects,” to Larry Silverstein’s “pull it” WTC7 quote, that the PTB were telling the intelligentsia that the regime itself were the perpetrators. MITOP is meant to instill fear, helplessness, depression, schizoid behavior, and ultimately paralysis in those who can think and change, so as to try to stop them from ACTING on what they have realized. The way to counter this is to ACT.

For now please consider using these new terms for what is claimed during the planes first half “entry”/disappearance:

Zero Interaction Physics or

Zero Crash Physics

Pristine Tower

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, July 16, 2009

The "New" Apollo 11 Footage

Pretty sucky:

Article here. "How's the lighting?" The lighting looks artificial! And who is asking this? Neither of the two astronauts are saying this, but it sounds like someone viewing the scene-- with no audio delay (as would be expected for the viewer on earth and astronauts on the moon)!

Note how CNN (or NASA) fucks up! The landing was officially on the 20th.

(tip to AP for the find)

Note: NASA said they lost the original Apollo 11 footage (they taped over it!?!)!!!! So they had to use tape from CBS and kinescope versions. What a laugh! Note, this article even says how conspiracy theorists would be suspicious of this!
Bookmark and Share

Keeping the Hoax Alive

(click to enlarge)

Notably, Neil Armstrong is eschewing the anniversary hoopla.

Some of my reasons for doubting the moon landings are here, and A.P. has written more here.

The Times has an obligatory take-down of the truth here:
Vocal Minority Insists It Was All Smoke and Mirrors

They walk among us, seemingly little different from you or me. Most of the time, you would never know of their true nature — except that occasionally, they feel compelled to speak up.

Take an example from Lens, this newspaper’s photography blog. A recent feature, “Dateline: Space,” displayed stunning NASA photographs, including the iconic photo of Neil Armstrong standing on the lunar surface.

The second comment on the feature stated flatly, “Man never got to the moon.”

The author of the post, Nicolas Marino, went on to say, “I think media should stop publicizing something that was a complete sham once and for all and start documenting how they lied blatantly to the whole world.”

Forty years after men first touched the lifeless dirt of the Moon — and they did. Really. Honest. — polling consistently suggests that some 6 percent of Americans believe the landings were faked and could not have happened. The series of landings, one of the greatest gambles of the human race, was an elaborate hoax developed to raise national pride, many among them insist.

They examine photos from the missions for signs of studio fakery, and claim to be able to tell that the American flag was waving in what was supposed to be the vacuum of space. They overstate the health risks of traveling through the radiation belts that girdle our planet; they understate the technological prowess of the American space program; and they cry murder behind every death in the program, linking them to an overall conspiracy.

And while there is no credible evidence to support such views, and the sheer unlikelihood of being able to pull off such an immense plot and keep it secret for four decades staggers the imagination, the deniers continue to amass accusations to this day. They are bolstered by films like a documentary shown on Fox television in 2001 and “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” by Bart Sibrel, a filmmaker in Nashville.

“There are smart, normal people who buy into these conspiracy theories,” said Philip Plait, an astronomer and author who counters the conspiracy theorists point by point and at excruciating length at his “Bad Astronomy” Web site. He is one of many people who have joined the fight to affirm that It Happened. A group effort, at, debunks with gusto; its main author, Jay Windley, named the site for the Moon base in Arthur C. Clarke’s classic science fiction novel, “2001: A Space Odyssey.”

Even though the so-called evidence from the conspiracists can clearly be proved wrong, Mr. Plait said, understanding the proof can require a working knowledge of history and photography and of science and its methodology. “You’ve got to do the work; you’ve got to put the elbow grease to it,” he said, “and most people don’t do the work. So these things get traction.”
(article continues for several more paragraphs)
Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

What Are the Odds? A Plane Crash Into a Soft Field Produces a Huge Crater and Lots of Large Recognizable Aircraft Debris

To be perfectly fair, the crater on the left side and bottom of this picture is reminiscent of the official UA93 crater:

However, this piled up debris is quite different from the UA93 crater:

As are the easily gathered bodies and body parts:

Interestingly, this CNN article on the crash has a couple of 33's.
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Obama Citizenship Watch

I'm sure this is just a harmless mistake:

Contained in an otherwise relatively mundane account of Obama’s recent visit to Ghana in the Daily Graphic news outlet is a sentence sure to raise eyebrows amongst people like journalist Jerome Corsi, who has been at the forefront of the Obama birth certificate scandal since well before the election.

The full paragraph reads, “For Ghana, Obama’s visit will be a celebration of another milestone in African history as it hosts the first-ever African-American President on this presidential visit to the continent of his birth.”

Bookmark and Share

Deep Thought of the Day

I suppose the good thing about Supreme Court nomination hearings is that it reminds us very acutely of how ridiculous and obnoxious US Senators are.
Bookmark and Share

The Insidious Jim Marrs/Jeff Rense Op in the JFK Assassination Cover-Up

by The Anonymous Physicist

I believe is the largest conspiracy website in the world. While it still has some good pieces often, mixed in are major focuses on “Jews and Bird Flu.” In June 2009, it curiously pretended to release some news on the Kennedy Assassination. It claimed this video, on Secret Service (SS) agent/driver William Greer turning and killing JFK, had something new:

The truth is there are better videos available--see more below. Then shortly after posting the above video, Rense posted this “rebuttal” from Jim Marrs. This was apparently done in tandem, with the second piece’s posting showing the ulterior motive for posting the first. I.e., while purporting to post something new--a better proof of the driver killing Kennedy--the real reason seems to have been to have one of the alleged grand pooh-bahs of JFK “research” try to counter all the many people who know that SS agent Greer fired the fatal head shot. This is now all the more necessary to the traitors and mass murderers in control of the USA since 9/11/01, and its sequelae, such as the Patriot Act. The PTB still fear the masses learning that illegitimate President-killers have been in control since Nov. 22, 1963. Learning and knowing this about the PTB, would tell the people that they are totally unsafe, at every moment of their lives in this country.

Marrs’ essay begins laughingly with, “Okay, now for a dose of truth.” This reminds me of the motto just past the entrance to perhaps the world’s greatest set of liars and backstabbers--the CIA’s Langley HQ. Its motto on the wall says, “The Truth Shall Set You Free.”

Then Marrs states, If Greer had shot JFK, someone in the crowd--some less than than [sic] 10 feet away--would have said something.” He includes, “Nellie Connally, whom I knew personally, would have talked. The truth is that none of this happened. In fact, this issue never came up until about the mid-1980s when William Cooper… view[ed] a bad 4th or 5th generation copy of the Zapruder film…”

The above paragraph contains nothing but blatant lies! First, from the beginning, it was known that Greer fired the fatal head shot, killing Kennedy. It was known to everyone near the limo, it was known to Jackie Kennedy, who hearing the shot from 5-10 feet away immediately tried to jump out of the car (with the regime later providing the most asinine rationale for this, one could imagine), it was known to S.S. agent Clint Hill who told the Warren Commission, “Just about as I reached it [the limo] there was another sound, which was different than the first sound. I think I described it in my statement as though someone was shooting a revolver into a hard object…” It was known to honest, non-intel agent, researcher Fred Newcomb in the 1960’s after interviewing eyewitnesses. See here!7D!0A!3D7855A05297/Larry762/fontcolor3300FF/page4.html This great online site, from Larry Jamison, states that the book by Newcomb, of which he could not get a publisher in the USA, was titled, “"Murder from Within," © 1975 [and was] derived from original research done in Dallas in 1968 when the memories of witnesses were still fresh.” Note that the very title of the book denotes that Kennedy’s Secret Service detail killed him.

That site continues, “Mr. Newcomb felt his book made the case for the limousine driver shooting JFK so well that he sent copies of the book to the 1975 Congress and Senate because he felt he would be guilty of "obstruction of justice" if he did not do so.

These are the witnesses whose statement to Mr. Newcomb and sometimes the Warren commission included the words "IN THE CAR."

1. Mary Moorman - school teacher standing next to Jean Hill. She said she saw Greer shooting back but thought he was shooting back at the assassin. SOURCE: Warren Commission and taped interview by Fred Newcomb.

2. Jean Hill - Jean Hill saw what happened too, but when she tried to bring up the subject of a gun being fired in the car, Senator Arlen Spector (a 33rd degree Mason) would change the subject or say "it's time for a cup of coffee."

3. Austin P. Miller - Texas Louisiana Freight Bureau, who stood on the railway overpass overlooking Elm Street was asked by Arlen Spector where the shots came from: His reply was "from right there in the car." Senator Spector just went on to the next question, never asking Miller any specifics. From: Warren Report, New York Times edition, p. 82.

4. Clinton J. Hill. Jacqueline Kennedy's bodyguard reports in Vol. II, pp 138-139 of the Warren Commission Volumes: "I jumped from the car, realizing that something was wrong, and ran to the presidential limousine. Just as I reached it, there was another sound. I think I described it in my statement as though someone was shooting a revolver into a hard seemed to have some type of echo."

5. Hugh Betzner - Had picture published in Life magazine and was standing right next to the drivers side of the motorcade: He saw a gun in the hand of one of the secret service agents and heard a sound "like firecrackers going off in the car."

Now I have addressed the issue, and actions of Nellie Connally (and John Connally) before. One only needs to run the Z-film to see the following. After the first shot(s), John Connally [who was known as LBJ for “Little Boy Johnson, as he was LBJ’s boy] turns to look at who he knows is the intended victim (and NOT where the shots are coming from). Connally is then hit by Greer’s first shot. He yells out, “My God they’re trying to kill us all.” [Instead of just the intended victim.] Then you can see that the two Connallys reflexively look to the front just before ducking down to give Greer a clear shot to finish the job. It appears even that the two bumped heads momentarily. So “Nellie” was either earlier informed of what was to happen from her husband, or quickly figured it out in “real time,” and knew the truth, and lied about it till her death. This should not be shocking, as no one knows better than the perps, how easily they will be offed, if they say or do something “unwanted” by the PTB they work for.

Bill Cooper in his book, “Behold A Pale Horse”, described just when and how he learned that Greer and the US Gov’t killed President Kennedy. Cooper was in Naval Intelligence and aboard a ship in the early 1970’s, in Vietnam or nearby, when he was shown an early copy of the Zapruder film. Cooper was so upset that he subsequently, briefly went AWOL, as he couldn’t stomach the fact that he was working ultimately for murderers and traitors. He was talked into coming back, and was honorably discharged from the Navy in 1975. But exposing Greer, and the regime, became the focus of his life since he saw Greer killing Kennedy. After Cooper began exposing Greer and the US Govt, he was car chased off a cliff in California, and lost a leg. If we had even 1% of the population with Cooper’s sense of right and wrong and determination, we would get this country back. But Cooper first saw the Z-film in the early 1970’s, and it was apparently an “ONI copy”, not a later generation copy.

Marrs continues, “…several other JFK researchers, myself included, warned him not to do so [show the world that S.S. agent William Greer fired the fatal head shot] because the claim was false.” IF this is true, it shows the guts and integrity of Cooper, that he did not knuckle under the regime’s pressure tactics for 15-20 years, until the regime assassinated him, just after 9/11/01. Cooper did not hide his disdain for Greer, and all the intel assets posing as JFK researchers.

More from Marrs, “It is true that Greer turns to his right and looks back at JFK at the time of the fatal shot...a somewhat suspicious circumstance as Greer claimed he never looked back and did not know the assassination taken place until Roy Kellerman, the agent next to him, said. "Let's get out of here, we're hit. Greer then faces front and the car accelerates. In those days, it was customary for men to wear their hair 'greasy' and Kellerman's hair was especially slicked down that day. Watch Kellerman closely and you will see the sunlight glinting off the top of his head.”

This last paragraph is full of lies and omissions. First Marrs omits that Greer turned back twice as is evident from the Z-film. This is a major omission and is tantamount to a great lie. I was the first, at least for several decades, to publicly proclaim that Greer fired twice, the first time hitting Connally, who heard who had hit him, and turned to look at his shooter before ducking, and saying what he did. Now for the issue of Kellerman’s black hair turning white, and only on top. Marrs brings this up because he knows that we are seeing the top of Greer’s gun. The point is moot, because we can see the end of the gun past the curvature of Kellerman’s head, in frame 313. So “grease”--a laughable excuse--does not stand up. There are even frames--before alteration or removal--of gun exhaust seen. Jamison’s website shows the front page of the GLOBE magazine that contained an article on Greer killing Kennedy, and highlighted the gun exhaust seen on the Z-film. The “greasy” excuse is one of the most obvious and stupid lies ever. Why? Because we see Kellerman’s hair is still black throughout the video. When Marrs notes that the top of Kellerman’s hair turned white on the Z-film, it is only confirming that the video alterers did the same thing when he fired the first time. It only becomes white and only on the top when the regime needs to try to hide Greer’s gun--twice!

Marrs then states, “I have studied first-generation clear prints of the Zapruder film…” This monstrosity needs great elaboration! Marrs must now come clean and state, just where and when he allegedly saw these “first generation prints.” This reminds me of the unheard of Dallas cub reporter who was allegedly shown a “first generation” Z film by the SS, shortly after the assassination. This was Dan Rather, and he lied in saying that the film showed JFK being propelled forward in the limo. This was done in conjunction with the CIA-run Life Magazine which printed reversed Zapruder frames which also then “showed” JFK going forward in the limo. This “fact” remained for the public until Geraldo Rivera first publicly showed a copy of the Z film on TV, in 1975. (Till then the regime proclaimed it was too horrifying for the public to view.) It showed JFK being violently propelled straight back from Greer’s shot. Note also Noel Twyman’s book, “Bloody Treason”, states that HL Hunt in his office overlooking Dealey Plaza was brought, by the Secret Service, a copy of the Z-film to view, within a day of the assassination. Zapruder also had an office in that building. So it is clear just who may be given access to “first generation” Zapruder versions.

Regarding this “first generation Z-film,” Marrs must state where and when he saw this film--preferably under oath--because we are now getting into obstruction of justice, conspiracy after the fact, murder, and high treason. Then Marrs must state why the rest of us are not allowed to see this alleged version of the Z-film--especially if it so clearly exonerates the regime! Yes, logic always hangs these types out to dry. Note that in the 1990’s, I met a woman who told me a former boyfriend was mid to upper level at the CIA. He had told her that he was shown a version of the Z-film (supposedly unaltered) and it was clear as a bell that Greer killed Kennedy. He was even given a copy. After he left the CIA for the private sector, he apparently made the mistake of speaking about this on the phone. Shortly thereafter his home was broken into, ramshackled, and the film taken.

Rense adds, at the end, “*Jim Marrs is widely-acknowledged to be one of the world's foremost authorities on the murder of JFK. His book 'Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy' is considered a classic in the art of journalism.” So just as the Rense piece began with a joke, it ends with one.

Now for some final thoughts on Marrs, the Zapruder film, Cooper and myself. Marrs, because of his book, “Crossfire”, was a consultant for Oliver Stone’s film, “JFK.” I can clearly recall Stone being interviewed by David Letterman, after “JFK” came out. When Letterman asked Stone who he thought did it, Stone cleverly did not quite answer that. Instead, he replied, “A lot of people think the driver did it.” Perhaps this was why Stone blurs the film around the time of the fatal head shot. Apparently not wanting to show what he knew was a lie, he preferred to just blur it. Likewise, perhaps the reason Stone wasn’t killed was because of the lie the film contained. It portrays New Orleans D.A. Jim Garrison say JFK’s body is slammed “back and to the left, back and to the left, back and to the left” instead of straight back as we can see. This was to enable the “grassy knoll shooter fired the fatal head shot” Limited Hangout. While there were one or more shooters there, the physical behavior of Kennedy’s body proves where the fatal shot came from--Greer.

Now I used to recommend Marrs’ books. I knew of course, that they contain mis- or disinformation as to the Ultimate Truths of each topic they cover. But some authors cleverly take you up to 90% of the way there. So I only recommended them to people for the extensive backgrounds they often include. Put another way, Marrs’ books have a Limited Hangout (LH) for every conspiracy issue they cover. This includes, JFK, 9/11, aliens, UFOs, who’s ultimately in control, etc. I no longer recommend Marrs’ books because there is now a vastly better set of books. This new set of books costs more. But they were not written by an asset of the regime, and they DO reveal the Ultimate Truths of each crucial conspiracy matter:

That is, the Ultimate Truths of the Quarantine around the Earth, the nuking of the World Trade Center, and the China Syndrome Aftermath, the events of Maury Island and Roswell, Hiroshima, and who killed JFK, RFK, MLK, and why--as well as the revealing the hidden cause of most important events in Man’s history--are explicitly stated. My book “Quarantine: Mankind Held Hostage: The Ultimate Truth of Hiroshima, 9/11 & Man’s History” pulls no punches on ALL the conspiracy matters just cited.

The Zapruder film is another example of MITOP--Made It Transparent On Purpose. This acronym indicates the philosophy of the PTB. While they continue to massively lie on important conspiracy issues for the masses, they leave an obvious trail for the few who can see and think, that the “official story” is a joke, and that the Gov’t did it. Leaving the end of the gun in frame 313 is an example of this. And also while the Z-film is heavily doctored, there is more than enough there to see the truth. E.g., while the Z-film has painted on “hands of Greer,” on or near the steering wheel, you can clearly see the hunched up left shoulder and the left forearm brought over towards the right ear. The Z-film has many missing frames, a bogus, duped background of itself to simulate motion when the limo was brought to a standstill, and numerous things painted on. The latter includes the back of JFK’s head--after it had been blasted out, the side flap on the right side of his head, the “hands of Greer” and other things. Twyman’s book also showed that Greer, after the fatal head shot, turns toward the front twice as fast as any human could duplicate. Why? One or more frames were removed, apparently to hide gun exhaust and such, just after the fatal headshot. That the Secret Service’s job that day to kill President Kennedy is also clear from this video of JFK’s limo protector/agent being called off as the Dallas motorcade gets underway. S.S. agent in charge, Emory Roberts, orders him off, and strands him at the airport. During the assassination, Roberts ordered all agents NOT to fire back, and NOT to run to the limo, which Clint Hill disobeyed.

Another JFK Assassination grand pooh-bah is James Fetzer. His books contain much “Assassination Science,” as he called one of his books. He has a physicist and a radiologist reveal some of the conspiracy. I often disclose the MITOP philosophy with him when I say, Fetzer’s books contain an analysis of a molecule on a flea on the limousine, but if you just run the film as a whole, you will see SS driver, Greer killing Kennedy! (Fetzer, of course, was sent in to try to “lead” 9/11 research as well.) Indeed I knew a woman who told me, when she was a child of 12, and first saw the Z-film, she immediately could see that the driver did it--without being told that that was there.

We must never forget that Cooper was assassinated on Nov. 5, 2001. I ask that you also think of me, and how I have suffered after once speaking publicly on Greer firing twice--hitting Connally (accidentally) before killing Kennedy. After I showed a version of the Zapruder film with audio added (from a Dallas motorcycle cop’s Dictabelt recording), I have been brutally assaulted, car chased, heavily wiretapped, and massively mercury poisoned after numerous break-ins of my successive homes. My health has been disastrous for a number of years because of the regime’s mercury poisoning me.

I have been struggling to hang on, for nearly a decade, after they incapacitated me with the mercury poisoning. For the last three years, all the minimal physical and mental abilities I might have possessed have gone solely into revealing the ultimate truths of both 9/11, and the wider conspiracies, by writing at this blog. Despite my citing my severe difficulties here several times, no reader has offered any kind of significant assistance for me.

The Ultimate Truth of the Kennedy Assassination is that SS agent Greer fired twice, first hitting Connally, then blowing out the back of Kennedy’s head. At the APEX of EACH of Greer’s TWO head turns, the audio-added Z-film has the sound of a shot from Greer. Note that while some have posted versions of the audio-added Z-film on youtube, all (so far) have been doctored. This one makes clear that Greer fired the fatal head shot--and you can now hear this as well as see it. But the timing has been altered a bit, and it is not quite clear that at the apex of his first turn, a shot rings out and Connally is hit, as more accurate audio/video Z-films show. It makes sense, alas, as there are so many altered versions of the silent Z-film, that we should expect to see many altered versions of the audio-added Z-film. In fact we know that the audio-added Z-film is being “remasterminded.” Just as surviving eyewitnesses get “re-interviewed,” if you realize what that means.

The numerous eyewitnesses corroborate that after hitting Connally, Greer brought the limo to a stand still--so he could shoot straight, after he accidentally shot Connally. That the job of the Secret Service on Nov. 22, 1963 was to get Kennedy killed, is also indicated by Dr. Charles Crenshaw. He revealed in one of his books, that the FBI was interrogating the Secret Service at Parkland Hospital, and an SS agent knocked out an FBI agent with the butt of his machine gun. The FBI was going to arrest Greer and Kellerman, until then. Later SS agents pulled their guns at Parkland to prevent the autopsy there, as Texas law, and Parkland staff, demanded.

One way for you to counter the regime’s lies and assassination is to post this all over the Internet. Post it to counter the bogus JFK assassination industry that variously wants to portray that: Oswald did it after all, or the Grassy Knoll did it, or we can never know. Books by Marrs and Fetzer both declare that anyone but the actual shooter, Greer, could have done it. Fetzer specifically denounced Cooper in one of his books, and here we can see Marrs doing the same at Rense’s.

One of the most telling things in the Kennedy Assassination is that Dr. Crenshaw stated that Agent Clint Hill had his gun out and cocked the whole time in Parkland Hospital. Crenshaw--not knowing what had really happened in Dealey Plaza--indicated that there was no need for Hill to do that, as he thought that the killer was not there.

Of course, we now know--as did Clint Hill, that fateful day--that the killers were right there! And our eternal gratitude for knowing that rests mostly with Bill Cooper.
Bookmark and Share

Monday, July 13, 2009

Take Away the References to Plane Impacts and Thermite--

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, July 12, 2009

A Real Building Collapse

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, July 11, 2009

Analysis of the Latest Thermite Paper of Steven Jones, et al.-- SURPRISE: It Helps Prove Nukes Destroyed the WTC on 9/11

by The Anonymous Physicist

I have written several articles here, including this one on “unextinguishable fires”, critiquing some of the papers and theories of Steven E Jones, PhD, and his gang claiming a thermite compound destroyed the WTC. I have also asked that everyone who is honest to realize Jones’ earlier history of being inserted to destroy the energy field of Cold Fusion, before its creators were even able to publish their paper is a dead giveaway to Jones being a life-long intel agent or asset. Twenty years later, some of the top physicists and chemists in the world have proven that Cold Fusion works.

I will now analyze Jones’ most recent paper. This will likely be the last time I analyze any new papers from him or his group. The reasons why will be evident. This latest thermite paper is entitled, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe” by Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R. Larsen. Published in “The Open Chemical Physics Journal”, 2009, 2, 7-31

(Click on “Download” to get the entire pdf document.)

First there are many anomalies in the authorship, and the journal. One of the listed authors, Gregg Roberts, has a B.A. in psychology. No graduate degrees are listed for him at Jones’ group’s website ( As he has no degrees in the physical sciences, why is he listed as co-authoring this work on alleged advanced chemical physics?

Then we come to the Bentham Open Journal itself. Despite Jones usual proclamation of “peer reviewed,” it was not. Others have shown it is what is called “pay to play [publish]” in this matter. This particular article has a tragicomedic history. You will be in stiches when you read this tale here. It includes this: “Previously, the chief editor of the Bentham journal that the Thermite article was published in resigned, and denounced the Journal with this statement: “I cannot accept that this topic is published in my journal. The article has nothing to do with physical chemistry or chemical physics, AND I COULD WELL BELIEVE THAT THERE IS A POLITICAL VIEWPOINT BEHIND ITS PUBLICATION. If anyone had asked me, I would say that the article should never have been published in this journal. Period.” Despite supposedly being the chief editor, she had not been informed that the thermite article was going to be published in her journal.” An even funnier tale is revealed whereby someone was able to publish total computer-generated nonsense in a sister Bentham Open Journal. So much for “peer reviewed” or even notifying its chief editor!

I also note for the record that the article contains a total of 33 figures (photos and drawings). My readers know the significance of this.

Then I have already commented on the alleged four WTC dust samples used in the paper. THERE IS NO CHAIN OF CUSTODY/EVIDENCE FOR ANY OF THEM. They were allegedly in people’s apartments for six years. They were not hermetically sealed or documented in any way. Their shipping is not described. They would be disallowed in a court of law. To be allowed, such samples would have to be sealed and protected and sworn to its whereabouts at every point in time (and space). It would be the easiest thing for intel agents to have substituted for any real samples either at any time during their first 6 years of “storage,” or during their shipping. I will leave out for the moment the issue of what could have occurred in the labs given the above background. There is also no apparent disclosure as to who might have paid for the use of the expensive apparatus employed for this “research.”

Now the crux of this paper can be gathered from its abstract. “We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the WTC…. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry. The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm [nanometers] across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures… Elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When …the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.”

Now for specific criticism of the methods, contents and conclusions of this paper. On page 17, they write, “The resulting spectrum [from the surface of a red chip], shown in Fig. (14), produced the expected peaks for Fe, Si, Al, O, and C. Other peaks included calcium, sulfur, zinc, chromium and potassium. The occurrence of these elements could be attributed to surface contamination due to the fact that the analysis was performed on the as-collected surface of the red layer. The large Ca and S peaks may be due to contamination with gypsum from the pulverized wall-board material in the buildings.” Now I can critique this paragraph in several ways. First possible contamination is noted several times. Normally such an occurrence renders such research as useless. But I would note that this “excuse” may be a hint that not just Aluminum and Iron Oxide (rust) were in small (100) nanometer sized particles or grains, but that other elements or everything in the samples were as well, giving a hint to what really happened to the towers. More on this below.

On page 28, the authors indicate they are so concerned that all they have is paint chips (and iron oxide [rust]), that they include this paragraph, “To merit consideration, any assertion that a prosaic substance such as paint could match the characteristics we have described would have to be accompanied by empirical demonstration using a sample of the proposed material, including SEM/XEDS and DSC analyses.” So it might just be paint chips, but the public must find a way to get paint chips analyzed with similar expensive apparatus they used. On page 23, we have, “These observations reminded us of nano-thermite fabricated at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and elsewhere.” There is more below on who these authors indicate makes such alleged nano-thermite below. And what does “reminded us” mean? On page 17, they note that for one of their experiments, they used only one of the four samples. “The chip that was used for this experiment was extracted from dust sample 2.” Why use only sample #2 here?

On page 25, we have the curious statement, “We make no attempt to specify the particular form of nano-thermite present until more is learned about the red material and especially about the nature of the organic material it contains.” This is one of many statements indicating they don’t know what they have, but have merely declared it to be super nano-thermite. They are beginning to sound like Judy Wood of the DEW (non-)hypothesis. She basically proclaimed, I don’t have to explain how DEW did anything, I only have to show these pictures, provide baby talk, and say “DEW.” Substitute “nano-thermite”, for DEW, use pretty photomicrographs, and bigger words this time and VOILA!, you have the same Op-Plan.

On page 26, we have some key sentences. “A report on an April 2001 conference discloses who was known to be working on such explosives at that time: The … symposium on Defense Applications of Nanomaterials..… [noted] all of the military services and some DOE and academic laboratories have active R&D programs aimed at exploiting the unique properties of nanomaterials that have potential to be used in energetic formulations for advanced explosives…. nanoenergetics hold promise as useful ingredients for the thermobaric (TBX) and TBX-like weapons. Furthermore, the authors say, “Super-thermite electric matches” have been developed at Los Alamos National Laboratory for which “applications include triggering explosives for ... demolition.”

Here the authors are indicating 1. Any super nano-thermite is most likely a U.S. Gov’t DOD/DOE creation, and 2. their beloved thermite or nano-composite thermite is ONLY capable of being used as a “match” for something else!

The last supposition is further supported by the authors on page 29, ”It may be that this [red] material is used not as a cutter-charge itself, but rather as a means to ignite high explosives, as in super-thermite matches. Having observed unignited thermitic material in the WTC residue, we suggest that other energetic materials suitable for cutter charges or explosives should also be looked for in the WTC dust.” In other words, they now appear to be admitting that even if there was thermite there, it was only used as a “match” for something else. Why then not concentrate on the something else, instead of the “match”?

Now we have two curious statements on pages 28 and 29 that I will list in order, and then “translate.” “One might speculate that the red thermitic material has been attached to rusty iron by an adhesive. The cooling effect of the iron in such close proximity, acting as a heat sink, might quench the reaction and explain the fact that unreacted red thermitic material, always found by us in thin layers, remains in the dust. These hypotheses invite further experiments” ….”We have observed that some chips have additional elements such as potassium, lead, barium and copper. Are these significant, and why do such elements appear in some red chips and not others? An example is shown in Fig. (31) which shows significant Pb along with C, O, Fe, and Al and displays multiple red and gray layers. In addition, the gray-layer material demands further study. What is its purpose? Sometimes the gray material appears in multiple layers.” Translation: Jones, et al, don’t know what they have. They just claim it is nano-thermite, and then say the other things there don’t quite make sense. I assert that it is far more scientific to realize that some other source of energy made much of what was there into 100 nanometer size particles or grains, and that’s why all these different elements are mixed with each other, and are of very small size. And that source is well known. Nuclear fission bombs can create particles down to 10 nanometer size. Fission mini-bombs provide a far better explanantion for all the different elements and their mixing!

Then on page 28, they say, Furthermore, the energy is released over a short period of time, shown by the narrowness of the peak in Fig. (29).” How does this short interval of energy release fit with Jones previous claim of “unextinguishable fires,” or with the 6-month long release of great heat in the WTC rubble pile or underneath the former skyscrapers? Then on page 29, after citing the controlled demolition of a Las Vegas Hotel, they say, “Of course, we do not assume that the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers occurred conventionally.” This is most curious, as I thought the standard was that all explosives with TNT, thermite, nano-thermite, thermobarics, etc.--since they all involve chemical reactions--are all labeled as “conventional”; and only nuclear bombs--because they involve nuclear reactions--are called non-conventional. A slip-up?

On page 19, is the key to the discussion of the “iron-rich microspheres.” The authors state, “In the post-DSC residue, charred-porous material and numerous microspheres and spheroids were observed. Many of these were analyzed, and it was found that some were iron-rich…” In other words, there are OTHER such small spheroid entities in their samples, not just iron-rich ones. You might miss this if you don’t read carefully. So all we really have is the phenomena that great heat vaporizes ANY material and when it resolidifies, we have the well known phenomenon that spheroidal shapes is what nature usually provides. And I believe that Jones harps on this for one reason--to hide the VAPORIZATION that occurred. And the great heat during the WTC destruction was due to something else.

Finally let us examine some of the authors’ conclusions on page 29.

Conclusion #4: “The small size of the iron oxide particles qualifies the material to be characterized as nanothermite or super-thermite.” WRONG. Iron oxide (rust) would be a common component in a skyscraper, and mini-nukes more readily explains their small size.

Conclusion #6: “From the presence of elemental aluminum and iron oxide in the red material, we conclude that it contains the ingredients of thermite.” WRONG. Again nukes would have heated up things and can readily account for elemental aluminum.

Conclusion #7: “The low temperature of ignition and the presence of iron oxide grains less than 120 nm show that the material is not conventional thermite (which ignites at temperatures above 900 °C), but very likely a form of super-thermite.” WRONG. While it isn’t thermite, it isn’t super-thermite either. As above, the use of nuclear fission bombs can easily yield grains of iron oxide (or anything else present) down to 120 nm.

Conclusion #10: “The carbon content of the red material indicates that an organic substance is present. This would be expected for super-thermite formulations.” WRONG. Carbon material could have been blasted into any grains or particles from the effects of the fission bombs. The source of carbon could have been many things, sadly even possibly from the missing, vaporized 1157 people.

And their ultimate conclusion is (naturally) what they wanted it to be: “Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.” WRONG. As their other findings indicate, if anything here is real or honest--and this is a huge if based on the deep background of S.E. Jones--all that can be said is that many elements were found in particles or grains of approximately 100 nm size. This rather indicates that a source of incredible energy--nukes--was present that was able to create particles of such small dimensions from whatever it contacted.

Furthermore, their own statements indicate that another explosive compound was necessary and that the nano-thermite may have just acted like a “match.” Do you see the pseudo-scientific, epicycle-like reasoning used here? If the reader is clever enough to see the contradictions in their thermite hypothesis, they have an epicycle-like “answer” waiting in the wings. If you say, how does some “super nano-composite thermite” know when to explode, or when to be in an “unextinguishable fire,” or when to remain as “unreacted thermitic material” here, the authors then claim that some other explosive compound is necessary and was there on 9/11. Yes, the only things “unextinguishable” with the thermite hypothesis are its palaver, hidden funding, and promotion.

I assert that the evidence Jones, et al, found actually helps prove that small nuclear bombs destroyed the WTC! And, of course, I have detailed that the great heat in the rubble pile, was from the fission fragments not used up in the bombs that destroyed the WTC. Their half-life is 700 million years; only 1-6% of it was used during the chain reactions of the implosions, and it took six months to reach all these fragments, and cart them away. All the unique phenomena observed during, and after, WTC destruction are readily explained by the nuking of the WTC and the China Syndrome Aftermath. No “super nano-composite thermite” “match” and its necessary other unknown explosive compound that Jones is now touting can account for all that occurred. They cannot account for the thermal rays, the EMP, the half-burnt/half pristine cars, the vaporization of so many people, furniture, steel and other contents, the very small dust particle size, the six-month long high heat in the rubble pile and under the former skyscrapers, and numerous other phenomena observed during and after WTC destruction. My articles and book make clear the evidence of thermal rays, EMP, “extraordinarily high temperatures”, neutron bombardment, tritium production (from ternary fission occurred). For more on all this, see the articles: and book-- which includes the entirety of my work on the destruction of the WTC here: I have written. If you read all that I have written on this, you will agree that the thermite “hypothesis” is nothing but another desperate Limited Hangout from the intel agencies that cannot account for most of what happened on 9/11 at the WTC. And the thermite hangout was clearly designed to try to prevent the People from finding out that the American Regime nuked its own city and People on 9/11. Don’t let this pseudo-scientific hangout survive your scrutiny or your love for your fellow human beings.

Bookmark and Share

Powered by Blogger