On Any Other Day But 9/11...
On any other day but 9/11... most people would find it odd that the video that is supposed to show a Boeing 767 attacking the WTC doesn't really show an object that looks like a Boeing 767 or something that is even the size of a Boeing 767:
On any other day but 9/11... most people would find the damage pattern to the steel columns of the outer WTC wall supposedly made by a swept back plane wing very odd:
On any other day but 9/11... most people would find it odd that key videos of the 2nd WTC attack have an unusual cyan tint:
On any other day but 9/11... most people might be surprised that there is no exit hole in the north face of WTC2, after videos were shown where the nose of the plane passed through the building:
On any other day but 9/11... most people might think it very strange how a plane could glide into a building across several floor slabs and not explode on point of impact:
On any other day but 9/11... most people might find it odd how a large plane could COMPLETELY disappear into this hole, when there was so much debris in the way:
On any other day but 9/11... most people might be surprised that the plane that passed into the building on video without anything breaking off didn't really make hole large enough to go through:
On any other day but 9/11... most people would be surprised to see two of the largest buildings in the world turn into dust and fall down at near free-fall speeds, and completely disappearing into a curiously small pile of rubble-- and most people would also demand a thorough explanation for what happened:
On any other day but 9/11... most people would wonder what on earth happened to this building to make these holes and expect some answer from the authorities:
On any other day but 9/11... most people would think it VERY ODD that a 150 foot long, 125 foot wingspan airplane could crash into the ground and leave only this small crater and minimal debris:
On any other day but 9/11... most people would expect that a 6 ton section of columns crashing to the ground from 1000 feet would cause more damage to the street and sidewalk-- and would also wonder how a loosely embedded plane tire stayed in the columns during the impact:
This would happen any other day but 9/11.
On 9/11, however, we all know that muslims suspended the laws of physics.
On any other day but 9/11... most people would find the damage pattern to the steel columns of the outer WTC wall supposedly made by a swept back plane wing very odd:
On any other day but 9/11... most people would find it odd that key videos of the 2nd WTC attack have an unusual cyan tint:
On any other day but 9/11... most people might be surprised that there is no exit hole in the north face of WTC2, after videos were shown where the nose of the plane passed through the building:
On any other day but 9/11... most people might think it very strange how a plane could glide into a building across several floor slabs and not explode on point of impact:
On any other day but 9/11... most people might find it odd how a large plane could COMPLETELY disappear into this hole, when there was so much debris in the way:
On any other day but 9/11... most people might be surprised that the plane that passed into the building on video without anything breaking off didn't really make hole large enough to go through:
On any other day but 9/11... most people would be surprised to see two of the largest buildings in the world turn into dust and fall down at near free-fall speeds, and completely disappearing into a curiously small pile of rubble-- and most people would also demand a thorough explanation for what happened:
On any other day but 9/11... most people would wonder what on earth happened to this building to make these holes and expect some answer from the authorities:
On any other day but 9/11... most people would think it VERY ODD that a 150 foot long, 125 foot wingspan airplane could crash into the ground and leave only this small crater and minimal debris:
On any other day but 9/11... most people would expect that a 6 ton section of columns crashing to the ground from 1000 feet would cause more damage to the street and sidewalk-- and would also wonder how a loosely embedded plane tire stayed in the columns during the impact:
This would happen any other day but 9/11.
On 9/11, however, we all know that muslims suspended the laws of physics.
posted by spooked at 7:45 AM
27 Comments:
i love it! but maybe it should be 'any other day before 9/11'. as anonymous has illustrated as of late and as the collective movement continues to show, there aren't too many others who find these things strange even after 9/11.
what's that? the fuselage didn't slow down when hitting the perimeter columns of WTC followed by the concrete floor stabs and steel truss'?
what's that? WTC looks is 2/3 its original height and looks like a snow cone during gravity 'collapse'?
yea dood, magic happens when you travel 600 mph and my super-duper-thermight is spicer than yer mom's homemade chilli.
This is what happens when the urge to emotional denial is greater than the capacity for scientific analysis.
The term "most people would find the damage pattern...very odd" is ridiculous since there is no previous record in history of a passenger plane hitting a steel and aluminum curtained 110 story building at 500 miles per hour.
The "most people would find it odd....blue coloring" of the video comment ignores the fact tens of thousands of eyewitnesses reported the morning to be clear, bright and cloudless. In other words, the sky was really blue.
Incidentally, most people would find it ridiculous that one frame from an analog video of a plane traveling 500 miles an hour, a moment in time no greater than a tiny fraction of one second, would be used by an amateur to
try and prove anything.
Why bother, obviously "most people" would rather take the NIST's experimental data contained in 10,000 pages of text much more seriously than endless "troofer" pablum.
hitting a steel and aluminum curtained 110 story building
if that means a massive steel structure with an aluminum cladding facade bolted to the the outside face of it then you are correct.
blue coloring" of the video comment ignores the fact tens of thousands of eyewitnesses reported the morning to be clear, bright and cloudless.
then the videos should show alleged ua175 just shining and glinting in the bright direct sunlight shouldn't they.
but instead we see 2 different phony ua175s -
one is flat primer grey colored with a left wing and tail that seem to blink on and off and then slips thru the side of the tower like a ghost without slowing down.
the other is shadowy flat black colored and missing it's right wing. this black one is the one that appears to go all the way thru the tower and "nose-out" the other side yet there is no exit hole where the nose noses-out.
tell me, how can a plane fly without it's right wing in the first place?
and why if it was a bright sunny day did the sun not reflect and shine off ua175 like a mirror?
obviously "most people" would rather take the NIST's experimental data contained in 10,000 pages of text much more seriously than endless "troofer" pablum.
and there you go.
"trust us, we're NIST! we're official!"
"oh ok, whatever you say. i'm very comforted by the fact that you guys are official."
----
you should just shut up anonymous.
you've already proven to be either a liar or a fool.
"IN YOUR FACE, SUCKERS!!!!!!!!!"
Be honest Spooked, this is not your style.
anonymous said:
"Why bother, obviously "most people" would rather take the NIST's experimental data contained in 10,000 pages of text much more seriously than endless "troofer" pablum."
NIST used frames from a video to say that "Flight 175" in the video passed into the South Tower without slowing down at all. 0% deceleration. No resistance. I take that very seriously.
when the urge to emotional denial is greater than the capacity for scientific analysis
that's pretty much entirely the point isn't it!
science tells us that the top of wtc2 can not destroy the floors below it while simultaneously being destroyed itself. all at the same rate as a bowling ball dropped from the same height and being resisted by thin air alone would reach the ground.
you have some nerve using the phrase "capacity for scientific analysis".
this from an anonymous liar who claims to have looked at the events of 9/11 for a year yet sees no indication that the govt fairytale is anything other than what it is claimed to be.
what about wtc7 that had minimal fire yet collapsed in a classic controlled demo manner in only 7 seconds - magic?
I love how you state "anonymous liar" while being anonymous yourself.
Anyone post anonymously. That doesn't mean we're all the same person, genius.
... Or ARE we?
ya and i admire how you change the subject from 9/11 to why is my name anonymous as well.
10 seconds to poof!
anonymous, it helps if you choose a name and stick with it. Blogger gives you the option of writing in a name, so you don't have to register.
名無しは馬鹿なのか、犯人のなのか。
名無しは馬鹿なのか、それとも犯人なのか。いずれにしても、もう相手にしない。
OK. I have never heard a no-planers theory on how they rigged the explosion to leave a PERFECT indentation of a wing tip, at about 8 o'clock next to where Spooked put circles a and b.
Seriously, if it wasn't a plane but a cloaked missile, how do those outer "wheat chex" columns get bent INWARDS?
I couldn't give two shits if the plane had stopped in midair inches from the building and did a Wile E. Coyote before slipping between the steel and concrete and exploding.
That wouldn't have surprised me more than the two buildings exploding and the third experiencing global structural failure in CD fashion.
"They" have contingencies for every theory you can dream up. By the time you get someone important to listen and act, WW111 will have started. November 2008 is a loooonnngggg ways away...
I'm not sure if you are the same guy. If so, ignore what I just said about being through dealing with you.
"I have never heard a no-planers theory on how they rigged the explosion to leave a PERFECT indentation of a wing tip, at about 8 o'clock next to where Spooked put circles a and b."
What makes you think this was done with explosives? And if it was, it doesn't seem that hard to use shaped charges to do that. I don't know what is possible.
"I couldn't give two shits if the plane had stopped in midair inches from the building and did a Wile E. Coyote before slipping between the steel and concrete and exploding."
Obviously. That's no more absurd that what we are asked to believe.
"Seriously, if it wasn't a plane but a cloaked missile, how do those outer "wheat chex" columns get bent INWARDS?"
How the hell should I know? And how do you know they were really bent inward?
"'They' have contingencies for every theory you can dream up."
I agree about that in relation to anything involving Atta, Mineta, war games, stand down, and the like.
"By the time you get someone important to listen and act, WW111 will have started."
So now I am responsible for preventing WWIII? You sound like one of the Steven Jones, 9/11 Accountability, let us define "truth and justice" crowd. No thanks.
"November 2008 is a loooonnngggg ways away..."
There's no statute of limitations on murder and this is bigger than Cheney and the Chimp.
Do what you want. Don't ask me to follow any self-appointed leaders of a More 9/11 Lies Movement.
just because there's a "little mark @ 8 o,clock" that none of us can explain doesn't mean that the govt fairytale holds even a single drop of water.
飛行機無し
and no i'm not. it's short for habanero.
"I'm not sure if you are the same guy. If so, ignore what I just said about being through dealing with you."
No, I'm not that guy.
"What makes you think this was done with explosives? And if it was, it doesn't seem that hard to use shaped charges to do that. I don't know what is possible."
What makes me think it was done with explosives is the explosion. That is, if i'm inhabiting the "no-plane" reality tunnel.
Seriously, if it wasn't a plane but a cloaked missile, how do those outer "wheat chex" columns get bent INWARDS?
"How the hell should I know? And how do you know they were really bent inward?"
I know they were bent inwards because, if you bother to look, they are bent inwards.
'They' have contingencies for every theory you can dream up.
"I agree about that in relation to anything involving Atta, Mineta, war games, stand down, and the like."
No, dude, everything except insurrection. For contigencies for insurrection, FEMA picks up the ball.
By the time you get someone important to listen and act, WW111 will have started.
"So now I am responsible for preventing WWIII?"
Yes you are.
"You sound like one of the Steven Jones, 9/11 Accountability, let us define "truth and justice" crowd. No thanks."
Yeah I don't follow this shit like it's a soap opera, so I don't have a context for that statement.
November 2008 is a loooonnngggg ways away...
"There's no statute of limitations on murder and this is bigger than Cheney and the Chimp."
I agree. But this is not a litigious matter; justice is not the same as law.
"Do what you want. Don't ask me to follow any self-appointed leaders of a More 9/11 Lies Movement."
I agree. Anyone NOT asking me to come to Washington DC for a march can fuck off. What's a movement without movement?
Infiltrated, thats what, by spooks and their memes.
and that's not directed at Spooked. I'm not pointing fingers. I simply wish to hear a noplaners explanation of the wing tip mark, because in that paradigm, I can't think of one. Look at Killtown, he comes up with crazy shit all the time, but I can't fault him for that, I come up with crazy shit too. But believing it amounts to a hill of beans is really crazy, cuz the only way the country can avoid destruction is to be deconstructed.
I hope I've pissed people off enough; I can only dream of fomenting the rage i feel. So helpless. blah blah blah
the NWO needs to be co-opted by us
we should beat them to the punch
throw out all our leaders
tear down all the bureaucracies
try to imagine
the NWO needs to be co-opted and beaten to the punch?
what would happen were that to happen?
i can't speak for spooked or ningen but i wouldn't dream of speculating about the cause of that 8 o,clock skid mark.
however, while that is being explained i would demand an explanation as to why the entire giant tail section of alleged ua175 was recorded for posterity as having slipped right thru the side of wtc2 like a ghost without any of it breaking off yet there were no corresponding 'skid marks' let alone broken 'wheat chex' where said giant tail section was recorded for posterity as having casper the ghosted right thru the side of the wtc2.
you can see that it works both ways doesn't it.
we have indeed done the reading and the math and when we don't understand we are the first to admit it and demand an explanation.
which so far has not been forthcoming.
FWIW, I think the wing tip marks were made by a beam/directed energy weapon.
sup!
there is a site (somewhere, i did see it) that points out that red dots (like infrared targeting sights) were being played across the side of wtc2 right before good old casper made its appearance.
Anonymous, you have not pissed me off, because for the most part I could not understand what you were talking about.
I assure you I bothered to look at the photograph carefully before I asked how you know the aluminum facade strips were bent inward.
How am I responsible for starting WWIII?
h is for 否行機理論？
Great article, Spooked. The lack of an exit hole is very compelling.
Hikoki no koto wa tondemonai, minna mo shiteru no, ima. Doshitano minna Nihongo de kaiteiru no?
There's feature length version of 911 Octopus - New World Order up on Google now, and I urge those of you who watch such things to check it out. If you've seen part one just skip on through the movie... lots of interesting new stuff in there.
As for the anonymous little girl who claims the plane made perfect marks in the building, uh, it's not even close to perfect. There's a gash in the building that's apparently supposed to represent a plane crash, just like there's a hole in the ground in Shanksville. There's no perfection anywhere on display.
Fred
漫画175
Any idea what the cyan tint is for? Hiding stealth craft? Something else?
Fred
Hi Fred. I was just goofing around in Japanese, seeing if it would show up, and someone joined me. So everyone knows who I was talking about, I said "is anonymous just an idiot, or one of the criminals?" Then I said, "either way, I'm through dealing with him." Then someone said "h is for no planes" (in Japanese).
I like the last one - "Cartoon 175."
Fred, you said:
"There's a gash in the building that's apparently supposed to represent a plane crash, just like there's a hole in the ground in Shanksville. There's no perfection anywhere on display."
I haven't seen that part of the movie yet, but I assume you are talking about WTC 1 or 2. I was thinking this morning whether the NIST photos might have been photoshopped quite a bit to make a plane shape. If I recall, the videos shows a lot of black smoke obscuring the gashes, and the photos could have been doctored later.
356
Post a Comment
<< Home