An Inconvenient Truth About 9/11: The Hijacked Planes Were a Hoax
The no-plane evidence kit:
Why they didn't use planes.
Hunt the Boeing, Shanksville Edition
We Have Some Holes in the Plane Stories
"Ghost Gun UA175"--careful analysis of the images of the plane everyone saw on TV
Why those plane-shaped holes in the WTC towers show that Boeing 767s did not hit the towers.
The "Ghost-plane"-- frame-by-frame analysis.
Connecting the dots on the no-plane theory.
A complete critique of the south tower hit.
Arguing "no-planes"
Evidence of planted plane parts.
Flight Simulator Modeling Showing that 2nd Hit Videos Were Faked: here, here and here.
The 9/11 TV Fakery blog
My thanks to all the people who tirelessly promoted this concept-- against very heavy odds. These people were endlessly insulted and slandered, they know who they are. They eventually helped convince me.
Why they didn't use planes.
Hunt the Boeing, Shanksville Edition
We Have Some Holes in the Plane Stories
"Ghost Gun UA175"--careful analysis of the images of the plane everyone saw on TV
Why those plane-shaped holes in the WTC towers show that Boeing 767s did not hit the towers.
The "Ghost-plane"-- frame-by-frame analysis.
Connecting the dots on the no-plane theory.
A complete critique of the south tower hit.
Arguing "no-planes"
Evidence of planted plane parts.
Flight Simulator Modeling Showing that 2nd Hit Videos Were Faked: here, here and here.
The 9/11 TV Fakery blog
My thanks to all the people who tirelessly promoted this concept-- against very heavy odds. These people were endlessly insulted and slandered, they know who they are. They eventually helped convince me.
posted by spooked at 9:39 AM
7 Comments:
I've been holding out on you, man.
I know why your flight sim modelling is wrong. I've known ince almost the first second I looked at your posts on it.
I've been trying to decide if I want to tell you why, or just let you keep going because I find it entertaining?
I'll let you know when I choose.
I've known since almost the first second I looked at your posts
sure, you know everything. that's why YOUR blog is just oh so marvelous!
I'm with You!
Don't give up! Please!
I am a broadcast media specialist and friend of the truth movement.
I have seen all of the propositions concerning the "no planes hit the WTC" theory.
It is very embarrassing for the truth movement. All those people are very ignorant about basic image technologies. Their analysis is a fantasy and a display of their ignorance about imaging technologies.
Believe me, my work used to be digital restoration of film and video, I have restored movies and videos frame-by-frame and know more about motion images than most people, even those who are technicians in broadcast media.
Even basic knowledge about the medium involved is not even accounted for. No wonder we are called conspiracy nuts with lunatics like that.
aaaaaahhhhhh you are an expert
then clearly explain why the nose of the "supposed" jumbo jet goes completely through the building "exploding out the other side"?
your media video einsteinism is warrented if you can explain the evolution of the on the spot 17 second delay coverage from that 9/11 morning
why does the plane get lost in the smoke cloud whaen every other video footage shows it hundreds and hundreds of yards to the left of the drifting smoke cloud?
six different images claimed to be the same #2 hit jumbo jet
yet none of them look alike, let alone like a jumbo jet of any reality sort
but just to be clear
if you got something important to add to debunk the FACT that no jumbo jets were used on 9/11, start by giving a clear and full explaination for the nose of the "supposed" plane to explode out the other side of the building
if you find a way to believe that, then please give me your credit card number, i have some great investment deals for you that will only cost you a fifty year cash deposit of 100k for a billion dollar return in the year 2057, i guaruntee its validity and can show you videos of my products after deposit of funds is verified
"Why they didn't use planes"? I'm fairly new to this view point which seems to gaining respectability at the very least. If you assume as I do that there are perpetrators with almost limitless resources and control of the crime scene, and these groups have prepared by whatever means to destroy these buildings at the chosen time, and the destruction will be explained as due to the impact of two large jet liners: how then do you explain this scenario if the two planes, flown by whatever method, impact the towers, immediately crumpling up and falling to the street below?? The outer steel beams and the large steel plates joining them, although not as monstrous as the core beams and lower beams but are still formidable by any standard. Add the strength of steel reinforced concrete floors horizontal on edge. How can the criminals be certain that the impact then will render the desired result? Will they take the risk or do they have the confidence in any calculations? Why was the first tower hit the last to be destroyed ( I do not say "collapse")? Why the delay? Did things not go as planned, trapping many above, and was the destruction put off to try to save them? All to do no avail of course, even if true. Any chance promises of low loss of life were made to gain top approval? Of course any promises if made were lies; all involved were by then incriminated and powerless.
In Howard Zinn's excellent People's History of the United States, he chronicles the assault of the elites of this country on the poorest. At the end, he posits the question of would these people kill you to keep what they have? The answer to this is obvious, and whatever the details, I don't think there can be any doubt about who perpetrated this event. and..there is not doubt that Dick Cheney was the mastermind behind it. W is far too stupid to have concocted anything this comples.
Post a Comment
<< Home