"Reporter" John Miller's Foreknowledge-- More Media/Government Collusion in the Events of 9/11
The "anonymous physicist" has a new finding/revelation that indicates possible foreknowledge and media/government collusion regarding the second tower "collapse." Just as we recently learned of media foreknoweldge of WTC7 "collapse."
On 9/11, ABC-TV anchorman Peter Jennings (whose voice most of us recognize) is talking with another reporter whose voice is that of ABC-TV reporter John Miller--ABC's terrorism/crime "expert."
In this video, they are showing and talking about the just "collapsed" first tower (WTC2). Listen to the other reporter (Miller) revealing that he has been told information that indicates others know that the other tower will soon fall too.
After viewing the first tower fall, Miller says; "and now uh they say that the other tower is leaning. Um. If you look at some of the pictures, it appears to be on a slight angle uh to the right."
Won't you tell us who "they" are, John? Could it be military intelligence?
Funny thing though. In the video, I see no tilting to the right of WTC1, do you? Not on this video, or any others. Therefore it appears that John Miller was told to provide a helpful excuse for the second collapse, that someone in power knew was coming! Just as we recently learned that the PTB told the BBC ahead of time that WTC7 collapsed when it hadn't yet. Note also the following. Miller says "photos", when all they had, as this was happening, were the videos. See how he also starts the false meme that the tower “goes straight down” just as we see close-up that it is also exploding outwards. Notice also Miller's final "uh", just before he says "to the right." Since it's not really there he had to pause to think or recall what he was told, or else he made it up on the spot. Note also that Jennings does not try to refute the "coming straight down" lie even though he too can see it exploding outwards, as it disintegrates. Jennings, it seems, knows that Miller was there to tell everyone (including himself) what to say and think.
Why does John Miller have and provide this (bogus, "leaning to the right") knowledge ahead of time? There are many remarkable things we can learn about John Miller! Soon after this 9/11 "reporting", he was promoted to co-anchor of 20/20 at ABC-TV. And within a year, he wrote a book that 9/11 happened because of "intelligence agencies' failures."***
But wikipedia has a summary of Miller's life-long oddities.
He became an NYC TV reporter with only one year of college, when most can't get this job with one or two full degrees in journalism. He quickly became the "expert" on organized crime/Mafia and terrorist groups, reporting first at WNEW-TV and then WNBC-TV in NYC.
He then served as the Deputy Police Commissioner of NYC from 1994–1995. Despite this background (or maybe more likely because of it?), Miller gets an interview with none other than Osama bin Laden in May 1998! Now if you were OBL, and if you really were an enemy of the USA, would you give an interview to someone associated with the police and intelligence agencies of the USA?! And maybe someone should write a book stating that "Al-CIA-Duh was successful on 911 because of John Miller's failure to reveal where OBL was in 1998." Unless of course, OBL was CIA, then you would only trust another fellow intelligence asset.
In 2003, Miller quit 20/20 and ABC, and became LAPD Bureau Chief for Counter-Terrorism and Criminal Intelligence. In September, 2005 Miller left the LAPD to become the FBI's Assistant Director of Public Affairs. (Could this be in their sub-bureau of faked videos and skyscraper collapse foreknowledge?)
But we learn from Wiki that John Miller's strange odyssey actually began at birth. "John's father, John Miller Sr., was a gossip columnist in New York and friends with Mafia boss Frank Costello. The two were so close, Costello served as godfather to John Jr." Fascinating that John Miller's godfather was THE Godfather or “boss of all bosses” at the time. But does this remind anyone of that other great anti-Mafia, Mafia family guy. Hint: He was Mayor of a city whose two largest towers were "collapsed" with mini-nukes. This could only have been done by the real Mafia--the U.S. government.
***Reading the reviews at Amazon, the book is clearly disinfo.
This Miller guy is a real piece of work. He's clearly a key example of the embedding of US intelligence in the media for 9/11.
I mean really-- what are the odds that one of the few people to ever interview bin Laden before 9/11 gets on ABC news on the morning of 9/11 to talk live about the demise of the twin towers??? Not to mention the incredible fact that Miller, a guy with Mafia connections, is interviewing bin Laden in the first place!
More dirt on Miller here.
Meanwhile, not one single official 9/11 supporter has been able to indicate that they support the NIST model for destruction of the WTC twin towers.
Looking at the news footage is a bit tricky because the "perp control room" was furiously cutting-and-pasting footage together. For example, in this clip, the bad guys got confused and pasted in a segment of WTC 5&6 blowing up while the towers were still standing. (Thanks to Simon Shack for pointing this out!) The audio clearly says "both towers are still standing" after we've already seen and been told that the South Tower had "started to collapse".
It's interesting footage to watch, but it's also interesting to just listen to what they are saying with your eyes closed. It's pretty easy to hear the level changes and continuity glitches. The live footage was all chopped up and cut-and-pasted together to hide elements that contradicted the story they wanted to show.
I agree with everything you say about John Miller, but keep in mind that the guys in the studio are probably looking at a very different scene from what the TV Viewers were being shown. OTOH the "leaning to the right" assertion sounds totally made up, certainly.
John Miller ought to be outed as a shill just like Jack Kelly of USA Today notoriety.
Fred (who just got banned from disinfo site nineeleven.co.uk for refusing to shut up about TV Fakery and exposing a couple of shills.)
"Anonymous physicist" identified! He can be seen with his head up his ass, prominently featured on a web page hosted by another head-up-his-ass, the infamous disinfo agent, Spook911!
And Fred, glad to see the recommendation to the sysadmins of the UK site to ban you bore fruit. I'm sure they don't take too kindly to disinformation agents like you spreading your garbage and lies. All that had to be done was point them to Spooky's garbage pit and the multitudes of your comments and they could see right through your bullshit.
Have a nice day - and watch your digital back. wE aRe ThErE.
"***Reading the reviews at Amazon, the book is clearly disinfo."
Takes one familiar with disinformation campaigns to know one.
"""and watch your digital back. wE aRe ThErE."""
wow 9:33! did you just inadvertantly verify that some 9/11 blogs have a dedicated gang of shill/spoilers?
that's probably the dog-house for you for that isn't it!
listen to these fools:
Fred is a disinformation agent?
And yet if you follow his advice and watch this clip you can clearly see wtc5&6 exploding while both towers are still standing:
Maybe the pretend jetfuel was to blame for that explosion!
My goodness-- the govt shills get more and more ridiculous every day.
Thanks for the video link, Fred.
By the way, I have never used the name "Spook911" nor "Spooky". Perhaps the anonymous disinfo accuser has me confused with someone else.
It's the illuminatti or the Masons or the bildebergers or the lizard people or...
aren't those the guys that build things out of rocks or bricks?
what the devil is the lizard people?
Indestructable Boeing anti fire tyre!
Someone needs to update his Wikipedia page with
this stuff. Expose the spook! Nice post.
Again, please no violent threats here. Threaten prosecution and jail time all you want.
Wouldn't it be great if a few reporters from U.S. Corporate media would emulate the example of those courageous reporters from the "People's Daily" in Beijing, who, after the Tiannamen Square incident, unfurled the famous banner:
"We Don't Want To Lie Anymore"
Imagine this was in Russia, and Ivann Millertsov had similar credentials -- Federal Security Service, Moscow police, St. Petersburg police, formerly with Channel One television, etc. Would this be grounds for questioning his credibility as a journalist?
It seems that suggesting that the FSS bombed Moscow apartments to get support for the Chechen war is socially acceptable in this country's press, so I assume that Millertsov's ties to the security apparatus would be considered grounds for questioning his credibility. Not here, of course. it could never happen here.
Although Millertsov went to the St. Petersburg police and then the FSS after his work for Channel One, he was a high-level official with the Moscow police before going to Channel One.
Also troubling is the friendship of Millertsov's father to Oleg Ivanov, head of the feared Izmailovskaya gang, which has known ties to Chechen rebels through drugs and weapons smuggling. Some wonder whether it was Millertsov's ties to either the security apparatus or Chechen organized crime which allowed him to obtain an exclusive interview for Channel One in 1998 with Chechen separatist leader Aslan Maskhadov.
I grew up here in nYc and personally witnessed Mr. John "Cop Wannabe #1" Miller's ascension through WNBC TV's ranks.
He seemed to have an OBSESSION with Cops/Feds, and with playing the "Cop" role. To the point of pathology. I've met many pathetic wannabes like this. They do everything they can to play the 'Cop' role (joining the Auxiliary Police, etc.)...just short of actually BECOMING a Cop.
Miller is a SHADY as they come.
rob, this movement needs people like you, in NYC, i think fred/bsreg and ewing2001 live in nyc also...rick siegel's in northern jersey, i think...those would be some great people to network/brainstorm with...
I consider everyone must read this.
Post a Comment