"Holey" Weirdness, Batman!
Many many weird things in this high-res image of the WTC1 hole:
(click to enlarge)
Here's what is supposed to have happened:
Among other questions is-- what happened to the middle of the 97th floor? It wasn't even hit officially by much of anything, and it's wiped out.
UPDATE: Sorry-- image link was buggered initially. I think it is fixed now.
UPDATE 2: The thing that gets me here is how yes, in some ways, this looks just like a 767 sliced into the side of the tower. But in other ways, it makes no sense at all! I don't think the image is faked-- it is far too complex and fits with other images. But there is just weird, freaky stuff there. And this close-up also is just very strange-- for instance the stuff that looks like knotted rope around the OUTSIDE of some of the knocked in columns:
(click to enlarge)
(click to enlarge)
Here's what is supposed to have happened:
Among other questions is-- what happened to the middle of the 97th floor? It wasn't even hit officially by much of anything, and it's wiped out.
UPDATE: Sorry-- image link was buggered initially. I think it is fixed now.
UPDATE 2: The thing that gets me here is how yes, in some ways, this looks just like a 767 sliced into the side of the tower. But in other ways, it makes no sense at all! I don't think the image is faked-- it is far too complex and fits with other images. But there is just weird, freaky stuff there. And this close-up also is just very strange-- for instance the stuff that looks like knotted rope around the OUTSIDE of some of the knocked in columns:
(click to enlarge)
posted by spooked at 1:09 PM
10 Comments:
i can't see the high-res image and when i copy the url google says it is not there.
unfortunate.
The reason you can't see it is that there wasn't much left on the 97th floor after the explosions were set off.
Blame the Islamofascists...in the bushes.
well here is a close-up of the hole in wtc1 - several things get my attention.
http://nineeleven2001.t35.com/images/newyork-1.html
* the woman standing right at the edge would've had to climb thru 150 tons of flaming 767 debris including mangled remains of passengers - if flight11 had actually hit wtc1.
* a section of perimeter columns seems to have been blown outward meaning that flight11 would've had to somehow kick it back behind itself - if it had actually hit wtc1.
* the perimeter columns where the wingtips supposedly hit were not severed, meaning that either the wingtips were invisible, since they did not fall to the street below - or flight11 did not actually hit wtc1.
and watching an analyses of the only footage of the wtc1 "767 hit", we can see that the part of the hole where the right wingtip supposedly hit was not initially there and was merely more 9/11 fakery.
http://photo.livevideo.com/socialservice
What does 9/11 expert "Bolioboffin" say about all this? Oh, and the expert on all things pertained to flying: "WmSegar". What say HE?
GREAT picture! Thanks for posting that. It shows beyond any doubt that a large airliner at high speed crashed into the building. There can be no question now.
Great job, Spooky!
Right you are!
Everyone knows that 150 tons of aluminum airline can vanish into a steel and concrete hole that is too small for it and that a mere woman could climb thru the invisible burning wreckage of it only 30 minutes later!
Obviously, that hole was created by a nuclear explosion.
Open your eyes people!
No that hole was created by an aluminum 767 with a plastic nosecone which disappeared without a trace.
Go back to sleep people!
look at all the wtc beams and stuff that woman had to climb around to get to where she was standing at the edge!
obviously no real 767 hit there because there is no 767 debris.
NIST claims that the "fireproofing was blown off"? so what! there was no fire there and her presence there contradicts that false claim.
how could it be "hot enough to destroy the integrity of the steel" while also not even being hot enough to destroy the integrity of her skin?
Post a Comment
<< Home