9/11 Hijacker Tactics-- Bottom Line
To emphasize--- the bottom line for me dwelling on how the 9/11 hijackers might have taken control of the planes, is NOT to say that it is impossible that hijackers armed with knives, boxcutters, mace, and fake bombs could have taken over four planes. That part, while slightly unbelievable, is in the realm of possibility.
What I find in the realm of IMPOSSIBILITY is that hijackers armed with knives, boxcutters, mace, and fake bombs could have taken over four planes WITHOUT ONE PILOT EVER ALERTING AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL THAT A HIJACKING WAS OCCURRING.
This means, either that;
1) the authorities are covering up the hijack alert by the pilots because it means there was a severe failure on the part of NORAD, or
2) the pilots never alerted ATC of the hijackings, meaning that the hijackings did not occur the way the official narrative portrays them.
What I find in the realm of IMPOSSIBILITY is that hijackers armed with knives, boxcutters, mace, and fake bombs could have taken over four planes WITHOUT ONE PILOT EVER ALERTING AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL THAT A HIJACKING WAS OCCURRING.
This means, either that;
1) the authorities are covering up the hijack alert by the pilots because it means there was a severe failure on the part of NORAD, or
2) the pilots never alerted ATC of the hijackings, meaning that the hijackings did not occur the way the official narrative portrays them.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home