Insider Trading on 9/11
As noted in the previous post, Karl Schwarz seems to have some important information about illegal monetary transactions that were covered up by the destruction of 9/11. The transactions Schwartz refers to may well be real, but their linkage to 9/11 seems far from clear.
What is very clear is that there were strange financial dealings right before 9/11 that suggested that someone had insider knowledge of the catastrophes involving American and United Airlines.
The 9/11 insider trading story is laid out very clearly in Ruppert's "Crossing the Rubicon", in Chapter 19-- "9/11 Insider Trading, or 'You Didn't Really See That, Even Though We Saw It'".
Right after 9/11 there were several articles in mainstream sources describing the insider trading. Then, the media just completely forgot about these stories and now pretends they never existed.
We have to assume the media is covering for the government or somebody very powerful-- because the only people who might know of the attacks ahead of time and who would never get prosecuted for insider trading are 1) the terrorists, and 2) extremely powerful US officials.
The key point is that if the insider trading was done by the terrorists, there is no reason, a priori, for the media to cover this up.
Thus, by default, the insider trading HAD to be done by powerful US officials.
Moreover, given the clear connections with CIA officials and Wall Street bankers AND the known connections between the 9/11 hijackers and the CIA, the insider trading was almost certainly done by CIA officials or somebody powerful with CIA contacts. And this means of course that the CIA had foreknowledge of the attacks.
You can see why the media likes to ignore this story now, can't you?
What is very clear is that there were strange financial dealings right before 9/11 that suggested that someone had insider knowledge of the catastrophes involving American and United Airlines.
The 9/11 insider trading story is laid out very clearly in Ruppert's "Crossing the Rubicon", in Chapter 19-- "9/11 Insider Trading, or 'You Didn't Really See That, Even Though We Saw It'".
Right after 9/11 there were several articles in mainstream sources describing the insider trading. Then, the media just completely forgot about these stories and now pretends they never existed.
We have to assume the media is covering for the government or somebody very powerful-- because the only people who might know of the attacks ahead of time and who would never get prosecuted for insider trading are 1) the terrorists, and 2) extremely powerful US officials.
The key point is that if the insider trading was done by the terrorists, there is no reason, a priori, for the media to cover this up.
Thus, by default, the insider trading HAD to be done by powerful US officials.
Moreover, given the clear connections with CIA officials and Wall Street bankers AND the known connections between the 9/11 hijackers and the CIA, the insider trading was almost certainly done by CIA officials or somebody powerful with CIA contacts. And this means of course that the CIA had foreknowledge of the attacks.
You can see why the media likes to ignore this story now, can't you?
posted by spooked at 11:12 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home