Silence from the Mainstream Media

On Ruppert's "Crossing the Rubicon".

Is the book really not even worth rebutting?

Or is silence a better response from their viewpoint?

I wonder if Ruppert is surprised at how little attention it has gotten. I would be kind of depressed myself.

Still, it's #455 on Amazon, even though it has gotten amazing little attention.

David Ray Griffin's "The New Pearl Harbor" is #2,066
(Griffin's book on the 9/11 Commission Report is #8,381)

The 9/11 Commission Report itself is #111.

So Ruppert is doing quite well, but gets no press at all. I wonder if at some point the political/media borg will have to address the book however.

Certainly the wargame/highjacking drill issue is still very much out in the public domain with this book, and the government has not made any real official statement regarding it.

Of note actually, is that although back in May 2004, CNN and USA Today broke stories that NORAD had been running drills that simulated hijacked planes crashing into buildings BEFORE 9/11, they didn't mention the wargames that were running ON 9/11. Those stories were only mentioned by the Canadian Toronto Star and Richard Clarke's book, as well as a couple of low profile US publications.

So the 9/11 wargame issue, perhaps THE KEY to 9/11, is being pushed out into the public domain by Rupert's book and various web-site and weblogs (such as this one).

I sitll believe this issue could change the public's perception of 9/11 if it could ever be made widely known.

We'll see if that ever happens.