All Hell Breaks Loose

First, Popular Mechanics tries to debunk 9/11 conspiracies with this story. But all this article really shows is the problem with making a case based on physical evidence. This is Mike Ruppert's point, and a point I have brought up before (but keep forgetting). The article really does nothing to address MANY important questions about 9/11, as excellently rebutted by Jim Hoffman here. Overall, I think this article actually HELPS the 9/11 skeptic community to some extent, because it highlights the overall idea that people are skeptical of the official 9/11 story yet leaves so many critical questions unanswered.

Next, the NY Times comes out with a story today showing that YES THE "DOTS" WERE FUCKING "CONNECTED"!!!.

The report discloses that the Federal Aviation Administration, despite being focused on risks of hijackings overseas, warned airports in the spring of 2001 that if "the intent of the hijacker is not to exchange hostages for prisoners, but to commit suicide in a spectacular explosion, a domestic hijacking would probably be preferable."

The article lays 9/11 right at the doorstep of the FAA. Even if the FAA was more concerned about expediting airline travel than stopping hijackings, why didn't the Bush administraiton over-ride this? Moreover--- why the FUCK wasn't NORAD on high alert for hijackings? The Bush administration should be raked over the coals for this. It is nothing short of treason.

Then, this article in the NY Times: North Korea Says It Has Nuclear Weapons and Rejects Talks. This basically speaks for itself.

Finally, a poster on Daily Kos shows why bloggers are kicking ass over the mainstream media. This story is on the Jeff Gannon-White House propaganda machine. It's got gay sex, the CIA, the Plame affair and selling the Iraq war all rolled into one nice package.

That's quite a shit storm.