Why Did the FAA Suspect Flight 93 Was Hijacked at 9:16am????
NORAD officers Gen. Larry Arnold and Col. Alan Scott have even admitted that the FAA warned them about flight 93 (see items 7, 8, and 9 in the link), however this point has been wiped out in the 9/11 commission report. The government changed this story and rewrote history for no apparent reason.
So what the heck happened right before 9:16am that made the FAA suspect flight 93 was a hijack?
At this point, the plane was on course, the transponder was on, there were no phone calls from passengers yet, there was no apparent message from the captain of flight 93.
What made the FAA think flight 93 was a hijack?
SOMETHING IMPORTANT IS BEING COVERED UP HERE!
What is being covered up?
What may have been a tip-off that flight 93 was a hijack?
Possibilities:
1) the pilots warned ground control before 9:16am of suspicious passengers on the plane or even the early stages of a hijack, and this is what is being covered up. However, this does not explain the struggle in the cockpit at 9:28am heard over the radio. Why would the hijackers wait so long (12 minutes) to attack the cockpit when they were already running late, why didn't the pilots secure the door better if they knew there was a good chance of a hijack and why weren't the pilots prepared for a cockpit intrusion? Also, why would the government cover this story up?
2) the FAA knew there were suspicious passengers on the flight, and were moved to take action after the WTC hits. Possible, but why would this be covered up?
3) the FAA warned NORAD of the hijacking at 9:16am, and NORAD simply didn't respond-- perhaps a mole intercepted the order and prevented it from being passed on. However, at least two NORAD officers knew of the warning, and Vice-President Cheney certainly seemed aware of some plane heading to Washington early on. While I can see why this story might be covered up, the idea that NORAD didn't know of the hijacked plane doesn't completely make sense.
4) the FAA knew flight 93 was a hijacking exercise plane, and thus gave it to NORAD as a warning to watch out for. But NORAD doesn't want to admit that it was running a hijack exercise. This makes the most sense to me in terms of what we already have hints of and this is clearly something the government would want to cover up.
So what the heck happened right before 9:16am that made the FAA suspect flight 93 was a hijack?
At this point, the plane was on course, the transponder was on, there were no phone calls from passengers yet, there was no apparent message from the captain of flight 93.
What made the FAA think flight 93 was a hijack?
SOMETHING IMPORTANT IS BEING COVERED UP HERE!
What is being covered up?
What may have been a tip-off that flight 93 was a hijack?
Possibilities:
1) the pilots warned ground control before 9:16am of suspicious passengers on the plane or even the early stages of a hijack, and this is what is being covered up. However, this does not explain the struggle in the cockpit at 9:28am heard over the radio. Why would the hijackers wait so long (12 minutes) to attack the cockpit when they were already running late, why didn't the pilots secure the door better if they knew there was a good chance of a hijack and why weren't the pilots prepared for a cockpit intrusion? Also, why would the government cover this story up?
2) the FAA knew there were suspicious passengers on the flight, and were moved to take action after the WTC hits. Possible, but why would this be covered up?
3) the FAA warned NORAD of the hijacking at 9:16am, and NORAD simply didn't respond-- perhaps a mole intercepted the order and prevented it from being passed on. However, at least two NORAD officers knew of the warning, and Vice-President Cheney certainly seemed aware of some plane heading to Washington early on. While I can see why this story might be covered up, the idea that NORAD didn't know of the hijacked plane doesn't completely make sense.
4) the FAA knew flight 93 was a hijacking exercise plane, and thus gave it to NORAD as a warning to watch out for. But NORAD doesn't want to admit that it was running a hijack exercise. This makes the most sense to me in terms of what we already have hints of and this is clearly something the government would want to cover up.
posted by spooked at 10:28 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home