The Drumbeat Gets Louder
"Former MI5 Agent Says 9/11 An Inside Job".
More and more credible people seem to be "coming out" about 9/11.
Attack Was 'Coup de'tat,' Buildings Were Demolished By Controlled Demolitions.I think this guy might know what he's talking about.
More and more credible people seem to be "coming out" about 9/11.
posted by spooked at 9:59 PM
5 Comments:
Just got back from my NYC 9/11 meeting. One of our members Nico Haupt showed me a very intriguing photo of the Pentagon clearly taken VERY EARLY after whatever hit the Pentagon, hit the Pentagon. It shows ABSOLUTELY NO RECOGNIZABLE PLANE, OR PLANE PIECES. Viewing this photo, it is clear beyond any doubt that no AA Flight 77 struck this impact area. Here is the link:
http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/11.jpg
As always, I eagerly await your take on this. :)
Well.... actually, the impact site is to the right, and this picture was taken after the wall collapsed. You can see the break in the Pentagon wall.
I don't know-- a lot of people would say the plane went inside and that's why you can't see it. And there were some plane parts that were found outside the Pentagon. The main problem is what happened to parts of the wings and to the tail?
These couldn't have gone into the hole. There are other reason to think something besides a 757 hit the Pentagon, as I went over in a post a couple days back.
Overall, I think it is possible that flight 77 hit the Pentagon. I can't rule it out completely, but I also have strong reasons to doubt it as well.
exactly. if the plane went inside, then where are the wings? did they fold themselves up neatly, in order to fit into the small hole that is the ONLY visable penetration of the wall? those HUGE wings would HAVE to have been sheered off, and subsequently left right there at the entrance. WHATEVER hit the Fistagon, it obviously wasn't AA Flight 77. Show me the wreckage. It simply is nowhere to be found.
http://img258.echo.cx/img258/2405/misslehole2fg.gif
Whatever managed to penetrate through all those ring walls, was DEFINATELY NOT A THIN-SKINNED, ALUMINIUM CLAD AIRLINER.
watch the second video here:
http://www.terrorize.dk/911/pentagon3/
Eyewitness Don Wright repeatedly says he saw a "Small, commuter plane" with two engines hit. That could work well with what you recently just posted...that very odd (and apparantly, old) two-engined flying missle. properly painted in AA guise and flying fast, that would fool a whole lot of people into thinking it was a commericial plane.
Good find Rob. Personally, I think someone who saw the plane from a distance might have a better view of what kind of plane than someone on the road who saw it rush by in one second.
And a small plane would fit with that old missile I found that looks like a small plane.
Post a Comment
<< Home