Hopefully, My Last Analysis of the Flight 93 Crash: Where I Show the Official Story Is Simply Wrong
Here is the official government version of the flight 93 crash (all of the details can be found in the book "Among the Heroes" by Jere Longman):
A
B
C
According to the official story, the remains of people that were in or near the flight 93 cockpit were found outside the crater, whereas all other passenger remains were found in the hole. BUT-- both types of remains were quite minimal-- they only found about 10% of the total possible remains from the known passengers. In other words, there should have been about 7000 pounds of body parts but they only found 700 pounds worth.
Things that don't make sense:
1) That the front of the plane broke up up while the rest of the plane went in the ground. By normal physical principles, either the nose went into the ground first followed by the fuselage or the plane didn't go into the ground period. I don't see any way around it. A good comparison would be with the planes crashing into the WTC: the nose didn't break off as the planes hit and broke through the wall-- the nose went in first. Moreover, the front of the plane smashing into bits should slow down the momentum of the plane quite a bit and thus it is not clear what drove the rest of the plane into the ground.
2) How did the front of the plane that supposedly didn't go into the ground break entirely into very small pieces? There wasn't even large sections of seats-- it's as if the front of the plane totally disintegrated. How would smashing into soft ground do this? Even an explosion doesn't rip everything into small unrecognizable pieces.
3) I can see bodies vaporizing to some degree if they were outside the crater and were subjected to the full force of the explosion and fire, but I don't understand why more intact bodies weren't recovered from the crumpled plane in the crater. What force shredded even these bodies to such an extreme degree?
4) What caused some debris from the plane to be found miles away? Some significant debris, including human remains and pieces of seats were found two miles away at Indian Lake.
D
Scenario A would be analogous to most plane crashes. An example is the recent crash of the Helios flight in Greece-- the plane crashed into the ground going full speed, but large sections of the plane were recovered including the tail, and passenger bodies were relatively intact.
Scenario B, where the plane goes into the ground but the tail sticks out-- that was based on an actual plane crash that happened in Indiana 45 years ago (flight 710).
CONCLUSIONS:
Either--
1) the whole crash site was faked (the lack of any tail section near the crater is very fishy since the black boxes were found in the hole) with a planted bomb and human remains were planted later, or
2) the plane had a massive bomb on it (in the cockpit area?) that went right off before the plane crashed or the plane was shot by a powerful missile right before the plane crashed. But the timing is tricky for either detonating a bomb or being struck by a missile in order for the rest of the plane to bury itself in the ground. Possibly, the plane was blown up and they are just lying about the plane and the black boxes being in the ground in order to cover up that the plane blew into smithereens by a missile or bomb right before it crashed. But if this is the case, what created the crater?
3) The plane crash site was bombed by interceptor jets after it crashed. But if the plane crashed, why would they need to bomb it, and how could they be sure there were no witnesses? Also, wouldn't there be two seismic signals-- the crash and the bombing?
Since we had two Boeing 757 crashes on 9/11, both with suspicious holes and not enough debris (flight 77/Pentagon and flight 93), I have to think both were faked. But if this is true, it is mind-boggling to think how they must have planned and coordinated this. And if this is all fake, why didn't they do a better job? Why did they make it look so fake? Just to stoke conspiracies? To save the cost of a couple of 757's?
None of it makes a lot of sense, but the clear thing is that THE OFFICIAL FLIGHT 93 CRASH STORY IS WRONG!
A
B
C
According to the official story, the remains of people that were in or near the flight 93 cockpit were found outside the crater, whereas all other passenger remains were found in the hole. BUT-- both types of remains were quite minimal-- they only found about 10% of the total possible remains from the known passengers. In other words, there should have been about 7000 pounds of body parts but they only found 700 pounds worth.
Things that don't make sense:
1) That the front of the plane broke up up while the rest of the plane went in the ground. By normal physical principles, either the nose went into the ground first followed by the fuselage or the plane didn't go into the ground period. I don't see any way around it. A good comparison would be with the planes crashing into the WTC: the nose didn't break off as the planes hit and broke through the wall-- the nose went in first. Moreover, the front of the plane smashing into bits should slow down the momentum of the plane quite a bit and thus it is not clear what drove the rest of the plane into the ground.
2) How did the front of the plane that supposedly didn't go into the ground break entirely into very small pieces? There wasn't even large sections of seats-- it's as if the front of the plane totally disintegrated. How would smashing into soft ground do this? Even an explosion doesn't rip everything into small unrecognizable pieces.
3) I can see bodies vaporizing to some degree if they were outside the crater and were subjected to the full force of the explosion and fire, but I don't understand why more intact bodies weren't recovered from the crumpled plane in the crater. What force shredded even these bodies to such an extreme degree?
4) What caused some debris from the plane to be found miles away? Some significant debris, including human remains and pieces of seats were found two miles away at Indian Lake.
D
Scenario A would be analogous to most plane crashes. An example is the recent crash of the Helios flight in Greece-- the plane crashed into the ground going full speed, but large sections of the plane were recovered including the tail, and passenger bodies were relatively intact.
Scenario B, where the plane goes into the ground but the tail sticks out-- that was based on an actual plane crash that happened in Indiana 45 years ago (flight 710).
CONCLUSIONS:
Either--
1) the whole crash site was faked (the lack of any tail section near the crater is very fishy since the black boxes were found in the hole) with a planted bomb and human remains were planted later, or
2) the plane had a massive bomb on it (in the cockpit area?) that went right off before the plane crashed or the plane was shot by a powerful missile right before the plane crashed. But the timing is tricky for either detonating a bomb or being struck by a missile in order for the rest of the plane to bury itself in the ground. Possibly, the plane was blown up and they are just lying about the plane and the black boxes being in the ground in order to cover up that the plane blew into smithereens by a missile or bomb right before it crashed. But if this is the case, what created the crater?
3) The plane crash site was bombed by interceptor jets after it crashed. But if the plane crashed, why would they need to bomb it, and how could they be sure there were no witnesses? Also, wouldn't there be two seismic signals-- the crash and the bombing?
Since we had two Boeing 757 crashes on 9/11, both with suspicious holes and not enough debris (flight 77/Pentagon and flight 93), I have to think both were faked. But if this is true, it is mind-boggling to think how they must have planned and coordinated this. And if this is all fake, why didn't they do a better job? Why did they make it look so fake? Just to stoke conspiracies? To save the cost of a couple of 757's?
None of it makes a lot of sense, but the clear thing is that THE OFFICIAL FLIGHT 93 CRASH STORY IS WRONG!
posted by spooked at 10:02 AM
128 Comments:
If you weant to see larger version of the figures, please click on them and then click again.
Flight 93 crashed into an area that once was a strip mine. The ground was not packed as solidly as one would expect; that's why the remains of the jet burrowed into the ground.
As for plane debris being found so far from the site, one can only conclude that Flight 93 was shot down because parts certainly don't bounce that far -- especially when colliding with soft ground.
Planes don't "burrow into the ground." Most anything that hits the ground at a few hundred miles an hour is going to shatter like a cheap glass.
Have you EVER seen the tail of a plane sticking out of the ground after an accident?
The density of the ground doesn't matter-- and this is the same reason why you wouldn't want to belly flop into a pool from the same heights you might be tempted to dive in (20-30 m).
Get some continuum mechanics under your belt and come back to us on this...
Wow...well, I'm certainly convinced. You are to be commended for this public service. However, now that this has been all figured out, could you get to work finding out what Soylent Green is REALLY made of?
Wow, I see there's a whole lotta crazy goin' on in here.
So, it wasn't muslim terrorists after all?
You might be on to a world-wide conspiracy here... Maybe Palestinian suicide bombers are actually Israeli-made mannequins strapped with bombs...
This is pure horseshit.
Occam's Razor cuts this dumbass theory to ribbons.
So Bush faked 9/11 and then framed make-believe terrorists from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Lebanon, and the UAE? But if Iraq and Afghanistan were his ultimate targets and he wanted 9/11 to be the reason for invading them, why didn't he just say the make-believe terrorists were from those two countries? I mean, really...how hard could that have been for a "liar" like Bush?
Your brilliant conclusion:
"None of it makes a lot of sense..."
I think this goes without saying.
Maybe you should leave the investigation to someone who has some experience in the field of aviation crashes, instead of a politically motivated jackass.
...and despite his "genius" at fooling the world on 9/11, Bush still couldn't figure out a way to fake WMD stockpiles in Iraq. Go figure.
omgrofflecakes
lmaoomgbbq
that has got to be the funniest thing i have evar read in a long time.
Ah ha ha ha ha ha, woooooo ha ha ha.
What an incredible coincidence that two planes would crash into the World Trade Center on live TV, at the same time that Bush was setting off the controlled demolition explosives, all just moments before the Pentagon was hit with a missile, probably as a diversion to keep people from seeing the Men in Black planting body parts and plane wreckage in Pennsylvania. Too bad people who are so expert at planting plane wreckage couldn't bring themselves to plant parts from the front of the plane. Budget cuts, I guess.
Anyway, what another amazing coincidence that so many people would skip the country and go into hiding, each one with an identical cover story to phone in to their loved ones via cell phone. "Honey, the hijackers killed the pilot." Oh, yeah. Right. I hear that excuse from my teenage son every time he has a fender bender.
Now if we could just get Osama to go back to denying the Al Qaeda plot story. He sort of complicates matters.
By the way, where's all this oil we were supposed to be getting from the Iraq invasion? I could sure use some for my 767.
*yawn*
My god you must be so bored.
HUMINT? hahaha...
these drawings? hahahaha...
Your "theories"? hahahaha....
This site must be a joke.
So all the answering messages recorded from ppl on Flight 93 were faked too? And what about the cockpit voice recorder? And Allahu akubar being yelled out over and over again just before the plane broke apart? All that faked too, huh?
I honestly don't understand why ppl like you just refuse to accept what REALLY happened.
And after all, your hero (and the New York Times' hero and the MSM hero and all you left wing nutjobs' hero) Osama Bin Laden HIMSELF said it was an Al Qaeda event.
Guess that's faked too, huh?
You have got to be the nuttiest investigator ever existed. Pink Panther with his magnifying glass should take a bow.
You can't very well compare it to the Helios crash, 93 pretty much flew straight into the ground under power, while the Helios flight ran out of fuel and glided into a hill, completely different types of crashes. But then a skyscraper isn't the same as a bunny cage either.
Holy crud, that entire theory is almost as brilliant as testing the physical threshholds of rabbit wire.
Perfect controlled environment, that one.
Dude those pictures sold me, especially the bit about the tail sticking out of the ground.
Damn I wish I were as smart as you!
That quite literally is the stupidest thing i've ever read. I've taught at both the high school and collegiate levels and have seen quite bit of stupid in my time...but this takes the cake.
The plane took a nose dive into the earth at a speed above 400mph. The blackbox clearly indicates this as well as the accompanying audiotapes that reveal Ziad Jarrah and Saeed al-Ghamdi agreeing to crash the plane.
This is satire, right. Please, let it be satire. Otherwise, you need some serious help and it scares me that you're walking around unsupervised.
I saw Condi Rice in the pilot's cabin on that flight. She deliberately flew the plane into the ground. At the last second she leaped out of the window with a parachute. The word "Haliburton" was stenciled on the 'chute.
Man, time to get your tinfoil hat resized. I think it's cutting your circulation off.
A WINNAR IS YUO!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=56836&mesg_id=56836
Here's something to ponder, if the government set up 9/11 and had those planes fly into the WTC, and the "missle" hit the pentagon, why would they have fighters shoot down flight 93 and then lie about it? Wouldn't it make more sense for them to either let it go on to Washington and hit a building, or shoot it down and claim credit for saving the White House or Capitol?
I do believe the government was behind the whole thing, but it would take a lot longer than the 8 months Bush was in office to plan it.. who would have had the time.. hmmm.. could it be... [church lady voice]CLINTON?????[/church lady voice]
When you show these notepad drawings to your friends and family, do they just nod and smile with a familiar "Uh huhmmmm"?
Here are a few things that will keep you up at night, trying to figure out how to complete your 9/11 magic trick:
1) What happened to all of those passengers on 9/11? Did we kill them, or are they all in hiding?
2) Why do so many witnesses confirm seeing planes that crashed into things and exploded?
3) Considering that we can't even keep wiretapping of financial accounts secret (an event that only takes dozens of people to plan) how is it that we managed to keep the hundreds of US military/industrial complex/CIA/FBI/ATC people quiet about 9/11?
-John
You do understand that if flight 93 and WTC were faked that this means every single public official from dogcatcher to Bush is in on it. The cop on the street, the ambulance driver, the fireman, the first-grade teacher ... everyone. They are all in on it together somehow.
The only way to combat this is armed rebellion. We have to take over the government before it is too late. 2008 is way too late, folks.
Some of those public officials in on this are Democrats that have been subverted by greed and power. It is very difficult to trust anyone that has ever held power in their hands. Keep that in mind when you send your children to school.
Does your rubber room have a widow?
This is unbelievably stupid. What are you, some kind of Oliver Stone wannabe?
Have you ever bothered to look at the extensive photographic record of other airliner crashes?
There are literally dozens of cases where the dynamics of the crash matched that of Flight 93.
Again, your total lack of aeronautics, engineering, and physics, renders you completely incapable of anything remotely resembling an accurate model of the circumstances of these incidents. The only thing you prove by continuing this farce is your own ignorance and inability to face the facts.
While many would LIKE to believe there was a conspiracy, virtually NO ONE takes the idea seriously anymore. Even the biggest Bushco. haters around have dismissed the idea as ridiculous.
The "Condi Rice in a Haliburton parachute" theory has been completely discredited.
We now know that after shooting Lee Harvey Oswald, Jack Ruby was cryogenically frozen, cloned, and stored in Rumsefeld's basement until being thawed out and used to fly the planes into the WTC, etc. If you want I can draw you a picture.
Your experiments prove beyond any doubt, that you are indeed a nut job.
This website is great! How did you come up with this idea? I swear, I have not read anything this funny in years. You should be on T.V. Have you thought of making fun of others besides moonbats? If not you should consider it. Ohh..you should do another "analysis" of the first WTC bombing. I bet it would be a riot. Thank you so much for making my year.
This is kind of like the idea "I wrote it down then I read it, so it must be true". Your drawings don't really amount to much but I'm glad you have to much extra time on your hands.
Keep up the ground breaking work!
I wont bother commenting on your "theory," as that ground as been well covered by other posters. I will add, however, that your drawings are the most amateurish ones I have seen since finishing 3rd grade art class. FYI, do you know that lack of understanding of spatial relationships is a symptom of insanity?
You missed two other possible conclusions:
1. It happened just like the FAA said.
2. You're a complete fucking idiot.
Please leave the science to the grownups.
What a complete jackass. Your pictures sure are funny looking though. I'm sure alot more thought went into them than the actual professionals that study wreckage and the dynamics of plane crashes.
Ah... moonbattery...
Here's your answer
Have you ever seen slow motion video footage of a bullet hitting something hard? The front part of the bullet vaporizes. The energy transfer on the front of the colliding object is so massive that it explodes into what is literally a powder of metal flakes. That impact absorbs a significant ammount of the velocity and force, and the rest of the bullet receives less damage (mostly deformation). After the shot the front of the bullet has been reduced to powder, the back of the bullet is usually still recoverable and somewhat recognizable.
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED HERE! The aircraft, weighing a MASSIVE ammount and moving probably about 700 mph slammed almost vertically into the ground. The nose of the plane absorbed the highest ammount of force and completely exploded on impact, exactly as you would expect. This absorbed a portion of the impact (weakening the ground and maybe slowing the tail down a few hundred miles per hour as it followed the nose in), allowing the rest of the aircraft to bury istelf, exactly as a bullet would have.
It's really quite obvious, and you flit around the edges of this answer yourself in your "Things That Don't Make Sense". For example: "Moreover, the front of the plane smashing into bits should slow down the momentum of the plane quite a bit and thus it is not clear what drove the rest of the plane into the ground." You just answered it yourself right there: the front of the plane "smashing into bits" (eg- exploding!) DID IN FACT "slow down the momentum" of the rest of the plane "quite a bit". In fact, it was this slowing of momentum that allowed the rest of the plane to be driven into the ground instead of exploding as the nose had.
As the front of the plane exploded, it's debris was scattered over a wide area, again exactly as you would expect and as was found on site. The rest, going too slowly now to completely explode but still fast enough to break dirt, buried itself. This is exactly like a bullet, and completely answers your "Things that don't Make Sense" #2 and #4.
#3 asks why bodies inside the tail section were not recovered in better shape. Again, nothing surprising here. Bodies in a head on car crash are routinely torn to pieces and horribly mangled; imagine a hundred plus-ton aircraft going from 700 mph to dead stop in about 1 second. You're not going to find much of a recognizable soft squishy human left. Even in the tail!
The only scenario that makes sense is exactly what the crash investigators concluded. It's the only one that matches the physical evidence and logic.
Next Up on Humint Events Online:
Disproving Copernicus; The World is Really Flat After All.
Please, all I really wanna know is: Did the bunny get away??!
Wow! These right-wing neo-nazis are sure being hard on you! Just so you feel better, I printed your diagrams and I'm gonna take them home for my grandkids to color. When they ask where they came from, I'm gonna tell 'em Bozo the Clown sent them. See there... all your hard work was not in vain!
I really love these wacky parody sites of those kook conspiracy theory people!
ROFLMAO!!!! Obviously you have no idea what happens to an aircraft impacting the ground at those speeds. I am surprised anything over two inches long would be found.
You have done a masterful analysis of the crash of flight 93. You are to be commended. This will surely blow the cover off of the whole crooked scheme.
Ignore all the negative comments above. They are simply the MiB attempting to make a smokescreen of ridicule to mask your stunning revelation of the truth.
I must caution you however, that you are now in great danger. They will stop at nothing to prevent you from making your discoveries widely known. You must exercise great care as they will surely attempt to silence you in any way possible.
Have someone else start your car. Preferably someone you care little for. Vary the routes you drive. Never take the same route two days in a row. Constantly check your rearview mirrors (discreetly, do not move your head, just glance with your eyes) for tail vehicles.
If you must meet anyone do so in a public place so that there are witnesses at all times. Make sure there are not too few people but be doubly cautious to avoid crowds where pursuers and assailants may find easy cover.
Be cautious what you say on the phone, they are listening. Always listening. They have lasers that they can use to pick up the vibrations of your windowpanes and turn those vibrations back into audible sound (there are devices you can attach to your windowpanes to vibrate them in ways that prevent this method from working.)
You will be contacted shortly by our operatives so that we may arrange for your transport to a safe house. Once there we will provide you more information we have uncovered about the chilling conspiracy that threatens the freedoms of all Americans.
Le Resistance.
Tell me again how sheep's bladders can be employed to prevent earthquakes.
This site is a parody, right?
Whats truely sad - is that Le Resistance isnt kidding...
Does this look familiar?
http://www.airdisaster.com/special/special-ua585.shtml
Please keep up the wonderful research....No wonder you guys keep losing elections.
Any chance you could set things up and sell your drawings as prints?
PayPal?
Remember the Valuejet that went nose down into the Florida swamps about 10 ago? You don't?? (Hint: no debris left over). Maybe you should do some basic "research" before posting your lunatic cartoons.
One of you moonbats should volunteer to let a fully fueled jetliner go nose-first into your house, just so you can see this "controlled demolition" for yourself...
I guess the Neocons must have set this one up in 1974 as well.
Quote...
Not many pieces of wreckage larger than 3 feet long could be found after a Turkish Airlines DC-10 crashed into a forest at a high rate of speed at Ermenonville, France. A defective latching mechanism on the cargo door caused it to fail in flight resulting in decompression and loss of all hydraulic control. All 346 people aboard were killed in the accident. (March 3, 1974)
End quote
http://www.planecrashinfo.com/w740303.htm
Is it hard to breathe with your head that far up your ass?
Love the ruled paper, btw.
This is another loser, who's life has been a failure. He is now screaming for attention. Like a three year old crying to a babysitter because his mommy left him. I pray God saves your soul, the shit you write is pure blasfamy. I hope none of the victim's families see this.
You are a damned loon!
Take off your tinfoil hat, so your brain can get some air...
No offense, but I hope you get cancer.
Liberal...
its not what it used to be
This is yet another example of why I no longer consider myself a liberal...
You can relate to some...but most are just "out-there"
Whoa, dude. Um... still in high school? Just checking...
Is this post a joke? I hope so, otherwise it shows your complete lack of knowledge about the subject. And I mean complete. Almost comical.
Have you no recollection of other planes that have 'crashed' in the approximate same manner? There is nothing about the crash site nor the debris that should promote any other reason other than the official version. Trust me... I am a pilot, worked for the safety board and have read way too many accounts of horrible accidents.
Is that High School notebook paper? Not even 'college ruled' is it?
I loooove this stuff.
BushChimpHitler is an idiot, buffoon, incapable....
But he can take down the towers and fool the entire world using faked plane crashes, etc.
One or the other you dork... he's either a genius that's responsible for all of this or stupid.
Can't be both.
*I have an idea about you and your grade-school drawings, however.
You really need to back to your doctor and get him to upp the dosage on your medication. Maybe then you wont be so delusional and prone to these paraniod conspiracy theories.
Get real you unqualified nutcase.
I've only one question.
Is this sort of stupidity the result of public school or lead-based paint chips?
holy cow. it's hard for me to believe anytime read one of these nuts ramblings.
I think the easiest way to grasp how idiotic your theory's are is to take a few steps back and ask yourself the real "why".
If you think the trade towers where a controlled detonation, whyy would the government create an elaborate airplane excuse? why not "the terrorists used explosives". pretty simple huh? You can go back even further. Is there really any reason "why" anyone would have any need to fake this? there are millions of simple way to get to the same political end any of your crackpot theorys are based on.
The only thing you can prove by subscribing to these theories is you jump to conclusions about things you can't understand.
You obviously think you're an intelligent person, and it's very romantic to be fighting for a cause, but maybe you should work on something that could make a difference instead.
You really need to back to your doctor and get him to upp the dosage on your medication. Maybe then you wont be so delusional and prone to these paraniod conspiracy theories.
Get real you unqualified nutcase.
I am now quite a bit dumber than I was before reading this laughable piece of refuse.
I'm not as dumb as the author, but his inane rant has dulled my intellect nonetheless.
One question on your drawings....Does your mommy have the originals posted on her refrigerator?
Please consider never talking to anyone again. Maybe you can move far, far away. Like Mongolia. The thought that people like you are in the same country makes me physically ill.
You and your ilk do NOT deserve to live in America.
Wow! Did you get your engineering degree by drawing a picture of a turtle or a pirate's head?
Son, you're nuttier than squirrel shit. What you should do is, every time you feel a "thought" forming in your "brain", take a hammer, or any hard blunt object, and give yourself a good whack on the bean. Rinse and repeat as necessary.
From now on, you're grounded...from thinking. Ever. Again.
LOLOLOLOLOL
I think the 'highly technical drawings' which look like my 5 year old son drew are what sealed the deal for me. LMAO.
You "911 was an inside job" wack jobs crack me up.
Keep em' coming!
By the way, the plane is upside down in your scribblings. Was that part of the official government report (the one you dispute), or did you just throw that in as a subconscious cry for help with your madness?
The funniest thing is that this loser has dedicated his life to 'finding out the truth' & he's going to use his awesome intellect & reasoning capabilities, proudly displayed here, to do it.
lol, what a douchebag!
Congrats!!!!
You made LGF's Hilarious Lefty Post of the Day
www.littlegreenfootballs.com
Thank you for providing me with hours of entertainment and material. Now I have another post with a Wilhelm Scream in the pipeline for my blog.
Scary Stuff Kids...
What a moron. Must be a Kos follower.
Thanks for the laugh. That was really funny. I particularly enjoy the childlike drawings, presented as serious evidence.
By the way...
If we assume 9/11 was a massive psy-ops campaign, then we can assume that nothing about 9/11 is really as it seems...
If we assume that, well, yes. However, an intelligent person would not begin with an assumption (particularly one as idiotic as that one). A serious person would develop a theory based on the available facts, and would not manufacture "evidence" -- such as your cute little pictures -- to support what is nothing more than a prejudice.
Tell ya what's really scary... he's most likely a voter.
Dude, have you ever read Chomsky? If you haven't you probably should right away. Howard Zinn and Edward Said rock, too. The U.S. and Israel are the root of all evil. I'd be happy to press the button to eliminate all of the imperialist swine that live in both those countries. Keep fighting the good fight!
Spooked writes...
If we assume 9/11 was a massive psy-ops campaign, then we can assume that nothing about 9/11 is really as it seems.
Don't you really mean this?
If we assume that nothing about 9/11 is really as it seems, then we can assume 9/11 was a massive psy-ops campaign.
Good to see that you put that engineering degree from Berkley to good use.
The "WHAT SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED" picture is such a riot. Everytime I look at it, I bust out laughing.
Muffled explosion?....maybe if your 10 miles away. Tail section sticking out of the ground? Uh, duh. Where are the tail sections sticking out of the ground in these photos of similar crashes.
http://killtown.911review.org/flight93/427-585.html
Fellow moonbats should really take a hard look at themselves....really.
Really.
A friend of mine was at the Pentagon-his company operated the heavy cranes- there were plane parts found- along with the bodies. No cruise missles or any of that BS.
I love the "repeat a lie enough and it becomes true" attitude shown here and by other conspiracy nuts.
Well then, based upon your two now
Web-famous "experiments", one can logically deduce that airplanes of the future, in the interest of safety, should be constructed of rabbit wire.
I've alerted Boeing, giving you full credit, of course.
Hopefully, My Last Analysis of the Flight 93 Crash
I think I speak for everyone when I say:
"Please please please please post just one more!"
BTW, I did find one flaw in your work. The "explosion" lines on Figure A of the "What Should Have Happened" diagram are far too rounded. High-speed airline crashes usually produce much spikier lines.
Bravo Spooked.. Great parody site! Typical layout, but with oddball tacks and diagrams exhibiting 5 year old drawing skills... 9 out of 10... keep up the good work.
We're firmly in your corner and support your quest for the truth. Thank you for the brilliant analysis and for exposing the real terrorists.
Sincerely,
M. Moore and C. Sheehan
You should be the poster child for birth control. You are easily the stupidest human being on Earth and you have my sincere pity.
I agree with John from Wuzzadem... please do another. This is awesome and look at all the traffic you're getting.
So do you think maybe it was Bush Jr. that fired from the grassy knoll because his father had a deal with the Saudis to take out Kennedy so Aristotle Onassis could marry his widow in return Onassis would allow the Saudis to invest in Gulf shipping intersts. And for his part Bush Sr. then could secure contracts from the Saudis for Zapata Drilling while simulataneously bidding for the good graces of both Lyndon Johnson's Texas oil interests and Richard Nixon's rise to power rewarding Bush Sr. with the UN ambassadorship.
Tell you what, I'll go buy an RC convertible. We can put Barbie and Ken in the backseat and throw in a couple of GI Joes as driver and SSA Kellerman. Then we can strap a Black Cat to the side of Ken's head to provide incontrovertible truth that the fatal shot did indeed come from the front and consequently proving the conspiracy as fact.
Resolved: henceforth, the nosecones of all planes will be shielded with pieces of your thick skull, so that they will survive disintegration on impact...
Ah, Charlie Sheen, you old raconteur!
Wow. And to think that all these people took the time to get past security screen to leave their comments.
See what you've inspired with your quest for the truth? Carry on, brave sir knight.
You freakin' ziphead.
So Bush faked 9/11 and then framed make-believe terrorists from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Lebanon, and the UAE? But if Iraq and Afghanistan were his ultimate targets and he wanted 9/11 to be the reason for invading them, why didn't he just say the make-believe terrorists were from those two countries? I mean, really...how hard could that have been for a "liar" like Bush?
Because, if the Saudis didn't agree to go along with the plan, the Neocons could then drag their muppets onto Fox News and say "we have clear evidence that implicates _________ and we cannot sit by and allow it to continue."
Yer either with us, or yer with the terrerrists...
Jesus fucking Christ. End yourself.
Another victim of public school physics taught by NEA members...
/and too much aspartame as a child
Try your experiment again with a raw egg representing the airplane.
When your going 600 mph, this is closer to the truth of it.
Speaking as someone with a brother who specialises in air crash investigation, I wish to advise you that your "analysis" is the funniest thing I have seen in years.
My analysis, of your analysis, yields one overwhelmingly evident result.
You're a blithering idiot.
-Sonnabend
www.conservativeunderground.com
I cannot agree with the respondent who said "This is pure horseshit." Horseshit has a useful purpose.
If I were you, Spook, I'd lose the tinfoil hat and invest in disposable diapers. You've got Frisch running out of your ears, man.
To paraphrase from the movie Billy Madison:
Nowhere in your rambling, incoherent post did you come close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. We are all dumber for having read it. I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul.
Le Resistance: Do you actually beleive we don't know where you so called "safe houses" are? We've been watching your every move for a long long time...
Smile for the camera sweetcheeks.
~MiB
Here is the question that bugs me. Why would "BushCo" blow up flight 93, the Pentagon and three World Trade Center buildings? If Bush wanted to use a terrorist attack to start a war why use FIVE attacks (really four attacks and one building that fell)? All he needed was one attack on one of the WTC buildings but goes and increases the chance of being caught or something going wrong by four?
Wow, you should write for the Onion. They need writers with your "Unique" talent.
All Bush would have needed was to reopen the Flight 800 investigation, and "admit" it was taken down by a shoulder-fired missile from that mysterious rental boat.
But c'mon, really! Are you telling me we didn't already have justification for going to war after the many embassy bombings, the first WTC attack and the Cole bombing? That's just plain stupid.
The hardest part in arguing with conspiracy nuts is simply coming to grips with the fact that they're really NOT JOKING!
You're just another Bush hating NUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I have something to tell you that you really really really really need to understand and come to grips with.
Bush won
Twice
Admitting this will be the first step to your recovery.
I think O.J. could use your help finding the real killers
I see you're a loony Bush-hater. Good. I like that.
But this theory isn't as interesting as other 9/11 conspiracy theories I've spread -- errrrr, I mean, heard.
Love and Kisses,
Howard Dean
Are you Sicilian?
"So I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me!"
The Lord, she says you are brilliant brilliant person.
Ok, now I am really upset.
I put in years of planning, recruit people willing to commit suicide (do you know how difficult it is to get someone with any kind of intellegence to kill themselves - try it sometime!), set up terrorist cells in the land of the Great Satan, and wait for the perfect time to pull it off. AND YOU WANT TO GIVE BUSHITLER THE CREDIT???!!! I can't believe it!!!
With Zarq going room temperature, Iraq going Democratic, and my network drying up, I really don't need this now.
OBL
Pure comic genius. Can you do drawings for the WTC attacks?
On a semi-serious note, you do realize that commercial airliners aren't made out of steel or titanium, right?
The conclusions you arrive at are so fantastic and ill-informed, that I am embarrassed FOR you.
I have personally witnessed plane crashes and have seen and handled aircraft debris after the fact. I can professionally attest that you haven't the slightest clue about physics, aircraft construction, behavior of materials at extreme temperatures and speeds and simple common sense.
You are an embarrassment to the country and humans in general. Please get off the internet.
Just a quick question about the "What should have happened" section of your brilliant study: You do realize that Flight 93 was an airliner and not a yard dart, right?
Request: Make a Lego model and analysis of WTC7 complete with a little Lego Dick Cheney planting bombs... please.
You are all fools. This person is nothing less than a comic genius. Nobody would present a site like this for public consumption with the expectation that it would be taken seriously.
The drawings, people, the drawings!
GO TO GOOGLE.COM
LOOK UP GOOGLE VIDEOS
WATCH LOOSE CHANGE 2
IT EXPLAINS EVERYTHING.
I SEE COMPLEATE CHAOS IN OUR FUTURE LADIES AND GENTLEMAN.
Just read your full profile. You left out the part about having spent a great deal of time in a mental institution.
What other lies have we been told? Oh, I know! John Lennon was killed by the government because he knew Jimmy Hoffa was actually behind JFK's assassination. Of course, he was put up to it by a very jealous Richard Nixon who later broke into the Watergate to get back documents implicating him in getting Ronald Reagan's acting career going; I'm sure you know that acting was just a vehicle that would later allow Reagan to get close to Margaret Thatcher who, as it turns out, was none other than Winston Churchill, recipient of a captured Nazi elixor that gave him eternal life but required frequent costume changes.
Ah, hell. Let's just blame it all on Keyser Soze...
Dude, you are so clearly a fountain of disinformation that if you aren't on the government payroll, you should be.
You might try making it less obvious.
great thinking, man.
keep on going!
all the naysayers who posted here are simply pussies.
they are afraid to face life, they'd rather take it up their bums 24/7.
and when it comes to defending america- they run to canada.
they are just a small bunch of meaningless
tax-paying 9-to-5-to-bar sheep.
no amount of patriotism on your part will wake them up.
I think you have just given us a big piece of the clue that perhaps these planes were modified, either with some kind of re-enforced nose cones or a type DU penetrator warhead, that would explain how they were able to burrow into the ground and penetrate the WTC so well.
That sound actually very logical.
The blog is really informative and i like to share it with my friends. It was really valuable.I will keep visiting this blog very often. I am very pleased to find this site.:)
I like your cartoons it reflects. What you sad the below lines....
This has been fantastic site you were created. And that pictures you shown is very informative....
I love this site...
http://www.pregnancymiracleebookreview.com/
Health fitness Supplements must be used by everyone especially old people because they need it in order to moderate their blood flow and to strengthen their bones.
Kitchen appliances can be divided in to major kitchen appliances and small kitchen appliances. Major kitchen appliances are usually built in and they include heavy machinery such as refrigerator, cooking range, oven etc.
Top 10 mp3 players reviews.com is a platform that gives an insight view of the top 10 mp3 players. It provides you with the various rankings as well as the market reports on the best selling mp3 players.
Leadership Development and Management Skills are essential if you want more out of life.
Combat your regular stress with Healthy diet plan
Post a Comment
<< Home