Tales of the Tails
The tails of 757s and 767s are massive structures. The vertical stabilizer is twenty-five to forty feet tall on these planes.
The tail is also the part of the plane that survives the best in a head-on crash. The tail should has less momentum as the plane strikes the building or ground head-on, and the counteracting force slows down the speed of the plane-- thus the tail should not have been subject to the same forces as the from of the plane or the wings.
Of the four planes that crashed on 9/11, not one tail was ever seen by the public and certainly there are no photographs of any of the tail structures from flight 11, 175, 77 or 93.
Moreover, the holes that the planes went into (WTC, Pentagon, ground) are not even large enough for the vertical stabilizer to go into intact. So what happened to the tails? Why didn't one tail from one of the 9/11 planes break off from the crash and ensuing explosion, and then get found near the crash site?
How did every tail just disappear?
Importantly, note how easily the tail of a large jet breaks off in this little movie-- just from a hard landing.
Yet we are expected to believe the tail of all four jets on 9/11 just disappear into whatever they hit?
I call bullshit.
The tail is also the part of the plane that survives the best in a head-on crash. The tail should has less momentum as the plane strikes the building or ground head-on, and the counteracting force slows down the speed of the plane-- thus the tail should not have been subject to the same forces as the from of the plane or the wings.
Of the four planes that crashed on 9/11, not one tail was ever seen by the public and certainly there are no photographs of any of the tail structures from flight 11, 175, 77 or 93.
Moreover, the holes that the planes went into (WTC, Pentagon, ground) are not even large enough for the vertical stabilizer to go into intact. So what happened to the tails? Why didn't one tail from one of the 9/11 planes break off from the crash and ensuing explosion, and then get found near the crash site?
How did every tail just disappear?
Importantly, note how easily the tail of a large jet breaks off in this little movie-- just from a hard landing.
Yet we are expected to believe the tail of all four jets on 9/11 just disappear into whatever they hit?
I call bullshit.
posted by spooked at 9:46 PM
2 Comments:
so...i take it from this post that you may be moving in the direction of 'No Planes" theory? Or...into the 'Holographic Projection' camp? Or both? That's where I lean to at the present time.
I have a clip on one of my 9/11 Media CD's (i know...i still need to get them out to you) of the approach of the "Plane" that hit WTC #2. As you may or may not know, it was a CRYSTAL CLEAR day on 9/11/01 here in NYC. This clip is a wide angle, longshot from the north of both twin towers before the second hit. All of a sudden...LITERALLY OUT OF THIN AIR, pops the supposed UAL flight. I mean, you HAVE to see this clip. The "Plane" LITERALLY just POPS into view out of NOWHERE. There is at one moment just clear sky, then presto..a 'Plane' appears. I personally believe that that was the instant the holographic cloaking technology kicked in. This clip is FUCKIN' FREAKY.
I think I saw that clip Rob, it is VERY weird.
And yeah, I am leaning towards the idea that what hit the WTC and pentagon were some sort of holographically cloaked missiles/ military jets.
Post a Comment
<< Home