Important Aspects of 9/11 That Deserve More Attention
Here are two aspects of 9/11 that I think are very important and are a bit of a mystery:
1) The very early stages of the collapse of WTC1. The top of the building sinks down by a good forty or fifty feet without any noticeable distortion of the outside walls. What on earth causes this? The best explanation is probably that the core has been taken out, causing the top to sink, by some sort of demolition-- but where exactly is the core being severed, and what type of explosive does this without producing obvious explosives discharges?
Conceivably, the core is taken out at the base, and this might account for the ground shaking that is observed in one movie shortly before WTC1 collapses. Then once the core starts falling, there is a more traditional demolition, with explosive jets clearly observed coming out the sides of the tower as it collapses.
But in any case, there is still the question of how the top of the building can "melt" down without disturbing the sides of the structure. It is rather odd. Are the walls folding in on themselves somewhere?
2) The story of the twin flight 11's. Basically, it appears that there were two planes known as flight 11 at Boston Logan airport on the morning of 9/11. One of these planes was likely stolen in some manner by the hijackers, and was used on 9/11 to act like it was hijacked and send fake transmissions mimicking a hijacking. This plane PROBABLY did not crash into the WTC, but may have flown to Washington DC and participated in the Pentagon hit in some way (low-level fly over?).
This second flight 11 is undoubtedly an important key to how the hijacking ruse was created on 9/11. Men with semi-official cover get control of an American Airlines jet, perhaps they load it with pilots and flight attendants in order to particpate in the hijacking/terror drill run on 9/11. This jet is the official flight 11 but reports mechanical problems and doesn't load passengers. So a new flight 11 is set-up, at a different gate, and this one takes passengers. It is not known what happened to this plane.
Interestingly, something similar to this seems to have happened with flight 93, although there were not two flight 93's. But most of the people on flight 93 were originally supposed ot be on flight 91, which was cancelled due to mechanical problems. I wonder if the original flight 91 was also taken over by people with semi-ofifical cover and used in the hijacking drill? I have speculated here a lot about flight 93 being involved in the hijacking drill, but perhaps it was really flight 91-- the plane that sent out amazingly timed radio transmissions.
The bottom line here is that first, I am convinced the 9/11 hijackings were faked somehow, and two, I am extremely curious to know how it was done. I think this twin flight 11 is one of the best clues out there for telling us what really happened with the hijackings on 9/11.
1) The very early stages of the collapse of WTC1. The top of the building sinks down by a good forty or fifty feet without any noticeable distortion of the outside walls. What on earth causes this? The best explanation is probably that the core has been taken out, causing the top to sink, by some sort of demolition-- but where exactly is the core being severed, and what type of explosive does this without producing obvious explosives discharges?
Conceivably, the core is taken out at the base, and this might account for the ground shaking that is observed in one movie shortly before WTC1 collapses. Then once the core starts falling, there is a more traditional demolition, with explosive jets clearly observed coming out the sides of the tower as it collapses.
But in any case, there is still the question of how the top of the building can "melt" down without disturbing the sides of the structure. It is rather odd. Are the walls folding in on themselves somewhere?
2) The story of the twin flight 11's. Basically, it appears that there were two planes known as flight 11 at Boston Logan airport on the morning of 9/11. One of these planes was likely stolen in some manner by the hijackers, and was used on 9/11 to act like it was hijacked and send fake transmissions mimicking a hijacking. This plane PROBABLY did not crash into the WTC, but may have flown to Washington DC and participated in the Pentagon hit in some way (low-level fly over?).
This second flight 11 is undoubtedly an important key to how the hijacking ruse was created on 9/11. Men with semi-official cover get control of an American Airlines jet, perhaps they load it with pilots and flight attendants in order to particpate in the hijacking/terror drill run on 9/11. This jet is the official flight 11 but reports mechanical problems and doesn't load passengers. So a new flight 11 is set-up, at a different gate, and this one takes passengers. It is not known what happened to this plane.
Interestingly, something similar to this seems to have happened with flight 93, although there were not two flight 93's. But most of the people on flight 93 were originally supposed ot be on flight 91, which was cancelled due to mechanical problems. I wonder if the original flight 91 was also taken over by people with semi-ofifical cover and used in the hijacking drill? I have speculated here a lot about flight 93 being involved in the hijacking drill, but perhaps it was really flight 91-- the plane that sent out amazingly timed radio transmissions.
The bottom line here is that first, I am convinced the 9/11 hijackings were faked somehow, and two, I am extremely curious to know how it was done. I think this twin flight 11 is one of the best clues out there for telling us what really happened with the hijackings on 9/11.
posted by spooked at 9:50 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home