Reasons to Suspect the US Military Planned and Executed 9/11
1) Operation Northwoods plan showed military leadership is capable of perpetrating false-flag attacks to start a war. Moreover, the military has a history of inventing pretexts to start wars.
2) Bush administration military leadership clearly wanted badly a new war prior to 9/11-- in particular Iraq was seen as an attractive target (PNAC).
3) The Able Danger program showed the military kept track of "terrorists" and also protected them.
4) Drone planes (and missiles with cloaking devices) as were used on 9/11 were most probably military in origin.
5) NORAD hijacking exercises on 9/11 were a cover for the attacks and were planned by the military.
6) DelMart Vreeland worked in the Office of Naval Intelligence and had foreknowledge of 9/11.
7) The Pentagon was almost certainly bombed as well as hit by an aircraft on 9/11-- only the military could have rigged bombs at the Pentagon.
8) The military has trained killers (ala Operation Gladio), who could carry out the attacks.
9) The military has easy access to explosives of the type that were used to demolish the WTC.
10) The military is capable of cruel and inhumane behaviour: bombing civilians, prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere, etc.
Oddly, most of the high profile 9/11 skeptics tend NOT to blame the military, but rather blame the CIA-- e.g. Mike Ruppert, 9/11 truth.org.
While I am no big fan of the CIA, I think they really were not capable of carrying out 9/11. The CIA was certainly "in on" 9/11, but I think they had little to do with actually carrying out the attacks.
If 9/11 was the massive "inside job" as I now believe it to be, then it could only have been done by the US military (specifically, rogue elements of the military).
2) Bush administration military leadership clearly wanted badly a new war prior to 9/11-- in particular Iraq was seen as an attractive target (PNAC).
3) The Able Danger program showed the military kept track of "terrorists" and also protected them.
4) Drone planes (and missiles with cloaking devices) as were used on 9/11 were most probably military in origin.
5) NORAD hijacking exercises on 9/11 were a cover for the attacks and were planned by the military.
6) DelMart Vreeland worked in the Office of Naval Intelligence and had foreknowledge of 9/11.
7) The Pentagon was almost certainly bombed as well as hit by an aircraft on 9/11-- only the military could have rigged bombs at the Pentagon.
8) The military has trained killers (ala Operation Gladio), who could carry out the attacks.
9) The military has easy access to explosives of the type that were used to demolish the WTC.
10) The military is capable of cruel and inhumane behaviour: bombing civilians, prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere, etc.
Oddly, most of the high profile 9/11 skeptics tend NOT to blame the military, but rather blame the CIA-- e.g. Mike Ruppert, 9/11 truth.org.
While I am no big fan of the CIA, I think they really were not capable of carrying out 9/11. The CIA was certainly "in on" 9/11, but I think they had little to do with actually carrying out the attacks.
If 9/11 was the massive "inside job" as I now believe it to be, then it could only have been done by the US military (specifically, rogue elements of the military).
posted by spooked at 10:55 PM
1 Comments:
I'm thinking the CIA enabled the military and covered for them. But that the CIA did very little of the "work". Much of the "work" may have been done by private CIA/military contractors.
Post a Comment
<< Home