Why LIHOP Equals MIHOP
LIHOP = "Let It Happen On Purpose"
MIHOP = "Make It Happen On Purpose"
If you read Paul Thompson's 9/11 timeline and the evidence presented by Mike Ruppert in "Crossing the Rubicon", the evidence is really overwhelming that governmental authorities at some level knew "9/11 was coming".
The important question that follows from this finding is: if intelligence agencies knew a major attack was coming, but wanted an attack to succeed for geopolitcal reasons, would they really let the attack proceed in an uncontrolled manner?
To me, it seems logical that the people in the US who wanted an attack to occur would also really wanted to limit its scope, and also to target it to suit their own purposes. Thus, they needed to be able to control the attacks. They didn't mind if some aging skyscrapers were knocked down, particularly if it covered up financial fraud and the owner collected an insurance windfall. They probably didn't want something like the Capitol building hit or the Whitehouse hit. They probably didn't want to take the chance that a nuclear plant or a chemical plant would be hit. They didn't want the part of the Pentagon where the top brass worked to be hit. Although they may have wanted to specifically take out the Army accounting office to cover-up more financial misdeeds.
This is where MIHOP comes in.
This is where the 9/11 LIHOPers needed to control the attacks.
How would they control the attacks?
One way would be to have incompetent patsies as the hijackers and have the planes piloted by remote control. Or have staged hijackings and swap the real planes with remote control drones. There are other ways they could have controlled the attacks, of course, but the point remains:
LIHOP leads naturally to MIHOP.
Furthermore-- if there is MIHOP, there should be telltale signs from the physical evidence of MIHOP. For instance, the fact that no 9/11 hijacked plane warned ground control that they were hijacked, the fact that the transponders were all turned off, the rapid collapses of WTC1, 2 and 7, the strange flight path of the plane that hit the Pentagon and the strange fate of flight 93. These are important pieces of physical evidence that support MIHOP.
MIHOP = "Make It Happen On Purpose"
If you read Paul Thompson's 9/11 timeline and the evidence presented by Mike Ruppert in "Crossing the Rubicon", the evidence is really overwhelming that governmental authorities at some level knew "9/11 was coming".
The important question that follows from this finding is: if intelligence agencies knew a major attack was coming, but wanted an attack to succeed for geopolitcal reasons, would they really let the attack proceed in an uncontrolled manner?
To me, it seems logical that the people in the US who wanted an attack to occur would also really wanted to limit its scope, and also to target it to suit their own purposes. Thus, they needed to be able to control the attacks. They didn't mind if some aging skyscrapers were knocked down, particularly if it covered up financial fraud and the owner collected an insurance windfall. They probably didn't want something like the Capitol building hit or the Whitehouse hit. They probably didn't want to take the chance that a nuclear plant or a chemical plant would be hit. They didn't want the part of the Pentagon where the top brass worked to be hit. Although they may have wanted to specifically take out the Army accounting office to cover-up more financial misdeeds.
This is where MIHOP comes in.
This is where the 9/11 LIHOPers needed to control the attacks.
How would they control the attacks?
One way would be to have incompetent patsies as the hijackers and have the planes piloted by remote control. Or have staged hijackings and swap the real planes with remote control drones. There are other ways they could have controlled the attacks, of course, but the point remains:
LIHOP leads naturally to MIHOP.
Furthermore-- if there is MIHOP, there should be telltale signs from the physical evidence of MIHOP. For instance, the fact that no 9/11 hijacked plane warned ground control that they were hijacked, the fact that the transponders were all turned off, the rapid collapses of WTC1, 2 and 7, the strange flight path of the plane that hit the Pentagon and the strange fate of flight 93. These are important pieces of physical evidence that support MIHOP.
posted by spooked at 9:39 PM
6 Comments:
------
Supposedly flight 93 was heading to the capitol building, they they can't know the precise targets.
I'm not convinced flight 93 was shot down. I think what happened with flight 93 was part of the plan, with two possible angles they could push: the shoot-down (from Ed Felt's call) or the passenger revolt (the other calls). Clearly they decided to go with the passenger take-over-- I think that was part of the script, though don't ask me how they set it up.
What is not clear to me is, whoever was orchestrating the attacks, how far they were willing to go, how much damage were they willing to inflict on the country. Assuming the attacks were orchestrated by a US military cabal-- I'm not convinced they wanted to destroy the government so much as severely threaten it. I don't think 9/11 was supposed to lead to the end of the US so much as a military coup of sorts.
----
"Supposedly flight 93 was heading to the capitol building, but they can't have known the precise targets by the official story"
---
covert-- No, I don't.
I really don't like to go in for doomsday scenarios.
The avian flu, which is not easily transmitted at this point, may turn into a big problem, no doubt. It could kill lots of people, fuck up society, but I doubt it will "destroy" the US.
-----
you may be right, I just like to think there was a line which they wouldn't have crossed-- for 9/11. But you may be right. I don't know. Since we don't know who DID 9/11 exactly, it's hard to say for sure.
if you had a lot of power of a powerful country, and seeing how fragile it really is, wouldn't you want to get out in front of the threats?
i'm sure they train soilders like "if you want to catch a terrorist you have to become a terrorist" or "if we want to control how much drugs come into the country, we have to become drug dealers" to convienently dodge the moral issues.
with the vaccum left after USSR toppled, the military had to invent a bad guy...so after looking into terrorist they got their plan together to encite and expand "the cell" so now they get to have their perfect adversary - a never ending one (no government collapes).
Now it's The Anti-Muslimism Show - On 24/7!!!
And don't forget The Peak Oil/Bird Flu Show!
FEAR FEAR FEAR (never having to do anything about the real threats)
Someone knows who did it.
My guess is that the USG looked the other way (for some reason; blackmail should not be ruled out) and then another group did it.
Post a Comment
<< Home