Why LIHOP Equals MIHOP
"LIHOP" = "Let It Happen On Purpose"
"MIHOP" = "Make It Happen On Purpose"
If you read Paul Thompson's 9/11 timeline and the evidence presented by Mike Ruppert in "Crossing the Rubicon"*, the evidence is quite overwhelming that governmental authorities at some level knew "9/11 was coming".
The evidence for "LIHOP" is strong.
The important question that follows from this conclusion is this: if intelligence agencies knew a major attack was coming, but wanted an attack to succeed for political/geopolitical reasons, would they really let the attack proceed in an uncontrolled manner?
To me, it seems logical that the people in the US who wanted an attack to occur would really want to target it to suit their own purposes. Thus, they needed to be able to control the attacks. They wanted to be sure the WTC towers were destroyed, but they may not have wanted something like the Capitol building hit or the White House hit. They may not have wanted to take the chance that a nuclear plant or a chemical plant would be hit. They didn't want the part of the Pentagon where the top brass worked to be hit. However, they may have wanted to specifically take out the part of the Pentagon containing the Army accounting office, to cover-up financial misdeeds. They may have wanted to limit casualties to some extent (if the towers were attacked later in the day, when they were more full, thousands more could have died).
This is where "MIHOP" comes in.
This is where the 9/11 LIHOPers needed to control the attacks.
How would they control the attacks?
One way would be to fake the hijackings and fake the plane crashes. Lace the WTC towers with enough bombs to bring them down completely. The 19 hijackers could be mere patsies who met a nasty end somewhere. The 9/11 plane passengers could be a mixture of fake indentities, a la Operation Northwoods, with a few real people mixed in. The attacks could be done other ways, but you get the idea.
The point is LIHOP leads naturally to MIHOP.
Interestingly, if there is MIHOP, there will be telltale signs from the physical evidence of MIHOP. For instance, the odd nature of the hijackings and phone calls, the lack of air defenses, the general lack of plane parts at any crash site, and the rapid collapses of WTC1, 2 and 7. These are important pieces of physical evidence that support MIHOP.
Indeed, the it seems quite likely that even the '93 WTC attack was "MIHOP".
The Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 was also very likely MIHOP, but used white terrorist patsies instead of Islamic patsies.
Welcome to the sick and bizarre world of fake terror.
*Note, I do not endorse all of Ruppert's conclusions in the book, but the book is still a valuable source for pre-9/11 warnings.
"MIHOP" = "Make It Happen On Purpose"
If you read Paul Thompson's 9/11 timeline and the evidence presented by Mike Ruppert in "Crossing the Rubicon"*, the evidence is quite overwhelming that governmental authorities at some level knew "9/11 was coming".
The evidence for "LIHOP" is strong.
The important question that follows from this conclusion is this: if intelligence agencies knew a major attack was coming, but wanted an attack to succeed for political/geopolitical reasons, would they really let the attack proceed in an uncontrolled manner?
To me, it seems logical that the people in the US who wanted an attack to occur would really want to target it to suit their own purposes. Thus, they needed to be able to control the attacks. They wanted to be sure the WTC towers were destroyed, but they may not have wanted something like the Capitol building hit or the White House hit. They may not have wanted to take the chance that a nuclear plant or a chemical plant would be hit. They didn't want the part of the Pentagon where the top brass worked to be hit. However, they may have wanted to specifically take out the part of the Pentagon containing the Army accounting office, to cover-up financial misdeeds. They may have wanted to limit casualties to some extent (if the towers were attacked later in the day, when they were more full, thousands more could have died).
This is where "MIHOP" comes in.
This is where the 9/11 LIHOPers needed to control the attacks.
How would they control the attacks?
One way would be to fake the hijackings and fake the plane crashes. Lace the WTC towers with enough bombs to bring them down completely. The 19 hijackers could be mere patsies who met a nasty end somewhere. The 9/11 plane passengers could be a mixture of fake indentities, a la Operation Northwoods, with a few real people mixed in. The attacks could be done other ways, but you get the idea.
The point is LIHOP leads naturally to MIHOP.
Interestingly, if there is MIHOP, there will be telltale signs from the physical evidence of MIHOP. For instance, the odd nature of the hijackings and phone calls, the lack of air defenses, the general lack of plane parts at any crash site, and the rapid collapses of WTC1, 2 and 7. These are important pieces of physical evidence that support MIHOP.
Indeed, the it seems quite likely that even the '93 WTC attack was "MIHOP".
The Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 was also very likely MIHOP, but used white terrorist patsies instead of Islamic patsies.
Welcome to the sick and bizarre world of fake terror.
*Note, I do not endorse all of Ruppert's conclusions in the book, but the book is still a valuable source for pre-9/11 warnings.
posted by spooked at 6:34 PM
1 Comments:
Interesting analysis. I have previously argued that LIHOP and MIHOP are not necessarily mutually exclusive. There appears to be elements of each involved on different levels and in different ways.
Post a Comment
<< Home