How 9/11 Was Done-- the Hijackings Were Fake
Reasons to think the hijackings were fake:
1) there was no air defense on 9/11 -- because an air force interceptor can't find a plane that isn't there!
2) the radio transmissions from the plane by the supposed hijackers make more sense with someone who was creating the impression of a hijacking rather than that a hijacker doesn't know what is the right button for the intercom.
3) flights 11 and 77 never took off on 9/11.
4) it is extremely unlikely four planes could be taken over by men armed with boxcutters/small knives-- without even one pilot signaling a hijack was occurring.
5) the maneuvers of the putative hijacked planes to get to the targets at high speed were too professional for amateur pilots.
6) air force hijacking exercises and ground-based terror drills involving hijackings were run prior to 9/11, 9/11 could have been another such drill gone "live".
7) there was a NORAD hijacking drill being run on 9/11, it created a diversion for the attacks, possibly supported the idea of real hijackings.
8) if an evil government cabal wanted to manufacture an air attack, it is easier to fake hijackings and use drones/missiles for the attacks than it is to try to control a real live hijacking situation.
9) there was a severe dearth of plane parts at every 9/11 plane crash site, suggesting the crashes were faked.
10) there is no reliable evidence the hijackers were on any planes; the nineteen official hijackers were certainly patsies.
11) the 9/11 passenger lists presented to the media have many conflicts and other oddities; the official 9/11 plane passengers were a mix of real people, fake passengers and spooks with aliases, the real people were killed at an unknown location.
12) real planes don't melt into buildings the way "flight 175" glided into the south WTC tower; a real plane did not crash into the south tower.
1) there was no air defense on 9/11 -- because an air force interceptor can't find a plane that isn't there!
2) the radio transmissions from the plane by the supposed hijackers make more sense with someone who was creating the impression of a hijacking rather than that a hijacker doesn't know what is the right button for the intercom.
3) flights 11 and 77 never took off on 9/11.
4) it is extremely unlikely four planes could be taken over by men armed with boxcutters/small knives-- without even one pilot signaling a hijack was occurring.
5) the maneuvers of the putative hijacked planes to get to the targets at high speed were too professional for amateur pilots.
6) air force hijacking exercises and ground-based terror drills involving hijackings were run prior to 9/11, 9/11 could have been another such drill gone "live".
7) there was a NORAD hijacking drill being run on 9/11, it created a diversion for the attacks, possibly supported the idea of real hijackings.
8) if an evil government cabal wanted to manufacture an air attack, it is easier to fake hijackings and use drones/missiles for the attacks than it is to try to control a real live hijacking situation.
9) there was a severe dearth of plane parts at every 9/11 plane crash site, suggesting the crashes were faked.
10) there is no reliable evidence the hijackers were on any planes; the nineteen official hijackers were certainly patsies.
11) the 9/11 passenger lists presented to the media have many conflicts and other oddities; the official 9/11 plane passengers were a mix of real people, fake passengers and spooks with aliases, the real people were killed at an unknown location.
12) real planes don't melt into buildings the way "flight 175" glided into the south WTC tower; a real plane did not crash into the south tower.
posted by spooked at 10:54 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home