No Second Plane?
Check out this video.
That is EXACTLY what I would expect how a normal person would film the second attack. Start filming on the first tower burning, get bored, stop filming, then see the second tower blow up and start filming again.
Even better, listen to the guys talking. They have NO IDEA what happened to the tower, no mention of a plane, they can only guess it was a terrorist attack.
That is EXACTLY what I would expect how a normal person would film the second attack. Start filming on the first tower burning, get bored, stop filming, then see the second tower blow up and start filming again.
Even better, listen to the guys talking. They have NO IDEA what happened to the tower, no mention of a plane, they can only guess it was a terrorist attack.
posted by spooked at 10:41 PM
3 Comments:
smash, you keep bringing up these eyewitnesses as if there weren't just as many who claimed to have NOT seen a plane as there were that claimed to HAVE seen a plane.
you find it hilarious that flight175 slips right thru the side of the tower without meeting any resistance? like smoke? like casper the ghost? like a cartoon? ya that's very funny, isn't it.
plenty of people are listening, fool - they just don't know what to say.
CS-- what the FUCK are you talking about? I just showed you a video with two people who saw the second tower hit and they didn't see a plane. Now how on earth am I saying they are lying?
As for the eywitnesses to a plane, they may be lying, or simply mistaken. I don't know. What abou the people who said missiles were being shot at the bldg? Were they lying?
Bottom line-- when the eyewitness evidence conflicts, you have to go with the physical evidence.
the REAL bottom line is:
both pinch and smashed know full well that the photos/videos speak for themselves. everyone else knows it too.
Post a Comment
<< Home