Question of the Day
In the absence of the video footage showing a plane hitting the WTC, how believable would the government's contention that large planes crashed at the Pentagon and at Shanksville be?
In other words, FORGET about New York City, forget about hijackers, forget about "eyewitnesses" and just think about the "crash" scenes at the Pentagon and at Shanksville. Are either of these crash sites believable on their own?
In other words, FORGET about New York City, forget about hijackers, forget about "eyewitnesses" and just think about the "crash" scenes at the Pentagon and at Shanksville. Are either of these crash sites believable on their own?
posted by spooked at 10:18 AM
4 Comments:
But where ARE the planes? Specifically, where are the people who were on them? Their relatives believe they are dead. What did happen to the planes and passengers?
who says that their (passenger's) relatives believe they are dead?
if you add up the total number of passengers for all four flights there were barely enough to fill even one flight - and a search of the s.s. death index supposedly reveals that few of the passenger's names are on it. i say supposedly because i haven't done such a search myself, only read of others doing so. and a search of the flight logs for 911 shows that AA flights 77 & 11 didn't even leave the ground that day. and the plane that was UA flight 175 wasn't listed as decommissioned until '04, and if you look at the images of 175 as it's headed for (and especially impacting) wtc2, you will see that what we were told was UA175 might as well be called yosemitesam175. which leaves us with flight93, and ohio tv stations and the cleveland mayor reported that flight93 had landed in cleveland on 9/11/01. which leaves 4 out of 4 planes that don't actually coincide with the official 911 story - but as for passengers? good question!
911hoax.com
The WTC footage is key. I used to disregard the no-plane-at-the-Pentagon theory, because it seemed so pointless. Even if I stretched to disregard the eyewitness reports, I still faced the 'fact' of an airliner crashing in New York. If the plotters were capable of that, surely they were capable of flying one more plane into the Pentagon? The idea, tha of three real jets and one fake, had little explanatory power.
Good logic "C"-- I tend to agree.
Post a Comment
<< Home