Pre-Saging 9/11 on TV
Before "The Lone Gunman", there was "The Simpsons"!
There was also THIS Simpsons episode, which shows the demolition of Burns' casino, and people fleeing down the street from the dust cloud-- very reminiscient of the WTC collapses on 9/11.
There was also THIS Simpsons episode, which shows the demolition of Burns' casino, and people fleeing down the street from the dust cloud-- very reminiscient of the WTC collapses on 9/11.
posted by spooked at 9:08 AM
5 Comments:
Greetings all --
I am active at the music site http://www.radioparadise.com
There is a forum about 9/11 questions here:
http://www.radioparadise.com/content.php?name=Forums&file=showtopic&topic_id=4936&x=1375757
or search for September 11 Theories
We have quite a debate about 9/11 going on at Radio Paradise,
Some people are posting lots of 9/11 Truth stuff
and some people are saying the Official Story is correct ("denyers")
The denyers are saying that anyone who questions the official story is mentally ill.
The denyers have also posted a bunch of physics equations showing why it is normal for the buildings to fall at free-fall speed.
This was in response to Jane Doe's Billiard Ball website.
I don't know the first thing about physics and cannot respond to their math.
Can anyone come over to Radio Paradise and wade into the debate and help with these questions?
Thanks!
You know what-- it is probably a waste of time to argue with them. All you need to do is follow common sense. Is it logical that the top 13 stories of a 110 story building, which due to the way these buildings are constructed weighed less than 10% of the building, can crush the remaining 97 undamaged stories-- and do this at near free-fall speeds?
Or does it make sense that the top 30 stories of WTC2 would start to tip dramatically to the side, then suddenly disappear into dust-- and at the same time this crumbling piece of building drives a complete global collapse of the rest of the building? And this happens all at near free fall speed?
If that makes sense to you, then why don't you try constructing some simple models of towers and see if you can reproduce any of those effects.
If it doesn't make sense, then you're on the right track.
have also posted a bunch of physics equations showing why it is normal for the buildings to fall at free-fall speed.
the wtc1&2 didn't merely fall, they exploded and turned into dust from the top down. you can see many columns being ejected upwards and outwards simultaneous to all of the concrete being rendered into powder. if the towers had merely fallen then maybe those equations showing why it is normal for the buildings to fall at free-fall speed would actually apply.
janedoe's billiardballs
prof. woods (janedoe) is a structural engineer working as a prof. of mechanical engineering and she knows what she is talking about.
Judy Woods is NOT a structural engineer.
by the way, everyone should check out the videos at Terrorize:
http://terrorize.dk/911/#wtc.2.demolition
It is quite clear this was no simple "collapse".
Post a Comment
<< Home