9/11 Explained?
Remember the case of the "phantom" flight 11 described by the 9/11 commission?
The idea that flight 11 never hit the North tower fits perfectly with the fly-by theory and with this analysis showing a much smaller than predicted plane hitting the North tower.
Flight 11 was a fly-by and never hit the tower!
Flight 175 was a fly-by and never hit the tower!
Flight 77 was a fly-by and never hit the Pentagon.
And finally, since it is clear no large plane crashed in the ground near Shanksville, Flight 93 was also a fly-by and never crashed into the ground.
A fascinating explanation for how these hoaxes were pulled off is that in each "crash", the plane suddenly turned on electronic optical camoflage and became hidden from view.
What I just realized, is that in each of the 9/11 crashes, the actual crash could have been done by a separate specially-designed optically camoflaged aircraft-- a device that could produce a 767- or 757-like scar wherever it impacted. This aircraft would never show up in videos but would produce the building damage and explosions.
UPDATE: perhaps more likely is the facade scars were produced by precisely positioned explosives-- since optically camoflaged missiles or aircraft might be too valuable to blow up in this event.
Overall this fly-by and disappearing plane scenario seems plausible and explains the evidence. Why they would have set it up this way, I have no idea. There must be some logic to it that we don't fully understand yet.
Also, note: this is sort of a hybrid-planes-noplanes theory. It's saying planes were there but they weren't used for the actual strikes-- something else hit the towers and Pentagon.
The idea that flight 11 never hit the North tower fits perfectly with the fly-by theory and with this analysis showing a much smaller than predicted plane hitting the North tower.
Flight 11 was a fly-by and never hit the tower!
Flight 175 was a fly-by and never hit the tower!
Flight 77 was a fly-by and never hit the Pentagon.
And finally, since it is clear no large plane crashed in the ground near Shanksville, Flight 93 was also a fly-by and never crashed into the ground.
A fascinating explanation for how these hoaxes were pulled off is that in each "crash", the plane suddenly turned on electronic optical camoflage and became hidden from view.
What I just realized, is that in each of the 9/11 crashes, the actual crash could have been done by a separate specially-designed optically camoflaged aircraft-- a device that could produce a 767- or 757-like scar wherever it impacted. This aircraft would never show up in videos but would produce the building damage and explosions.
UPDATE: perhaps more likely is the facade scars were produced by precisely positioned explosives-- since optically camoflaged missiles or aircraft might be too valuable to blow up in this event.
Overall this fly-by and disappearing plane scenario seems plausible and explains the evidence. Why they would have set it up this way, I have no idea. There must be some logic to it that we don't fully understand yet.
Also, note: this is sort of a hybrid-planes-noplanes theory. It's saying planes were there but they weren't used for the actual strikes-- something else hit the towers and Pentagon.
posted by spooked at 8:32 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home