The Tip-Off
A few days back, I discussed an article entitled "A critical analysis of the collapses of WTC towers 1, 2 and 7 from an explosives and conventional demolition industry viewpoint".
I think really the biggest tip-off that these guys know something is up with the WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 collapses is right in the title: "conventional demolition industry".
Isn't this basically a tacit admission that there is another type of demolition that could account for the the collapses of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7? A type of "unconventional" demolition.
Why else would they say "conventional demolition industry"?
I think really the biggest tip-off that these guys know something is up with the WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 collapses is right in the title: "conventional demolition industry".
Isn't this basically a tacit admission that there is another type of demolition that could account for the the collapses of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7? A type of "unconventional" demolition.
Why else would they say "conventional demolition industry"?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home