Flight Simulator Modeling: What I've Learned So Far
What I learned from the previous post is that no one has a concrete reason or specific example of why Flight Simulator is not accurate at modeling planes in flight.
No one has been able to suggest a better program or better software to use.
What I have found in extensive tests with Flight Simulator is that it actually is extremely accurate in recreating scenes from several 2nd hit videos, and that for several of these videos, flight simulator shows a near perfect 767 on track to hit the south tower. So the software clearly can be accurate at modeling planes in flight-- which is what you might reasonably expect.
Whether you want to believe it or not, Flight Simulator shows there are a few funny things about the first and second WTC attacks:
1) the plane that hit the north tower is too small and doesn't look much like a 767
2) the two known videos of the south tower hit that were televised "live" (the ABC video that was shown on ABC, CNN and Fox, and the WNYW video (for some reason both "live" videos were both taken from helicopters that were quite some distance from the WTC) show a plane that is too small for a 767.
3) many of the planes in the 2nd hit photos and videos are flawed, deformed versions of 767's.
4) some 2nd hit videos show approach paths that conflict with other videos.
No one has been able to suggest a better program or better software to use.
What I have found in extensive tests with Flight Simulator is that it actually is extremely accurate in recreating scenes from several 2nd hit videos, and that for several of these videos, flight simulator shows a near perfect 767 on track to hit the south tower. So the software clearly can be accurate at modeling planes in flight-- which is what you might reasonably expect.
Whether you want to believe it or not, Flight Simulator shows there are a few funny things about the first and second WTC attacks:
1) the plane that hit the north tower is too small and doesn't look much like a 767
2) the two known videos of the south tower hit that were televised "live" (the ABC video that was shown on ABC, CNN and Fox, and the WNYW video (for some reason both "live" videos were both taken from helicopters that were quite some distance from the WTC) show a plane that is too small for a 767.
3) many of the planes in the 2nd hit photos and videos are flawed, deformed versions of 767's.
4) some 2nd hit videos show approach paths that conflict with other videos.
posted by spooked at 3:10 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home