MISSING: Four Top Secret Planes
Last seen: 9/11/01
General Appearance: similar to a Boeing 757/767 series aircraft; wings sometimes flash off and on; color, variable
Details:
-- can pass easily without slowing into large sturdy buildings or into the ground, leaving a perfect silhouette shape of the Boeing 7X7
-- wingtips and tail look real, but disintegrate upon contact into fine powder, and only leave a mild indentation on solid surfaces
-- the rest of the plane has the unique ability to break into very small pieces upon impact, leaving a deep indentation in solid surfaces
-- can carry specially designed ordnance, either a fuel bomb or a penetrating warhead
Cost: priceless
General Appearance: similar to a Boeing 757/767 series aircraft; wings sometimes flash off and on; color, variable
Details:
-- can pass easily without slowing into large sturdy buildings or into the ground, leaving a perfect silhouette shape of the Boeing 7X7
-- wingtips and tail look real, but disintegrate upon contact into fine powder, and only leave a mild indentation on solid surfaces
-- the rest of the plane has the unique ability to break into very small pieces upon impact, leaving a deep indentation in solid surfaces
-- can carry specially designed ordnance, either a fuel bomb or a penetrating warhead
Cost: priceless
posted by spooked at 10:25 AM
22 Comments:
Don't forget, there were people on those planes you joke around about.
I mean, you are in this for the victims, right?
Chad,
I'm one of the "victims". We all are.
There is no proof that:
* ANY plane crashed ANYWHERE on 9/11
9/11 was an inside job that was wrongly blamed on Osama bin Laden (who may very well have been in a hospital on 9/11).
No one was on the planes to which I am referring.
My heart goes out to all the victims of 9/11, both living and dead.
Questioning those strange events is the only way we can find justice and peace for them.
If you have an explanation for what happened to the wingtips and tails of the planes that hit the WTC towers, I'd love to hear it.
The wingtips and tail of the planes are probably the lightest parts of the aircraft. Why you would expect them to survive a building impact is beyond me.
But regarding the passengers, I'd love to hear your explanation of what happened to people like Betty Ong, John Ogonowski, Mark Bingham, Jeremy Glick, Sue Olsen, etc.... Peter Hanson, who was on board Flight 175 with his wife and daughter, and was on the phone with his father as he watched the plane slam into the south tower.
Where are they Spooked?
And Anon, if you honestly believe that there is no evidence of any planes anywhere that day, you're sick.
I'm not saying the wingtips and tails "survived". I'm asking where they went. Look at the videos. The wingtips and tail pass intact into the building according to the videos but do not sever any columns according to the pictures of the hole in the sout tower.
As far as those people, how the hell should I know where they went? I imagine they were killed somewhere, but how should I know where it was done? I only can look at the evidence I have, and that evidence says no conventional plane hit the towers.
You don't get it. I'm telling you, the Hanson family was on the plane. His father listened to the impact through the phone.
I suggest you stop pretending you're an expert photo analyst who has the ability to conclusively prove there were no planes by looking at grainy stills and read some of the reports by actual experts who've studied this for years.
no chad, you don't get it.
The wingtips and tail of the planes are probably the lightest parts of the aircraft. Why you would expect them to survive a building impact is beyond me.
since the wingtips and tail are indeed the lightest parts of a 767 the phenomenon of these same wingtips slicing thru the massive steel perimeter columns like a boxcutter thru butter and disappearing without a trace as was presented to us by the media and recorded for posterity while at the same time photographs of the resulting hole show that many of the columns weren't even really severed is patently absurd.
Peter Hanson, who was on board Flight 175....
which ua175 was he on? the primer grey colored ua175 with no flaps that was recorded slipping into the tower like a ghost without even slowing down or the even more foolish looking shadowy black ua175 that was recorded with an amputeed right wing?
the ghost of peter hanson himself appeared before me during a seance and demanded that we get to the bottom of these anomalies. to do otherwise would be to dishonor his memory.
Hey chad... it's been proven for a long time now that those cell phone calls from flight 93 were fakes because the technology didn't exist to connect cellular calls in planes above 8000 ft. "Mom? This is Mark Bingham....You believe me don't you?". How many times do you call your mother and use your last name?
http://www.physics911.net/cellphoneflight93.htm
The cell phone calls were fakes... as well as the lists of passengers who were supposed to have been on those flights (all passenger lists released by news outlets contradicted each other AND didn't have any of the '19 hijackers' names listed).
Also, if you think big Boeing planes WERE used that day... where is the PHYSICAL evidence (i.e. engines, wings, tail sections, fuselage)? If you can honestly say planes were used in the absence of any verifiable plane debris, you're sick.
Photographic plane evidence:
Flight 77:
- http://tinyurl.com/g3zb7
- http://tinyurl.com/lzcrd
Flight 93:
- http://tinyurl.com/z36ry
- http://tinyurl.com/nrsho
- http://tinyurl.com/m58yj
New York Planes:
- http://tinyurl.com/kpoc6
- http://tinyurl.com/hq8lf
- http://tinyurl.com/hvo69
Flight Manifests
- http://tinyurl.com/qclrm
Mark Bingham
- http://tinyurl.com/fv5kg
And yes, cell phone calls, while not reliable, can be made from planes. And let's not forget the small matter of AirFones from which numerous calls were placed as well.
the ghost of peter hanson himself appeared before me during a seance and demanded that we get to the bottom of these anomalies.
Your mocking tone fully illustrates your complete and utter lack of respect for these people.
Chad--
you seem like a smart guy-- please tell me how the wingtips and tail passed through solid steel columns:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b55pvLgpuIE
that is CNN video. Nothing breaks off the plane.
Here are the frames broken down:
http://ghostplane.blogspot.com/2006/06/i-call-bullshit-frames-from-here-which.html
do you see the wingtips and tail breaking off?
this is from the NIST report:
http://killtown.911review.org/images/wtc-gallery/nist1-2d/e-24_wtc2-impact-pattern.jpg
is there a hole where the tail and wingtips go?
As far as Peter Hanson, his phone call is a little suspicious, as I've discussed here:
http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2005/01/proof-that-phone-call-from-911.html
And again, I am sorry for everyone who was affected by 9/11. That does not mean we cannot ask questions about that day.
Maybe the tips of the wings and tail DID shear off. I highly doubt the main concern of the first responders to the scene was to scour the plaza looking for tiny pieces of plane wings.
After two 110 story buildings fell on top of them, good like finding them again.
And your speculation of Hanson's call turns my stomach. Are you aware which direction your flying in at all times? In the midst of a hijack, I doubt his priority was to figure out exactly where they were going.
You single out the word "getting" as if you've been in a hijack situation before.... Disgusting. You have no idea what emotions those people were going through and have no ground to analyze their ever word.
And if you recall, flight 175 came in from the south-west. All you'd have to do is look out any window on the left-hand side of the plane to see the North tower in flames.
If I saw that, you're goddamned right a "My God" might slip out.
I'm saying the videos (more than one, actually) show the wingtips and tail passing INTO the building, not breaking off. It directly conflicts with the column damage.
Chicago was on the way of their flight path, I think a passenger would know pretty well that the plane had turned around and was going the wrong way-- certainly I would try to find out where I was going. I also still think it is very strange Hanson thought they were going to fly into a building. Again, I don't think it would have been easy for Hanson to see straight ahead of where the plane was going. It's possible he saw tower 1 burning well before they crashed, but there is no mention of him sayng anything about it. He certainly can't have just seen it before they crashed.
In any case, there are many reasons to think the hijackings were staged/faked, thus placing the calls in question.
Again, I don't think it would have been easy for Hanson to see straight ahead of where the plane was going. It's possible he saw tower 1 burning well before they crashed, but there is no mention of him sayng anything about it. He certainly can't have just seen it before they crashed.
If he was looking straight ahead, he'd be looking at the cockpit door. Now, if the plane took a straight, direct path, perpendiclar to the south face of the south tower, then yes - he wouldn't be able to see it. But it didn't. It came in from the south WEST over Jersey. If satellites could pick up the smoke from the North Tower, I'm thinking people flying a mile or two out of the city could see it too.
I honestly just can't comprehend how you guys can claim that none of the passengers on any of the flights were legit and still go around saying you're in this to fight for the victims.
The truth of the matter is that you're much more concerned with making the government out to be evil so you can go around feeling special and important.
I honestly just can't comprehend how you guys can claim that none of the passengers on any of the flights were legit and still go around saying you're in this to fight for the victims.
none of us have any more of a clue what happened to those passengers than you do. more specifically, all either side can say is that those passengers are no longer with us and we both we sorry for their families. no planes does not equal no dead passengers. any number of speculative things could have happened to the passengers after that morning that no one is privy to. bottom line, they are gone and we all respect.
[t]he Hanson family was on the plane. His father listened to the impact through the phone.
keep on bringing up those phone calls too because they are so convincing-- remember, without those phone calls, we wouldn't know about the box cutters! the calls could have been fake and although some audio has been released much of what is known about the calls has been from written reports, not actual audio. besides, whats a plane impact sound like over a cell phone anyway?
The truth of the matter is that you're much more concerned with making the government out to be evil so you can go around feeling special and important.
i am most concerned with asking people tough questions, showing them something they might not have been exposed to before, and letting them make their own choices about the govt.
Maybe the tips of the wings and tail DID shear off. I highly doubt the main concern of the first responders to the scene was to scour the plaza looking for tiny pieces of plane wings.
it is unfortunate that people died but that is not the focus of our concerns, as you are well aware. one media presented us with a grey colored 767 that disappeared entirely including the wingtips into wtc2 without even slowing down yet a photo of the resulting hole shows that the columns were not severed where the wingtips were seen to have disappeared. another media presented us with a shadowy black supposed plane silhouette but it was missing the right wing. one media showed ua175 approaching from the SW yet another media shows it approaching from the SSE.
what is this nonsense?
http://www.physics911.ca/gallery2/v/WTC2/debris/fig-2-29.jpg.html
did those parts break off as the plane entered wtc2 and fall to the street below or did they punch all the way thru the the tower and out the other side or were they trapped in the tower and then it collapsed?
we see by the videos that not one inch of ua175 broke off on its way in and a photo of the other side of wtc2 reveals that no exit hole was made and to think that they survived the collapse of wtc2 is absurd.
those fuselage parts must have been planted ahead of time.
those photos of an engine are even more ridiculous - they are not even a 767 engine and again; a photo reveals that no hole was made in the other side of the tower. those engines must have been planted ahead of time.
the entire govt/media account of 9/11 is a farce one end to the other.
as far as mocking the victims i did no such thing - anything short of a complete and open investigation into every single aspect of 9/11 is the true dishonoring of the victims.
Fatty was had! and shep-- all good points.
Ultimately, it seems Chad just punts on the critical wingtip and tail evidence and just pulls out some nonsense about us wanting to think the govt is "evil" and we want to feel "special and important".
Yeah.
Believe me, it was a long painful process getting to where I am, but realizing that there are evil aspects of the govt is something I never really wanted. I just wanted to know what really happened on 9/11, because the official story stinks.
There are indeed evil aspects of the government, Spooked. You're right about that.
Too bad even the majority of the truth movement finds you no-planers to be paranoid schizophrenics.
I see a lot of "could have's" and "must have's" and "maybe's" in every single one of the arguments made here.
You all claim that no plane wreckage was found, but when I provide links to photographs it's, "Well they must've been planted."
You all claim that no planes hit the towers, but when I provide flight manifests and phone calls it's, "Well, they could've been faked."
Asking tough questions is one thing. Ignoring sound evidence in an attempt to validate one's pre-conceived idea of government and solidify the importance of one's existence is another.
Best of luck sleeping at night.
"Sound evidence"...yeah RIGHT.
I've now tried DOZENS of times on x-country (as well as regional) flights since 9/11/01 to make a call with my personal cellphone while in flight, from every altitude imaginable after wheels-up. Just like what was supposedly done on 9/11.
I HAVE NEVER BEEN SUCCESSFUL.
NOT ONCE.
IF PERSONAL CELLPHONES DON'T WORK ON PLANES NOW...SEPTEMBER 2006...THEY SURE AS HELL DIDN'T WORK ON 9/11/01!!
Only the fuckin' SHEPLE BELIEVE THAT SHIT
But I guess 9/11 was some magic day for cellphone use...huh governmnet SHILL "Chad"!!??
You're as transparent as GLASS "Chad"...how much is the gub-ment payin' SHILLS these daze???
LOL
chad... some of your links don't work my friend.
there's a very good reason you'll get the common response that the plane parts were planted.
here's where you have to turn on your brain... look at most of your pictures of debris and fuselage parts (flight 77)... they're SHINY! HUH?!? doesn't that make you wonder? if a plane smashed into the pentagon with a giant ball of fire... how do pieces like that make it onto the (unblemished) lawn with no burn marks at all? planted is the only explanation (ok, maybe magic works too). also, the 'engine remains' and compressor rotor are parts that don't come from any engine on the boeing that was claimed to have been used in that collision. do some research instead of just posting pictures... it may turn your world upside down when you realize that no boeing hit the pentagon.
also...airplane parts have serial numbers... if any of the parts shown in the pictures you've posted are actually from the planes in question then it's easy to give proof by matching the found debris to flights 77, 175, 93 and 11. there's a reason this hasn't been done... none of the 4 boeings were used that day. look for yourself:
http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNum_inquiry.asp
above is a link you can check the tail identification numbers of the 4 planes they claim were used that day. i'll help you out: Flight 11 is N334AA, 77 is N644AA, 93 is N591UA and 175 is N612UA. the FAA requires that destroyed aircraft be deregistered within 24 hrs... notice something odd? 2 planes weren't deregistered until Jan. 14 2002, and the other 2 were deregistered on Sept. 28 2005...not Sept. 12 2001
now, i understand that you're just in denial and you'll ignore the mounds of facts out there that shatter the official hoax theory. i suppose being so delusional makes you think the planes are actually hugging back too.
chad is being deliberately obtuse. it is probably more comfortable for him to accept that those plane parts are legit - it gives him an easy out.
chad i explained why i believe those alleged ua175 parts must have been planted ahead of time - if you don't accept my reasoning that's fine but you should at least address it.
even the majority of the truth movement finds you no-planers to be paranoid schizophrenics
i'm not really concerned with what the truth movement thinks of me since they haven't seen fit to address any of these issues either. i do find it odd that you can be aware of the truth movement's concerns about 9/11 yet you still endorse the govt/media explanation for 9/11.
Chad, Chad, Chad---
what the FUCK happened to 20 feet of wings out to each side of UA175 and to the 25 foot high tail section? There are no holes in the building for these to fit through, and the videos show them going into the building without breaking off.
Doesn't this bother you the least???
Of course phone calls could have been faked, that clearly would have been part of the plan, as would flight manifests. Get a clue, okay?
9/11 was a massive DECEPTION. Fake evidence naturally was part of the plan.
i think there were some REAL passengers, for example the flight that landed in Cleveland...holmgren thinks these passengers were escorted off the plane, possibly onto large buses and taken to remote FEMA-style camps, then killed...i think a couple of the planes had REAL passengers and the other 2 might not have...then there's the issue of TV/Media fakery/complicity (did any jetliners hit WTC), the legitimacy of flight passenger lists, were there hoax/fake flights, tail numbers of the planes, war games/terror drills, so many questions...
www.911tvfakery.blogspot.com
www.911closeup.com
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/manufactured.html
Post a Comment
<< Home