The Wing Damage to the WTC Outer Wall
e.g.
is particularly preplexing since the wings of a 767 are angled back:
This means a wing would have to saw through a column, starting at the column corner edge, before it can damage the next column over. And definitely, some of those columns above look sawn through.
I never knew aluminum could cut through steel.
As if that weren't unlikely enough, the outer sections of wings-- the wingtips (about the last 15-20 feet on the left-hand side above)-- didn't cut through the columns. So they must have broken off since they didn't penetrate the columns. And physics says the wingtip would have broken off and flown backwards. But if the wingtip broke off, how did it leave a mark out to the very end of where it would have contacted? The only way is if the wing suddenly started crumpling up on the column at the tip. But how was it exactly that part of the wing could saw perfectly through the 14 inch wide steel column, yet the outer part of the wing was completely ineffective at this and crumpled up?
Finally, check out the damage carefully to those 7 left most columns in the scar. Does that look like where a wingtip crumpled up against the columns? Or more like where something was knocked against them, such as an explosive force? Would wing crumpling cause the column edge to fray apart like is seen in the photo?
I think not.
is particularly preplexing since the wings of a 767 are angled back:
This means a wing would have to saw through a column, starting at the column corner edge, before it can damage the next column over. And definitely, some of those columns above look sawn through.
I never knew aluminum could cut through steel.
As if that weren't unlikely enough, the outer sections of wings-- the wingtips (about the last 15-20 feet on the left-hand side above)-- didn't cut through the columns. So they must have broken off since they didn't penetrate the columns. And physics says the wingtip would have broken off and flown backwards. But if the wingtip broke off, how did it leave a mark out to the very end of where it would have contacted? The only way is if the wing suddenly started crumpling up on the column at the tip. But how was it exactly that part of the wing could saw perfectly through the 14 inch wide steel column, yet the outer part of the wing was completely ineffective at this and crumpled up?
Finally, check out the damage carefully to those 7 left most columns in the scar. Does that look like where a wingtip crumpled up against the columns? Or more like where something was knocked against them, such as an explosive force? Would wing crumpling cause the column edge to fray apart like is seen in the photo?
I think not.
posted by spooked at 11:27 PM
6 Comments:
And physics says the wingtip would have broken off and flown backwards.
i bet that physics also says that the fuselage beginning with the nose would squash like a beer can under a clown shoe - with the plane's own momentum acting as the clown shoe.
We saw the wings go through the wall. There was no deformation or breaking of the wings. We see unbroken columns where we saw the wings go through. Wing goes through wall. Wall is not broken. Fuselage comes out the north side. No hole in north side. Nothing is real. Nothing is true. Brain shutting down. Yes, Nurse Ratched, I'll come quietly.
well put, gmcohan.
I like the clown shoe line too!
I've been thinking about your earlier post, Spooked.
I think certainly they had bombs in the building to create the scar effect. If you look in slow motion there are three main explosions that create the scar.
Another thing I find very interesting is that about three floors above the scar (labeled 98 in your picture), the whole floor seems to have been firebombed. In a real jetliner, the fuel is stored in the wings, so it seems like you should see tons of fuel burning around where the wings went in, not 3 floors up.
Also, fuel being a liquid, how is it going to fly up through 3 stories of office building? The floors that got hit by the wings should have gotten sloshed with jet fuel.
In the Revver video you can see clearly that that entire floor (about 3 floors above the scar) seems to be burning.
One thought on the "disappearing plane". Lets say for a moment that they used a large drone, designed to look as much like a jetliner as possible. Would it be hard to get the drone to disappear using thermite? We do have molten metal pouring out of the building in some of the pictures, so it seems to me like the planners could have wanted to destroy the plane evidence. So maybe the plane was filled with explosives and melted down so that no one could produce anything with a part number.
Also, can anyone clear up where the flash took place on the many videos relative to the scar? Is there any visible damage near where the flash (from the pod) took place?
Comments?
Fred.
the flash appeared to be directly in line with the axis of the fuselage so if the flash was a real event and not a video anomoly it's result would be right where the aluminum fuselage was seen to have poked right thru the tower like a ghostly arrow.
scott forbes was a financial worker in one of the towers...in the days/weeks leading to 9-11, he heard many strange construction noises, they were coming from the 98th floor....we need to research these specific floors where people heard strange noises/activities going on...were the "perps" getting everything "ready"--wiring, explosives, timers, etc??
Post a Comment
<< Home