Early 9/11 Propaganda
Time, 9/24/01:
NY Times 9/15/01:
September 14, 2001 (C):
Just wondering if anyone believes that passenger bodies were found strapped in their airplane seats in the rubble of the WTC. We're not talking about a bus rolling over here. The story was an incredibly destructive airplane crash where officially a huge plane was torn to shreds inside a building.
And we're expected to believe passengers were found STRAPPED IN THEIR SEATS IN THE RUBBLE where not even black boxes survived????
Come on. This was early bullshit fed to us to promote the passenger planes crashing into the WTC myth.
Even the "bound hands" story is suspect-- for a few reasons:
1) for the severed hands, how likely is it that the force that tore the hands off wouldn't break the bindings-- or at least cause it to slip off? How did they know they were stewardesses hands?
2) it is quite unlikey an intact stewardess body was found in the WTC rubble.
3) I am unaware of any phone call from a plane where anyone mentions that a stewardess was tied up.
4) how many stewardesses had bound hands? Was there a relatively intact body in the rubble and then severed hands on a nearby building from another stewardess? Or was one disinfo?
5) stewardess' severed bound hands were reportedly found at the flight 93 crash site. What are the odds that both sets of severed hands are real?
Lower Manhattan was a sharp steel forest where volunteers and fire fighters dug around the clock without rest. Doctors at St. Vincent's Hospital told of the fire fighter who had to carry out the decapitated body of his captain. The search dogs were overwhelmed; there was just too much flesh to smell. One emerged with a torn, blackened teddy bear in its mouth. Rescuers found the bodies of airline passengers strapped in their seats, a flight attendant with her hands bound.
NY Times 9/15/01:
"One worker who had tunneled into the debris said he had found the remains of people strapped into what seemed to be airplane seats. Another, in one of the most searing discoveries among the ruins, found the body of a flight attendant, her hands bound."
September 14, 2001 (C):
Some gruesome remains are discovered in the WTC remains. Investigators find a pair of severed hands bound together with plastic handcuffs on a nearby building. They are believed to have belonged to a stewardess. [Newsday, 9/15/01] There are reports of whole rows of seats with passengers in them being found, as well as much of the cockpit of one of the planes, complete with the body of one of the hijackers, and the body of another stewardess, whose hands were tied with wire. [Ananova, 9/13/01, New York Times, 9/15/01] Yet many months later, AP reports that "no remains have been linked to the 10 hijackers who crashed two airliners into the World Trade Center" contradicting the claim that a hijacker's body was found. [AP, 8/16/02] While all these bodies and plane parts are supposedly found, not one of the four black boxes for these two airplanes are ever found. A National Transportation Safety Board spokesman says: "It's extremely rare that we don't get the recorders back. I can't recall another domestic case in which we did not recover the recorders." [CBS, 2/23/02] The black boxes are considered "nearly indestructible," are placed in the safest parts of the aircraft, and are designed to survive impacts much greater than the WTC impact. They can withstand heat of up to 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit for one hour, and can withstand an impact of an incredible 3,400 G's. [ABC News, 9/17/01]
Just wondering if anyone believes that passenger bodies were found strapped in their airplane seats in the rubble of the WTC. We're not talking about a bus rolling over here. The story was an incredibly destructive airplane crash where officially a huge plane was torn to shreds inside a building.
And we're expected to believe passengers were found STRAPPED IN THEIR SEATS IN THE RUBBLE where not even black boxes survived????
Come on. This was early bullshit fed to us to promote the passenger planes crashing into the WTC myth.
Even the "bound hands" story is suspect-- for a few reasons:
1) for the severed hands, how likely is it that the force that tore the hands off wouldn't break the bindings-- or at least cause it to slip off? How did they know they were stewardesses hands?
2) it is quite unlikey an intact stewardess body was found in the WTC rubble.
3) I am unaware of any phone call from a plane where anyone mentions that a stewardess was tied up.
4) how many stewardesses had bound hands? Was there a relatively intact body in the rubble and then severed hands on a nearby building from another stewardess? Or was one disinfo?
5) stewardess' severed bound hands were reportedly found at the flight 93 crash site. What are the odds that both sets of severed hands are real?
posted by spooked at 5:08 PM
6 Comments:
I think it's pure Bullshit. Why don't we call the NYT and ask for their sources on that? There ought to be rescue workers willing to come forward and testify that they found the bound hands, if it's true.
Fred
the NIST model shows the 767s shredding themselves into confetti - some other fools point out photos of fuselage parts on the roof of a nearby building as proof that ua175 actually hit wtc2 - both of these claims are part of the official fairytale.
which is it - were the planes rendered into confetti or not?
photos of the backside of wtc2 reveal that no hole was made for anything of significance to have ejected from so obviously the fuselage parts were planted there ahead of time - what about the alleged inferno? and what about the entire weight of the steel components that would have crushed everything? no bodies strapped into seats could have been found in the rubble.
I also find it very peculiar that no visible airplane debris could be seen in either tower-- those were huge planes that disintegrated without exiting. Shouldn't there at least have been a great deal of debris piled up at the north side of the south tower-- and possible some debris even sticking out of the windows?
spooked, what do you think of the stuff on orbwars.com, also LJ Chavez talks about dorito shaped stealth UAV's. My guess is maybe they loaded some of those up with explosives and flew those in. Or at least that's one guess. I could see just a flyby plane working fine too, but i think something plane-like was probably visible. I'm sure if a cruise missle flew overhead most people would see a plane. After all, the thing has wings. Who has time to stare at everything that flies over NYC.
anon-- anything is possible. There was serious weirdness with the south tower hit, and I tend to think some high-tech top-secret device was used. But the bottom line is there is too much disinformaiton out there to sort it out effectively. Clearly though, many 2nd hit videos were faked, but why is anyone's guess. And a plane simply doesn't melt into a steel framed building and leave a cut-out of itself.
If you watch the documentary "9/11 Mysteries", they interview one of the crew involved for weeks in searching the rubble. He explains that the largest body part found in the entire search and clean up, was a human hand. That is all - just a hand, not 2 hands, and certainly not bound. The largest piece of recognisable office debris was a telephone keypad, so I don't think whole bodies, whether decapitated or not, could stay in tact if a file cabinets and computers could not remain in tact. Everything that comes from the media, in particular, any newspaper with Murdoch behind it, is total lies aimed at brainwashing the general public and to coverup the true events of 9/11 - which was controlled demolition, and a pretext to begin a war.
Post a Comment
<< Home