WTC 1 Attack Witnesses
compiled by Marcus Icke.
The bottom line is few if any credible witness described a large passenger jet.
The bottom line is few if any credible witness described a large passenger jet.
posted by spooked at 9:35 PM
3 Comments:
So... what's the most reasonable scenario?
I think there were preplanted demolition and "fireball" explosives in the towers.
I'm going with a drone aircraft with 2 engines to smack the towers and create the scars.
I think the drone aircraft may have had a pod and launched a missile or bomb to create the "flash".
I'm guessing that the plane was packed with explosives so that it blew up, which is why we don't see wreckage inside the scar, and which also helped the perpetrators stay anonymous by destroying any incriminating evidence (serial number for the wrong type of plane.)
I'll go with "innocent" media cleaning-up of crappy plane images for a lot of the "hoax" aspects of the video. Look at the naudet or pentagon frames... it's a blur... maybe the CNN's of this world just told their guys to clean it up a little and make it look more like a plane? (Is this normal? I suspect they tamper with video all the time to make it more "newsworthy" but I don't know...)
Finally some of the other video that surfaced may have been gussied up by self-promoters.
I think "no plane" ought to be revised to "swapped plane / drone with explosives".
No plane or missile / media MindKontrol only: <5%
Large UAV / Medium-sized Aircraft loaded with explosives 65%
Missile or neato UAV with Buck-rogers cloaking: 25%
Fred
it just seems too bizarre that there might not really have been a plane but looking at a NIST report photo we see edna cintron standing in the hole and there is a big tangle of perimeter columns wadded up right next to her in the opening where the plane allegedly went:
edna cintron
so a real plane would've had to
blast its way thru and once it was inside the tower it would've had to kick that tangle of columns and spandrel plates back into the opening behind itself before disappearing entirely without a trace. how is that possible? plus note that there is no discoloration whatsoever on the face of the tower where the 1000's of gallons of fuel would have to have splashed against and ignited.
Could that stuff have fallen from above? Is there any chance that the plane is in there under a bunch of rubble?
Just asking.
fred
Post a Comment
<< Home