The Ground Zero Clean-Up Was Much Faster and Cheaper Than Expected
There are many articles that say this, here is one example.
The article explains that part of the reason the clean-up was cheaper was because the "bath-tub" that had the foundation for the towers, was much less damaged less expected. This is consistent with what Wood and Reynolds are saying here.
I wonder if the clean-up was quicker in part because there was much less steel than expected to haul away.
The article explains that part of the reason the clean-up was cheaper was because the "bath-tub" that had the foundation for the towers, was much less damaged less expected. This is consistent with what Wood and Reynolds are saying here.
I wonder if the clean-up was quicker in part because there was much less steel than expected to haul away.
posted by spooked at 9:45 AM
5 Comments:
try our new and improved removal machine - now with wider focus aperture! (pat. pending)
5 year limited guarantee.
Eh? Nobody believes the cleanup was so quick because the Mafia stole the scrap? It was front page news! Don't you guys trust the NY Post? =P
Yeah, it was the mafia... yeah, that's the ticket...
Hi Spooked, looking back on it, I'm almost certain they planted that story because they were worried someone would want an accounting of all the steel and realize that most of it was missing. I think that's why they also told the New York Times that workers had discovered whole rows of passengers strapped in their seats, as well as stewardesses with their hands tied and throats slit.
Pretty sick how the media just printed what they were told to print, eh?
Geninuinely disturbing, I think.
Fred
I think you're exactly right Fred-- those were all bogus planted stories, and definitely disturbing.
Post a Comment
<< Home