It's Impossible To Fake a Video of a Plane Crashing Into a Building
whoops.
Dedicated to fighting authoritarianism, bigotry, greed, corruption, climate change denial, white supremacy, racism, stupidity and general evil, as well as the exploration of interesting ideas and conspiracy theories including 9/11, UFOs, ET's, the paranormal and the general unknown.
posted by spooked at 12:13 PM
7 Comments:
Fakes are a snip. No prob. Ever heard of Maya?
What's not so easy - and what you seem to forget - is that the planes hitting the towers were actually seen by real people standing on the ground. One home video actually has the soundtrack where someone in the room says "What's this plane doing?" just before the second aircraft hits.
I'm thinking you're either a psyop plant or deeply ill, my boy.
"One home video actually has the soundtrack where someone in the room says "What's this plane doing?""
Oh, the one with the overacting people in the background and the black plane flying perfectly in a straight line? Yeah, that one's not fake.
http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html#16
This video is not a fake. I was standing there watching when it happened. I thought, "Gee, that pilot must be crazy." Then he went straight into the building.
See how easy it is? Now this fantasy has been actually seen by a real person on the ground. So much easier than crashing a plane.
The comment made by wftgawhth above may be earnest. However, he/she either doesn't understand the issue being discussed, or else the comment is intended to be disinfo.
Here's why I say the above.
#1) wftgawhth implies that because he saw the event, and because the video represents something like what he saw, then the video is not fake.
Those who can follow logic and the allegations of "TV Fakery" know that the issues about the videos go way beyond whether or not there was indeed aircraft which impacted the towers. I realise some "no-planers" are indeed absolutist. Hover this blog has provided excellent coverage of alternative videos which seem to contradict each other. This contradiction, if it is real, proves some fakery.
I think BG misunderstood me. By "this video" I meant the video in the post this thread is about.
wftgahth, you were being sarcastic, right? That's how I took it. Sounded like you were quoting Bush.
wftgawhth was being sarcastic, although i enjoy BG's earnest, well-thought, critical, and logical responses...
Post a Comment
<< Home