Humint Events Online: Jeff Wells: I'm Not a Disinfo Artist

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Jeff Wells: I'm Not a Disinfo Artist

posted by spooked at 10:45 AM

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sam Hill takes a stab at breaking down the deal over at rigint:

Jeff's like a pusher who gets you hooked by giving you some relatively clean stuff, and cheap.

Once he's sure you're going to keep coming back for more, he switches the deal from white powdery smack cut with clean lactose to brown horse shit cut with pcp.

Then while you're nodding maybe he'll rifle through the contents of your wallet.

Wake up, suckers. It's a giant con.

i reposted that comment from down below because i think Sam very eloquently summed up the game at rigint. so much of the scifi conspiracy UFO posts which Jeff comes out with have a minuscule amount of credibility, even if the ideas he puts forth are misplaced, but Jeff still cannot wrap his rigorous mind around 9/11 enough to get beyond the physical evidence. i am not saying his posts are straight up garbage, but i am saying that his game is to distract/sidetrack from 9/11 with semi-related issues but ignore a few key aspects. he plays the gatekeeper role perfectly.

If you want to destroy my sweater
Pull this thread as I walk away
Watch me unravel i'll soon be naked
Lying on the floor, lying on the floor
I've come undone

i think the sweater is the 9/11 media psyop and the thread is the noplanes/tvfakery issue-- pull on it, and the entire thing starts to unravel.

4:03 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

I don't know who Jeff Wells is, but he comes across as a more subtle Disinfo Agent than those at DU.

One (of the many) giveaways is the fact that rather than start with something like: "I'm not sure about x,y, or Z...BUT those buildings just came down, go boom". He takes the opposite tack and if/whenever he is "caught" and challenged on a material fact or point that he left unmentioned, he will then say something like "oh well, yes, I know that not everything has been fully explained".

He would have more credibility if he didn't try to ignore important points and do so in a way that makes it obvious that he was hoping to not have to deal with them.

Another giveaway is that he says that Larry's "pull it" means the firefighting team and that the expression "pull it" is NOT a phrase associated with controlled demolitions...YET he doesn't claim that it's commonly used in any other context. By his logic, it was a "one time" use of those words by Larry Silverstein, and if THAT is the case, then how would anyone know what Larry meant?

Whoever Mr. Wells is, he isn't the most effective Disinfo Agent to ever come down the pike.

Unless his boss calculated and told him not to worry too much about logic, since very few people will see that it was made from a piece of "petgoat's swiss cheese log".

8:26 PM  
Blogger spooked said...

Good points.

Here's a few of the things that really bother me about his 9/11 viewpoint--

1) he acts as if knowing what hit the WTC is some sort of silly detail

2) he acts as if demolition is a distraction or even disinfo-- then when pressed on it, says he's just not convinced by the evidence

3) he complains constantly about people who focus on the physical evidence but never seems to take the time to seriously assess the physical evidence

4) he has an incredible exacting standard of proof for the 9/11 physical evidence but doesn't mind spreading all sorts of disinfo such as UFOs

5) he talks about how the 9/11 movement is going nowhere, and blames it people squabbling over the physical evidence, but never provides any guidance or leadership for what 9/11 truthseekers SHOULD be doing--for instance what would be effective forms of activism for 9/11

8:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i agree with you on those points above, spooked. it amazes me how many in the 9/11 accountability movement aren't interested in the planes.

in my opinion, the planes are the central part of the 9/11 media psyop, specially, the images/video of the planes impacting WTCs. the OGCT falls apart when the planes are removed and many holes which the 9/11 accountability movement is racing fill (i.e wargames, shootdown,hijackers) are conveniently plugged once you remove the planes-- or switched you perspective and look at the holes from a different point of view.

don't know what else to say about wells, 'cept that he's a phony bologna. his latest post contains some 'interesting' advice on critical thinking:

Critical thinking isn't instinctual. We shouldn't presume, in our disdain of the official story (whatever story that may be, and however official), that we've reached the truth once we stand with it's official opposition, because we may be either boxing ourselves in with rigid either/or thinking, or be boxed in by the authorities who mean to control both thesis and antithesis. We should know that some boxes feel like home. They're meant to feel that way.

i find his concluding remarks quiet ironic.

5:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jeff Wells is communist. I don't know who he works for but somebody must be signing a paycheck for him.

He's a dissembler on many isues. 9/11, ritual abuse mind control (where his site serves as "flypaper" for victims and ropes them into endless tail chaising), and most interestingly, the American political system. He writes non stop lies about congressman Ron Paul. Pretty odd for a Canadian to take so much interest in the destruction of the US Constitution. He's a globalist, not unlike other bloggers with the same agenda.

Not long ago, congress passed a law that amounts to thought crime, making anyone a terrorist when the government says they are. Wells expressed his wish that it would so.

The guy is not to be trusted.

1:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry. That last bit should have said "Wells expressed his wish that would be so". IOW, he agreed that Americans who are pro constitution should be arrested.

1:09 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger