Liquid Center?
What we see here is either incredibly powerful explosions-- or an effect analogous to throwing a heavy object into water, where the water is violently displaced by the object and it thrusts upwards. Of course, if it is the latter mechanism, we have to wonder how the massive center steel supports (the core) of the tower suddenly turned to liquid. It's actually quite a bit like the whole inside of the tower was turned into liquid or thick powder, and then the very top floor of the tower simply fell inwards, displacing the thick powder inside and pushing the outer walls out since they have lost their horizontal anchors to the core.
In reality, it appears to be a combination of explosions and of some large top sections falling through powdered interior debris.
Nuclear bombs can account for this effect.
Not much else can account for this effect in a practical sense.
posted by spooked at 9:21 PM
5 Comments:
let america return to be the beacon of liberty...
instead of the flashlight of fascism.
Hi Spooked,
I've been thinking about this issue a little bit, and can't a conventional explosive do the same thing as a mininuke?
Usually people talk in terms of kilotons of TNT, and A normal nuke might be 100 megatons, but maybe a mininuke is 20 kt (?). Wouldn't you see the same effect a non-nuclear weapon with a 20 kt yield?
Anything that goes BOOM! could potentially put out enough energy quickly enough to create the effect seen... so I'm wondering why it has to be nuclear?
Suppose they preloaded the tower with NitroGlycerin or some other type of conventional or unconventional explosives? If you put in the right amount, wouldn't you get the same effect?
Yes, conventional explosives could do much the same thing, except you would need so much more of them (on the order of hundreds to thousands of tons of them). Nukes give much much more bang for their size. Also, nukes can account for the EMP effects better.
i'm no expert, but i don't think conventional explosives can account for the high amounts of radioactive elements found after Operation S-11: Barium, Tritium, Strontium, etc...
www.wtcnuke.com
www.nucleardemolition.com
http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/evidence.htm
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/
I'm not sure we really saw much in the way of EMP. I think they may have deliberately taken out the cell phone networks to keep people from reporting what was happening, but I think with an EMP a lot of electronic
equipment gets permanently fried.
I've heard tale of some police radios being fried... but I haven't seen a lot of evidence of it. I guess with a "new generation" nuke the thing is basically a beam weapon anyway, since it emits invisible radiation and doesn't produce the same explosive effect as a big nuclear bomb.
Any idea what the yield on the thing they used would be? And did they use one or many?
Post a Comment
<< Home