The WTC Temperature Problem

According to NIST, they found no evidence that any WTC steel was heated above 600 C and in fact little steel was heated above 250 C.

This would seemingly rule out nuclear bombs as the cause of the WTC "collapses", wouldn't it? It would also tend to rule out ANY explosives.

The problem, is that this "finding" that no steel was heated above 600 C, also rules out any fire-induced collapse mechanism.

Thus, either NIST is flat out lying about the temperatures of the steel-- or they were EXTREMELY selective about what steel they tested.

Hmmm-- I wonder if they tested THIS piece of steel for heat exposure:

6" thick WTC I -Beam Bent like a Horseshoe

Further evidence of tremendous heat can be seen in this 8 ton 6" thick I beam that is bent like a horseshoe without warping, kinking or splitting. Again, there is no way for thermate to create this horseshoe, unless it is "miraculous" thermate. Clearly, this is residual steel that has been exposed to massive and intense heat that is entirely consistent with a Thermodynamics,Nuclear Fusion, Electromagnetic Radiation, Kinetic Energy and virtually nothing else can produce this single effect, let alone this and ALL the other irregularities.

UPDATE: The other issue related to this is the apparent molten steel found at Ground Zero, upon which it is very difficult to get solid evidence for apart from a few eye-witnesses that have been interviewed. Thus, there are no reliable pictures of this molten steel-- meaning, either the story is apocryphal or it has been covered up. I would think however, that true evidence of molten steel would be one of the things the government REALLY would not want showing up, and thus these pictures and videos would almost certainly be censored.

That extreme hot spots remained at Ground Zero for a few weeks seems likely -- and this tends to support demolition and go against NIST.