Ghostplane/Hezarkhani Angle Found?
It's very close.
The bigger trees seem like they could be from 5 years growth. The lamp-post in front left is missing, though.
The lamp-post is key. Can anyone prove that that particular lamp-post was there on 9/11? If not, the video would clearly be proven to be a fake composite.
The bigger trees seem like they could be from 5 years growth. The lamp-post in front left is missing, though.
The lamp-post is key. Can anyone prove that that particular lamp-post was there on 9/11? If not, the video would clearly be proven to be a fake composite.
posted by spooked at 8:21 AM
2 Comments:
It is your job to prove that the lampost wasn't there. Got proof?
if the lamppost was indeed there (battery park?) on 9/11 then the CNN ghostplane footage would be remiss by not having included it. but the CNN ghostplane footage is already proven to be fake by the behavior of the so-called plane.
a real 767 is made of aluminum and has a plastic nosecone. it would have squashed against the massive steel/concrete wtc like sword of truth's head beneath donald rumsfeld's boot. it would not have glided effortlessly into the wtc without even slowing down like casper the ghost.
Post a Comment
<< Home