Erased from the Collective Memory
Anyone else remember how incredibly amazingly improbably wrong the exit polls were for the 2004 presidential election?
Anyone else remember how muted the media response was-- and how even the "liberal blogosphere" didn't want to talk about it?
I have to say, at least for me, rather than fading from my conscience, these facts become more stunning and more suspicious with time.
Anyone else remember how muted the media response was-- and how even the "liberal blogosphere" didn't want to talk about it?
I have to say, at least for me, rather than fading from my conscience, these facts become more stunning and more suspicious with time.
posted by spooked at 11:56 AM
10 Comments:
Yeah! I say do away with elections and just use the exit polls to elect the critters!
That way those people who just refuse to answer exit polls won't be counted!
That'll show THEM!
Need I point out that in other countries, exit polls are specifically used to detect election fraud?
It's ALL a big conspiracy to you, isn't it you poor, dumb, fucktard...
Spooky!
Who the fuck CARES what other countries do!
Oh yeah...YOU do! I bet you were a fan of Kerry's "Global test!"
I could give a flying fuck what other countries do. Exit polls are an incredibly lame way of predicting an election. There is absolutely *zero* control of people who participate in exit polls. You do not *have* to answer an exit poll. And that makes it a good indicator of election fraud? Data from a poll that nobody has to answer?
Why can't you get that into your fat butt brain?
Boy, are YOU a smaht asshole!
One of the dim bulbs that posts obnoxious comments here said:
"I could give a flying fuck what other countries do. Exit polls are an incredibly lame way of predicting an election."
But I'm sure you have no problem when this government interferes in other countrie' elections, like in the Ukraine, based on exit poll results.
Spooked, have you ever heard anyone questioning the 2004 Iowa caucuses which made Kerry the leading contender? I remember somebody questioning it, then nothing. It seemed weird that he came out of nowhere. This is just speculation, of course. My theory, also nothing more than speculation, is that Kerry couldn't contest the voter suppression in Ohio because he was compromised by the fraudulent caucus. Watch Hellary become the leader in Iowa.
Who didn't want to talk about it the most, just like with 9/11? MarKOS Zuniga, the man who turned down the CIA because he didn't want to live in DC, and started a blog instead.
Ningen-- yes, I do remember there was some funny business with the Iowa caucuses-- there were serious complaints about methods-- phone calls or something, and then that died. Then we around that time there was that blatant smearing of Howard Dean by the media, and he went on to lose.
The thing about all this and the "liberal" blogs is that they NEVER talk about election fraud OR even question 9/11 in any serious way-- which makes me think that all the big sites are shills or at minimum controlled.
Of COURSE they are controlled! JESUS you are a dumb shit!
EVERYTHING and EVERYONE except you 3 morons are in on it! Jesus freaking christ - when will you get that in your head It is 6 billion/plus against you, Spookster! Better get the Anony Sphincter and ha is for fuckhead cowboy'ed up, partner, cause that is *all* you have to watch your back!
"cowboy up" this, old man!
a refutation of the official collapse theory
Post a Comment
<< Home