WTC Plane Witnesses and Plane Parts All Around the WTC Complex
If people want to argue that no planes hit the WTC, they need to confront the testimony of many firemen who say they saw plane parts around the WTC. The testimonies are one reason I have not completely ruled out that a plane or planes hit the towers. These reports were culled from testimonies published by the NY Times in August 2004. (The NYTimes needed to go to court to get these published, though in retrospect, it's not entirely clear why. One reason people thought these were being censored was that they had testimonies about bombs going off. Some testimonies still have parts blacked out for unclear reasons.)
Again, I think there are serious anomalies with the official WTC plane story-- particularly in the video record. And one reasonable conclusion from careful study of the videos is that no real plane hit the towers at all, that the videos were all faked, and that the plane-shaped holes were made by some other mechanism than a plane strike.
On the other hand, we have these firemen who say they saw plane parts all over.
For one, I wonder why we haven't seen more pictures of these plane parts. Surely if they were there, such as the plane engine that supposedly crushed the trunk of a car, a picture would have been taken. I understand that photos of body parts would be withheld, assuming these were taken. But it's less clear why all these plane parts wouldn't be photographed.
The basic explanations for these witness reports are:
1) there were plane parts all around the WTC as described, from the real planes that crashed into both WTC towers
2) there were plane parts all around the WTC as described, only from the real plane that crashed into the north WTC tower
3) there were plane parts all around the WTC as described, that were planted there
4) there were plane parts all around the WTC as described, that were planted in the tower and blown out by explosives
5) the firemen are mistaken about the debris due to general confusion, trauma and media reports of the planes
6) the firemen are exaggerating or fabricating the presence of plane debris in their reports due to pressure from hire-ups (wo have been told to support the official plane story)
7) the witness reports have been tampered with to exaggerate the presence of plane parts
8) the firemen were brainwashed to thinking they saw plane parts
9) if we assume there were no plane struck the towers, the witness reports describing plane parts could be from a combination of explanations 2-8.
10) non-conventional planes/aircraft hit the towers (the videos had a CGI overlay over this aircraft), and the debris seen on the ground was from these aircraft.
11) some combination of the above.
I'm happy to hear opinions on this.
Again, I think there are serious anomalies with the official WTC plane story-- particularly in the video record. And one reasonable conclusion from careful study of the videos is that no real plane hit the towers at all, that the videos were all faked, and that the plane-shaped holes were made by some other mechanism than a plane strike.
On the other hand, we have these firemen who say they saw plane parts all over.
For one, I wonder why we haven't seen more pictures of these plane parts. Surely if they were there, such as the plane engine that supposedly crushed the trunk of a car, a picture would have been taken. I understand that photos of body parts would be withheld, assuming these were taken. But it's less clear why all these plane parts wouldn't be photographed.
The basic explanations for these witness reports are:
1) there were plane parts all around the WTC as described, from the real planes that crashed into both WTC towers
2) there were plane parts all around the WTC as described, only from the real plane that crashed into the north WTC tower
3) there were plane parts all around the WTC as described, that were planted there
4) there were plane parts all around the WTC as described, that were planted in the tower and blown out by explosives
5) the firemen are mistaken about the debris due to general confusion, trauma and media reports of the planes
6) the firemen are exaggerating or fabricating the presence of plane debris in their reports due to pressure from hire-ups (wo have been told to support the official plane story)
7) the witness reports have been tampered with to exaggerate the presence of plane parts
8) the firemen were brainwashed to thinking they saw plane parts
9) if we assume there were no plane struck the towers, the witness reports describing plane parts could be from a combination of explanations 2-8.
10) non-conventional planes/aircraft hit the towers (the videos had a CGI overlay over this aircraft), and the debris seen on the ground was from these aircraft.
11) some combination of the above.
I'm happy to hear opinions on this.
posted by spooked at 8:02 AM
3 Comments:
plane parts in the vicinity of wtc? hmmm. we're still looking for 757 parts on the ground over at shanksville.
^yellow jacket guy #8
---
we see videos of a plane minus it's left wing and left tail hitting and entirely entering wtc2 without any of it breaking off and falling to the street below.
so the plane parts that firemen claimed to have seen couldn't have gotten onto the street that way.
^h
You forgot:
12) The Giant Ray Gun From Space used its HYPNO-SETTING to implant memories of plane parts when none were there.
Nice work, Spooked. All of these possibilities should be considered.
Post a Comment
<< Home