HUGE WTC SMOKING GUN: RENOVATION OF "PLANE HIT" FLOORS PRIOR TO 9/11
RENOVATION OF "PLANE HIT" FLOORS PRIOR TO 9/11 REMINISCENT OF PENTAGON RENOVATION IN "PLANE HIT" SECTION PRIOR TO 9/11.
NIST report NCSTAR1-6A, page xxxvii (Via 911 Blogger):
These renovations covered the almost exact same floors as where the "planes" hit-- particularly they spanned the "plane-hit" floors perfectly for WTC1 (94-98), and covered the lowest floor of the "plane-hit" floors (78-84) for WTC2.
Simply put, this is too much of a coincidence to be mere chance: that the same regions of both towers where the demolition started following the "plane hits" were the same regions that were recently "upgraded".
Renovations would have been perfect times to plant explosives and other devices that could mimic plane hits and subsequent fires.
The renovations would fit together, again, with a plan for 9/11 years in the making.
Speaking of the WTC1 "plane-hit", this new video is very good and quite relevant.
NIST report NCSTAR1-6A, page xxxvii (Via 911 Blogger):
In the years between 1995 and 2001, thermal protection was upgraded in a number of the floors affected by the fires on September 11, 2001. Specifically, in WTC 1, floors 92 through 100 and 102 were upgraded; and in WTC 2, floors 77, 78, 88, 89, 92, 96 and 97 were upgraded.
These renovations covered the almost exact same floors as where the "planes" hit-- particularly they spanned the "plane-hit" floors perfectly for WTC1 (94-98), and covered the lowest floor of the "plane-hit" floors (78-84) for WTC2.
Simply put, this is too much of a coincidence to be mere chance: that the same regions of both towers where the demolition started following the "plane hits" were the same regions that were recently "upgraded".
Renovations would have been perfect times to plant explosives and other devices that could mimic plane hits and subsequent fires.
The renovations would fit together, again, with a plan for 9/11 years in the making.
Speaking of the WTC1 "plane-hit", this new video is very good and quite relevant.
posted by spooked at 10:39 PM
32 Comments:
aha! obvious fakery now in evidence for both 767 *impacts*.
http://www.livevideo.com/video/socialservice/1C074ED750694730BF1F536A0950A502/911-amateur-part2.aspx
Well then. It should be relatively easy to find out who or what company was doing the renovating and actually accuse people for once!
New investigation, HERE WE COME!!!
Yes Chad-- why don't you get right on it? Do your part!
You've gotten it this far Spooky. I'd hate to take the glory away from ya'. Especially for something so easy.
Figure out which companies were on those floors. Then call them and find out who was in charge of their renovations when they were at the WTC.
It's now just as easy to spot Shillery as it is to spot fake attacks on the WTC.
The truth IS getting to more and more people, but the problem is that it's taking so long that by the time enough people become aware they've been fooled, it'll be too late to do much about it. More key people will die, evidence will be destroyed, manufactured and altered, the Naudet brothers will have received an Academy Award (shield of protection), and the world's "leaders" will demand that it's time to "move on" to HILLARY, BRITNEY, AMY, or even TOM CRUISE.
shills have devolved from denying the evidence of fakery and of explosions to merely berating Spooked for not mounting some kind of crusade. ha ha!
I'm not berating Spooked specifically. But honestly, isn't some sort of crusade the objective here? A new investigation right?
What good are all these "smoking guns" doing by sitting on a blog?
What good are all of your brilliant thoughts doing by sitting on a comments section of a blog?
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
I'm not trying to expose the NWO. I'm not trying to prove the scientific community wrong.
I'm just trying to help you guys get off your asses and actually DO something with all these smoking guns you keep finding.
I'm just trying to help you guys get off your asses and actually DO something with all these smoking guns you keep finding.
Gee, I was kind of hoping to inspire others to do the work for me.
:)
In all seriousness, my goal for this site has always been:
1) research what really happened
2) compile as much proof of an inside job as possible
3) get feedback from other researchers
I never was so much into activism-- both because it is just not practical with my living situation and because I have always been fairly pessimistic that the public would ever get turned on to this info in large enough numbers to really make a difference.
Submitting some kind of scientific paper is not really practical either. I just don't have the time to put such a thing together.
My goal therefore has really been to try to figure out what happened and communicate my findings to others.
The people out there who read this site, it is up to them to use the info as they see fit. Hopefully their conscience will guide them in the right direction.
For many of us, knowledge of the truth is a worthy pursuit in itself.
Who cares what some shill says? They have a totally different goal.
And I guess this is where I see a huge disconnect in the truth movement, Spooked. While I appreciate your honesty in disclosing your intentions, I can't help but see it as a form of armchair quarter-backing.
Like the anonymous poster said after you, seeking truth is a worthy pursuit. I whole-heartedly agree, whether it's in regards to 9/11 or anything else in this world.
But when we're talking about implications as serious as a government murdering it's own citizens, seeking truth isn't enough. To claim you have these smoking guns and are content to just post them on a blog in the hopes someone else will pick up the torch is on par with finding the cure for cancer but not doing anything with it.
You kinda' see what I'm saying? For once, I'm not trying to be condescending or sarcastic. And I don't mean to single you out in particular, because it's a trend that the entire movement displays. Lots of talk, but very little action.
You and I disagree about the events of 9/11, but were I on your side, I'd be absolutely adamant about using whatever evidence we had to affect change.
Just my 2 cents.
implications as serious as a government murdering it's own citizens,
well the evidence surely points directly to exactly that having happened.
gravity doesn't account for the towers having entirely disappeared in only 10 seconds each and a third in only 7 seconds. certainly the entire wtc complex did not blow itself up in a giant suicide pact.
since the media are complicit in all this with their obvious fakery on 9/11 they are a hindrance at best.
waving a sign seems rather pointless at this point.
Yeah, following up on the last poster-- the big problem is that traditional activism simply is not feasible because the agenda of 9/11-related change is so huge-- and there are such powerful forces arrayed on the side of the official story. Plus, the lies we have been sold are so huge it is too difficult for most people to accept it.
There are people in the "movement" who are obviously much more into activism than I, but even these people aren't willing to accept the deepest truths that I have written about here.
The activism issue is an interesting question and a real conundrum, but I really can't do more than what I have done. When I first started on 9/11, I wrote a bunch of letters to the media and to my US representatives, I marched on the White House, signed petitions. I spent lots of money, I have spent countless hours writing this blog.
Bottom line is I have done the best I could.
The 4:38 troll said at the end of her
BS:
"Just my 2 cents."
Yep, that's about what your trollspiel is worth, too.
Thanks for that well-reasoned and thought provoking response, anon.
For a second there, I thought a mature dialogue would spark up.
I too wrote a bunch of letters to various media and to many congressional representatives, pointing out the obvious explosive demolition of the WTC.
Of course there was never any response of any kind.
This was before realizing that the media had shown a great many fake videos of 9/11.
I say kudos to the perps for having the balls to pull off the crime of the New American Century, and getting away with it, and then turning around and using it as a justification for the invasion/occupation of the oil-filled middle east - but may they rot in hell for it.
There is no "truth movement".
by the way, where is the f sledgehammer?
hmmm.
Paid Shills will never "turn" because they've no doubt signed a Secrecy Oath and their freedom/life would be endangered if they were to tell the truth about 9/11 being an inside job.
It's futile to think that the 9/11 perps could ever be called to account for their (9/11) crimes, but it sounds "patriotic" to demand that Spooked (or anyone else) start some kind of action to demand accountability from their (Shills) bosses.
It's futile to think that the 9/11 perps could ever be called to account for their (9/11) crimes...
So why bother?
So why bother?
why indeed?
and what happened to your newfound attitude?:
For once, I'm not trying to be condescending or sarcastic.
take a break chad, the official 9/11 fairytale of 19 evil muslim highjackers were responsible for the total annihilation of the entire WTC complex is in no danger from any supposed *movement*.
by the way, where is bazant's alleged *sledgehammer*?
and what exactly happened to poor WTC7?
did it simply die of a broken heart after witnessing the demise of its much taller brothers?
911hoax.com
911blimp.net
webfairy.org
911closeup.com
"Submitting some kind of scientific paper is not really practical either. I just don't have the time to put such a thing together."
Translated means you don't really believe this crap and you lack the courage of your convictions to really *do* something about what you call the crime of the century - no, the millennium.
Nice. You have the answers but you refuse to do anything with them.
How's THAT for courage?
Translated means you don't really believe this crap and you lack the courage of your convictions to really *do* something about what you call the crime of the century - no, the millennium.
Nice. You have the answers but you refuse to do anything with them.
No that's not how it is "translated". I said what I meant. And I wouldn't write this blog everyday if I didn't believe what I wrote.
If I thought that writing a paper and getting it accepted would truly change things, then I might do it.
So let me ask this-- if I got a paper accepted in an engineering journal that supported the demolition of the WTC, would you suddenly change your mind about demolition (assuming you aren't just playing games here and you truly currently believe the official story)?
So let me ask this-- if I got a paper accepted in an engineering journal that supported the demolition of the WTC, would you suddenly change your mind about demolition (assuming you aren't just playing games here and you truly currently believe the official story)?
Hell... If any of the papers put out by truthers went through legitmate, scientifically peer-reviewed journals, YES. I would change my stance.
"So let me ask this-- if I got a paper accepted in an engineering journal that supported the demolition of the WTC"
About the mootest of all moot points because it is an absolutely categorical 100% certainty that it would be IMPOSSIBILE for you to do that.
Absolute. The most absolute of all absolutes. You lack the technical acumen to write one, you lack the engineering experience to write one, you lack the facts to write one, you lack the motivation and drive to write one, and there *isn't* an engineering journal in existence that supports your cockamamie and screwed up view of this thing.
Try again.
very ironic comment @8:49, considering that Bazant's latest was REJECTED by the Journal Of Engineering Mechanics.
maybe Bazant should try again.
I've read this blog non stop for 3 years and rarely post but I just gotta say thanx for you work, it's been invaluable in shaping my views and subsequent efforts regarding 911.
Peace.
Thank you, 1:59 PM.
As far as Mr. 8:49 AM-- I'll ask again: if if IF I got a paper accepted in an engineering journal that supported the demolition of the WTC, would you suddenly change your mind about demolition (assuming you aren't just playing games here and you truly currently believe the official story)?
From all your bluster, one would think that me publishing such a paper would pretty much rock your world, but since you won't even answer the question, maybe you are just playing games.
The fact is, I shredded Bazant's collapse story. There are holes in his arguments you could fly a 767 through. No one yet has refuted our critiques of his work. No one yet has explained the lack of a "sledgehammer".
You don't need to be an engineer to understand the WTC demolition argument and see its power. It's just that the fact of demolition is shrouded in uncomfortable politics.
I bet that if we were talking about the events of 9/11 but they took place as part of a terrorist attack in Russia, you might have a different view of the likelihood that the two 110 story buildings that were completely leveled and pulverized were actually blown up by explosives and didn't just collapse.
Google "The FBI uses polygraphs to eliminate suspects"
Post a Comment
<< Home