Re-Post: Bent and Charred Parking Meter North of WTC7
The photo below is from the Meyerowitz "Aftermath" book.
Meyerowitz's caption-- "I often wondered, as I walked along Barclay Street, what it was that did this to the parking meters. There were at least eight of them, all leaning over the sidewalk at a thirty-degree angle, their bodies charred and their plastic faces melted away." (emphasis added)
Barclay Street is just to the NORTH of WTC7, and is on the opposite side of WTC7 from where the WTC towers were.
This parking meter evidence is as close as Meyerowitz comes to questioning the official story. But it is a obviously evidence that goes strongly against the official story. It essentially proves a very hot, very strong blast wave from WTC7 -- and thus almost certainly is proof of demolition.
Meyerowitz's caption-- "I often wondered, as I walked along Barclay Street, what it was that did this to the parking meters. There were at least eight of them, all leaning over the sidewalk at a thirty-degree angle, their bodies charred and their plastic faces melted away." (emphasis added)
Barclay Street is just to the NORTH of WTC7, and is on the opposite side of WTC7 from where the WTC towers were.
This parking meter evidence is as close as Meyerowitz comes to questioning the official story. But it is a obviously evidence that goes strongly against the official story. It essentially proves a very hot, very strong blast wave from WTC7 -- and thus almost certainly is proof of demolition.
posted by spooked at 8:39 AM
29 Comments:
People are not supposed to notice things like that. Shame on you!
A "blast wave", you say, is what did that?
A "blast wave"?
Jesus H. Christ. More. Give me more! More sweet troofiness! I got a fever! And the only prescription is more troofiness!
A "blast wave" is going to bend those iron posts over at a 30% angle. A "blast wave".
Oh my side and body.
If not a blast wave, then what?
Oh maybe it was gravity.
Yeah, that's it, they bent over under their own weight from the incredible force of the earth's gravity!
Oh my fingers and toes.
Note to official story supporters-- the burden is on you guys to come up with a plausible alternative explanation for this evidence.
Note to official story supporters-- the burden is on you guys to come up with a plausible alternative explanation for this evidence.
Why? Have you guys brought indictments on actual people? Have you finally retained a lawyer to bring forth your nuke theory?
If so, congrats!!
Anyone else notice the windows in the building behind the parking meter was neither cracked nor broken and the thin aluminum slats in those vents weren't bent or dented? The side of the building in that photo isn't even 6 feet away either.
That's some blast wave, huh Spook?
Dude, be serious.
We all know "very hot, very strong" nuclear blast waves only target parking meters.
....
I'm sure the Great Anonymous Physicist can enlighten us though.
Did you know this was the second time I made that observation in this thread?
Spook deleted the first one... almost as if he's trying to hide it from his fans.
Talk about hidin' it, sword of dumbacles -
city councilman and the cops don't want you to have that Geiger counter without their permission
So you can't explain either why a nuclear blast wave would destroy parking meters but leave window 6 feet away untouched?
Why did you just say so?
Anyone care to gamble how long it takes Spook to swap that photo for something that doesn't show a pristine building right behind his beloved melted parking meters?
So now, not only is the FDNY in on it, but the NYPD is joining the ranks. Gotcha.
Still doesn't explain how that "very hot, very strong" blast wave that the NYPD is trying to keep you from detecting only damaged the parking meters.
And Spooked, there's no reason to hide. Your readers will still believe anything you post is true, regardless of your ability to back it up. Blind ignorance is part of the charm of the truth movement.
First, I didn't claim it was a nuclear blast wave.
Second, I agree that the building behind looks to be in good shape. So whatever happened was limited in its radius.
Nonetheless, we have EIGHT charred and bent parking meters and no explanation besides a blast effect.
So now, not only is the FDNY in on it, but the NYPD is joining the ranks.
I've no idea what you're talking about.
But we STILL have EIGHT charred and bent parking meters and no explanation besides a blast effect.
It's also worth mentioning that we are actually not shown what is directly behind the meter. It's possible the wall IS charred there. This could have been the last meter in the row and the wall behind to the right was charred all the way along.
Further note that the vent most closely behind the bent charred meter looks different-- the slats are quite different.
Ahhhh....so the street level vent is proof now that there was a significant "blast wave". Good point! I've never seen New York City street level vents or louvers in anything other than perfect, pristine and identical condition to other vents or louvers in the immediate area.
Great find, Spooky! Keep it up! You're winning me over with your impeccable logic.
"It essentially proves a very hot, very strong blast wave from WTC7 -- and thus almost certainly is proof of demolition."
Could you walk us through your conceptual model of how a "very hot, very strong blast wave" equates to an "almost certain" demolition?
Thanks.
Could you walk us through your conceptual model of how a "very hot, very strong blast wave" equates to an "almost certain" demolition?
Perhaps you could give an alternative explanation besides demolition first.
I didn't think you could.
Thanks.
As far as an "alternative" to demolition, I would argue that the "primary" reason would be that debris from the collapsed WTC 7 was responsible for the damage to the meters. "Demolition" since there is a complete lack of evidence for such, would be an "alternative".
Thanks for being so honest in saying you have no conceptual model for what you are claiming.
Thanks for being so honest in saying you have no conceptual model for what you are claiming.
Well, I didn't say that. So you're not being honest here.
The simple conceptual "model" is that a shock wave from demolition hit the meters, bending them over while the heat from the explosives charred them.
The idea that debris did this damage can be ruled out by the lack of marks where debris struck the meter-- plus the fact that eight parking meters were bent to the same extent-- which would not be expected if they were randomly hit by debris.
"There were at least eight of them, all leaning over the sidewalk at a thirty-degree angle, their bodies charred and their plastic faces melted away."
"The simple conceptual "model" is that a shock wave from demolition hit the meters, bending them over while the heat from the explosives charred them."
...and yet didn't break or crack glass less than 6 feet away.
This is amusing, try to argue yourself out of this one Spook.
I don't need to argue out of anything, the evidence is there.
I would say that glass is farther away than 6 feet though, and as I pointed out above, we don't know what the wall looks like right behind the meter.
I don't need to argue out of anything, the evidence is there.
Evidence of what? You posted one picture of one parking meter as as almost certain proof of demolition.... What is your working theory as to how a "very hot, very strong blast wave" would only effect parking meters?
You say the glass is more than 6 feet away? Okay, I'll give you 8. Maybe even 9. What happened in that 2-3 foot window that caused this very hot, very strong blast wave to lose its punch?
nevertheless sword of comedy, the meter is bent over and the face of it is charred, and Meyerowitz says there were 8 of them.
by the way sword of comedy, i said that a 767 is not an armor piercing round and you said the WTC was not made of armor.
so what exactly was it made of, sword?
nevertheless sword of comedy, the meter is bent over and the face of it is charred, and Meyerowitz says there were 8 of them.
Further proof that the truth movement needs no proof. "Meter's bent over. Inside job. I'll change the subject now...."
fake 767s = inside job.
no 757 debris = inside job.
an explosion is not a collapse = inside job.
ya change the subject.
Further proof that it is impossible to reason with a shill
What exactly are you reasoning??
You still have yet to explain how your "very hot, very strong blast wave" only damaged the parking meters.
nor has any "official" report "explained" how these parking meters were so oddly distorted and charred.
Considering the magnitude of what happened that day, I'm going out on a limb to say that the NIST Parking Meter Report was probably not all that high up on the list of Things To Do.
Post a Comment
<< Home