Science and Ancient History

Here's the problem for us to get the truth about our ancient ancestors and the real history of the human race. Dogmatic science has become so stultified and farcical that any findings that veer away from "accepted" parameters are ignored or ridiculed. Why? The people who bring us half truths and obfuscations are afraid, pure and simple. They're afraid of ridicule, afraid of banishment from scientific society and scared of losing their priviledged positions they so carefully constructed. All because they might stumble on truths that belie all the hogwash they've presented to us as legitimate science. In other words they're petrified of being exposed as liars, or even worse, as incompetents. And so we're given the same tired old crap in the face of extraordinary research and discovery.

I would also add that to a large extent, scientists probing human history are intentionally limiting (or being censored from) promulgation of ultimate truths.

UPDATE: A great summary from Nolocontendere:

Every institution lies to us now, including science. We're lied to massively and constantly because the liars can't stop lying - if they told the truth just one time all their previous crap would be exposed and people would doubt everything they said from that point on.
Controlling real history enriches our overlords in many ways too. They've uncovered evidence of technology that that would free us from manipulation and impoverishment but don't hold your breath. Proof that civilization comes and goes in grand cycles is poison to them because pretending they're the apotheosis of advancement is important for their machinations.