Nuke EMP at Time of 2nd Hit?
Check out the Burger King sign lights going out just as the "plane" goes in:
The nuke could have been in the basement, timed to go off with the "plane hit". Perhaps there was even a nuclear event with the "plane" explosion.
This is also a good video to hear how unbelieving Fairbanks was about what happened. I have to think he is giving off signals here about fakery.
(Thanks to a reader for the tip about the EMP)
The nuke could have been in the basement, timed to go off with the "plane hit". Perhaps there was even a nuclear event with the "plane" explosion.
This is also a good video to hear how unbelieving Fairbanks was about what happened. I have to think he is giving off signals here about fakery.
(Thanks to a reader for the tip about the EMP)
posted by spooked at 7:55 AM
16 Comments:
Definitely an interesting point.
But since I'm assuming most Burger King signs aren't shielded for EMP's, wouldn't this supposed EMP have fried the sign's circuitry? Resulting in the sign being inoperable.
But the BK sign then comes right back on???
Yeah, good point. Perhaps a power dip is a better explanation-- seems like an EMP could interfere in that way-- but in any case, the timing is quite amazing.
ya the BK lights blink exactly when the explosion occurs.
obviously the plane is fake because real aluminum 767s (w/ a plastic nosecones) can't behave, upon striking a massive steel wtc, as that one does.
what i can't fathom is the man reacting to the explosion - unless he was some kind of giant, the only way that fairbanks could have captured him in that position would be if fairbanks was lying on the ground while filming that little set-up.
see what i'm saying?
i wonder; where is sword of truth with the long long overdue lesson in physics that he threatened us with oh so long ago?
please, sword of truth - tell us all how a real aluminum 767 w/ a plastic nosecone could glide entirely into a massive steel wtc like a casper the ghost!
as if 9/11 was not an inside job!
First of all, if we know a video is CGI, and was taken/processed by the FBI, it is a mistake to take seriously anything on it--else we go back to “pods” and “flashes”, etc. Anything and everything on an FBI (or other such agency) processed video could be an intel hangout.
In general now, the intensity of the EMP--that intercepts electronics or wires or anything metallic--determines, in part, what will happen to these metallic or electronic parts. If the EMP is very intense, at that location, the great current and heat subsequently induced, can cause said parts to over-heat, and melt or explode. If the EMP intensity is not so large, the current induced can--for a while--interfere with the normal electric flow in a device for a short while--but no melting or exploding will occur, and the normal flow and function can then return after a very short while.
Anonymous Physicist
Interesting how a supposed EMP (whatever its intensity) would choose to affect the BK sign, but leave the camera filming the sign unaffected...
Read the first paragraph above.
Assuming for the moment that there might be some reality in the doctored video, the sign would have numerous differences with the camera.
The sign might have an inert gas (like neon) that would be directly excitable by a passing EMP. In any case, there are numerous differences between the two, and from a less intense EMP, this would be very relevant.
Or it's just possible that the BK was on the same power grid as the towers (crazy, I know, being directly across the street and all) and that the plane impact disrupted said power for a split second.
I think you gave yourself away, Early. I thought it was you from the beginning, pushing all OCTs.
You are the only one (Posted) here who believes there were "plane impacts."
7:19 PM
You have a very active imagination.
Is it fueled by the medication you take - and would you know it if it is?
I'm sure you have some proof that a poster here "believes" there were
"plane impacts".
Would you mind sharing the evidence
on which this particular "belief"
of yours rests?
If you claim to be clairvoyant and therefore don't need any evidence,
why should we believe any of the
exotic claims you make whenever you
post here?
Are you on planet Earth or do you reside inside the shallow part of the dark side of z Moon? Do you speak Mooneez or Moonie- with ease?
Good job, A.P.!
You busted him--"Early"!
Thanks. Whoever "a.p." is, s/he
is well known for her baloney sandwiches and wild claims (e.g. implying that Spooked is CIA), and whenever she gets caught, she never denies the truth, she simply ignores it and resorts to the standard tactics of all rightwingers:
* attack the messenger
* change the subject
Think maybe the phony physicist is
CIA? Nah - not smart enough and can't hold her own in a discussion.
Blows her cover every time.
Effin moron, "Early":
It was you that couldn't hold your own above. A.P.'s answers about EMP were good, but yours about "plane impacts" once again blew your CIA cover.
The arrogant, very phony and fake
"ap" has implied that Spooked
is CIA and has not denied it, because
s/he can't. I've saved the comment
where that particular gem appears.
I know about others here, but I'm beginning to wonder if maybe "ap" is
some kind of CIA experiment gone bad.
She just keeps on servin' up bigger and bigger baloney sandwiches.
"ap" - I'll repeat my offer:
For fiddy cent I'll guess your sex.
I think you gave yourself away, Early. I thought it was you from the beginning, pushing all OCTs.
You are the only one (Posted) here who believes there were "plane impacts."
BUSTED!
Be gone CIA troll.
More baloney sandwiches from the
phony fake who arrogantly characterizes herself as a physicist,
and who is such an ingrate that she actually wants us to believe that
the only person who is willing to publish her nonsense is a CIA agent.
Imagine that. Spooked911 is CIA.
Don't believe it? Ask "ap".
Post a Comment
<< Home