Does Anyone Dispute the Fakeness Here?
Check out when the astronaut gets up at 50 seconds in-- he is briefly lifted up while his feet scuffle underneath him as he tries to stand. Also, notice how long it take him to get up-- as if he is waiting for something. This pretty clearly shows the astronaut being suspended on wires, in my opinion.
Also, check this out:
Apart from the similar way to the above clip that the astronaut bounces around, check out the sound when the box drops. Should an object dropped and hitting the ground in a vacuum make a sound?
Also, check this out:
Apart from the similar way to the above clip that the astronaut bounces around, check out the sound when the box drops. Should an object dropped and hitting the ground in a vacuum make a sound?
posted by spooked at 9:42 AM
30 Comments:
So many things wrong with the Apollo "missions."
Aside from the controversy of whether the lunar rover could actually fit in the Apollo, ever since I watched them drive around on the moon, something was amiss. If the moon has only 1/6 earth gravity the way they zipped around would have flipped them in an instant.
And speaking of gravity/mass, that 1/6 would have applied to their suits and packs yet superbly fit astronauts were completely out of breath climbing slight rises. So much wrong.
notice how the sun is behind the astrofake yet the front of his suit is illuminated - impossible with no atmosphere.
"to infinity, and beyond!"
Hey guys--- I don't know when I can post here again. Google/blogger has locked the blog for terms of use violations-- they think this is a spam blog all of a sudden.
Guess I finally pissed somebody off enough so they screwed with the site.
they don't "think this is a spam blog all of a sudden".
oh well man, you did very well for a long time - certainly you pointed out the obvious media TV fakery of ua175 hitting wtc2 and the obvious high energy destruction of the entire wtc complex and the resulting "china syndrome" aftermath which puts the lie to the govt/media/NIST claim that 19 evil other guys with box-cutters did it.
kudos for a job well done on your part spooked!
jha.
Spooked this is terrible....are you really shut out of the blog????
OH NO!!!! I read this and have admired all your work. Who do you think is shutting you down?
Is it because of the moon posting?
http://loveforlife.com.au/book/export/html/5195
Something is quite wrong all over the net. I've tried a lot of sites and explorer can't open them. Firefox can though. I just got done talking with a guy who had a way to trace the interference and he said it's coming from Beijing. That's all I know at this point.
Spooked:
Everyone knows Google (and Blogger) are CIA, and as to why they did this now�
Even though you have put up my articles on Ultimate Truths, including the Nuking of the WTC and the China Syndrome Aftermath, the murder of President Kennedy by Secret Service driver, William Greer, and the Ultimate Truth of it all with the Grid/Quarantine/Bio-Net, I suspect the recent posting of my article on countering the British American Gestapo regime, about a week prior, is the likely cause of why they are going after your blog now.
You can gripe, you can point out U.T.�s, but when you point out to the civilian masses, AND to the military, what they CAN AND MUST DO to counter the Gestapo regime, all Hell breaks loose.
This is likely the reason for doing this now:
http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2008/07/defeating-britishamerican-gestapo.html
Anonymous Physicist
Self-flattery - even though everyone knows how powerful and threatening to
the Gestapo you are. You just have
too much credibility and ability to sway mass opinion, ap.
They can't shut you down, so they go after the puppeteer.
That is more likely the reason for
doing this now.
Long live Anonymous Physicalist!!
That you anonymous remasterminder?
Since you obviously work for the Gestapo, tell us their thoughts, why don't ya?
Oh, I forgot, you've been doing just that for years here.
Well, ap, you know it's the truth.
The Guvmint is afraid of people such as yourself. Why?
Coz they doan like the newz you're spreading, but what else can they do
to you? They already poison you and
try to make you seem silly. They are true propaganders and they how to play that game.
That's why they go after the puppet Master.
I hope this doesn't mess up any
potential efforts to undo the wrongs done to Mr. McWilliams, but here is a very good article. It
was written before Mr. Bill Cooper
went to Jesus as the direct result
of lead poisoning - allegedly by
law enforcement "goons" in Arizona.
"Driver Greer Hazy by Steve Gerlach
Let's get one thing straight. There's no evidence, visual or otherwise, that proves that the driver of the Presidential limousine, William Greer, shot Kennedy in the head as the motorcade drove through Dealey Plaza. This is important as this underground theory is still doing the rounds even though it's been convincingly conquered time and time again.
The story comes from William Cooper, a former US Naval Intelligence Briefing Team member who goes around to all the little farming communities in the US telling people the driver of the Presidential limousine shot Kennedy in the head.
William Cooper is suspect anyway.
A) He states he has read all about the assassination in Naval files when we know most files have been destroyed and that very little has been written officially other than reports on the guilt of Oswald. But no, he says it's all in the files, every last bit of detail. The Government wrote down how it knocked off its own commander. And heck, what's the NAVY got to do with this? Why are they writing reports detailing how the hit occurred unless Kennedy was hit by a torpedo launched from one of their submarines!
B) Never believe anyone who does lectures and hasn't written a book to back it all up. William Cooper has written a book, but there's no index and no guide to his sources. He is therefore highly suspect. Are we to believe the ramblings of one man with no proof other than his say-so?
For those who do not know of the theory, watch the Zapruder film now and watch the movements of the driver. Okay, see anything? No, of course not. This theory only works once you've been told about it and then you look for what you've been told to look for. Cooper tells his audience first and then shows them a very hazy copy of the Zapruder film to supposedly back him all up. He also states that he has the only COMPLETE copy of the Zapruder film that includes all the frames that have been cut out. Can we ask where he got the film from? No, that's about the only part of his story that's classified. It's funny, because looking at his hazy copy, it looks just like every other copy of the film I've ever seen - except that it's the worst copy I've ever seen. The quality is shot, but I'm sure it's that way for a reason.
In his book, "Behold a Pale Horse" Cooper raves for a page or two with the story of the time he had David Lifton ("Best Evidence") and Robert Groden ("High Treason") at one of his lectures and how they refused to believe his story. He says this is because they are part of the Governmental plot. I suggest it is because Groden and Lifton have studied the case themselves and have seen the Zapruder film enough times to know what's happening. I'll believe Groden and Lifton over Cooper anytime.
Cooper is still alive and still flogging his story and says he hasn't been knocked off because he's so public in his stand and that if he died everyone would know he was right. I suggest they haven't killed him off because he's so far off the mark with this story that he doesn't have to be worried about.
The story, and that's what it is - a story - goes like this:
As the limousine turns onto Elm, Roy Kellerman sitting next to Greer in the front seat and closest to the camera - is, according to Cooper, watching Kennedy in the rear-view mirror waiting for the bullets to knock him off. (Kellerman's job was to actually watch the President in this way. Nothing suspicious in doing your job.) But the story goes on...
When the bullets strike and Kellerman sees that Kennedy is not hit fatally in the head, he turns to Greer and, apparently, tells him Kennedy is still alive. Greer, as the story goes, then checks over his right shoulder, turns back, slows the limo as Kellerman takes over the wheel and then turns back around, lifting his left arm over his right shoulder and shoots Kennedy with his Secret Service issued gas revolver filled with dum-dum bullets containing shellfish poison. Kennedy's head then explodes and Greer turns back around and then speeds off.
Fine and dandy, but it didn't happen.
According to Cooper, that's why the brain was removed - so no one could trace the poison. According to Cooper, they killed Kennedy because he was going to tell Americans that the CIA and the FBI were selling drugs to their kids and, wait for it, that the American Government had cut a secret deal with aliens!!!
Heck, stories like this make the Warren Commission look like an A1 criminal investigation!!
Cooper's theory is high fantasy. That's not the problem. The problem is that people are still believing it. The only reason it has been mentioned here is to finally quash the idea from anyone out there who thinks it's correct. If you begin to believe, upon watching the Zapruder film, that what Cooper says is possible, let me hit you with the four points that blow the theory and Cooper out of the sea.
1) No one, but NO-ONE, saw Greer shoot Kennedy.
2) Close examination of a good copy of the Zapruder film shows all these extraordinary movements by contortionist Greer is nothing more than the sun shining off his shoulder, Kellerman' s head, and the gutter.
3) If you were to assassinate the President, would you risk being hit yourself by actually sitting no more than four feet away from him?
and - 4) If, and I do mean if, Kennedy was shot by Greer then Kennedy would have been thrown back and to the RIGHT not the left as seen in the Zapruder film.
Mr. Cooper, you' re sunk."
There's all kinds of weird theories
about who killed JFK.
On the Net you can find posts from people who claimed the secret service guy in the car behind JFK is who shot him. Some say it was a guy in the sewer manhole.
So-called eyewitness testimony needs to be closely analyzed before it's worth being taken seriously.
Here's an example of how a LN ("Lone Nutter") manipulated eyewitness accounts and published it on his JFK web site. This guy is a professor at Marquette University and even uses their servers to host his web site. Ain't that the foshizzil!
Here's the link I forgot to forget to remember to include:
http://tinyurl.com/6phvnk
Sorry about that. Apologies to all you serious researchers who were frustrated by my omission. It really was a mistake of the head and not of the heart. Or else maybe encroaching dementia.
Enjoy.
Alex Jones hints at a UK researcher who believes that nukes were used. Major Doug Rokke interview.
http://wtcnuke.com/news.php
What a joke you are REMASTERMIND.
Calling Spooked a puppetmaster.
Your every post here has had nothing but lies. You are obviously on a very short leash from Langley, Ft. Meade or the Pentagon.
Pteranodon:
Good find, in a way.
It's also this youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmmY8I-4wd0
Listen at about 5:20. While this is mostly about biological matters or D.U. (which has nothing to do with nuking the TWC), Rokke gets into some Ultimate Truths at 5:20.
First Doug Rokke gets into the Davy Crockett mini-nuke, that I first highlighted, at this blog a year and a half ago. Then when Rokke noted that mini-nukes could pulverize, and bring down a tower at free-fall speed, to my surprise, Alex Jones then interrupts and says “there’s physicists in England that have analyzed and say that it looks like there may have been small nukes in the towers.”
Now as far as I know (and this sickens me, as this was obvious to me from the first that I began to investigate it) that I was the first--and remain the only (as far as I know)--Physicist to say and research that small nukes destroyed the WTC. NOT “British Physicists.” (I have made it clear that I am an American.)
I did a google search trying to find if any other physicist has said that nukes brought down the WTC and still come up with nothing-- not British or any other physicist.
So this aspect appears to be mis-information or dis-information on Jones’ part. It could even be that Rokke was about to mention me, and the archived sites, sponsored by Spooked, that have my nukes at the WTC, and China Syndrome Aftermath articles archived. I am also the only one to have written that multiple nukes were used, and Jones uses the plural--nukes. So likely he was referring to me.
Interesting that Alex Jones interruption about “British Physicists” ended the discussion by Rokke about nukes bringing down the WTC.
Maybe someone could either send a (watered down) version of this comment to Jones or post it at his forums. And correct him in that the only Physicist to say and research that the WTC was brought down by small nukes was this Anonymous American Physicist whose articles are archived at these blogs
www.wtcdemolition.blogspot.com
www.wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com
Thanks.
Anonymous Physicist
Why do you call yourself "Anonymous Physicist? Are you a real physicist?
Just curious, 'cause it is a bit odd, ya know.
Well, not so anonymous Intel troll:
The Anonymous Physicist’s articles on the nuking of the WTC are included here:
www.wtcdemolition.blogspot.com
His articles on the China Syndrome Aftermath are here:
www.wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com
A.P.’s articles pointing out the bogus Physics and Mathematics of Bazant and Seffen are included here:
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/spooked911
His work speaks for itself, and he has written--as you well know--from the outset, that he has taught Physics at several Universities.
Now it is your job to specifically counter his work, or to get physicists to read and cite errors in his articles, or to stop trolling here, intel filth.
Do one or the other, troll!
The rest of you, please do inform people that it was the Anonymous (American) Physicist that Jones and Rokke were referring to in the radio interview cited above.
Why should I waste time reading what you have to say? I don't know you or
what your qualifications are to speak
about anything. I don't have any reason to think it makes anymore sense than your JFK theories.
Apparently you believe that your esteem is a collector's item, but I don't have any reason to think so.
Are you an "intel" agent? Nutcase?
Or a combination?
You must have taken offense to the article which devastates your JFK
theory.
6:51:
If you don't comprehend any Physics, that's fine. But then do as was suggested, and get one of your Intel Agency Physicist's to try to negate any of Anonymous Physicist's points in his articles, or shut the phuck up.
That's funny - and ironic, because most intelligence services do employ
physicists. Real ones, not pretend ones.
And, all real physicists know that
you don't use an apostrophe to make a word plural.
Do you know of any real physicists who pay even the least bit of attention to poisoned-headed wackos
who pretend to be physicists?
Note: Bill Cooper's opinion doesn't count. Besides he expired
and ascended on a cloud of stale cigar smoke some years back and hasn't been heard from since. But, if you run into him, please contact your local law enforcement agency because Brother Bill is wanted on
account of some criminal activity.
Nothing but lies from the remasterminder, as have all his posts here. Does anybody bother to read his crap anymore? I can't bring myself to read his stupid lies.
I have stated that Greer’s first shot (at the apex of his first turn around, and Exactly when the 3rd of the 4 shots heard on the audio-added Zapruder film that the Congressional Committee had, and I have, and numerous people have, and which is being REMASTERMINDED by obvious Intel agents , hit Connally, who then yells out “My God they’re trying to kill us all” (instead of just JFK as he Connally had turned around to stare at the known [to him] intended victim once the shooting started, as he was deeply in on it [he was called LBJ, little boy Johnson--his henchman].
After hitting Connally by accident, Greer brought the limo to a stop (many eyewitnesses have said this and books such as Noah Twyman’s show how the apparent motion of the limo is because it is a “dupe”[licate] running against a background of itself--no CGI then. After Greer stopped needing to drive, he had good aim and the gun in his left hand can be seen being brought up and over to his right shoulder. He then blows Kennedy’s brains half out.
See how JFK's head is turned to Jackie, he didn’t complete the turn (and she couldn’t push him down as she tried per Secret Service instructions) because JFK was hit in the throat with a paralyzing bullet (likely the CIA’s beloved shellfish toxin). But from how his body and head are turned to Jackie and where the entry wound is that I have shown via Asst Press Secty Kilduff’s full video (above the right eyebrow), only a shot from Greer could have done it!
Jackie--from about 5-10 feet away heard well just where the shot came from! She immediately then tries to jump out of the car--and this is at the time when Greer, after succeeding, did really accelerate, and this endangered her, but not as much, she thought as being in the limo WITH THE SHOOTER.
And the regime’s ludicrous “she was trying to retrieve a piece of his skull” is a foul joke. She was the first to see, in front of her, that her husband now was missing half of his brains! See that look of horror on her face! The regime’s idiocy--was she planning to do surgery that doesn’t still exist, and was she planning to put back the bits of brain all over her and Dealey Plaza too? Watch carefully also as Connally and his Mrs. look for an instant to Greer as they desperately try to get out of his line of shooting and duck down so quickly they bump heads at first. There’s missing frames at this point to hide some of Greer’s gun emission, [which some of us have photos showing, as this photo was actually printed in a national magazine], but watch the Z film closely several times.
And this is why Fred Newcombe had no trouble interviewing eyewitnesses in the mid-‘60’s who told him they saw the driver do it. Some even said this to the Warren Comm., and it was altered and their signatures forged. You can ignore what may have later been remasterminded or even on the scene as Jean Hill said immediately agents “swooped down on me and put a hurt on me” and took her away. So even now, there are intel assets/”researchers” “re-interviewing”/remasterminding surviving witnesses’ statements REGARDING THE DRIVER/GREER. Again read all here:
http://community-2.webtv.net/@HH!7D!0A!3D7855A05297/Larry762/fontcolor3300FF/page4.html.
And yes you may find other interviews with some of the surviving eyewitnesses when they were surrounded by the regime’s murdering agents, and survival instinct told them to say WHAT THEY WERE INSTRUCTED TO SAY. At least 177 known witnesses have died suspiciously. But Newcombe convinced these witnesses he wasn’t with the regime, and they could give him the truth of what they actually saw and heard.
S.S. agent Clint Hill (a last minute replacement per Jackie’s order, and not in on the Assassination), has no trouble jumping off the second car and running up to the lead car, because the first CAME TO A STOP (instead of racing away at the first shot 6 seconds, or so earlier. Hill’s statement, while likely doctored, by the W. Comm, as so many witnesses later said their’s was, still contains this quote,
“I heard a second firecracker type noise but it had a different sound---like the sound of shooting a revolver into something hard.”
He knows it wasn’t a rifle, like others may have said, because he was very close TO THE SHOOTER/GREER. Furthermore according to the books and testimony of Parkland Doctor Crenshaw, Clint Hill was the only one at Parkland who had his gun out AND COCKED THE WHOLE TIME--AS HE KNEW THE MURDERERS WERE ALL AROUND HIM--HIS COLLEAGUES. The FBI first held both Greer and Kellerman, until Hoover said let them go.
Dr. Crenshaw describes the amazing scene in Parkland when a Secret Service agent cold cocked an FBI man with the butt of his machinegun! (Knocking out the FBI agent.)
So the local FBI knew that the Secret Service had killed President Kennedy. As I have written, everyone at the scene knew who did it, and the regime manufactured the mystery--and created the industry of BOGUS “researchers”, (intel assets/alterers of the truth, as here), books, articles, websites, museums, forums, hangouts, etc.
This is similar, of course, to the industry that the regime had to create after it nuked the WTC, and also caused the China Syndrome. So it put out first what I coined “Pristine Pancaking” (a la the “Pristine Bullet”) O.C.T. nonsense, followed by the thermite hangout, and the DDT (DEW DISINFO Theory).
The last one precisely took all photos of the destruction and aftermath that proved the WTC was nuked and that the China Syndrome resulted, and tried to claim via, its agents, that an evidence-free unknown mechanism did it.
The 3 intel hangouts (OCT, Thermite, and “DEW”) being analogous to all the hangouts RE JFK. Including Oswald alone did it in violation of the Law of Conservation of Momentum, as JFK got slammed back in the limo (but the regime prevented showing the Z film till 1975). Then succeeding intel hangouts of: the Mafia did it, Castro did it, Vietnamese did it, Johnson did it, even one hangout (and book, when they were worried about all the publicity Bill Cooper got) that said “yes the Secret Service did it (shot by an SS agent in the follow-up car), but it was an accident”!!
Johnson of course was in on it, but he was far from in charge of anything, and they made him resign in ’68, which he never would have done if he really were the top dog on the totem pole.
Indeed Sen. Yarborough describes LBJ ducking down in his limo at the first shot, to make sure they didn’t kill him too. The tale of an SS agent throwing him down is a known lie.
This is similar to 9/11 and the WTC, everybody on the ground (including several reporters) there (who weren’t intel agents, and there were many), AND WHO DIDN’T HAVE A TV, said “what plane?” It’s almost like Ali, who wouldn’t go to Vietnam in the 60’s said, when asked, “ I know where Vietnam is, it’s on TV”. So the planes WERE ON TV.
Back to JFK, Jackie made many statements alluding to the driver, but also said “the secret service has my kids.” It is said that the complete truth she has left to be released only after both her kids are dead. Well “they” killed her son, one left now.
RE JFK, the truth is there is far more evidence proving this, including photos and videos, but I do not have the time or space here to go into all this. But the above including seeing the Kilduff video, and the other evidence I have cited is sufficient, especially with a good copy of the audio added to the Z film.
Anonymous Physicist
P.S. Bill Cooper is known as the most trusted conspiracy expert. And the only criminal here is the one who has committed treason and obstruction of justice here.
Total garbage. No more credible than witnesses who said the shots came from beneath the manhole cover over the sewer pipe or those who say that the secret service agent in the follow-up car shot JFK.
Whenever someone totally ignores the mountain of evidence which proves their theory implausible and impossible, then you know you're dealing with someone who is not honest or objective. In this case, as in other cases advanced by the phony physicist, we can be certain that we are not hearing from someone interested in the truth.
It DOES however make your claims about having been poisoned with mercury by the CIA seem at least a bit more likely...were it not for the simple fact that the CIA wouldn't have the least bit of interest in some nutcase whose crazy thinking actually absolves them from charges of having been
responsible for JFK's assassination.
You seem to lack any sense of proportion, honor, or character.
No wonder you have to hide your identity.
Honest readers must acknowledge that this article alone makes a compelling case that claims made to the effect that the SS driver of JFK's limo is who killed him.
Furthermore, honest readers cannot have failed to notice that no one has yet responded to, let alone refuted the many points raised in this and other previously posted articles about this issue.
NONE of the films taken in Dealey Plaza show anyone in the limo shooting JFK.
Citing eyewitness statements in support of the claim without taking into consideration how unreliable
said claims are merely shore up the
obvious fact that the claims about Greer are bogus and are nothing more than DISINFORMATION planted by
someone who may not even be aware that s/he has been duped and is being used, perhaps without even realizing it.
The CIA has everything to gain from
this DISINFORMATION. Using a highly agitated, paranoid Patsy to plant it here ALSO serves their purpose.
Informed readers know that CIA-chosen Patsies are always people who come across as odd, fanatical loners with peculiar and bizarre aspects in their biography.
As with Oswald and Osama, CIA-created Patsies always have "colorful" stories to tell.
The great mystery here is why the blog owner acts as an enabler for
"anonymous physicist".
We may well learn why in the days ahead.
"Driver Greer Hazy by Steve Gerlach
Let's get one thing straight. There's no evidence, visual or otherwise, that proves that the driver of the Presidential limousine, William Greer, shot Kennedy in the head as the motorcade drove through Dealey Plaza. This is important as this underground theory is still doing the rounds even though it's been convincingly conquered time and time again.
The story comes from William Cooper, a former US Naval Intelligence Briefing Team member who goes around to all the little farming communities in the US telling people the driver of the Presidential limousine shot Kennedy in the head.
William Cooper is suspect anyway.
A) He states he has read all about the assassination in Naval files when we know most files have been destroyed and that very little has been written officially other than reports on the guilt of Oswald. But no, he says it's all in the files, every last bit of detail. The Government wrote down how it knocked off its own commander. And heck, what's the NAVY got to do with this? Why are they writing reports detailing how the hit occurred unless Kennedy was hit by a torpedo launched from one of their submarines!
B) Never believe anyone who does lectures and hasn't written a book to back it all up. William Cooper has written a book, but there's no index and no guide to his sources. He is therefore highly suspect. Are we to believe the ramblings of one man with no proof other than his say-so?
For those who do not know of the theory, watch the Zapruder film now and watch the movements of the driver. Okay, see anything? No, of course not. This theory only works once you've been told about it and then you look for what you've been told to look for. Cooper tells his audience first and then shows them a very hazy copy of the Zapruder film to supposedly back him all up. He also states that he has the only COMPLETE copy of the Zapruder film that includes all the frames that have been cut out. Can we ask where he got the film from? No, that's about the only part of his story that's classified. It's funny, because looking at his hazy copy, it looks just like every other copy of the film I've ever seen - except that it's the worst copy I've ever seen. The quality is shot, but I'm sure it's that way for a reason.
In his book, "Behold a Pale Horse" Cooper raves for a page or two with the story of the time he had David Lifton ("Best Evidence") and Robert Groden ("High Treason") at one of his lectures and how they refused to believe his story. He says this is because they are part of the Governmental plot. I suggest it is because Groden and Lifton have studied the case themselves and have seen the Zapruder film enough times to know what's happening. I'll believe Groden and Lifton over Cooper anytime.
Cooper is still alive and still flogging his story and says he hasn't been knocked off because he's so public in his stand and that if he died everyone would know he was right. I suggest they haven't killed him off because he's so far off the mark with this story that he doesn't have to be worried about.
The story, and that's what it is - a story - goes like this:
As the limousine turns onto Elm, Roy Kellerman sitting next to Greer in the front seat and closest to the camera - is, according to Cooper, watching Kennedy in the rear-view mirror waiting for the bullets to knock him off. (Kellerman's job was to actually watch the President in this way. Nothing suspicious in doing your job.) But the story goes on...
When the bullets strike and Kellerman sees that Kennedy is not hit fatally in the head, he turns to Greer and, apparently, tells him Kennedy is still alive. Greer, as the story goes, then checks over his right shoulder, turns back, slows the limo as Kellerman takes over the wheel and then turns back around, lifting his left arm over his right shoulder and shoots Kennedy with his Secret Service issued gas revolver filled with dum-dum bullets containing shellfish poison. Kennedy's head then explodes and Greer turns back around and then speeds off.
Fine and dandy, but it didn't happen.
According to Cooper, that's why the brain was removed - so no one could trace the poison. According to Cooper, they killed Kennedy because he was going to tell Americans that the CIA and the FBI were selling drugs to their kids and, wait for it, that the American Government had cut a secret deal with aliens!!!
Heck, stories like this make the Warren Commission look like an A1 criminal investigation!!
Cooper's theory is high fantasy. That's not the problem. The problem is that people are still believing it. The only reason it has been mentioned here is to finally quash the idea from anyone out there who thinks it's correct. If you begin to believe, upon watching the Zapruder film, that what Cooper says is possible, let me hit you with the four points that blow the theory and Cooper out of the sea.
1) No one, but NO-ONE, saw Greer shoot Kennedy.
2) Close examination of a good copy of the Zapruder film shows all these extraordinary movements by contortionist Greer is nothing more than the sun shining off his shoulder, Kellerman' s head, and the gutter.
3) If you were to assassinate the President, would you risk being hit yourself by actually sitting no more than four feet away from him?
and - 4) If, and I do mean if, Kennedy was shot by Greer then Kennedy would have been thrown back and to the RIGHT not the left as seen in the Zapruder film.
Mr. Cooper, you' re sunk."
"If, and I do mean if, Kennedy was shot by Greer then Kennedy would have been thrown back and to the RIGHT not the left as seen in the Zapruder film."
But, if Connally shot him, wouldn't he be thrown just like in the film?
That's why I think it's more likely that Connally did it.
No, dude. Too many people would have seen him if Connally had done it.
The shooter was probably up on the railroad crossing. There, he'd have a clear view of the approaching limo
and the parade viewers would be focused on the limo, not on the bridge.
There are plenty of well-meaning people who have theorized how JFK was killed, but anyone who has invested much time, study, and thought about the case will tell you that:
1. The limo driver didn't shoot JFK.
2. Connally didn't shoot JFK.
3. No shots were fired from the railroad overpass.
4. No shots were fired from the sewer manhole.
5. No one in the follow-up SS car
fired any shots.
Most researchers believe the fatal
headshot came from either the north or the side side of Dealey Plaza.
http://community-2.webtv.net/@HH!7D!0A!3D7855A05297/Larry762/fontcolor3300FF/page4.html.
These eye- and earwitnesses: “1. Mary Moorman - school teacher standing next to Jean Hill. She said she saw Greer shooting back but thought he was shooting back at the assassin….
2. Jean Hill - Jean Hill saw what happened too, but when she tried to bring up the subject of a gun being fired in the car, Senator Arlen Spector (a 33rd degree Mason) would change the subject or say "it's time for a cup of coffee."
3. Austin P. Miller - Texas Louisiana Freight Bureau, who stood on the railway overpass overlooking Elm Street was asked by Arlen Spector where the shots came from: His reply was "from right there in the car." Senator Spector just went on to the next question, never asking Miller any specifics.”
Now go Remastermind something else.
That's the kind of childish argument I'd expect from a 10 year old.
I'm beginning to believe you really
are suffering from some kind of mental deficiency. Whether or not it was caused by Mercury poisoning administered by "intel goons" is
hard to know.
Post a Comment
<< Home