Pictures from a Real Plane Crash
The 1978 PSA182 crash in San Diego, caused by a midair collision with a Cessna.
And something we've never seen for any 9/11 plane-- the hanger where they collected the parts and tried to reconstruct the plane:
Don't give me the line that they didn't do this for 9/11 because they knew exactly what happened to the planes. They knew exactly what happened to PSA182 as well-- and they still tried to reassemble it.
This picture of the plane coming down is stunning:
And something we've never seen for any 9/11 plane-- the hanger where they collected the parts and tried to reconstruct the plane:
Don't give me the line that they didn't do this for 9/11 because they knew exactly what happened to the planes. They knew exactly what happened to PSA182 as well-- and they still tried to reassemble it.
This picture of the plane coming down is stunning:
posted by spooked at 11:40 AM
8 Comments:
If that "N6" part is really from N612UA then perhaps the plane was destroyed somewhere and that part transported to WTC5. Does N612UA still fly? Just speculation.
Part of the idea if reassembling wreckage is to try and find the cause of the malfunction (if it's mechanical) so we can then avoid a similar tragedy in the future.
Reassembling the flights from 9/11 won't prevent people from hijacking planes. It would've been a waste of taxpayer dollars to do so and more than likely would've only provided even more fodder for you no-planers seeing as how you're willing to turn the most innocuous assumption into "proof".
Another part of the idea of reassembling 9/11 plane wreckage is that it would provide at least "some" evidence that planes DID crash into the WTC, the Pentagon, and in Shanksville.
Not doing so has made the job of disinformation agents much easier.
How would reassembling a plane prove it hit the towers, the Pentagon, or crashed in Shanksville?
You guys think that video was faked and plane parts were secretly and covertly planted all over lower Manhattan, the Pentagon lawn, and Shanksville.
How easy would it be for the government to just bring plane parts to an empty hangar that absolutely no eyewitnesses would be privy to?
All of a sudden, this would make you believe there were actual planes??
... Please.
Stop trying to sound rational. It's not your forte.
that wouldn't make me believe there were actual planes because fortunately there are several videos each showing a TV fakery plane behaving in a manner that defies physics.
In that new picture of WTC5 plane part, the small part with "N6" doesn't even belong to the bigger part. It is not attached and has different coloring. The "famous" picture has clearly been manipulated.
Anyone who believes in the fairy planes should watch the document September Clues by Norwegian Simon Shack:
http://www.livevideo.com/socialservice
BTW, there towards the end of Part F (which is in Part 2 of the new
2008 version) one can see the "Pavel Hlava" amateur video of the first "hit". Before the explosion from the side wall, no passanger plane can be seen.
I should point out that supposedly, the FBI DID re-assemble the flight 93 plane. They even claimed they had recovered 95% of the plane (miraculously, since the crash site shows barely any significant plane debris).
So the point that they didn't NEED to do this is clearly moot.
My point is that we have NEVER SEEN any pictures of the supposedly re-assembled flight 93 plane or reconstructed debris.
Post a Comment
<< Home