Video Fakery, Timing the 2nd Hit and Blackouts
In terms of 2nd hit video fakery on 9/11, if we assume that CGI was used to add the plane image into live videos of the exploding South tower, by far the trickiest aspect of this operation was getting THE TIMING RIGHT IN A LIVE BROADCAST.
If you think about it, it seems almost impossible for the perps to be able to merge an image of a fast moving plane into a video of an exploding tower and get THE TIMING PERFECTLY RIGHT IN A LIVE BROADCAST. Think about how hard this would be, as they would have to know when the tower was due to go off, down to the split second, and then merge the video in real time for a live shot.
I think this is where the blackouts came in:
Particularly notice the top two shots, which were essentially "live". The one in the upper right was the ABC shot that was shown on CNN and Fox as well. Notice how the shot changes after the plane disappears behind the building. I think this was the cover for the timing issue. Probably the plane shot was put together earlier in time, then merged into the tower video without the explosion, and then this was inserted right AFTER they knew the tower was exploding, on a time delay. The blackout and camera change allowed them the chance to cut the video and then put in the shot of the exploding tower.
If you look at the Fox5 shot, a common theory is that the blackout that follows the plane hitting the tower is due to the unexpected "nose out", and part of the cover-up for that. But I suggest that the "nose-out" wasn't the main reason for the blackout, but rather the blackout allowed the shot to be cut to the real live video of the exploding tower.*
Why the Naudet shot had a cut-away between the plane and the exploding tower is not exactly clear, as this shot was only shown much later, not live, and could have been fixed timing-wise in post-production. So, the Naudet cut-away could have been a coincidence, or possibly laziness in getting the timing right. A third possibility is that the Naudet 2nd hit shot was pre-planned in some way to have this sequence.
*Note the nose-out was still CGI, but I am saying it may not have been a mistake. It may have been intended for the initial animations.
If you think about it, it seems almost impossible for the perps to be able to merge an image of a fast moving plane into a video of an exploding tower and get THE TIMING PERFECTLY RIGHT IN A LIVE BROADCAST. Think about how hard this would be, as they would have to know when the tower was due to go off, down to the split second, and then merge the video in real time for a live shot.
I think this is where the blackouts came in:
Particularly notice the top two shots, which were essentially "live". The one in the upper right was the ABC shot that was shown on CNN and Fox as well. Notice how the shot changes after the plane disappears behind the building. I think this was the cover for the timing issue. Probably the plane shot was put together earlier in time, then merged into the tower video without the explosion, and then this was inserted right AFTER they knew the tower was exploding, on a time delay. The blackout and camera change allowed them the chance to cut the video and then put in the shot of the exploding tower.
If you look at the Fox5 shot, a common theory is that the blackout that follows the plane hitting the tower is due to the unexpected "nose out", and part of the cover-up for that. But I suggest that the "nose-out" wasn't the main reason for the blackout, but rather the blackout allowed the shot to be cut to the real live video of the exploding tower.*
Why the Naudet shot had a cut-away between the plane and the exploding tower is not exactly clear, as this shot was only shown much later, not live, and could have been fixed timing-wise in post-production. So, the Naudet cut-away could have been a coincidence, or possibly laziness in getting the timing right. A third possibility is that the Naudet 2nd hit shot was pre-planned in some way to have this sequence.
*Note the nose-out was still CGI, but I am saying it may not have been a mistake. It may have been intended for the initial animations.
posted by spooked at 7:42 AM
2 Comments:
i'm guessing the naudet 2nd hit was chopped because the original included some incriminating footage of some kind. possibly more orbs. note there are THREE cuts, all in ONE SECOND.
youtube com/watch?v=rqwZEYBxizo
Or perhaps a chemtrail spraying pair of shiny qubes (scroll down for the 2nd "hit" photo):
http://www.handpen.com/Bio/chemtrails.htm
Post a Comment
<< Home