Pictures at a Demolition
The remnants of the RCA Dome in Indianapolis. The 4 story structure was imploded Dec. 20th with 875 explosive charges.
(click to enlarge photos; they are high-res and can be expanded massively)
Note how little compaction of the debris there is and the large sections of structure remaining.
Note the large chunks of concrete and large pieces of structure.
Compare with WTC debris-- much more pulverization, more compaction and lots of dust:
Obviously, the RCA Dome and the WTC were very different types of structures, and most of the WTC debris fell further before it hit the ground. But officially, the RCA Dome was blown up, and officially the WTC collapsed on itself without explosives. Yet, the WTC looks much more like the result of a explosive demolition! Of course, this is more evidence of the nuking.
(click to enlarge photos; they are high-res and can be expanded massively)
Note how little compaction of the debris there is and the large sections of structure remaining.
Note the large chunks of concrete and large pieces of structure.
Compare with WTC debris-- much more pulverization, more compaction and lots of dust:
Obviously, the RCA Dome and the WTC were very different types of structures, and most of the WTC debris fell further before it hit the ground. But officially, the RCA Dome was blown up, and officially the WTC collapsed on itself without explosives. Yet, the WTC looks much more like the result of a explosive demolition! Of course, this is more evidence of the nuking.
posted by spooked at 8:16 PM
1 Comments:
Wouldn't it make sense to see what
"hack89" has to say about this?
Isn't he one of the resident experts on the physics of 9/11?
Spooked: What do you think the responses to your post would be over at the DU forum? My guess is that
the few which might plausibly be called substantive responses will 1. question the analogy by emphasizing
the tremendous differences in the size of the buildings and
2. demand to see a peer-reviewed mathematical model which proves that there would be little difference in the resulting damage
in the two cases
Post a Comment
<< Home