Underground Explosion (?) and Related Thoughts
Watch at 20 seconds in-- the way smoke juts up next to the bridge:
The New Video of Falling Molten Material: Second Thoughts
by The Anonymous Physicist
The above video and the close-up of the molten debris shown here require careful analysis. Now its original poster may be correct, via its title, about molten material hitting the ground and then causing a great upward explosion of steam-like substance, after it hits the ground. Note I am not saying the material isn't molten as nukes would have definitely sent some molten material flying out.
But there appears to be another possibility. I say this because the video does not allow for the previous scenario to be definitive. The timing seems to be off. That is, the massive upward steam-like explosion seems to commence BEFORE the alleged molten material hits the ground. Thus another possibility is that we are seeing a massive upward steam-like explosion from a massive underground explosion, and not from the falling molten material which may not have hit the ground before the steam-like explosion seen. The great over-pressure from a nuclear explosion would try to find a way out, and the timing (recall all the helicopters and planes over-flying) for setting off the underground nuke by the perps may have been just a bit off.
Now my articles on the nuking of the WTC hypothesized that a final “cleaner” (ground, or below) nuke was employed to vaporize any remaining structure—else the gravitational collapse “theory” would look bad. See here: http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/05/wtc-nuke-thesis-from-anonymous.html The vaporization of much of the inside of the towers via nukes could well leave some structure because most of the innards were vaporized and some remaining steel structure doesn’t matter. I wrote that it matters more for those trying to claim the OCT of TOTAL gravitational pancaking. So I hypothesized that a final cleaner nuke was mandated to remove just such remaining structure. I also indicated that the so-called nuclear glow, which had the MSM panning AWAY FROM that which they were supposedly trying to show, could have been the glow from this "cleaner" nuke, as the tower was no longer extant.
Could this new video be revealing the release of the massive pressure from such an underground nuke? Further, trying to claim this video for evidence of molten dropping material could be part of the thermite hangout.
See more at http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com
The New Video of Falling Molten Material: Second Thoughts
by The Anonymous Physicist
The above video and the close-up of the molten debris shown here require careful analysis. Now its original poster may be correct, via its title, about molten material hitting the ground and then causing a great upward explosion of steam-like substance, after it hits the ground. Note I am not saying the material isn't molten as nukes would have definitely sent some molten material flying out.
But there appears to be another possibility. I say this because the video does not allow for the previous scenario to be definitive. The timing seems to be off. That is, the massive upward steam-like explosion seems to commence BEFORE the alleged molten material hits the ground. Thus another possibility is that we are seeing a massive upward steam-like explosion from a massive underground explosion, and not from the falling molten material which may not have hit the ground before the steam-like explosion seen. The great over-pressure from a nuclear explosion would try to find a way out, and the timing (recall all the helicopters and planes over-flying) for setting off the underground nuke by the perps may have been just a bit off.
Now my articles on the nuking of the WTC hypothesized that a final “cleaner” (ground, or below) nuke was employed to vaporize any remaining structure—else the gravitational collapse “theory” would look bad. See here: http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/05/wtc-nuke-thesis-from-anonymous.html The vaporization of much of the inside of the towers via nukes could well leave some structure because most of the innards were vaporized and some remaining steel structure doesn’t matter. I wrote that it matters more for those trying to claim the OCT of TOTAL gravitational pancaking. So I hypothesized that a final cleaner nuke was mandated to remove just such remaining structure. I also indicated that the so-called nuclear glow, which had the MSM panning AWAY FROM that which they were supposedly trying to show, could have been the glow from this "cleaner" nuke, as the tower was no longer extant.
Could this new video be revealing the release of the massive pressure from such an underground nuke? Further, trying to claim this video for evidence of molten dropping material could be part of the thermite hangout.
See more at http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com
1 Comments:
google: 9/11 Cancer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Worby
Post a Comment
<< Home