A Perfect Boeing 767-200 in Ghostplane?
CGI model Boeing 767-200 next to the ghostplane in a comparison from Ace Baker:
Ignore the color differences and just look at the angles of the two planes. For instance compare the wing versus tail versus fuselage angles. It's a bit subtle perhaps, but the angles are SIGNIFICANTLY off-- even though I'm sure Ace tried to align his model with ghostplane pretty well. It helps if you have a protractor to use. (I will put up something later with specific measurements.)
I know this well because previously I did extensive comparison of the various "UA175" airframes using Microsoft Flight Simulator-- extending from the original work of Marcus Icke.
It's pretty clear to me that the plane in the Hezarkahni "ghostplane" video is a mutated 767-200. I've posted on this extensively in the past-- but Ace Baker just doesn't get it.
Most of the planes in the videos of "UA175" have airframe anomalies. The best known airframe anomaly is the "pod". The anomalies, IMO, are all a sign of video fakery.
The fakers may well have distorted the airframes to mess with us or as a type of tacit whistleblowing. I don't think it is due simply to sloppiness.
Ignore the color differences and just look at the angles of the two planes. For instance compare the wing versus tail versus fuselage angles. It's a bit subtle perhaps, but the angles are SIGNIFICANTLY off-- even though I'm sure Ace tried to align his model with ghostplane pretty well. It helps if you have a protractor to use. (I will put up something later with specific measurements.)
I know this well because previously I did extensive comparison of the various "UA175" airframes using Microsoft Flight Simulator-- extending from the original work of Marcus Icke.
It's pretty clear to me that the plane in the Hezarkahni "ghostplane" video is a mutated 767-200. I've posted on this extensively in the past-- but Ace Baker just doesn't get it.
Most of the planes in the videos of "UA175" have airframe anomalies. The best known airframe anomaly is the "pod". The anomalies, IMO, are all a sign of video fakery.
The fakers may well have distorted the airframes to mess with us or as a type of tacit whistleblowing. I don't think it is due simply to sloppiness.
posted by spooked at 10:24 PM
3 Comments:
Whatever happened to Hani Hanjour and Mohammed Atta?
ace knows that the videos of ua175 are all fake.
they are all fake and it is obvious (for many obvious reasons) that they are fake, so it doesn't matter to what extent or why he believes so.
I absolutely tie in with anything you've presented us.
Post a Comment
<< Home