The Ridiculous Official Story of the WTC Hard Drive Recovery and More Likely Explanations
The "official" story is covered in this video nicely:
and described here further.
Basically, the idea is that illegal credit card transactions were made right before the attacks in the hopes that the computers that processed the transactions would be destroyed-- and that after the attacks, a few hard drives (32) were found and sent to the company Convar for data retrieval, to find out who made the illegal transactions. Nothing more has ever been reported on this issue, and the whole matter has been shrouded in extreme secrecy.
Let us count up the major points of ridiculousness to this story:
1) that the credit card scammers (officially Al Qaeda) would know, out of all the bank computers in the world that could have processed the cards, that the computers that processed their cards would be in the WTC.
2) that Al Qaeda would know that the WTC hard drives would be destroyed in the attacks (there's no way they could have known the towers would have been destroyed so thoroughly)
3) that once the towers were destroyed, that out of the thousands of computers in the towers, that the critical hard drives would be found and be intact-- or that ANY hard drive would survive the massive destruction of the WTC towers
4) that any company would pay $20,000 to $30,000 per drive to recover data on a hard drive without any indication that (a) it is their drive, (b) that it will have the data they are interested in
So this official story is clearly BULL. What's the real story here?
One possibility is that there actually WAS major financial fraud going on at the WTC before the attacks-- but by the bankers and brokers. The hard drive recovery effort was most likely making sure that there was no evidence of the crime left intact-- by testing the few surviving hard drives for incriminating evidence.
Another possibility, perhaps more likely, is that this hard-drive story is complete bull from start to finish-- all meant to cover-up the incredible pulverization (nuking) of the towers, by giving the impression that delicate computer hard-drives had some chance of surviving the destruction.
Either way, the obvious idiocy of this hard-drive story gives the lie to the official 9/11 story and is more evidence of an inside job.
and described here further.
Basically, the idea is that illegal credit card transactions were made right before the attacks in the hopes that the computers that processed the transactions would be destroyed-- and that after the attacks, a few hard drives (32) were found and sent to the company Convar for data retrieval, to find out who made the illegal transactions. Nothing more has ever been reported on this issue, and the whole matter has been shrouded in extreme secrecy.
Let us count up the major points of ridiculousness to this story:
1) that the credit card scammers (officially Al Qaeda) would know, out of all the bank computers in the world that could have processed the cards, that the computers that processed their cards would be in the WTC.
2) that Al Qaeda would know that the WTC hard drives would be destroyed in the attacks (there's no way they could have known the towers would have been destroyed so thoroughly)
3) that once the towers were destroyed, that out of the thousands of computers in the towers, that the critical hard drives would be found and be intact-- or that ANY hard drive would survive the massive destruction of the WTC towers
4) that any company would pay $20,000 to $30,000 per drive to recover data on a hard drive without any indication that (a) it is their drive, (b) that it will have the data they are interested in
So this official story is clearly BULL. What's the real story here?
One possibility is that there actually WAS major financial fraud going on at the WTC before the attacks-- but by the bankers and brokers. The hard drive recovery effort was most likely making sure that there was no evidence of the crime left intact-- by testing the few surviving hard drives for incriminating evidence.
Another possibility, perhaps more likely, is that this hard-drive story is complete bull from start to finish-- all meant to cover-up the incredible pulverization (nuking) of the towers, by giving the impression that delicate computer hard-drives had some chance of surviving the destruction.
Either way, the obvious idiocy of this hard-drive story gives the lie to the official 9/11 story and is more evidence of an inside job.
posted by spooked at 8:21 PM
1 Comments:
The dichotomy between the "officials' an the citizens is racing to the surface. Was there not a time when students could speak their mind on their campus?
Is there no honor from the heads of academia?
http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_29677.shtml
Students, faculty members, everyone outside of the President and the Board (Corporation, all) want no Bush Library at Southern Methodist University. But it a done deal. Barf.
Post a Comment
<< Home