The Fall of the WTC1 Spire and the Intact WTC1 Stairwell: Proof of Demolition Near Bottom of the Tower
After the destruction of WTC1, this stairwell in the core of the building remained-- three to four stories higher than the rest of the rubble pile:
Now remember the "spire" of WTC1 that remained for a few seconds during the destruction of the tower?
It was a good 70 stories high, and was part of the WTC1 core:
The spire didn't topple over, but fell more-or-less STRAIGHT DOWN:
IF THE SPIRE MERELY COLLAPSED, FALLING STRAIGHT DOWN, THE HEAVY CORE COLUMNS SHOULD HAVE OBLITERATED THE STAIRWELL AT THE BASE OF THE CORE!
Rather-- the stairwell WOULD survive if the spire was blown with bombs at the base-- a few stories above the stairwell. In this way, the higher spire columns could fall to the side as the base was blasted out. Perhaps several bombs along the base of the core were used to create this result. But it seems clear that a collapse of the spire could not result in this intact stairwell. It also seems likely that this nuclear blasting along the core/spire would account for all the missing WTC1 core columns!
Now remember the "spire" of WTC1 that remained for a few seconds during the destruction of the tower?
It was a good 70 stories high, and was part of the WTC1 core:
The spire didn't topple over, but fell more-or-less STRAIGHT DOWN:
IF THE SPIRE MERELY COLLAPSED, FALLING STRAIGHT DOWN, THE HEAVY CORE COLUMNS SHOULD HAVE OBLITERATED THE STAIRWELL AT THE BASE OF THE CORE!
Rather-- the stairwell WOULD survive if the spire was blown with bombs at the base-- a few stories above the stairwell. In this way, the higher spire columns could fall to the side as the base was blasted out. Perhaps several bombs along the base of the core were used to create this result. But it seems clear that a collapse of the spire could not result in this intact stairwell. It also seems likely that this nuclear blasting along the core/spire would account for all the missing WTC1 core columns!
posted by spooked at 5:20 AM
4 Comments:
dude, look at the 2nd photo (spire still standing) - notice the yellowish cloud of smoke rising - why is it so far to the right of the spire, is it maybe smoke from wtc2?
now look at the 3rd photo (overlay) - that yellowish cloud does not coincide with either tower - is the overlay incorrect?
now check out the 4th photo (series of spire destruction) - the yellowish cloud has disappeared entirely.
WTF!
the 2nd and 3rd photos are the same, just the 3rd has the tower overlay
the 4th photo is from a different, opposite angle and you can see a cloud to the left that is probably the same cloud
both photos show a cloud to the east of the spire
the spire stood for a few seconds, and so the timing of the 2nd and 4th pics may be slightly different-- in the 4th pic, you can see the cloud rolling away a bit
The Spire would topple and fall helter-skelter without help. Same with both towers. The perps had them come straight down. Why? Not realistic. Like to bait the truthers?
They were concerned about the people in the surrounding buildings, of course. Or they were not insured.
Why would they just not "land" the airplanes straight down fifth ave, Central park? Sensational and can't miss. But the insurance, and the dog old buildings were full of asbestos.
Throw away society. These buildings were only intended to stand a few years. Stupid idea to begin with. The Dom in Cologne has been standing for 800 years, even with WWII bombing.
Camjnpb, it's called "wind".
Post a Comment
<< Home